<unnamed>

Public Key

npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsr3gwdr05shx5f35jpthqsrhcgwrc4kuh2y0xmpt0647kgp5p06zgpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs7amnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wd4hk6qgcwaehxw309ac8yetdd96k6tnswf5k6ctv9ehx2aq6jv998

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nostr.mom

premium.primal.net

Last Notes

2026-03-13 21:19:14 UTC

- reply

yeah, you correctly articulated our misalignment.
which i have always aspired to be able to do with my friends: to pinpoint an exact premise we go different ways with.
i, like @nprofile…fp8q pointed out, think there is a circularity of reason which contradicts itself in thinking truth is a byproduct of an empirical instantiation.
But i’m compelled by the Thomistic arguments that act has primacy to potency, form to matter, the immaterial to the material.
if i were not, then i would probably agree with you 🤣
🤜🤛

2026-03-13 00:33:08 UTC

- reply

couldn’t be further from the truth.
speak up, advocate for your self interest, make the affirmative case
let the principles informing your action stand on their own.
be a beacon for others to reflect upon.
promoting sovereignty, helping others stand, that’s how bitcoin actualizes itself as the unstoppable force it can be.
spending your time and energy speculating about the interior motives of others, trying to tear others down doesn’t help those ends.

2026-03-12 23:40:40 UTC

- reply

I think bitcoin is very anti-fragile.
Satoshi knew bad actors would attack it. I think his consensus mechanism is up to the task of sorting through all the conflicts of self interest.
The principles of consensus make sense to me, so I’m good with participating in forming the consensus by contributing my vector of action to it, and let the chips fall where they will.

2026-03-12 23:14:49 UTC

- reply

🫡

2026-03-12 23:11:43 UTC

- reply

🤣
one who philosophizes and leads?
🤷‍♂️
it’s not hubris for the man building a house to say he is a carpenter.
I’ve devoted my life to philosophy and leading soldiers.
Now i’m in the bitcoin space.
if you want to go back to clucking, knock yourself out
imma do what i do. 🫡

2026-03-12 22:14:21 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…jqr4 ^

2026-03-12 22:13:22 UTC

- reply

https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqspxgc6unxajuj2ww4kqhn8pya8t0tf2s0409yy002cxxu2s5xdwyqu7pyf2
I articulates the principles of consensus best as I could here.

2026-03-12 22:12:26 UTC

- reply

I will also say, the entire “censorship” argument is a category error
and the “who is to say what is non-monetary” line of thought is non-rational, absurd, retarded.

2026-03-12 21:48:41 UTC

- reply

As a philosopher and leader, I focus on promoting principles for individuals to apply to their particular lives.
That’s why I will alway say, in general, bitcoin works by soverign agents acting in their self-interest, so think about what your interests are, and then act accordingly.
Since you ask about my particular interests, here is how I apply that principle to myself.
I have no need for arbitrary data. I have never had need for arbitrary data. I don’t care how effecient nodes propogate meme pool data to give me an accurate estimate for fees. I just want my transactions to be secure and decentralized, and am not willing to trade that off for anything.
So I run software that serves my interests.
I can do that, and stand next to someone who puts monkey pics in arbitrary data, because I believe that Satoshi’s network consensus decentralizes arbitration on contentious matters, and produces a better answer than any individual could.
I’m fighting against tribalism, becuse it is antithetical to the individual sovereign
You can’t outsource your sovereignty.
So I won’t tell you what particular thing to do, just emphasize the principles that make bitcoin bitcoin, and encourage you to be a sovereign.
but Im fucking sick of childish name calling and useless drama.
Advocate for your interests, make the affirmative case for why X serves an individual better than Y, but i’m done with the overselling of “bitcoin is dead if you don’t agree with me”
make the case
believe in bitcoin
believe in its consensus mechanism
participate
if consensus allows monkey pics on chain or csam, hate it as much as i do, im not going to leave bitcoin becuase of it.
this is how the sausage is made, so let’s just make the sausage
the tension is good, but the drama doesn’t serve anyone
it just makes a lot of gay retarded noise

2026-03-12 19:23:11 UTC

- reply

indeed, forming consensus is profound.
so just do that. run your node, explain why it serves your interests, and persuade others.
all other behavior rightfully belongs to the category “kardashian drama”

2026-03-12 18:43:35 UTC

- reply

kardashian drama is disgusting yet so many people are enthralled with it

2026-03-12 17:30:19 UTC

"Bitcoin evolves only where it strengthens the network’s resilience and growth, and even then, only through the voluntary consensus of its participants. No central planners dictate terms. The protocol thrives on individual freedom: sovereign actors who choose to uphold the system because its rules serve their self-interest, not because they were coerced.
No rational participant would run Bitcoin software that undermines their own interest. That is precisely the point: the system is self-re-enforcing."
That's the thing about philosophy, when you grasp the principles, you can apply them to any particular.
#Knots #Core #BIP110 #v30
Be rational; server your interests.
It will be ok.
Protocol consensus > you or I
#ModernChains
#bitcoin #Consensus #MakeButter!

