Tauri
Tauri | Bitcoin BLAKE2b (XBT)

Where is the value loss against Bitcoin that you speak of? The chart is green on all time frames. Not to mention we’re still in a bear market and Bitcoin was pumping hard the last couple of weeks. And btw, I hold zero Monero. Trying to be objective here. Ever since Bitcoin allowed to be used for spam instead of money, both Monero and Gold massively outperformed it.
https://image.nostr.build/b16697b4d7527e0550b3255d776a0dc489b58dbf647a0135ccdd7ca4d535417d.jpg

2026-09-04 08:49:18 UTC

- reply

The industry has been taken over by hordes of bad actors and people are still struggling to understand why many of us forked off 🤷‍♂️
https://image.nostr.build/34a32b03cf55a0c3b23447366e3eca86cd438a21cff8aed407f28009f8bf454b.jpg

2026-09-04 08:19:49 UTC

- reply

Don’t forget the guy also allegedly stole the mining business from Swan.

2026-09-04 07:44:32 UTC

- reply

Ocean was what it was thanks to Mechanic and Luke. Without them it’s just an annex for Tether, like the rest of the industry. It’s people who matter, not the institutions behind them.

2026-09-04 06:53:45 UTC

https://image.nostr.build/34a32b03cf55a0c3b23447366e3eca86cd438a21cff8aed407f28009f8bf454b.jpg
#nevent1q…zeqc

2026-09-04 06:50:16 UTC

- reply

Yeah, we were naive to think the pool cartel wouldn’t dare to attack the network this blatantly. In fact, we didn’t even think there was a catel. The folks that “warned” this “could” happen, *knew* this would happen. They were on the inside, lobbying behind closed doors and promising bail-outs if some pool(s) breaks ranks. I’m pretty sure that was the whole idea of the “security consortium” commitment of $15M. Unfortunately, we only have circumstantial evidence. But I’ve seen enough weird shit in the past few years to believe this was just a bunch of coincidences.

2026-09-04 06:41:51 UTC

- reply

Good point.

2026-09-04 06:41:10 UTC

- reply

So you don’t know. Maybe go to GitHub to check? It’s all in the open.

2026-09-04 06:40:04 UTC

- reply

Thank you friend.

2026-09-04 06:39:16 UTC

- reply

I didn’t know that glowing means wilful compliance. In this sense, I agree. It still means that they’re most probably compromised.

2026-09-04 06:31:20 UTC

This is the new CEO of @npub1qtv…7dze after Luke stepped down.
Expect a lot of weird shit from now on. They used to have a policy of not blocking people on X, even if they’re trolls.
They have started blocking the good guys now. Ocean has fallen.
https://image.nostr.build/c23dc02bafbae3f25b18556b53974d09ab9fefdb9ad526fc9a5a38d7b456ad25.jpg

2026-09-03 20:15:43 UTC

- reply

🤢just the fact that a guy who built his entire reputation on videos about self custody saying this makes me wanna throw up.

2026-09-03 20:13:45 UTC

- reply

Exactly. I have the feeling October will bring quite a bit of dump.

2026-09-03 19:37:53 UTC

Plot twist: nobody interested in Bitcoin-BLAKE2b cares about some pool shitcoin pumping. But interestingly enough, this works great to get cucked Bitcoiners pumped.
#nevent1q…srp3

2026-09-03 19:32:04 UTC

- reply

Their canary expired. Then they said they forgot to renew it. But a user on twitter said they gave him heads up not to trust anything that comes out from Boltz after that. I expect a criminal investigation will be announced in the next few months.

2026-09-03 19:13:42 UTC

- reply

It’s not a one man show. And none of us are comfortable with Luke doing most of the work. He just happens to be one that has the energy and balls to take responsibility when it needs to. Others have stepped in since 8/8/26 and more will come eventually. We disagree with Luke on many issues, but so far he hasn’t done anything that didn’t had broad consensus in the community. Even 300kb Blocksize was community voted and had overwhelming support.

2026-09-03 19:04:08 UTC

- reply

Clowns are good at being foolish.

2026-09-03 19:01:41 UTC

- reply

Francis and BB are cowards and state simps. I’m glad I no longer use their wallet and service.

