William ₿ Travis

Agreed. It's the best most people will do. It's not real bitcoin, but it's closer to it that any other thing. And it's proven pretty resilient, which will give people confidence in bitcoin, even if because of strc they don't understand it.

2026-05-05 14:01:14 CEST

- reply

No question it's a concerning situation. You shouldn't get to behave the way they do with no consequences. Of course we can say that about a lot of countries.
I just don't see where they are gaining any real power or could even maintain it after this all plays out.

2026-05-04 19:41:26 CEST

- reply

That is unpopular, but there is a lot to admire. I believe if any of us could have used the system the way he has to stack our own bitcoin, we would have done it.

2026-05-04 05:04:35 CEST

- reply

People were ok with Zelenskyy doing it. Not a single person in Europe batted an eye. Why not Trump, then?

2026-05-04 00:36:27 CEST

- reply

Actually true

2026-05-03 04:00:24 CEST

- reply

That's normally the way these things end.

2026-05-03 03:58:56 CEST

- reply

Bitcoin hasn't changed.

2026-05-03 03:56:55 CEST

- reply

Saylor wanted to be more negative, but it seems like someone has given him his speaking points on the issue.

2026-05-03 03:28:16 CEST

- reply

It was a little sloppy. I should have written it out first and then copied it over. Also, there is a lot more to tell.

2026-05-02 05:28:49 CEST

- reply

I agree, and I think to a certain extent the US will recede to the western hemisphere, but unfortunately, it will likely continue to stir the pot from Canada to the tip of South America.

2026-05-02 04:52:40 CEST

Since 1860, the Bank of England and the big banks in NYC have been at war with France. While Napoleon was defeated at Warterloo in 1815, Napoleon III created the Latin Monetary Union at the height of the Pound Sterling's monetary dominance. The goal was to create a new gold-backed system based on the French Franc.
In the US, President Buchanan was also interest in sound money reform, but he was ushered out of office, in favor of the statist Abraham Lincoln, who believed govt should create the currency.
Britain strongly opposed the Latin Monetary Union and saw to it the US was out by funding both sides of the US Civil War. The Rothchilds were heavily involved in the funding schemes. The family would continue this strategy to weaken France in WWI by funding the Germans and the French.
One interesting note: oil was discovered in Persia in 1908. At that time, Britain and France began to compete with each other for contracts. The Sykes-Picot agreement, which gave France Syria and Lebanon, gave Persian oil claims to Russia and Britain. The agreement was never implemented, and all the countries competed for access to Persian (Iranian oil).
After the first war, France continued to exert itself in Africa, Syria (through a League of Nations Mandate), and in Indochina.
As events moved towards WWII, the bankers got active again, with Montagu Nelson, the governor of the Bank of England and Prescott Bush colluding together to fund the German rebuilding effort. This funding continued until 1942 after the German army had crushed France.
Remember, despite the European war beginning in 1939, the American army did not enter the war until November 1942, almost a year and a half after Hitler entered Paris in June of 1940.
Why did American and British bankers support Germany so long? Prescott Bush did not love the Nazis. There was something else going on. keep in mind it had barely been 80 years since Napoleon III wanted the franc to be the world's currency.
It's been 80 years since Bretton Woods, and we still care very much about that.
What followed, from French isolation in Africa, to Kermit Roosevelt's managed coup in Iran in 1953, to America's massive funding if France in the Indochina war almost to the point of France's bankruptcy, to Nixon refusing to give them gold in exchange for dollars in 1971, to blocking them out of Iran after the Shah was deposed, so much of what has happened in the world points to a secret bankers war against France.
Now, with Trump threatening to pull out of NATO, Macron is freaking out, and Germany is re-arming and forcing men to ask for permission before leaving the country for some time. Is Germany afraid of Russia? Maybe. But have you ever looked at a map of US bases in Germany? They are all on the west side of the country.
When Texas was afraid of commanche raids, the put the forts on the frontier, not on the Louisiana border.
You can draw your own conclusions about where the US might have thought the real European threat was. With US bases in UK, Italy and Germany, France is boxed in. And even with a presence in Western Africa, US bases are all along the east coast of Africa. France has no military access to the oil of the Middle East. The country has been vassalized by the financial powers.
Americans don't think long term, but England and France were at war from 1108 when Henry I invaded Normandy until 1815 and the Battle of Waterloo. The war has continued to today, but it has been a financial one since 1860.
The next phase is the trade of Europe to the military industrial complex in exchange for the MIC departure from the Middle East. If the US leaves there as well, don't be surprised if Germany and Russia sfart pounding France again, and watch the bankers laugh while the fund both sides.
Am I right about this or wrong? I don't know. I'm not a historian, but the signs are there that in the reordering of the globe into a multipolar world, France is about to get pulverized, and the 1,000 year struggle between France and England might finally come to an end.
[And yes, in case you were wondering, I conceived of and wrote this entire post with my very own human mind.]