2026-03-12 02:59:39 UTC

- reply

💯

2026-03-12 01:04:24 UTC

- reply

always refining
bout to course correct the subjective theory of value 👀

2026-03-11 19:38:51 UTC

- reply

i did read your entire post
but it did not compel me to move off tbe principle that small world empiricism can ground the genesis of itself.
🫡

2026-03-11 19:35:22 UTC

- reply

I get what you are saying.
The relation here is inverted, “we have been trying to understand reality without first grounding ourselves in the empirical process that produces time and durable truth.”
no big world grounds out empirically.
bitcoin doesn’t do that.
anything empirical is a formalized bounded small world we create.
you are 100% correct the bounds create intelligibility
by accepting that relation, it solves the impasse: no need for an infinite regresss or uncaused cause
it’s just an acknowledgment of the finitude of our rational capacity.
all small worlds necessarily come from a big world, something beyond
time is a small world we understand, and it comes from a continuous big world present we don’t
trying to ground the source, origin, or genisis of a thing empirically is using a small world to justify a small world, and that’s impossible

2026-03-11 16:38:06 UTC

- reply

Align your actions with your interests.
Your node is your loudest action.
IDGAF if you need uncapped arbitrary data or not.
The only thing that matters is that you, the individual, think about what you actually need from the network, and align your actions with your needs.
not copy paste someone else’s interest like a NPC and serve their interests.

2026-03-11 14:17:54 UTC

- reply

Bitcoin Vets is awesome

2026-03-11 13:41:08 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…tjtx @nprofile…tkpx
What’s going to be really cool, is when I’m done with the audiobook, @nprofile…9xys is going to load it into his Jamie AI tool, which clips out answers from the audiobook to your queries.
Will be a very unique way to interact with the content.
Seeing how it works with podcasts, i think this is going to set a new standard for books.
Just talk to the book and the book talks back 🤣 what cool times we live in

2026-03-11 13:10:01 UTC

- reply

Ethics is to economics what physics is to engineering.

2026-03-11 12:29:28 UTC

- reply

last half is the best part imo

2026-03-11 04:40:46 UTC

“It is a sobering day when a man wakes up and realizes that the only future his children will have, is the one he builds with his own hands”
—____—
ooooph

2026-03-11 03:20:54 UTC

“We call him a fool, because deep down, we know his courage only magnifies our cowardice.”
hits me hard
#ModernChains

2026-03-10 23:22:18 UTC

- reply

🤣

2026-03-10 20:26:16 UTC

- reply

if that’s the worse of it, you good to go!

2026-03-10 20:20:12 UTC

- reply

Bro the play is obvious.
Capture the convexity premium embedded in the term structure of leveraged synthetic duration swaps.
Rehypothecate the collateral, tranche the exposure, arbitrage the forward curve, and roll the carry into a delta-neutral basis trade.
Then lever the mezzanine tranche, hedge the volatility skew, and warehouse the tail risk in an off-balance-sheet vehicle.
Boom. Cash money.

2026-03-10 20:09:45 UTC

- reply

freedom is a means, not an end in itself.
A mistake big L “Libertarians” often make.

2026-03-10 12:53:53 UTC

- reply

^💯
The protocol still accounts for and secure it, waiting for the UTXOs to be sent

2026-03-10 00:48:41 UTC

- reply

best part about being a philosopher is getting attacked by both Libertarians and Statists

2026-03-09 01:10:11 UTC

- reply

it came out of my primal wallet

2026-03-08 19:01:45 UTC

- reply

Mathematically impossible.
Whatever the truth is, evolution by natural selection is false.
https://blossom.primal.net/56aad7d6e3435316764dce3292e168783a58fa73ead4c86bdba893f82dd8c36d.jpg

2026-03-08 18:57:40 UTC

- reply

Reading a fiction book has become a fiction for me. 🤣
Sad really

2026-03-08 18:35:26 UTC

- reply

Harmony stands out in a world of clanging and clamor.