2026-09-03 18:57:29 UTC

- reply

Did this roid cuck really said people should keep their coins on exchanges? 😳

2026-09-03 18:36:36 UTC

- reply

I agree and I haven’t bought any yet. But there must be some form of price discovery to shape a market for the mined coins. This one being a KYC-free is an added bonus. I hope someone forks bisq or robosats, or even better - creates a new p2p exchange from scratch. I’ll be sure to use that. Also some atomic swaps between btc/xbt/xmr would be great too.

2026-09-03 18:23:45 UTC

https://image.nostr.build/2600a8185b636638954be7eb62a57f072ca2c00148b2460a464e75a38728ff78.jpg

2026-09-03 15:04:31 UTC

- reply

Yeah like wtf, they totally DDoSed my notifications 🫠

2026-09-03 13:54:49 UTC

Development on this front is underway. My advice to exercise caution, deposit only small amounts and withdraw the entire balance once the trade is completed, still stands.
If you experience a problem, open a ticket with support. If someone claims they got rugged, ask them to prove that they actually opened a ticket.
There are plenty of bad actors around, and some of them are quite despicable.
https://image.nostr.build/c379372ffb6bc7a078f5050a5f46dec1ed4e6cc2261eeae09b4919827e4a0c80.jpg
#nevent1q…yzc3

2026-09-03 13:13:04 UTC

- reply

They are acting the opposite of non retarded. Luke and Mechanic kept Tether in check, now all bets are off. Gonna see wild shit in the future. I’m not be surprised if they completely abandon supporting any spam aggressive template choices.

2026-09-03 12:33:26 UTC

- reply

I mean the last difficulty adjustment was think 24h ago? So that means this whole period will take 2 days. Then the next will be 8 days, then after that we are finally reasonable again. So given the frequent difficulty adjustments, shouldn’t this be reflected in the cost of hash rentals?

2026-09-03 11:52:26 UTC

- reply

Should’ve jumped by now, no?

2026-09-03 11:27:39 UTC

- reply

Although rip by a saw sounds deserted too 😂 Kidsing ofc

2026-09-03 10:56:08 UTC

- reply

Forgive my retarded English 🫣

2026-09-03 10:09:29 UTC

Some interesting events unfolded over the past 3 days regarding Bitcoin-BLAKE2b.
Here’s the timeline:
1. On September 1, a small non-KYC exchange called Neoxa listed the fork under a temporary ticker BTCB2B. Trading pairs included USDC and BTC.
https://image.nostr.build/291b303ddeef9058447aca2e0b86448fae34176712f90f6790c29a66d072b9c0.jpg
2. Just a few hours later, an unverified claim appeared on the BLAKE-hostile Reddit. A user claimed the exchange had rugged him for $500 worth of BTC that he allegedly deposited intending to sell it for BTCB2B. The user provided no evidence, but was quick to warn others not to use Neoxa.
https://image.nostr.build/d146a02870189f1a370bc0b0263c1a6b183ddf264aab467ec005d34efc1c8265.jpg
3. The Bitcoin-BLAKE2b community picked up the claim and started attacking the exchange with increasingly hostile comments — again, without first verifying whether the claim was true.
https://image.nostr.build/b17e9c05cd6b866e32393d61296d5426b412cb6bb2981351419f8bb9ce8c4c5a.jpg
4. About 24 hours later, the Neoxa team announced that they intended to remove support for BLAKE2b because of the enormous amount of hate directed at them.
This reaction appears particularly unfortunate given that there is no evidence anyone was actually robbed. Apparently, the account behind the original claim never even opened a support ticket, which raises obvious questions.
5. After some level-headed people joined the discussion, it appears the delisting has been postponed for now, and trading is still possible:
https://neoxa.exchange/trade/BTCB2_USDC
https://neoxa.exchange/trade/BTCB2_BTC
https://image.nostr.build/c1c011a6afb7d88f7bc00810048a9241ccd00dbc49a831ca4809fe52e6c03138.jpg
6. This should be a cautionary tale for us BLAKE2b Bitcoiners.
On one hand, it demonstrates that our attackers may be willing to operate in highly deceptive ways, including pretending to be one of us in order to cause damage from within.
On the other hand, we need to do a better job of verifying information — whether it confirms what we want to believe or not.
7. I have verified with multiple people that deposits, trading and withdrawals are working. But you should verify this independently as well.
Since the exchange is still in beta, exercise extra caution. Use only small amounts, and withdraw them immediately to your own wallet.
If you run into an issue, don’t be an asshole: open a support ticket and give the exchange a chance to resolve it. Only if the issue remains unresolved should you start posting angry accusations on social media.
We have few friends in this fight and many enemies — some of whom may even pretend to be friends. Stay vigilant.