2026-05-01 21:18:03 CEST

- reply

bowel movement, you say?
https://blossom.primal.net/fa5a1a7ac507a1f8c8afa9c285fe02927c755fadf82c18503b9863f82138d32e.gif

2026-05-01 20:36:11 CEST

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/3e7e9ee6eecd45f8272fd5525bbb4375d9bff4f31969a3f5ed4854e9bd312e9f.gif

2026-05-01 20:08:13 CEST

Someone help me understand how we all get wealthy when AI and robots take over.

2026-05-01 18:45:30 CEST

- reply

Lol. You literally just blamed "religious zealots" as a group by which you mean conservative Christians, and then you cry when the exact same argument is used on you.

2026-05-01 18:10:48 CEST

- reply

And Jews are hypocrites because their identity is ONLY for the purpose of loving God's laws and by doing so draw the world to Him. They have done the exact opposite.

2026-04-27 18:42:14 CEST

Was that our bitcorn conference dunp?

2026-04-24 04:48:10 CEST

- reply

Sounds like Vezzini.

2026-04-22 00:54:08 CEST

- reply

They sound like toddlers.

2026-04-22 00:53:28 CEST

It's interesting to me that there's still bitcoin FUD out there. I mean what are you fighting for at this point?

2026-04-21 04:52:55 CEST

- reply

Look, here's the thing. I don't know about all the podcasts, but I would be lying if I said I wasn't waiting for the govt to finally break it all and then try to reset it. In my view, that's when bitcoin maximalism will have it's chance to shine. Or we'll all be running for our lives. 😆

2026-04-20 21:12:53 CEST

- reply

Golden age of UBI.

2026-04-20 05:05:46 CEST

- reply

Looks like FBC of Richadson in the distance.

2026-04-17 21:00:33 CEST

- reply

I didn't quote everyone. I just showed you a chart and said an opinion.

2026-04-17 18:56:54 CEST

- reply

I'd say it's moved out of the range into a recovery zone
https://blossom.primal.net/300b160d729d4f6fe5faf23199f472532bd703b027f6cbe9f1b698a897c9713b.jpg

2026-04-16 05:49:56 CEST

- reply

Hear me out...music, but farts.

2026-04-16 04:02:13 CEST

- reply

Calm your autism down. There's enough of that to go around on Nostr.

2026-04-16 01:39:52 CEST

- reply

Honestly. It's what I did.

2026-04-16 00:59:19 CEST

- reply

That should tell you how much I do or don't care about those conversation. 🤣

2026-04-16 00:23:46 CEST

- reply

He knows that. It's about setting up services so that when The Mandibles happens, the riots are manageable.

2026-04-15 18:36:59 CEST

- reply

Tell me you don't think anyone on the planet is capable of filming the moon and activities around it without telling me.

2026-04-15 04:35:49 CEST

- reply

It's the certainty that drives me nuts. There're so many problems with the media NASA produces. But it's easier to just say, "nah, no ways these are lies" just because they want Star Wars to be true.

2026-04-15 04:33:08 CEST

- reply

Ok. We'll go with your inexpert opinion then.

2026-04-15 02:15:09 CEST

- reply

The base assumption is that the govt and MSM constantly lies. Pointing at NASA and saying "no lies there" even though they only "go to the moon" during a war is like a being a child waiting excitedly all night for the Great Pumpkin.