2026-03-08 14:30:33 UTC

- reply

the entire “non-monetary uses of a monetary object make it more valuable money” is logically incoherent.
I break down the argument step by step in my book, and give Peter Schiff, the poster child of this line of thinking, his turn through the logical ringer.
Somewhere, thousands of years ago, there was a peter schiff crying that gold wasn’t money because it couldn’t be eaten like cows or wheat.

2026-03-08 05:27:10 UTC

- reply

i need to take my girls out shootings.
will be 5 and 7 over the summer. definately old enough

2026-03-08 05:23:14 UTC

- reply

I’m reading it, and @nprofile…f2lt is doing the edit/master.
I get chills thinking that I am speaking to my grandchildren I will never meet.
I get to share with them my heart and mind, in my voice.

2026-03-08 03:48:39 UTC

“The debt may be denominated in dollars, but the true cost is measured in broken families, fractured communities, and unborn generations shackled before they draw their first breath.”
Recording the audiobook of Modern Chains.
That hits me hard every single time.

2026-03-07 18:26:45 UTC

- reply

anytime you copy/paste information without critical though, ur just an NPC

2026-03-07 18:25:40 UTC

- reply

The formal act is not any different than reading a book.
I think the essential aspect of “my own” is running the ideas through your own rational process.
Critically think about the principles, assemble them, collate them so you understand it and can use it to guide your actions, and you earn the “i did my own research” badge 🤣

2026-03-07 13:04:17 UTC

- reply

https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqspxgc6unxajuj2ww4kqhn8pya8t0tf2s0409yy002cxxu2s5xdwyqu7pyf2
exactly: should consensus carve out space for arbitrary data?
if yes, how much?
what node implementation you run is arbitrary data 🤣
this issue was always going to be arbitrated by protocol consensus

2026-03-06 19:04:15 UTC

- reply

Brown University puts total cost to 8 trillion.
Even at 2.5, the absurdity 🤦‍♂️

2026-03-06 18:51:41 UTC

- reply

it’s not a “gotcha” question.
any answer is valid, just articulate how it serves you.

2026-03-06 17:52:15 UTC

- reply

curious, what is your interest in arbitrary data?
how does it serve you?

2026-03-06 17:51:46 UTC

- reply

by you logic, every change to bitcoins protocol rules were impossible, because “less than 50% of the node runners” were using the software at some point 🤣
incentives are colliding, that’s how bitcoin arbitrates contention.
the dust must settle before anyone can say “what consensus has formed”

2026-03-06 16:51:49 UTC

- reply

bitcoin doesn’t give a fuck about “general opinion reached by some group”
we are talking about bitcoin, and somehow you think your meaning of the word “consensus” matters
maybe most don’t know how to respond to your incoherent lane changing, but i recognize it and call it out.
hopefully for ur benefit.
my degrees don’t make me right
or strong mentally, they are just a testiment to the metal training i have put myself through.
don’t cry about not being able to bench 315, just hit the gym.
same applies to logic and first principled thinking

2026-03-05 22:12:04 UTC

- reply

of course there are great people who saw things clearly long ago.
it’s just easier to see stick when beaten with it.
💯 resentment does nothing helpful

2026-03-05 20:14:23 UTC

- reply

i offer them the same initial grace and benefit of the doubt as i would hope would be given to me.
what they do with it, no holds bar after that

2026-03-05 20:13:11 UTC

- reply

How many of us would have fallen into the same temptations if in their shoes?
probably most of us..

2026-03-05 12:36:11 UTC

- reply

that principled vein runs all the way down to the metaphysical source.
life, liberty, property are incoherent concepts without their other side of the coin responsibility, duty, and stewardship

2026-03-05 06:22:06 UTC

- reply

“I'm not talking about the consensus part of Bitcoin”
🤦‍♂️
#nevent1q…6u54

2026-03-05 06:20:12 UTC

- reply

i don’t know why u are talking at all.
its incoherent emoting
and its not condescending to call people out
you are tilting at windmills and it’s embarrassing

2026-03-05 06:17:04 UTC

- reply

lol
this retard doesnt conflate personal preference with protocol consensus
🤣

2026-03-05 03:59:40 UTC

- reply

the meta-point of the debate is that conflict of interest is is definitionally certain, and the principles are WAY more important than the particulars.
i have a side, my side, my interests, what serves me in how i use the network, just like everyone else.
all i can do is participate, throw my actions in the hat. contribute my little vector, and that’s how we get the best possible answer, through consensus
the network doesn’t give a shit what anyone says on social media, it only hears what node you are running lol.
how many are screaming online that aren’t running a node?
you tell me why u need arbitrary data, i’ll say cool, but i don’t care
and i don’t expect u to care about me lol

2026-03-05 03:51:16 UTC

- reply

👍

2026-03-05 03:50:24 UTC

- reply

you don’t know what consensus is…
protocol consensus
has nothing to do with implementation.