2026-09-03 08:27:36 UTC

- reply

😏
But hash price is going down https://image.nostr.build/011dca015e7835fe53057166aff8cb563c69667e96e0cbb04ece4ed86b6bbf47.jpg

2026-09-03 08:10:12 UTC

Shachain is now the stalled one. 😏
#nevent1q…m39f

2026-09-03 08:08:16 UTC

- reply

Yeah, blocks are coming way faster on our side until the difficulty adjustment kicks in. And our chain is now longer than the Sha chain. “Longest proof of work” maxis in shambles 😂

2026-09-03 08:06:12 UTC

- reply

This landscape will look awesome at sunset

2026-09-02 13:45:38 UTC

- reply

Bro 😂

2026-09-02 12:29:16 UTC

- reply

Congrats man 🙌

2026-09-02 12:10:15 UTC

- reply

To an actual retard, no methafor will work, bc he doesn’t understand the concept of metaphors. Enjoy mutelandia, retard.

2026-09-02 12:05:30 UTC

- reply

Your email server and your bitcoin node are servers nonetheless, and the latter is much more resource intensive, therefore even more reason to be more tyrannical what txs get added. Honestly, I’ve muted enough coretards with similarly retarded logic, so unless you insist to join their silent ranks, do better. I hate when people waste my time.

2026-09-02 10:20:24 UTC

- reply

It’s not misleading. Do you know how email works? The server got a bunch of filters that try to identify spam and either move it to your spam folder or discard it completely. If your email spam filters are broken or non-existent, spam enters like a “standard” email (valid, lol) directly to your inbox. Mempool filters work similarly and since they have been broken for years and intentionally not updated, this is the state of your node (mail server), after blocks get confirmed. Spam emails are valid, just unwelcome. Spam transactions used to be unwelcome too, but they got a much more welcoming label in Bitcoin: they were called just “non-standard”, not invalid.

2026-09-02 09:14:09 UTC

This means that the rest 138 blocks were partially or completely full with non-monetary data. Such an awesome user experience in Bitcoin-SHA256. Imagine if you had 6 actual emails in your inbox and 138 emails from various Nigerian princes. 😆
#nevent1q…sd6k

2026-09-02 09:08:58 UTC

Useless app by a useless dev (@npub1xts…kk5s).
Did you fix the bug with the coinos wallet? You can just credit me back the ~15k sats so I can move on and delete this garbage and never look back. I have no use for the Poolcoin sats, but I want to give them to somebody who might appreciate them.
https://image.nostr.build/4f5c3bea9ffb66858326d7f90e8d2d3826b598b957883bf0c7e1d12e7852a3ac.jpg

2026-09-02 09:00:16 UTC

- reply

I have no idea what all this means 😂

2026-09-02 07:26:00 UTC

- reply

> is the fork actually going to isolate itself from bitcoin?
No, that’s why we’re saying it’s not an altcoin. It’s literally Bitcoin with a slightly different consensus set. All txs made on Bitcoin SHA gets replayed on Bitcoin BLAKE if they don’t violate any of the network consensus /mainly RDTS/

2026-09-02 05:21:55 UTC

- reply

I doubt that. They chase fiat, will simply pivot to AI or the next big thing.