2026-04-15 02:08:49 CEST

- reply

In fact, you probably are.

2026-04-15 02:07:42 CEST

- reply

It's not clear to me how the blow-up happens.

2026-04-15 02:03:09 CEST

- reply

But did anyone tell her that her pants look ridiculous?

2026-04-15 00:26:25 CEST

- reply

Perfect meme for that.

2026-04-14 19:20:43 CEST

- reply

Ask them for detail about the laws in question.

2026-04-14 17:58:02 CEST

- reply

Lucky person? Didn't we know exactly when they were coming around the moon? Isn't it reasonable to expect that someone on planet earth who doesn't work for the US govt would have the ability and equipment to watch for it? Isn't also reasonable that the US govt itself would have video documentation from planet earth? So far I've seen nothing. Seems fishy to me.

2026-04-14 14:32:24 CEST

- reply

Where is the independent ground based video showing the ship coming around the moon? Surely it exists. I cannot find any on youtube.

2026-04-13 21:22:28 CEST

- reply

Absolutely. Make them do real work. That is a compeltely different thing than staging a space show.

2026-04-13 21:21:37 CEST

- reply

Snowden had to run for his life. I don't think the average run-of-the-mill worker has the balls to talk. Besides, these people know they will move up in the system if the go with the program (btw, I do believe they're doing real work, but I wouldn't be at all surprised to learn that none of them are in the control room when things happen).

2026-04-13 15:54:53 CEST

- reply

And when people say there's too many people involved for it to be a lie, I wonder if they've heard of an NDA and how the govt can ruin your life for being a whistleblower.
I've also wondered if every single person in the control room wasn't a CIA asset. It's not as hard to get people to go along as most would think.

2026-04-13 15:14:40 CEST

- reply

Giving the timing of the "mission" and the release of the Hail Mary movie, it seems more likely that it is fake and a distraction (it's not working). Is there independent ground-based video of Artemis coming around the moon?

2026-04-13 03:09:29 CEST

- reply

What if all business were bitcoin sector businesses? Seems to me we wouldn't have any stuff or services any more. Just have a business with a cash ap POS device and take bitcoin.

2026-04-12 17:57:27 CEST

- reply

Russia, Kazakhstan, and Canada. Finland is negligible. The point is, if Europe thinks it can evade oil by switching to nuclear, it's in for some Russian winters.

2026-04-12 04:49:52 CEST

Where does Europe get its uranium for its nuclear power plants?

2026-04-12 03:02:33 CEST

- reply

I want to see you ride him in a race.

2026-04-12 02:44:35 CEST

Got the bag hung this afternoon.
https://blossom.primal.net/95182cb62cb2cd5379b0d6e2cf6e4e0ba951f453922c1abb2f25851904d50500.jpg

2026-04-11 05:55:12 CEST

- reply

Who's he yelling at?

2026-04-11 05:53:24 CEST

- reply

To a certain extent, this misrepresents the multipolar framework. Different perspectives on it don't insist on a more just situation for those outside the western sphere, only that asset mining through control aystems like debt are shifting away from certain areas to others while the endebted regions will be forced into a cbdc-fueled fuedal system. A one-world scenario may still be decades out. We will get there, but probably not at this stage. Rival interests must be subdued first.

2026-04-11 02:14:43 CEST

- reply

It's a distraction from the fact that this op was cover for something else.

2026-04-11 02:10:08 CEST

- reply

Bitcoin is for terrorists and people who don't want their money frozen or confiscated.

2026-04-11 01:57:31 CEST

- reply

Did he fund his own presidential campaign? Of course not. It cost $1.45B to get elected. He works for the entities that footed that bill. This isn't rocket science.

2026-04-10 23:32:30 CEST

- reply

They won't hold up in court.

2026-04-10 23:31:28 CEST

- reply

Probably. At some point. You better hope. But that hasn't been the history of things.

2026-04-10 23:01:00 CEST

- reply

Not etirely nuclear, but that's a good step. It accounts for abut 65% of France's electricity production. But the country cannot operate independent of oil yet.

