Violinist and teacher, building a homestead on raw land in between lessons and concerts. Fascinated by how we can develop resilience in our lives, in our families, in our communities. I'm excited about freedom tech and circular economies, and am deeply grateful for the devs and advocates who are helping build tools for a better future.
Public Key
npub1kwk98e8t2p3t0um50e3luulxwyt5mtcxvc80w8w89fcuju0dmzfsgkhx95 Profile Code
nprofile1qqst8tznun44qc4h7d68ucl7w0n8z96d4urxvrhhrhrj5uwfw8ka3ycpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgdg6y6p
Show more details
Published at
2023-09-10T23:43:27Z Event JSON
{
"id": "263b11af30bb3dbe60abbf334e793bbeca2b6a208a85c3830eb47e81691f30cb" ,
"pubkey": "b3ac53e4eb5062b7f3747e63fe73e671174daf06660ef71dc72a71c971edd893" ,
"created_at": 1694389407 ,
"kind": 0 ,
"tags": [],
"content": "{\"displayName\":\"FiddleHodlHomestead\",\"display_name\":\"FiddleHodlHomestead\",\"name\":\"[email protected] \",\"about\":\"Violinist and teacher, building a homestead on raw land in between lessons and concerts. Fascinated by how we can develop resilience in our lives, in our families, in our communities. \\nI'm excited about freedom tech and circular economies, and am deeply grateful for the devs and advocates who are helping build tools for a better future.\",\"lud16\":\"[email protected] \",\"nip05\":\"[email protected] \",\"pubkey\":\"b3ac53e4eb5062b7f3747e63fe73e671174daf06660ef71dc72a71c971edd893\",\"npub\":\"npub1kwk98e8t2p3t0um50e3luulxwyt5mtcxvc80w8w89fcuju0dmzfsgkhx95\",\"created_at\":1694387624,\"banner\":\"https://m.primal.net/HLAa.jpg\",\"picture\":\"https://m.primal.net/HLAY.jpg\"}" ,
"sig": "697c47003445d347a94fe746ced9ec624d4ec00b1cc0bd1be996e4f3f447323215328096e9f53d4b8b958e5439a0f81ebf0c2d55bbd8fe1c535334797a903a30"
}
Last Notes But seriously some of these women from the jury sound crazy. Yikes. #nevent1q…eta5 If I say that I don't think that there's a direct causal link between autism and vaccines, and your reply is that I cherry pick conspiracy theories, we're not in the same room. Signing off. Best wishes to you - I did say "likely" (not definitively) but the importance of the statement was the second part, so if you're going to choose statements that you believe are extreme, then please quote the entire thing! Personally I don't think that it's as simple as vaccines causing cancer (or autism, for that matter); I think that most diseases are multi-factorial and that a new pharmacological intervention is an obvious factor to look at when examining the rise in cancers. TL:DR vaccines may have contributed, but the same institutions that pushed the vaccines are disincentivized to examine their contribution. There's no way that that's an extreme position. Ok, what other statements are extreme? Wait - that's a lot of stuff that doesn't connect to my post at all. You said that I state a lot of extreme positions. What exactly is extreme about anything in either of my posts above? It matters because covid spending was an incredible wealth transfer to the wealthy in the US (and I believe in the EU as well); It matters because corrupt politicians (Trump, Von Der Leyden) literally made deals with pharmaceuticals to spend the people’s money on the products and marketing for private companies; It matters because governments censored scientists who were questioning the vaccine narrative; It matters because the govt response, while increasing the wealth of a few, were devastating to the poor and to children in particular; It matters because the rise in cancers in working age people is likely linked to the vaccines but there will be no official studies on this because so many powerful people are implicated in the rollout; It matters because people lost their jobs, their place in school, their ability to participate in society because of the mandates, which were supported by “science” which was actually business. It matters because so many people were fully convinced by the propaganda, and the implications of that for the next major crisis are terrifying. How can it not matter? He is? Every time I've heard him talking about Gaza it really doesn't seem like it. (Haven't heard this episode with Peter though) it's kind of horrifyingly brilliant Yes The explanation was always about how long it takes to build antibodies but at the very least, there should have been a separate category for vaccinated but still in that window. And I think that category would have looked horrifying. There was so much craziness re Covid, but one thing with profound implications for everything around the vaccine was the timing of someone being considered "vaccinated." For the mRNA jabs, you weren't considered