2026-09-02 04:12:32 UTC

By Joyce Dawn
“BCH. BSV. Fork. Shitcoin. We’ve seen this before”
There is a term for this…
a thought-terminating cliché.
You take a complicated question, attach a familiar label to it, and suddenly the label becomes the answer.
I like calling these manipulations out because once they’re named, the spell breaks and they lose their power.
There is a whole feedback loop at play that turns a historical precedent into a substitute for thinking.
Once the label is accepted, you no longer have to ask why this fork exists, whether the incumbent changed, whether the threat model changed, or whether the comparison is structurally valid.
All nuance gets ignored.
“Shitcoin” is doing the work of both a genetic fallacy and poisoning the well.
BCH failed. BSV failed. Bitcoin Gold failed. Therefore “forks fail.”
But “it was a fork” is a category, not a causal explanation. Different circumstances get collapsed into one label and treated like a law.
It’s an incredibly shallow inference, but repetition gives it power.
I can manufacture an equally persuasive argument in the opposite direction..
Luke has saved Bitcoin many times: the 2013 chain split, SegWit’s soft-fork path, UASF against miner veto, the 2018 inflation bug…and he has spent 15 years finding problems most people notice only after they become crises.
I could easily say:
“Bitcoin’s guardian angel has saved Bitcoin many times before. Therefore he’s saving Bitcoin again now”
Frankly, it has at least as much historical precedent behind it as “BCH failed, therefore this fork fails.”
But it doesn’t prove anything.
That’s the point.
A false analogy gets repeated until it becomes familiar. Familiarity starts feeling like truth. Prominent people repeat it. Mockery attaches a social cost to questioning it. Fewer people seriously examine the new case, and fewer still are willing to defend it publicly.
Eventually a contingent historical outcome starts feeling like a law of nature, and the fact that fewer people challenge it creates the appearance that everyone agrees.
The social reaction can literally help manufacture the outcome that people later point to as proof it was inevitable.
None of this requires centrally coordinated propaganda. These mechanisms arise organically in groups.
But they can also be deliberately exploited through repetition, labeling, ridicule and status pressure, and I have watched it happen clear as day in Bitcoin. This is how social engineering happens.
There are voices in this space whose practical role seems to be almost entirely narrative… establish the frame, repeat the labels, amplify the approved interpretation, ridicule the people outside it, and steer what people unconsciously accept.

2026-09-02 02:46:37 UTC

- reply

Or you can connect your shar256 Bitcoin wallet to public bitcoin node and your Blake2b bitcoin with the sparrow fork to your latest Knots Blake node. Still I don’t advise you to move any coins before making sure you know what you’re doing. Wait for some tutorial videos to drop.

2026-09-02 02:43:54 UTC

- reply

You need to run two nodes and two connect the two versions of Sparrow to each one.

2026-09-02 02:42:36 UTC

- reply

Bad actors gonna be pulling bad actors shit.

2026-09-02 02:40:41 UTC

- reply

Also works

2026-09-02 02:31:55 UTC

- reply

Bitcoin hasn’t won anything so far.

2026-09-01 18:33:59 UTC

- reply

It’s too early for that. Try to buy a miner instead. Or rent some hash.

2026-09-01 18:27:53 UTC

- reply

Great minds think alike 😎

2026-09-01 18:27:08 UTC

- reply

Should we care how bad actors and regards call it? I say no.

2026-09-01 16:00:06 UTC

- reply

It’s live on the mainnet since 30 August
https://mempool.guide

2026-09-01 15:57:16 UTC

- reply

Understandable. Here it is Nostr-friendly:
“What are you looking so miserable about? There's a whole ocean of oil under our feet.” -Daniel Plainview
The trauma of the block size wars of 2017 is being relived by Bitcoin plebs and core sycophants. Fear, sorrow, and confusion reign, even amongst us Roughnecks, and we’ve seen some shit! But this is the best outcome for Bitcoin. If the miners had followed the plebs, as they did in 2017, and smoothly activated a soft fork, there would still be the narrative hanging over Bitcoin that miners decide protocol rules. This narrative would be used to gaslight Bitcoiners into going along with whatever 5 or 6 mining pools decide in the future. This is an antifragility test that needed to happen. Better that it happens now instead of 15 years from now when the plebs would be less equipped to mount any meaningful resistance. This is a victory for Bitcoin and it sets the precedent for Bitcoin’s survival into the distant future long after our tongues are silenced.
Our garden weeds itself. The shitcoiner/big blocker mining pools. . . gone! The bithereum bros hell bent on turning Bitcoin into another Ethereum clone. . . gone! The NFT idiots and token scammers. . . gone! The suitcoiners who think nodes and self-custody are curse words. . . gone!
What comes next is a proof-of-work change, Bitcoin’s first. There is some hesitation amongst Bitcoiners that a POW change creates an altcoin. We disagree. A POW change is an inevitable part of Bitcoin’s maturity and a necessary tool to keep mining honest and decentralized. Whatever you think of BIP110, you can’t claim mining is decentralized. So how do you do it without creating an altcoin? We have a proposal that sets a positive precedent for POW changes.
The Bitcoin brand must not be surrendered. We can hear your objections already being shouted at the screen, “Bitcoin is captured, we need a clean break from Bitcoin!” or “You’re just gonna replay the bcash drama!”
Both objections are wrong as we will explain. Bitcoin is not a company. It is money. Money cannot rebrand itself every couple of decades. If the Bitcoin name fails or is abandoned, no one will trust its replacement. Money needs to be timeless. Money needs to be trusted to hold your life savings and be passed down to heirs without worry. If the Bitcoin name is held exclusively by bad actors, then fiat will have won. There will never be a Bitcoin standard if Bitcoin is renamed every time there is a POW change.
The next objection is a Block Size War flashback. No one wants to argue over what the real Bitcoin is. Good news, you won’t have to. Here’s our naming convention that can apply in 2026, in 2046, 2066, and whenever the future POW changes happen. The new POW algo gets attached to the coin’s name. We don’t know yet what Bitcoin’s new mining algo will be so we will use the example of a fictional algo SHA357. The coin will be called Bitcoin-SHA357 so there is no confusion with the core chain or Bitcoin-SHA256. This naming convention will be used only around the time of a POW change. Eventually, as the new algo outpaces adoption of the previous algo, the algo suffix gets naturally dropped and people just start referring to it as Bitcoin again. It’s still Bitcoin. It just had an upgrade to its algo, that’s all. This is intuitive as users expect periodic upgrades to software. Bitcoin is not immune from this need for periodic upgrades.
If misbehaving miners are unceremoniously forked off with a new algo, they are less likely to misbehave in the future. Or they’ll misbehave less frequently.
Note that Bitcoin Cash did NOT have a POW change. Some of the same mining pools that are currently mining on the invalid Core chain also mine bcash to this day. They are not Bitcoiners. They are big blockers who have once again forked off to a new chain. They didn’t decide what Bitcoin was in 2017 and aren’t deciding it in 2026 either.
Bitcoin survives this antifragility test.
*Update: Shortly after this article was published, Bitcoin's new mining algorithm was selected via a randomized method. BLAKE2b is Bitcoin's new mining algorithm. We're looking forward to mining Bitcoin-BLAKE2b

