#daoist #voluntarist #anarchist #humanist #social #political #conversations #nonviolence How to learn my philosophy: Start with some critical thinking on youtube with "TEDed the deomon of reason" miniseries Start with Immanuel Kants techings, follow stoics, also very nice to read "happy" by Derren Brown, add dao techings to it Follow this up by Podcasts like Darknet diaries and Jon Harbinger On Youtube watch TEDx talks, Veritassium and Huberman Lab Chronically offended by The Beave π
Public Key
npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq Profile Code
nprofile1qqst0nulg2nedvy3appae6ge60h5crwg9cpfg5hd7z7meh4eajunu7qpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqvvsj48
Show more details
Published at
2026-04-06T15:44:43Z Event JSON
{
"id": "0ad6efb2c470c83a525e6b3081444eb0b5733ff41159690e1540832bdfbebb87" ,
"pubkey": "b7cf9f42a796b091e843dce919d3ef4c0dc82e029452edf0bdbcdeb9ecb93e78" ,
"created_at": 1775490283 ,
"kind": 0 ,
"tags": [
[
"alt",
"User profile for freemymind π¨π"
],
[
"name",
"freemymind π¨π"
],
[
"display_name",
"freemymind π¨π"
],
[
"picture",
"https://image.nostr.build/f62e6a8f07602edb885ed198e1ff5c7090b8718ddd4037260bea7a1a58a05a68.jpg"
],
[
"about",
"#daoist #voluntarist #anarchist #humanist #social #political #conversations #nonviolence\n\nHow to learn my philosophy:\nStart with some critical thinking on youtube with \"TEDed the deomon of reason\" miniseries\nStart with Immanuel Kants techings, follow stoics, also very nice to read \"happy\" by Derren Brown, add dao techings to it\n\nFollow this up by Podcasts like Darknet diaries and Jon Harbinger\nOn Youtube watch TEDx talks, Veritassium and Huberman Lab\n\nChronically offended by The Beave π"
],
[
"nip05",
"[email protected] "
],
[
"lud16",
"[email protected] "
],
[
"client",
"Amethyst"
]
],
"content": "{\"name\":\"freemymind π¨π\",\"nip05\":\"[email protected] \",\"about\":\"#daoist #voluntarist #anarchist #humanist #social #political #conversations #nonviolence\\n\\nHow to learn my philosophy:\\nStart with some critical thinking on youtube with \\\"TEDed the deomon of reason\\\" miniseries\\nStart with Immanuel Kants techings, follow stoics, also very nice to read \\\"happy\\\" by Derren Brown, add dao techings to it\\n\\nFollow this up by Podcasts like Darknet diaries and Jon Harbinger\\nOn Youtube watch TEDx talks, Veritassium and Huberman Lab\\n\\nChronically offended by The Beave π\",\"lud16\":\"[email protected] \",\"display_name\":\"freemymind π¨π\",\"picture\":\"https://image.nostr.build/f62e6a8f07602edb885ed198e1ff5c7090b8718ddd4037260bea7a1a58a05a68.jpg\",\"lnurl\":\"lnurl1dp68gurn8ghj7ampd3kx2ar0veekzar0wd5xjtnrdakj7tnhv4kxctttdehhwm30d3h82unvwqhkjmnwv96x26r9d35h2mfnxy9s9c39\"}" ,
"sig": "753d31dc42ebce381987ea5fc231bd421b9ee4432e31abb1c94b370955a186049463f684f7f0a513ffa420a96373f23bcbc6a148eac35d8f49b72485d780df0e"
}
Last Notes npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Why you think so? Vegan menus are quiet ethically sound meals. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Privacy clearly works on a level of individuals too. When I lock the door in a public toilet and no one sees me pooping, this is all proof I need for it to be true. It is a fallacy to think privacy only works from a certain treshold. And those who belief them and do not try to be private therefore entrap themselfs. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π #asknostr Did some user already live with a Linux phone as daily driver for several days? With all the Bullshit coming from Google, to close the Android ecosystem, I am really looking forward to start using a Linuxphone. Even when it will come with extreme drawbacks. I really want to be part of this movement. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Ok. And in which client do notes from muted users still show up? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Ok. What client do you use? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π We need more normies adapting to this. Choosing good defaults increases everyones privacy, while increasing user friendlyness. Lets make good defaults sexy ππ #nevent1qβ¦7waw npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Hed the same issue. Best to just downgrade. This is an intentional removal. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Hard to get this answer correct. I will try my best, while hopefully focusing on the most important parts. As a base I dream of a society, that assumes a majority of individuals to act in good faith. I defnitly would go for a minimal state, that is reinvented over and over again. Every budget is limited in time and value. always prefer an opt-in model as default of whatever institution to come up. I would assume ideal institutions to be creatad out of individuals need. So also rather have institutions that are small and local instead of regional or national. Like this a smaller amount of people have the power to actually change something. The state has a structure where Families can delegate something to a local institution, a local institution can delegate something to a regional institution and the regional to the national. My dream society a grassroot democracy. No representatives at all. Decisions have to go through popular vote. Unelected individuals come up with ideas for institutions to love an issue, which serves the society as a whole. (could be education, could be security, can be building of common infrastructure: Library, meeting square, a software for digital participation in townsquare discussions) Yes such decisions are slow. Yes probably some people will never let themself convince about truth. But I think in exactly such big cluster discussions about specific issues, minorities can find eachother, cooperate and maby find a solution as a group. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Good thought Only that it is wrong π One choice -> Choosing between several options Two choices -> Choosing two times between several options Correct would be: You have one choice with two options. Take away one option and you got no choice. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I think the app is all opensource. So you could change it to fit your needs π npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I think I can just use it for bitcoin, when I want to. I have not too much problem, when an app has things I do never use. In Amethyst I also get many option I never use. To me it is important, if I find the things I want to use. Everything else does not matter in my opinion. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Did you already check out Cake Wallet? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Yes. I mean for the european societies, imigrants will be needed to maintain the wealth europe has today. Since a society with less people in the working age than non-working age is very hard to sustain. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π This is quiet a clear signature, that far higher migration will be needed, to sustain those societies. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Ok. Thanks for the explanation. But I really disagree with the idea, that whatever idea will be successful based on the criticism. When whatever solution brings an improvement upon existing solutions, it probably will find its adoption, even when it is only within a niche. But I would say it does not depend on anyone critizising a solution or supporting it over longterm. And it might hurts someones ego to hear that their invention or idea is not useful. But it is not at all a bad action to express ones true perspective to others. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I see it from a different perspective: 1. Do you belief in objective truth? 2. Do you belief in the possibility of free decisions by me and you. And subequently other people as well? 3. Do you agree, that only because external factors can influence me is not a proof, that they have influenced me. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Very true. In the end every new code snipped can be a new option. And we are all free to use exactly those we personally want to use. πβοΈ npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Thanks for this greate note. Made my day π₯³ #nevent1qβ¦l00l npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π The spirit to continue doing stupid stuff, even after it is obviously stupid is not the spirit of cyberpunk. Or is it? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Yes defnitly. I am very happy the internet brings these opportunities to all humanity. Still in order to proof to an imployer, that one can fulfill what is needed, some certificate will help a lot to have standardized proof of capabilities. And many strugles one might have, a "good" professor can halp individually, to understand well a certain concept. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I need to watch this tomorrow βοΈ Thanks for sharing. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π What a great contribution to nostr. Thanks a lot to this great developers. Big applaus for all your effort π₯³π npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π A beaty of a note π« npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Really? How much one needs to pay for this? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I went on a internet research, to verify with multiple sources,
who most probably caused the initiation of violence during the protests in January.
Human Rights Watch (https://www.hrw.org/news/2026/01/16/iran-growing-evidence-of-countrywide-massacres#:~:text=The%20mass%20killings,keep%20committing%20atrocities&text=Iran%E2%80%99s%20security%20forces,are%20a%20stark), Amnesty International (https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2026/01/iran-massacre-of-protesters-demands-global-diplomatic-action-to-signal-an-end-to-impunity/#:~:text=Verified%20videos%20and,International%20said%20today.) and UN human rights experts (https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2026/01/experts-urge-iran-break-cycle-violence-create-space-dialogue#:~:text=GENEVA%20%E2%80%93%20UN,right%20to%20life.)
all report on Irans government agencies murdering and prisoning their citizen.