2026-03-05 02:51:14 UTC

- reply

“fall” is the operative word
is it the type of fall one gets up from?
by “nature” vs by “mishap”

2026-03-05 01:20:53 UTC

- reply

also, arguing “censorship” is a category error

2026-03-05 01:12:24 UTC

- reply

I dont hate on spammers or “monetary maxis’s” i see the tension as a good thing, as long as the serve themselves.
all moves are valid right now
and consensus arbitrates what is valid
but people saying they can’t define non monetary is non rational, absurd, retarded.
or that working through consensus is an attack on bitcoin.
it’s not correct or honest.

2026-03-05 01:03:09 UTC

- reply

because of trade offs.
I would be fine with 0 arb data, because i have never had a need for it, nor do i ever anticipate i would need it.
but i understand some find some utility for some arb data, so having consensus carve out a small space for arb data seems perfectly reasonable. but the larger and larger u make the area, the more surface area it introduces for potential harm, so i am against uncapping it.
doesnt serve my interests.
if you have the need for uncapped arb data, then run a node to build
that consensus.
my position is to signal your self serving interest, because that is how consumes us is made.
if uncapped arb data is consensus, so be it.
if 100kb is consensus, so be it
if 0 is consensus, so be it.
i trust the consensus process even if it doesn’t align with my self interest, because it’s a better answer than any of us individually could come up with.
what worries me, is that people won’t serve their interests, and just parrot other people’s interest without any thinking.
if every user is a sovereign individual, serving themselves, i trust consensus will find the collective good.
if users are going to NPC themselves and copy paste others interests becuse they are too retarded to think on their own, we are fucked anyways

2026-03-04 20:12:26 UTC

@nprofile…tn4t with the signal.
https://pullthatupjamie.ai/blog/announcing-x-poast-you-dont-need-to-be-a-martyr-to-make-nostr-stronger-20260304

2026-03-04 19:51:56 UTC

- reply

both are arbitrary data 🤣
it literally doesn’t matter what is in it 🤣
could be full, empty, bible verse, a program, a jpeg. it’s all arbitrary
stapled onto a sent UTXO

2026-03-04 19:50:03 UTC

- reply

🤦‍♂️
You think the difference between a UTXO and arbitrary data is “my opinion”? 🤣
can you tell the difference between an UTXO and arbitrary data?
bitcoin knows the difference.
is that, then bitcoin’s “opinion”?
this is just principled thinking.
it’s ok if your not good at it, it takes practice
i believe in you
you are already this far!
keep going

2026-03-04 19:44:35 UTC

- reply

the point of the cucumber example is upon you becuase you are fixating on particular content and completely miss the principles in play.
it doesn’t matter what is encrypted or not encrypted in arbitrary data.
it’s the category, the function, the essence

2026-03-04 19:41:02 UTC

- reply

function is not mysterious and is observable; that’s the point.
sending UTXOs communicates value, which is monetary.
I don’t give a fuck what is in arbitrary data, it’s arbitrary, discretionary, ie means nothing, and is valid under consensus right now.
any function of arbitrary data is non-monetary. it’s attached to a monetary transaction.
it’s a denial of one’s rational faculty to say “who is to say what is monetary”
furthermore, that logical misstep costs one the concept of truth itself. it’s a head first dive into epestimic nihilism, and possibly the greatest performative contradiction anyone could make.