fully vaccinated until 2 weeks after your second shot. Most side effects are concentrated in the days immediately after vaccination, so all thing things that happened in that window - covid cases - covid deaths - strokes - heart attacks - (etc) were attributed to someone being unvaccinated (or partially vaccinated). It's hard to overstate the effect of this on the statistics around the effectiveness of the shots. Basically most of negative effects of the shots are falsely attributed to the lack of them. Assuming this is true, then the single hold-out juror in the Clancy case does not actually have to follow the judge's instructions (to decide according to the absurd MA law in question). So there's no justification for replacing him, which is what I believe the defense is pushing for. #nevent1q…8c32 very interesting - thank you! it's totally insane also the whole conversation leaves the drs and pharma untouched. I'm good with her being on trial, but they should be up there with her. those hearts and that stupid unicorn sticker... wow blatant infantilizing of the patients Really? I didn't realize this. That's encouraging. I thought that it was a very specific task: to evaluate the evidence within the framework of the law in question. This is such a mess. It seems that the Massachusetts law on insanity is written in such a way that a non guilty verdict is actually the only logical one. If I've understood correctly, all the jurors have to decide is if there is a reasonable doubt that she was in her right mind. And there's plenty of evidence - between dr reports and toxicology - that she was not in her right mind. The law is the problem here. Imagine a world where if there's any possibility that someone might be insane, they can't be convicted of murder. #nevent1q…794z ohhh! I did not realize these got so tall! We have some babies planted How do you use the berries? vaccines are in their own category somehow the propaganda has been very effective https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_s5y9Ls83Q no question - Trump is new level. By most official accounts he did leave the presidency with a lower net worth the first term - not common at all - but I think he's made up for it this term. Most of the earlier US presidents enriched themselves in ways that were not nearly so obvious and crass. Politicians are selfish and corrupt, pretty much without exception. Ironically I think that Trump 1 was one of the only recent US presidents to leave office with less wealth than when he started but he's figured out the ropes since then. But this was the point of the thread: You said that people blame immigrants instead of the ones in power, and I said that in fact voters seem to be pretty focused hating the ones in power more than they hate immigrants. I'm saying that her having killed them was already established before the trial started. MA has a weird law about insanity defense, and if she's found innocent this is going to be a terrible precedent in so many ways. GM, Nostr! this is our second batch of volunteer potatoes from last winter when we dug some of our kitchen compost directly into a bed near the house. Same spot has three small apple trees as well 😁 https://blossom.primal.net/3adff18a93f005fe9020b908886a21bb6506fbb483b901cfa9acecb243c86444.jpg oh, nice! it's lovely For the tent? (Which will sound crazy to most people, but we had one in our tent). Yes, and as with so many interventions you can easily explain it by ignorance, but the pattern is unmistakable: interference tends to lead to less sovereignty, weakened connections, and more dependence on the system. For my first birth in particular, I was in an altered state - the whole universe felt like it had cracked open. It was both empowering and deeply humbling. I know that it's not like that for everyone, but hospital birth protocols seem designed to preclude the sacred. I'm talking about the fact that voters are tending to reject politicians who have been careless with immigration policy. I can't speak to the UK, but in the US the hostility is much more toward them than to recent immigrants themselves, and certainly more toward them than immigrants as a general category. Once a week per muscle group? I've finally gotten back to some of my workouts, and I have kettlebells in there 2x/week (along with some bodyweight like pushups). With the bells I do some swings, then deadlifts, bulgarian split squats (35lb), cossack squats, some upper body work (20 lb). I've been considering splitting them by upper/lower so that each of those gets once/week, which sounds like what you're suggesting? worth a read - #nevent1q…hm4m The reason that Farage has