While israeli involvment was certainly part of the picture as reported in isreal today (https://www.israeltoday.co.il/read/fact-vs-fiction-the-mossads-role-in-the-2026-iran-uprising/#:~:text=Israel%20is%20also,Mossad%E2%80%99s%20active%20networks.),
it remains unclear, how the support exactly was done.
Even when Israel and USA supported the uprising, this does not disqualify the uprising as an uprising of iranian people as grass roots protests.
USA and Israel can also intervene during grassroot protests. They can be true at the same time.
When you defend the claim, that (even just maby) a substential part of the killed citizen have been killed by CIA and Mossad agents.
The number of civilian casualties is naturally smaller, when the institution that causes the murders report the number of murdered people.
This is nothing suspicious. This is expected behaviour of every regime that kills people.
So I would not see, why a critical person would give any trust towards the number of the iranian government.
That the USA has their influence on Iran since many decades is defnitly true.
For this, I can only promote the video of Johnny Harris (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bLOEhycMG78)
This is all a tragedy. But even with all the history. This does not change anything at current reporting on who commited the killings in the january protests within Iran. And it might explains the current situation, but it does not give legitimation to current actions of the iranian regime.
Clearly nor does it give legitimation any attacks on human rights from any other entity neighter. And actually I will not really look into the other sites of war. But just focus on the reporting of iran, when it comes to @@npub1zcrβ¦ndy4 Not even what she reports on other countries. Because a journalist, that has oversight over one war, does not necessary have any valuable insight on other wars. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Great illustration. For everyone, thinking they might want to try fasting one day π #nevent1qβ¦0yax npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π https://www.almendron.com/tribuna/the-cost-of-inaction-over-iran-we-are-left-with-graveyards/ To those reading the vague critique of @nprofileβ¦7z5t against journalist and new nostrich @nprofileβ¦z67d . I have been reading the critique. I have been reading about Masih Alinejad on Wikipedia. I read the mentioned article above. And yes probably it is true, that Masih Alinejad was funded by US-organizations. I have not seen any proof, that the CIA was involved in the funding. This seems a unprooven unsustainable claim. But first and formost I would argue, that a journalist is first and formost to be held accountable for her work. Are there any claims of her within articles, that can be prooven wrong? This seems the only question that matters. When she reports genuin and based on truth, I actually do not care, who is supporting her financially. #nevent1qβ¦ddpv npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π How? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π How to start with ngit? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I think there is enough vegans in the world to have a very strong argument, that living vegan can be a sustainable form of living. So your hypothesis falls flat on the face. But I agree, it is a lot to be changed, to acchiev a vegan society. And I would not bet that humanity will get there soon. But who knows, when the first meat can be cheaply produced in a laboratory. Then I am sure many would start prefering meat that was produced without harming any living being in the process. Additionally, this will use far less resources, than feeding animals and using land for them to grow in a cage until they are eaten. But I do not know if we are close to this scenario allready. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π The argumentation for animal rights is based on that they are sinsitiv beings. In many animals one can clearly verify, that they do dislike violence, even when they do not speak a human language and therefore do not participate in the discussion. I argue they clearly are owning themself. Most animals actions avoid harm, prefer to be treated with dignity and many have all the senses we have. So they are concious of their surrounding, since they can see, hear, feel and smell what happens around them. A being does not need the ability to have complex thoughts about themself. Otherwise all babies and disabilitated people that can not speak a human language would not own themselfs. But we know they have them since they have clear expressions through other measures. Like crying and smiling to express happyness or disconfort. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Maby you say which part? Since I remember a part, where he mentions that freedom can only be accomplished if all concious beings make part of freedom. So including Animals. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π It is also not said, that an individual behaves the same in a group or on its own. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π When I wrote "create the new truth second by second," this was related to time. Only present and past can be factual. Since it manifested itself. But all these things that happen are always happening within natural laws that where always there and will always be there. Means only the present and past is defined completly. In a way we can not change. While our personal decisions can still influence the future. So hard unchanged rules with soft manifestations in time, which are a kind of superposition of many free beeings. With the truth I think it is important to see the perspectives. Within the behaviour of Nature there is truth. We human can at best understand exactly how something behaves. But it is much more probable to fail complete unterstanding. Since we can only use our inperfect senses, to grasp truth. So we need to be sensitiv, always belief, that whatever model of reality we understand, could most probably still be improved. But what gives us security is the trust in our natural laws, which do not change. But our perception of them can. Our understanding of them can. And just the same is in social science. But it is much harder to measure. Almost impossible to create perfectly reproducible tests. But this is because our psyche is so complex. Simple models will probably not be enough to describ the complexity of our psyche. This does in the end not negate the hypothesis, that truth is completly defined even down to how psyche of human species and every individual works. It only will be a much greater effort to ever understand it deeply, than it is to understand physical behaviours. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Part 10: Common sense Are things we can universally agree on. It does not mean, that most support the idea. It means that an idea is true. And even when it comes to our lawful rights. They can be correct and incorrect too. Just the same way 2+2=4 is correct. And a correct right I have, needs to be the same right every other selfowning person has. So when a right is for me but not for others, this right is false. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π part 8: Ignorance is the cause of all evil and knowledge the source of all good. And in order to access knowledge I need to care. And the feeling that kills my care is anxiety. So in summary. I need to free myself from anxiety and start caring! If I want to be a good person. Mark Passio goas as far as cutting ties with people that act ignorant. And gives them the condition. When you want to get back in connection with me, start caring. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Part 7: Mark Passio rephrases the sentence: "Treat others the way you would like to be treated." into "Avoid treating others in a way you would dislike to be treated." 1. reason: Not every person likes the same things. Only because I would like to feel pain now does not mean an other person would like this. 2. reason: It is easier to fullfill. Since phrased like this it only ever requests non-action where the first version requests action. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π All fine. I accept you with all you have. We dolnot have the power to change our past. Nor have we got the opportunity to choose in which society to grow up and what culture is lived within this society. We grow up exposed to our family, society and local government for many years, before we are clever enough and strong enough to choose our way. I only ask to be equally curious and suspicious to new information. Clearly depending of the source more suspiciousnes or more curiosity can be legitimate. But as long as we all try to see our personal failures without juding ourself, we will get better. We have to look at failure in any way in a neutral way. Curiosity on how to change actions so we can may evit the same failure next time. But this means we should not try to unsee our failures, nor should we judge ourself hardly for failure. But we should try to find better ways, to avoid the same failure. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Do you actually belief what you repost? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π 2. Part of summary (around 2h40min into the presentation): A hypothesis originally shared by the presenter (Mark Passio): Humans are like computers (explicitly said, that humans are not the same as computers). So all that are using a computer (or smartphone or whatever device ran by a turing complete chip) may know that the machines behaviour will largly depend on the users input: When you enter a URL into the webbrowser, it is no accident, what webpage will be loaded. And similar to a computer, humans are similar to that. It matter, to what we are exposed. It defines our worldview and our actions deeply, depending of what information we see, hear or experience. A child of teachers is expected to have different oppinions than the child of Entrepreneurs. Or the child growing up in a hippie village. And like in these examples everything we see, hear, smell and feel will have influence on how we behave in the future. So it will have significant influence to what we expose ourself. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Thanks for sharing @nprofileβ¦en87 I use this quote to try summarizing some (defnitly not all) parts of this 8h presentation. For me it is very good to have those ideas shared with me. And thought, when I write a small summary, maby some other people have the courage to listen into a powerful widespaning presentation: My Summary to the referenced video presentation to natural law: Natural is used as to say independent from our thoughts. Factual could be an other similar word. As an example the idea, that "life is finite and ends at some point" is independent of our perception of this idea. It is true when I see and accept it like this. And it will behave just the same way, when I reject this idea. It is also a talk about belief. If there is an objective truth or not. The referent (and I) beliefe, there is a objective truth, which applies to all beings on this planet in the same way. Since when I would think there was no objective truth. The alternative would be, that the reality around me depends on my perception and therefore I create the realities around me. But why would I be intrested in any book, what members of society say, how my family members are doing and just about whatever happens? Since when there is no absolut truth, I have no connection point to influence my surrounding. I would be pointless to start or go into a conversation. But there most probably is an objectiv truth. And this objectiv truth only exists in the past and in the presence. But not in the future. Since the future depends un unforseeable actions, that collide and then create the new truth second by second. This truth does also not depend on our perception (as it is natural). We can try to see and learn about these particles of truth everywhere. Through hypothesis, tasting those and concluding, we can get a more informed view about truth. But all laws about nature, that we discover today, existed also before anyone discovered it. The planet earth was circeling t.e sun before humanity