2026-03-04 15:36:38 UTC

- reply

https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqspxgc6unxajuj2ww4kqhn8pya8t0tf2s0409yy002cxxu2s5xdwyqu7pyf2

2026-03-04 15:34:11 UTC

- reply

the sending of thr UTXO is monetary
the arbitrary data associated is the monetary transaction is.. wait for it.. arbitrary.
Arbitrary means discretionary.
meaning it doesn’t matter to the protocol. any non-monetary use of arbitrary is valid, and not monetary.
it’s really that simple.
stop pretending “no one knows what is monetary and non monetary”
you can do anything you want with a cucumber,
but it’s insulting yourself if you say you can’t tell the different between culinary use and dildo’ing yourself with it
the debate on whether or not the use of arbitrary data is good or bad for the network, is a matter of tradeoffs, and consensus will arbitrate
@npub1mad…5vdm

2026-03-04 14:02:12 UTC

- reply

bitcoin uses consensus to arbitrate governance
it doesn’t give a shit what you say your interests are, it only cares about the interests you pursue with your actions.
if you aren’t running a node, you have delegated your interest to those who do.
run whatever node you think best serves your interests, try to convince other why your preferences serve their interests, participate in building consensus, and be ok that consensus might not agree with you.
and that’s ok.
Satoshi’s consensus is the best chance humans have at figuring out collective wisdom.
the “spam” issue was never going to find resolution with relay policy
i’m just happy we will get a consensus lvl answer, one way or the other
I trust the principles bitcoin uses to form its consensus

2026-03-04 12:51:51 UTC

- reply

censoring content and protocol validity have two different objects.
https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqspxgc6unxajuj2ww4kqhn8pya8t0tf2s0409yy002cxxu2s5xdwyqu7pyf2

2026-03-04 12:46:39 UTC

- reply

They dont differentiate the object.
Protocol validity’s object is form.
Censorship’s object is material content
“My 5mb transaction got censored by the network! It’s supposed to be permissionless!!”
As for filters and relay policy, that’s 💯 on the node runner. run and relay what serves you. that cuts boths ways, which is why the resolution to the spam war was always going to be at consensus lvl

2026-03-04 11:51:17 UTC

- reply

your node never screams into the void. 🫡

2026-03-04 11:46:06 UTC

- reply

Humans are free by nature, so while nothing is more aligned with our nature than the pursuit of freedom, it’s non-rational to ignore the rational responsibility that’s the other side of the freedom coin.
life, liberty, property are means, not ends
responsibilty, duty, stewardship cannot be erased from the equation.
It’s an important philosophical point else our corrections to injustice soon become overcorrections.
Judgement is literally a constant.
It’s inescapable as a human.
Saying “don’t judge” is incoherent for a human.
Rocks don’t judge.

2026-03-04 11:45:40 UTC

- reply

2026-03-03 23:02:43 UTC

- reply

🫡

2026-03-03 20:59:42 UTC

- reply

seeming paradoxes about necessary relations.

2026-03-03 04:59:06 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…lmtm @nprofile…ds8n
Hey guys, I’ve read through what I think is all of the tread, sorry if i missed something.
Good discussion, these are really important ideas.
I don’t know the best way to respond given the depth and breadth of the thread, but here are some ideas which came to my mind.
Godel’s Incompletness Theorems mathematically prove no formal system can capture all the truths within its structure.
That’s really the form of any error we make when trying to shoe horn reality, a hylomorphic phenomenon, into an either or.
Form and matter: there is a physical world, and there immaterial order.
The relation between both is reality.
So out of the blocks, the “physics explains reality” is doomed
It describes a part, not the whole.
Any system which excludes the coherent possblility of its origin can never be an account of the whole.
if you arrive at an “infinite regress” or “something from nothing” as your account for the origin, understand you have arrived at the undefeated impasses
This is why you run into trouble with your conception of time.
A discrete measure, presupposes a the continuous, so we can’t deny the present. time presupposes an eternal/comtinuous now.
Aristole wrestled with these problems 2000 years ago, and he accepted the impasses on both extremes and and arrived at what Gödel proves later with math.
We have a 111k word manuscript on this exact relation.
the physics stuff is great about that part of reality, we just can’t mistake it for the whole

2026-03-03 04:39:31 UTC

- reply

“Bitcoin is infinite regress instantiated and contained.”
🤔
What is the genesis block?
That’s not an infinite regress.

2026-03-02 02:29:40 UTC

- reply

and you are a subject in that objective world. wrestling with that necessary relation is not “bullshit” even though it’s inherently messy
to operate in “either or’s” is logically incoherent in technical terms, and retarded in rhetorical terms

2026-03-01 21:44:30 UTC

- reply

Unless you sold 88% of you stack, I think you got the wrong denominator for your net worth ;)
Keep crushing
you are setting an example for many others to follow

2026-03-01 13:00:42 UTC

- reply

💯

2026-03-01 03:57:47 UTC

Stop majoring in the minors.