2026-09-01 14:10:13 UTC

- reply

I believe most mine either solo or pool mine with a fork of datum. PyBlock are stratum v1 pool, so we should not point hashrate towards that imo, since we don’t want to encourage SV1 from gaining traction again.

2026-09-01 13:37:37 UTC

- reply

What are the odds of hitting a block solo in 24h with say 4TH/s? Any calculator out there?

2026-09-01 13:36:12 UTC

- reply

I see. Might try it out

2026-09-01 13:27:19 UTC

- reply

Have you used that? Is it KYC?

2026-09-01 13:23:05 UTC

- reply

No, these are commodities tickers.

2026-09-01 12:57:00 UTC

- reply

Btw what’s Rented MMR? And where do you get the info about rented rigs?

2026-09-01 12:36:16 UTC

Amazing convo you two @npub1mgv…r9yd @npub19z2…fkd4 🙌
@npub19z2…fkd4 you actually inspired me here to give vibe coding a try to learn how software development works. Got myself a Claude subscription, excited to try it.
https://youtu.be/4MyutZv7Dbw

2026-09-01 12:20:52 UTC

- reply

If we agree to use it as a community, it may as well be.

2026-09-01 12:19:18 UTC

- reply

The demand to mine this is huge. Eventually we will have more rigs and hashrate to buy.
P.S. I like what you did with the ticker 👀

2026-09-01 11:55:52 UTC

- reply

There is no guarantees, period. Same thing applies to Bitcoin-SHA256. It’s not that we gave up too quickly. Some us have been fighting the spam/coretards since early 2023. We see no point trying to wrestle the bad actors for influence. We’re now building without their permission. We didn’t give up on Bitcoin, we gave up on the industry centraling it and turning it to shit.

2026-09-01 11:36:32 UTC

- reply

That’s super awesome dude!

2026-09-01 07:18:53 UTC

- reply

Bitcoin is a good investment for now. Soon will be mediocre investment, and after some years (less than 10) will be a pretty shitty one.

2026-09-01 07:17:23 UTC

- reply

Did you read the article above? It’s not about the name being cool, but what it implies as a possible outcome in some years.

2026-09-01 03:44:16 UTC

- reply

It no longer gives you defence (veto powers) against malicious MASFs when mining is this badly centralised. It no longer gives you UASF power to undo bad protocol level decisions or activate upgrades that the miners are opposed to.

2026-09-01 03:39:17 UTC

- reply

Moneys have tickers too. Read my post again. Stateless money gets the X in front according to ISO standard 4217.