so much support is that people are in fact blaming the people pulling the strings I don't believe that anyone at DSA started with "Ladies, gentlemen..." ooh, I'm sorry. Glad she's fine now, and thanks for chiming in here. I'm curious to hear your answer to @nprofile…09d3 question. Interesting. I've had a theory for a while that separating mother and baby after the birth - and all of the interventions like the ones you mentioned that are antithetical to our biological expectation - are probably behind post-partum depression. After carrying a child for 9 months and giving birth, every cell of your body is craving contact with that baby. Without that - and maybe without the other steps leading to the birth, all of which release oxytocin - I wonder if something in the woman's brain concludes that something must have gone terribly wrong. I missed the hormone question. Men who murder likely have issues with their testosterone levels but that should not enter into the trial, and arguably anyone who kills their children - any children, let alone their own - will show some kind of chemical imbalance. Did her defense actually bring up hormones? I wish that there were more conversation about how deadly these pharma cocktails can be, but I agree with you. In fact if she is found guilty in another trial, I hope that this is the conclusion (I doubt it will be, but that would be great): if you choose to put yourself into the hands of this system, you are still responsible for your actions. I just read that Lindsay Clancy was on 13 medications 😳 wow sometimes I wonder if these are real people, but what would be the point of a bot that says this kind of stuff? there you go, trying to use logic 😂 "...then wouldn’t occasionally acting like you’re insanely in love with your partner through intimate things make you actually feel more in love with them? The surprises, gifts, attentiveness, prioritizing, appreciation, etc. " Yes 😊 The question isn't whether she killed her kids. It's whether she was in her right mind when she did so. fun that we all get to learn some of it with you! She's so cute 🥰 I'm sorry, Kip! There's something between sinking into the stress and fear (not helpful) and trying to talk yourself out of it (rarely helpful). Can you allow those feelings - don't expand on them but don't fight them either - as you take the actions you want to take? when you're not in a battle with your feelings, you often gain some breathing room. oh dear! I hope you had a good trip (otherwise) and that you heal up well! I'm enjoying listening to Candace Owens these days, but I'm trying to keep all this in my mind at the same time: - she could totally be captured but in a way that I can't quite see yet; - if not captured now, could be/likely will be in the future; - in any case, her work can be a very entertaining distraction; and, regardless of all of that: - there's an aspect of decentralized investigation behind her work that is very cool; - it's good to see more collaboration between some segments of the left and right in the US; - and mostly - I find it genuinely encouraging to think of the mess we're in as a spiritual war, because then I know where to put my energy. Just after I wrote that post, by husband drove up with cinder blocks 😂. Looks like we're going with the cinder block structure after all. And yes- the flexibility of it seems great! Do you cover it when it's full? I literally saw this design for the first time yesterday! My husband and I are about to build one (slightly different version, with metal stakes in the ground as the main structure - but still one piece of firewood deep to allow lots of airflow). That's when you ask where in their backyard they would like the bear delivered. Thank you! Have to reconnect my wallet Yeah, it's not great. One of the worst things about this video is that the blond one clearly did her hair and makeup so that she would look really cute before pretending to drop her baby down the stairs. Americans can be wonderful but some of the stuff that comes out of my country...