2026-02-28 23:04:58 UTC

- reply

having children was what got me off the bench and into the game

2026-02-28 22:18:36 UTC

- reply

laser etched 💯

2026-02-28 19:29:08 UTC

- reply

Yes, usury gets the full treatment.
@nprofile…5gug and I had a great discussion in usury when he graciously had me on.
https://fountain.fm/episode/GbE7Us559aG9FBNLAQFM

2026-02-27 15:38:44 UTC

- reply

🙏
I’m glad the message resonated enough you wanted to share your thoughts.

2026-02-27 01:23:32 UTC

- reply

intentions don’t matter.
bitcoin consensus doesn’t give a fuck why you do what you do
it doesn’t even care about what you did
what you are doing is all that matters

2026-02-26 02:16:51 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…lwfh figured it out.

2026-02-25 21:06:43 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…yza6 @nprofile…fgqg @nprofile…3424 @nprofile…4t39 @nprofile…dgpe @nprofile…j97l @nprofile…yc8n @nprofile…dw5r @nprofile…lwfh @nprofile…w0s7 @nprofile…hs8c
Because I care.
#nevent1q…jjkz

2026-02-25 20:56:49 UTC

I got distracted with a a side quest.
But this message is important.
Please share and discuss with bitcoiners you care
about.
https://blossom.primal.net/13b7deea0ec21f2d0bf03056ef27afaa01776a65d776a4db265c0a2b56e247dc.mp4

2026-02-25 11:03:55 UTC

- reply

I took a break from writing the book the last 2 days to dig at the root principles of contention and consensus making.
think I’ll post a short video every holder of bitcoin should find helpful

2026-02-25 01:07:41 UTC

- reply

and be ready for the responsibilty, duty, and stewardship that are inherent in a sovereign agent.

2026-02-23 01:16:05 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…50qc 🧡

2026-02-22 16:18:42 UTC

- reply

“Every change to bitcoin is an attack on Bitcoin.”
This misses the most elegant aspect of bitcoin’s ability to align self interest with common interest.
Bitcoin’s design elegance is though consensus of the longest chain, guided by incentives, nothing more.
The consensus ossifies that which better serves the individual interests of the many and can adapt in the same way.
if someone wants to double the supply cap to 42M and propose that change in the protocol, that cuts against the interest of holder. so 21M is immutable in practice, even though it’s completely possible to do so.
if blown out OP return serves you, run 30
if it doesn’t, don’t
if you want arbitrary data 0 or infinite, advocate for why it serves a persons interest.
do whatever serves your interests
Participate in the process of consensus
i take actions tbs serve my interests, and regardless of how that consensus aligns with my interests, i don’t give a fuck because i care about being on the longest chain. that’s my ultimate interest in bitcoin.
I hate a lot of things the protocol allows as valid.
I also hate that the protocol doesn’t give me10% of every transaction.
satoshi consensus is good at sorting through self interest to find alignment with common interest.
so participate and let the chips fall where they may, listen to the first free market every.

2026-02-21 07:30:50 UTC

- reply

“We only participate in creation”
💯
that’s the whole game lol
often times man gets in trouble when he mistakes the image for the real deal 😂

2026-02-20 23:47:20 UTC

- reply

fun stuff, i enjoy the back and forth.
“I’m arguing the opposite”
I know.
Your film metaphor is epistemic, not ontological.
How we know, not how being-as-such comes into existence.
Act has to have primacy to potency: continuous to discrete
yes, you are arguing the opposite
which means that position runs into one of two impasse: infinite regress or something from nothing.
those impasses stand invincible, which is why potency is a product of act.
why the discrete part is a product of continuous whole.

2026-02-20 20:00:54 UTC

- reply

just read the preface, it’s down my alley! I don’t know when i’ll get through it all, but it will get added to the “to do” list

2026-02-20 18:04:21 UTC

- reply

I talked with my partner.
I’m good to do any pods, I just can’t talk about the book specifically or disclose its structure.
but i can get into subjective/objective value cause i already covered that Modern Chains

2026-02-20 18:00:37 UTC

- reply

you are in either or mode.
reality is a relation between
act potency, form matter, subject object, discrete continuous.
so for time, a discrete block/measurment in relation to the continuous eternal present
the block is not prime, it presupposes the continuous.
if there were no humans, how does bitcoin come to be?

2026-02-20 15:57:42 UTC

- reply

I agree with basically every premise you describe, i think your conclusion is a step too far.
“then money is not something humans simply create and apply.”
If no people, then no money.
Without a subject, there is no aim, and value-as-such is not intelligible.