2026-09-01 03:36:36 UTC

- reply

I know. Still can be adopted on most places. It’s not the first time when the same ticker gets attached to different assets.

2026-08-31 21:20:34 UTC

- reply

It’s pointless.

2026-08-31 20:21:40 UTC

- reply

Congrats man, you deserve that!

2026-08-31 20:15:08 UTC

- reply

Cuz it makes no sense to keep doing it.

2026-08-31 20:11:46 UTC

I guess you guys need to learn how to attach a large op_return to your transactions now. Shouldn’t be too hard for a community who fell in love with data usecases. 🤭
https://image.nostr.build/3ef253dcad57c878cd34401f39eb9b8a44cb1f01b1c856000eac3b15970fc9ef.jpg

2026-08-31 20:03:09 UTC

Bitcoin-BLAKE2b should adopt XBT as a ticker. Hear me out.
BTC already identifies the Bitcoin-SHA-256 chain. Once there are two competing Bitcoin consensus networks, using BTC for both just creates unnecessary confusion and endless arguing.
XBT on the other hand is already an established Bitcoin ticker, used in financial infrastructure and APIs.
The X prefix also has a deeper meaning: it is used for non-national (stateless) monetary assets like gold, silver and Monero.
That makes XBT a much better fit than inventing some shitcoin-sounding ticker like BTB or B2B.
XBT = Bitcoin-BLAKE2b
XAU = Gold
XAG = Silver
XMR = Monero
And if the market eventually trades BTC/XBT, that pair would give us a clean market signal for which Bitcoin people actually value more.
The name Bitcoin-BLAKE2b was organically adopted by the community thanks to the great essay by @npub1ehr…qsdz. Maybe you guys could call our bannermen for this one too? What do you think?
Link to the essay: https://x.com/Roughnecks110/article/2087128292444996022

2026-08-31 18:49:13 UTC

When doing IBD our nodes will fly through 2026 - unlike NFTcoin nodes… That is if someone is naive enough to still run a node there. 🤷‍♂️
#nevent1q…qphw

2026-08-31 18:46:50 UTC

When doing IND our nodes will fly through 2026 - unlike NFTcoin nodes… That is if someone is naive enough to still run a node there. 🤷‍♂️
#nevent1q…qphw

2026-08-31 18:39:44 UTC

- reply

“BTC is immutable”. Unless when you upset 5 big mining pools.

2026-08-31 18:27:26 UTC

- reply

Same experience 🤙

2026-08-31 16:00:42 UTC

“Thank you Larry Fink for your great service to Bitcoin”? Too soon? 🤔
#nevent1q…dek4

2026-08-31 10:37:54 UTC

- reply

Nice. When for iOS?

2026-08-31 08:52:37 UTC

- reply

Then that workout didn’t happen. 🙂‍↔️

2026-08-31 08:50:27 UTC

- reply

A fire spreads frighteningly fast when all the firemen pack their shit and leave, handing the job to people who insist that fires can’t be defined as good or bad - that they’re simply a force of nature we shouldn’t fight because doing so would be “unnatural.”

2026-08-31 07:46:31 UTC

- reply

@npub1gdu…6nak is also to blame. Afaik he never took a principled stance against spam even though it objectively degrades Bitcoin’s quality as money. And also to my knowledge, he never attacked Saylor for openly Saying Bitcoin isn’t money and stablecoins are the future.

2026-08-31 07:44:14 UTC

- reply

Or we were slowly infested by parasites and they waited for their moment to play their hand.

2026-08-31 07:43:15 UTC

- reply

I’m amazed too

2026-08-31 07:09:27 UTC

You can’t make this shit up.
This is the culture of Bitcoin-SHA256 in 2026. The ethos has been flipped on its head. I’m glad I abandoned this ship. The iceberg is just over the horizon, it seems.
#nevent1q…tuld

2026-08-31 07:06:27 UTC

- reply

Can’t believe this is a real tweet, but it’s 2026 and here we go 🤦‍♂️

2026-08-30 20:31:51 UTC

- reply

What stops you from Blake2b?

2026-08-30 20:29:44 UTC

- reply

Congrats man! Hopefully the next one will be for Bitcoin-Blake2b. 🙌

2026-08-30 20:28:19 UTC

- reply

And where are they now?

2026-08-30 14:34:50 UTC

- reply

A lesson learned.

2026-08-30 14:33:56 UTC

- reply

IT’S ALMOST ALIVE 😆