2026-04-10 22:58:21 CEST

- reply

Oh brother. You have no idea what Trump has done or hasn't done. Public Trump is a persona.
There's been a double standard for decades. The elite get to do what they want with very little accountability.
And you don't listen. I didn't say Trump was the problem. His chaos is serving a purpose. I said like the rest, he is also paid by people. The people who own the presidency are the problem. Trump is doing a job for them as all CEOs do for their boards.

2026-04-10 20:20:08 CEST

- reply

Yet France had been desperate for Persian oil for100 years. Keeping them away from it seems to be an ongoing priority of the City of London going back to Sykes–Picot, Balfour, and Partition actions. For better or worse (probably better), this current war may be about undoing all of that and handing the ME back to the Arab countries.
So to say this doesn't involve Europe may be saying a bit too much. But I do get your description of the MAGA attitude towards European history and world events.

2026-04-10 18:21:49 CEST

- reply

I don't need proof. This isn't a court of law. The point is about faith. You don't know Trump. You've never likely spent any meaningful amount of time with him to know his real character, outlook, or intentions. You have to make an assessment largely based on the PR he puts out about himself. Meanwhile, when I look at the people around him, I can see the corrupt financial leaders whose interest is in asset stripping (privatizing) nations and can draw other conclusions. You choose to put your faith in him. Ok, whatever. That's your decision, but don't pretend like you're on the inside and know what's really going on or that this guy can be trusted. All any of us can do is look at all the various things that are happening and try to recognize patterns of behavior.

2026-04-10 05:24:22 CEST

- reply

What are you talking about? Every president is owned. Why do you think Scott Bessent, George Soros' financial engineer of the speculative attack that almost killed the UK, is on his team. I'm sure Larry Fink has no voice in the administration. Oh, wait, he advises Trump on policy and his personal investments. But sure there's no directives coming from BlackRock to the administration. Don't start sounding like a democrat that says Proof! Proof! instead of using the gray matter to connect the easy and obvious dots.

2026-04-10 04:52:48 CEST

- reply

Tucker looks 65.

2026-04-10 03:23:58 CEST

Herd of deer went across the back meadow tonight. I was too busy planning deer-based meals to take a picture.

2026-04-10 03:21:38 CEST

- reply

Take it home and put it to work.

2026-04-10 03:19:36 CEST

- reply

I wish they'd get on with the reorg part.

2026-04-10 03:18:52 CEST

- reply

Stress, prioritizing expensive goods over children, light pollution, flourinated water; space limitations. I could go on.

2026-04-09 23:40:13 CEST

- reply

I got to areas in Alaska I would never have seen rhanks to a ship like this and all with my 75 yo father in law who could not have gone otherwise.

2026-04-09 05:17:20 CEST

- reply

100% paid by the same people. It's all noise.
Trump is also paid by people. Maybe different people, but still not good people.

2026-04-08 01:34:21 CEST

- reply

You offically work for NASA.

2026-04-08 00:22:06 CEST

- reply

Ben Shapiro is advocating for genocide. It's a wonder guys like him and Mark Levin are still walking around. They must be there to stir the pot and get Christians to hate Israel.

2026-04-08 00:20:43 CEST

- reply

I think it depends on context. If I am calling for peace and say the Bible says that we should love those who hate us and pray for those who persecute us and treat others as ourselves, I would say that's a useful appeal to Biblical authority.
Meanwhile using the Bible to advocate for genocide probably isn't either effective or helpful.

2026-04-07 13:37:06 CEST

I'm starting to think all the blowing stuff up in Iran has more to do with the contracts to rebuild it than anything else.

2026-04-07 13:34:40 CEST

- reply

They never say where the job creation will be, what the demand will be for, and how it will be funded.
It's all "trust me, bro."
#nevent1q…f8sa

2026-04-07 06:11:51 CEST

- reply

We may be once again getting close to finding out how true the saying is.

2026-04-07 06:10:58 CEST

- reply

Probably. Or a pretext for turning attention to Central America.

2026-04-07 06:10:03 CEST

- reply

I'm sorry you and @nprofile…x5fn are going through this. Peace be with you.

2026-04-07 06:03:15 CEST

- reply

Looks like a truck explosion on a bridge.