😳 You need to follow more people (or different people?). I don't see crypto talk all day on Nostr. this is really disturbing wtf is wrong with people cool! Also they host a lot of events, and many draw people that are like-minded to you in terms of sovereignty. Good hub to have close by 😎 https://blossom.primal.net/f77feeacc4a3268ba1c983011f6c2c0ff7ee89dd63b381457470c3644514b264.jpg Aww! that's nice to hear I think I've passed through Staunton. Is it near Polyface? Logical fallacy, that We have a richer community around us now - in our cabin at the edge of the woods - than we did when we lived in a rowhome in the city ooh this is heartbreaking. I'm so sorry 💔 Yes. It's the "how dare you for noticing" playbook Also, you're basically adding your feed to the surveillance footage. Not great in general, and not good for your privacy. nice!! I think we had the same tent, but we kept (and actually still keep) our kitchen outside. Which has its challenges... So cool to see this : ) don't clients require upkeep etc? conclusion: if you're an ant, stay away from labs better yet: if you're a living creature, keep maximum distance from "scientists" ugh - that sucks With cameras the most impt aspect for your privacy you is where the data is stored, and if you make sure that it's local (and not uploaded to some cloud) then it's yours to use as you might need. I don't think anyone serious pretends that the US invented democracy, and I think that studying the Iroquois Confederacy was part of Madison's prep as he drafted the constitution. (if not Madison, one of the other framers) I have been very critical of this president, but credit where credit is due - if this happens, it would be awesome. Food sovereignty and decentralization are fundamental to human thriving. (I think this is essentially Massie's Prime Act, but I could be wrong, and unfortunately if Trump does this with an Executive Order, it can be undone with a stroke of a pen by the next president. Still, I hope it works somehow.) #nevent1q…zczy that's not what he's saying My guess is that the USDA oversight is probably are good for something, but to set things up so that they create a bottleneck ... it's a mess and creates a very centralizing force on what could be a fairly decentralized food supply. yeah, exactly. I hope this works, and I appreciate that he's calling attention to the stranglehold of the major meat processors, but the hubris of govt is incredible: "I have decided that I will allow you to..." thank you! I had a wallet connected and no longer do - just have to set aside the time to get that going but, see, there's a special rule about this: before they're recalled they are in fact totally safe because they've been approved. And then after they're recalled everyone knows that they're unsafe so they don't reflect at all on the safety testing required by the FDA. it's magic interesting this describes a lot of what we see in the world today The legal definition of insanity is different than medical one, which I'm guessing is big issue for Clancy right now? And even for the medical one - according to which men who kill children in fact are found to have very high levels of psychosis and depression - you're trusting the same profession that totally failed Lindsay Clancy. Support for maternal mental health is GREAT. I don't think anyone is arguing against that. sure - the proximal drivers are those emotions. That doesn't rule out "and insane" Clancy was feeling something before she strangled her kids - desperation? anger? emptiness? Those were the proximal drivers. But people feel those all the time and don't kill their children. We don't decide that because she felt desperate she must not also have been out of her mind in that moment. it goes against every biological instinct I genuinely don't understand this one - the justice arbiter shoe fits you? This thread is actually helping me clarify what bothers me so much about the reactions to this case. I do think most conservatives are willfully ignoring most of the issues involved. That's disingenuous and really annoying. On the other side, the commitment to and identification with victimhood among her supporters is disturbing. *Children are murdered* "yes, but misogyny! we are the righteous!" a man who kills his family is crazy. No one sane kills their kids. Nice!! have fun 😊 (kettle bells for me today) Yes! The word "agency" kept coming to mind as I was thinking about the Clancy issue today. People assume that she had no agency at all, and I don't know how to say that without sounding like I'm not sympathetic. (Because in fact I am sympathetic, and I cannot imagine what hell that woman is in, and I think we should be focused much more on the doctors that treated her and whatever drug cocktail she was on). But somehow people seem to imply that we are all just at the mercy of doctors who don't listen. Something like - what can you do? No one listened to her and then she killed her kids. You don't have to entrust your mind and your family's well being to a profession that has shown over and over again to be totally untrustworthy. I'm not sure that this is true - but if so - wouldn't it be all the more reason to be sympathetic to the man in question (but also be cautious about someone who identified closely with him?)