Bud / Bud is on Nostr

What is meant will never need to be forced

Last Notes

2026-06-16 11:22:02 CEST

- reply

No but if he borrows against his assets, yes

2026-06-15 16:05:51 CEST

- reply

I think it's time to switch the communication design from identity-centered to topic-centered (like forums)

2026-06-11 15:17:39 CEST

- reply

AI is a mirror of a part of ourself

2026-06-11 15:15:07 CEST

- reply

Everyone is able to take that bet at any moment.
- open a massive short
- disclose that thing that would compromise bitcoin
- profit
And here we are, bitcoin is 17 years old. Still working fine, still attracting people, still making ATH along the way.

2026-06-10 17:07:16 CEST

- reply

spend and replace

2026-05-18 15:47:46 CEST

- reply

Like doctors have and do not respect?

2026-05-18 15:43:45 CEST

- reply

lmao, and yet all their work are open-source and verifiable. Even if satan itself had created what blocksteam did it doesn't matter because there is no underlying trust, everything they do can be verified.
Same reason it doesn't matter if the CIA created bitcoin

2026-04-17 22:55:57 CEST

- reply

That's a custodial risk, not specifically related to STRC.

2026-04-16 16:41:14 CEST

- reply

What risks? I haven't read any valid reason why this would be risky.
Strategy is overcollateralized and they manage to maintain a reasonable level of leverage.
Once all financial institutions adopt this approach (they will have no choice because of game theory), the systemic risk on bitcoin due to a potential default will disappear.
I think we are in this situation where it's too good to be true and most people are dismissing the idea without even understanding it fundamentally.

2026-02-14 10:57:24 CET

- reply

I'd love to know your anthropic bill 😄