existed. And continues doing so after Aristarchus of Samos expressed 270BCE, that the earth circles around the sun. And just like with every scientific revelation, many Ideas I hold today, can be falsified in the future maby. But the truth is what never moves. Truth needs no one to understand it. It needs no defendants. And it obejs no oppressors. Because it stands above all. Above every sovereign entity. And we thoutful human can observe truth when we really try to see. But we have to understand, that truth does not try to please our feelings. It does not follow any narrative. It was all here before us. It will be without us. #nevent1qβ¦3qnt npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Such a great representation of people that want their ideas implemented by others actins ππ₯³ #nevent1qβ¦eqnw npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I am happy you angage at this time ππ I live in a different time zone π The list prototypes is clearly not definitive. But I mean in general people that come to action and do not stop when they expressed their goals. Clearly within all of these stereotypes, there is also more and less productive people. Probably every prototype can never be a good representative for all people this prototype applies. π npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I am still listening the other presentation. And maby will take some hours still ππ npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Great read towards more building. I am quiet sure our generation will build things. Maby they are small. Maby they are different from eachother. But it is clear. When we go on building more and more are going to see it rising. And many will think, we are nerds. Many may think we are weird. But many of us already accepted all those names. Then let us be proud nerds, proud weirdos. All that matters is what we do. What we are depends on the perspective. For me builders, writers, doers, painters, sportsmen (abd women), activists are first and formost a great source of inspiration. #naddr1qqβ¦cxu7 npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Maby. When there is a human that got time to review the AIβs findings that are worth correcting within all the slop reports they create besides π«£ npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Thanks for explaing yourself. Well appreciated. I really am only asking to understand a bit better. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Thanks for the help of wording: Natural law. Just recently in a discussion in the commentaries of a newspaper I was writing about natural authority. And explaint to mean authority by ability. But some person misunderstood it as a legitimation of authority by bloodline. Sinc he understood natural as for "by birth". Was such a mess of a discussion π npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π "Law in this tradition is found in the world. Not decreed by rulers." I agree with this phrase a 100%. And I would argue, that only those observed laws can survive the filter of time. Since they are based in reality, the same way gravitation is based in reality. Both legal laws and physics are in the end the result of good observation from a hackers perspective. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π #asknostr Is there still a #trump supporter on nostr? I am currently watching a documentary, on how many past supporters are turning him down for entering the iran war and increasing prices of living in the USA. I am really curious who still supports him and for what reason. I do ask for curiousity. I will not critique whoever has the guts to explain it to me. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Thank you for sharing so much good writing art. I really injoy reading through your articles. I always somehow thought, that you have written those all yourself. π But to me it does not matter who writes it. It only matters, who offers me this fantastic read, so my soul can nurish herself with it. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Maby could be. I have nlt yet investigated, what caused those countries to get to the current state. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Actually Denmark, Norway or Finland accomplish high education level throughout society. And there are good studies showing that a overall better educated society with eaqual opportunities deliver a resilient strong economy. I would count those countries good example on how countries that deliver good opportunities to all people living in the country can deliver persistant growth. Meanwhile there is a good record on that an economy where rich people accumulate all the wealth while the middleclass is empoverished, the over all economic power shrinks. And this is happening in countries, which almost do not tax very rich people and companies. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I totally agree with the idea of property rights and voluntary action. Meanwhile I am in favor of everyone having access to minimal standards like food, drink and a house to live. Clearly with consent. But I am quiet strongly suggesting that we as a society support those in need with shelter, food and education, when they do not have the energy to acchiev all of those things by themself. Since when those basics are offered, people get the opportunity to grow and eventually gain independence. When those basic needs are not met, criminals are produced by society. No coincidential, but it is part of a society that does not care about those without property. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Too great of a note to not repost it :D #nevent1qβ¦kllz npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Hello Masih Very happy to see you posting a note via nostr. I am really looking forward to see your notes. Lets fight for the human rights and live freedom everywhere. May the day come, where suppressors have no shoulders to stand on anymore. Heartly greeting from switzerland npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π https://www.t-online.de/finanzen/ratgeber/geldanlage/id_100636452/gold-verkaufen-wann-gilt-die-meldepflicht-.html?utm_source=firefox-newtab-de-de #germany #deutschlandΒ #gold #geldwaesche #moneyloundering Ist es also mΓΆglich 100 Mal hinter einander fΓΌr 2'000 Euro Gold zu kaufen? So weit ich das sehe sind die 2'000 Euro an keinen Zeitraum geknΓΌpft. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π WooooW I actually think,there was never a better explanation of nostrers value. An Internet, where many companies created a business that sells attention and time. We as their product are as a result those left with less attention and less time. The high competition resulted in a lot of clickbait. Where we click on it, since it is catchy, only in order to find out it underwhelms our expectation. But there still is content based on an other business model. Creators that gain their money from happy viewers and listeners. patreon.com newpress.com paywalled media outlets, they all know that they will need to deliver to their supporters need in order to gain money. Therefor they are more sensitiv to produce quality content. And #nostr also goes in this direction. With the opportunity to spend zaps on specific content we want to see more of. With the unique liberties of the user, define the algorythm of content displayed. With the liberty to creat a user handle at will. And the freedom to use whatever client we prefer to use. #nevent1qβ¦kse9 npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Didi you never got things offered without something from your side? When you have an accident on the street, people only help you up for a bonus? When your mom was caring you as a baby, did she put you in dept for every kindness? Do people ask for money after they smiled at you? Althruistic action is something so deeply human, I would be surprised, when you pass a complete day without seeing an altruistic action. But I do not expect altruism. I receive it happily and try to practice myself in thankfullness. So I remember to do altruistic actions more often myself. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π What exactly offended you from this comment? Are you only intrested in offending and not at all in exchanging ideas? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Maby to be clear right away. I would not consider myself a Marxist. But defnitly progressiv, pro human rights, libertarian, antifascist, anarchist, individual freedom advocate. But I read and listen information of all kind. So I did start reading "das Kapital" of Karl Marx. And I think he has seen and written about problems that came up with the industrialisation. He has seen workers, that worked in insecure facilities for many hours in order to get their pay. And since those jobs were so easy to replace, fabric owners did care little about workers savety. And it does not help much, when the worker gains much, but when he gets into an accident the whole family falls into poverty. So Marx urged for the need of institutions, that ensure workers security, fair pay, so they can sustain themselfs and their families. Therefore he could see, that syndicates of united workers will may have the power to meaningfully negiciate about fair pay, lower working hours, insurance for risky work and so on. Since alo poor labor workers have human dignity. They have a right to work in environments they feel save too. And they are participants in the way towards profits of those companies. So they should get their fair share of those profits too. In the Book I have read Marx wrote mostly about the evaluation of the value of work. I hope this text of mine can be of value to you. Otherwise Might can be a good thing to read a book of Marx or whatever medium you like to learn about his work. Best regards npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Others call them best practice npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I think it really is not about if the Government is watching or not. To allow selling highly addictive drugs is just unethical. As it is unethical to sell them for doctors (that still do it), as it is unethical to sell social algorythm that get users trapped in doom scroll. I am happy to learn better. But this is my current best stance of looking at the Silk road. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Haha a really good interviewer. But finally this Gamestop guy is just stoned or what? π npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π This is probably as true as all the horoscopes one reads wherever. They are phrased to be true in most circumstances. Just like this social engineering is probably also the biggest attackvector in most hacks. But it is like this since it is the most costly vector to improve π npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Thanks a lot @nprofileβ¦en87 This is such a beautiful article to express the universal principles of Liberty. Whoever did not yeat search through Maxβs articles and is intrested in #freedom, #liberty and post-nation utopia should check out his articles. My absolute favourite nostr author. #naddr1qqβ¦zey8 npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π And did you get reactions in words too? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I would say most people consider themself democratic. And they accept that there is common infrastructure everyone should pay their fair share of it. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π So true. Only free software can be ethical software. #nevent1qβ¦gufj npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I respect this view. I think it all depends on the state one is looking at. I argue, that every powerful entity works along the system theory of Niklas Luhmann. That every system works for its survival. In our economy every company needs to grow in order to please their stakeholders. And as Google, TikToc, Metas products or Microsofts are already serving nearly all the world Market, their potential to grow can only be met by innovation or expanding within new markets as they try in AI. They are more and more hysterically to find new sources of income. And as more difficult it gets, the more illegit practices they are entering. And with the big majority of our societies using their services, they have a lot of power over societies preferences. This is why I mostly fear this big corp. And am happy there is free and good alternatives for many software. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I think for most Google, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft and TicToc are still the biggest threat, when coming to techvocracy. Far more than any government. Since when most start using privacy respecting services, there is less opportunity for a state to spy on us. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Where is the issue exactly? People can pay for their services. When a merchant sees, that people cheat on them, they will may search a solution. But is it probable, that merchants should be cheated oftenly? I doupt it. Like in every supermarket it is possible to steal things. But everyone knows that it is illegal and some percentage of stolen goods will be not discovered. This is not a problem for the supermarkets to sustain. Zero failure opportunity is not needed for an economy to work. It just should not fail too much. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I think normal identification is possible to do within the frame of humanrights. To hold someone accountable for his actions and in order for contracts to work. I welcome every society of the present and the future, that comes with less control. And I think we nostriches could be coming forward with better ideas. I totally support the idea of selfdeclaration of identity. But until there is a society, that works with this principle, there is no real proof of concept. This means we can not know if it will work. But when you know a project, that delivers evidence for selfdeclaring identity to work, I am very happy to read. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π You try to provoke. But just know not enough about Mandela, when you look at him as an illegitimate terrorist. When a regime that goes against humanrights calls someone a terrorist, it simply is an opinion. W. Bush defnitly was a terrorist, when he started the war against Afghanistan. Putin defnitly is a terrorist for all his offensive wars against Georgia, Syria and Ukraine. Benjamin Netanjahu defnitly qualifies as a terrorist, with the current violations agains gazas citizens. Clearly this list will be long and will come with islamic terroristr from Taliban to Hisbolla, IS, the syran regime or Ghaddafi in Lybia. But what crimes against humanity did Mandela commit? I argue that he was fighting against an unhumain regime of Apartheid, which was clearly against human rights. This was civil courage on the highest level and has nothing to do with terror. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Maby start by reading "das Kapital" of Karl Marx. You will come to understand, that he brought not at all ideas of taking away freedoms. But the idea for workers to organize, create cooperations, where they themselfes participate in owning the capital. In the value of work and its products. His work has value up to date, as liberal ideas that are true have important values up to today. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π But you do understand, the theory of migration as a root of problems is not fact. It is a populist statement, that tries to gain the votes of people with low education. It is an easy ever repeating pattern. Populists offer very easy solutions to complex problems. They propose to lower prices, offer more and better payed jobs and lower wellfare cost through lower migration. Only that almost no empirical data supports this claim. Migrants do commit significantly less criminal acts. They receive and request significantly less welfare support. They are usually not allowed to participate in voting, but participate paying tax bills on the other hand. So anyone claiming migrants to profit more then others simply refuse to look at the world how it is. In the US there is a big problem with equal opportunity. Children from poor families get very little chances to improve their income compared to other countries with similar GDP per capita. Wealth is much more unequal than in other countries with similar GDP per capita. And this is very easy to proof, that neoliberal thoughts are the root of those systemic issues. Not left leaning politics. Not whatever. It is the lies of neoliberalism. Lies of Trickle down effect, stacking of wealth on those who are born into wealthy families. Destroying merit based culture. This is what neoliberalism does. This is what the current US government pushes and what increases poverty in a very fast pace. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Transparency is the best way to ensure sensitive use of such restrictions. Defnitly I see, that it has potential threats. But I want to point out, that it is a potential threat. Not a evil act of an authoritarian regime. In a democracy it is important that people like you and me understand the topics, so we can articulate specific requests instead of populist screaming in extreme ways. Since undifferentiated expression is what weakens political consens. We need to understand things in the complexity they have. There is no gain in facilitating theories below their complexity. And regulation around privacy, security and freedom of speech is always a thin line between defending the vulnerable while allowing everyone to express all important things. But I would say currently there is not much in europe, that is drastically restricted when talking about free speech, while the bad influence of plattforms algorythms towards the political poles is very strong and scientifically well proven. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π So you refer to the DSA. https://www.eff.org/issues/eu-policy-principles The EFF reports on it as a groundbreaking Backbone for individuals freedoms. The EFF defnitly has always been one of the more important organisations to be the voice of free citizens in the internet. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/01/systemic-risk-reporting-system-crisis In this report they write about the risks of surveilance and sharing of personal data it could bring. And it is fair to defend privacy rights, so no company is oblidged to save additional logs and offer faster data on its user to the police (especially, when it should be automated). But as all of these points are legitimate to criticize, it is simply not true, that the DSA is one big surveillance tool implemented by authoritarian regimes. To say this lacks the understanding of all the great regulation it brings towards BigTech, which are needed so much in order to defend an open internet. For example in the will of Google to stop users from installing their apkβs from whatever source they want, the DSA could help defend freedom. And yet unseen law cases have been buiot against BigTech with the help of DSA. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Can you show evidence? Cases, where your hypothesis can be proofen? Otherwise this is nothing else then a narrative. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Finally for all the #AI #vibe fans π https://hackaday.com/2026/04/29/why-model-collapse-in-llms-is-inevitable-with-self-learning/ it is now mathematically proven, that a good AI can not improve through using its output as an input. And that well curated high quality information as input will always beat the AI, which just uses a big pile of non-curated data. #KI #intelligence #bubble npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Thanks for your arguments. Do you now argue for liberalism or for restriction of migration? Since those two ideas are contrary ideas. What values do you see, that can only be defended with presidental power, which could not be defended by parlament? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Not really. Why should parlament be more supporting of freedom restricting laws, than a president? Currently we can see ICE raids that come clearly from the president. Attacks on the free press directly from the president. Tariffs and wars directly from the president. Those are all clear decisions of restricting individual freedoms. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Totally agree with this quote. Freedom is real. And when we life in a free society, we need to talk about its benefits. When our individual freedom is restricted, innovation lowers. #nevent1qβ¦qpny npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I can block ads π Seems even better for me. I think the only plausible advertisment is the one coming from my circle of trust. Evrything else I do not consider part of a free world. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Thanks but please implement a nsec bunker to verify instead of nsec directly. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I would not offer my attention for money. I consider myself a free person. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π No through brute force it defnitly is not probable with current hardware. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I am not saying he was a pacifist. Why would he have to be one? Who is Madiba? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Personalities: Mahatma Gandhi Nelson Mandela Films: Forrest Gump the Green Book (currently in cinema) the astronaut npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I have sinned. I voted for the swiss electronic identification. I thought it would be better, when the government does it, instead of a private company. I still do. But today I would not use digital identification. Even when it will mean to be excluded from a service or event. #nevent1qβ¦rm43 npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Now. Whispers say, that quantum computers can find the private key from the public key within reasonable time. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Probably this will be the wave where only free software will allow the needed security for our societies to work. Let us step forward and adapt free software faster and show how it works. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π What is this post referencing to? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π What is needed is great idols, which use the power of love, knowledge, courage and braveness to protect the vulnerable within society. Not with guns. Not with muscles. But with our freedom to speak without fear and to not stepping back on agression. Persistancy is power βοΈ npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π What particular issue do you have with the browser you are currently using? Most probably it is far easier to change a working one, than building it from scratch. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Only because one can do a thing does not mean it is wise to do it or good in any way. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π There is no pac, since it would be ironic to centralize privacy advocates: Signal, proton mail, BRIAR, Libre Office, Linux and many distros of it and now the Marmot and Nostr protocol and what grows on them are important pilars. But longterm, they are more resilient when fragmented. Yes might less powerful. But might just harder to get rid of those too. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π #fragnostr #chnostr Are there people from #switzerland on nostr? Would like to have more local Nostr community. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Not at all ironic. I live in europe and I think no political praty nor any Justice system is currently attacking free press or discussions. Probably all is not perfect. There are issues I know. For example in Switzerland local courts tried to bring internet provider to block certain websites. But there is no legal foundation for it. I mean I assume you know, that there are states, where even small individual activists get fined or enprisoned for singing for peace in public. Defnitly nothing in this direction exists in Germany, France, Denmark or Switzerland. Freedom of expression is still valuated. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Maby also the european population is the last man (or woman) standing for a free world. Liturally, where in this planet, human rights are better protected?