2026-04-06 16:18:04 CEST

- reply

I am continually amazed at the god-like powers evolution has to create finely tuned systems over and over again and just like God no one has a clear explanation of how evolution works except "time".

2026-04-06 05:01:42 CEST

- reply

He is not in charge.

2026-04-04 04:38:52 CEST

Texas has more people and a larger GDP than Australia.

2026-04-04 03:34:38 CEST

Consider how many people volunteer to fight USA, Inc.'s wars.
The deaths that bother me are the ones from the national guard soldiers who get nationalized. This is why states need to have independent state guards like Texas does.

2026-04-04 03:28:18 CEST

- reply

People volunteered to serve in this govt's military. They get to go first.

2026-04-04 03:25:48 CEST

- reply

Who's the monster who wrote this?

2026-04-03 15:20:01 CEST

- reply

Didn't we decide attacking water supplies is immoral?
#nevent1q…razz

2026-04-03 09:09:23 CEST

- reply

Everyone in Texas benefits indirectly from the oil trade. During most downturns, the state experiences much less job loss, price inflation (especially gas), and salary suppression than the rest of the country. It also tends to bounce back faster economically. Energy is life, and Texas is very much alive and will contimue to be especially if the ME oil gets shut off.

2026-04-03 04:53:37 CEST

- reply

Even I want the US to lose, and I live in Texas where our oil is doing pretty well.

2026-04-03 04:39:32 CEST

Well, seems @nprofile…wlyq is broken. Does nothing but crash on Android.

2026-04-02 06:07:23 CEST

- reply

Mine still roll their eyes. Some co-workers, on the other hand, seem to get it. Now, I know I'm the head of my unit, so they will go along with most of what I say, but several possess some real knowledge about what's happening. The problem is, almost no one is willing to do anything about it. Selling the house and moving the family to the countryside is not something people are willing to do. It seems daunting. It wasn't really that hard and has actually been a pleasure. Still, I worry even sensible people aren't ready for the next things.

2026-04-02 05:59:57 CEST

- reply

It won't work.

2026-04-02 03:37:28 CEST

I don't know what's going on in the world tonight, but I do know that I encountered a dude with rescue kangaroo on the streets of Denton, Texas.
https://blossom.primal.net/007a6519b06dd0a7acd59294960e9b98fa11bb297d6bcfb6b4122f90ed61b755.jpg

2026-04-02 03:23:42 CEST

- reply

Good point during Holy Week. In the end there's only one true freedom. The best we can do is dodge a bullet (figuratively and literally). I am not waiting to get rich. I am waiting to see whether bitcoin saves my family from the mark of the beast. And at this point, that's as much sport as anything else since it's entirely out of my hands.

2026-04-02 03:20:23 CEST

- reply

Nothing does.

2026-04-02 03:18:48 CEST

- reply

Municipal courts should be restricted to city council districts. A person who commits a crime or brings a case could choose a trial in either the jurisdiction where the incident occurred or where the person lives depending on circumstance. All judges would be required to live within the boundaries of the particular district in which they serve. All juries would have to come from that district.
Keep in mind I'm thinking this out as I type, but the guiding principle is subsidiarity.

2026-04-02 03:10:41 CEST

- reply

Sometimes you have to call it as it is, civil or otherwise.

2026-04-02 01:17:04 CEST

- reply

Let's do it! Quiting bitcoin is the thing.

2026-04-02 01:13:32 CEST

- reply

It would certainly change a thing or two.

2026-04-02 01:12:56 CEST

- reply

Understanding how it got to us is inspirational, whether it was Len or not. What he did may have cost him his life. We should all have his courage. So no, not noise.

2026-04-01 23:14:49 CEST

- reply

Another issue is that the jury is supposed to be made up of your peers, which orginally meant that the jury consisted of people you knew or might encounter in every day life, not people who live miles away you'll never ever see. The jury doesn't know you or see themselves in you. Justice is supposed to be blind, but the purpose of a jury was to ensure that people held each other accountable for their conduct and to ensure that the deliberations were done fairly. The impersonal nature of urban juries makes that nearly impossible these days.