<unnamed>

Public Key

npub1kt3zf9yrvf9su558yfepw9mzvqax6yc57gwqecp035jal2ktk30shk98al

Profile Code

nprofile1qqst9c3yjjpkyjcw22rjyushza3xqwndzv20y8qvuqhc6fwl4t9mghcpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq3vamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwwpexjmtpdshxuet5qyt8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnp0faxzmt09ehx2aqs6pcpy

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

relay.primal.net

nostr.azzamo.net

Last Notes

2026-03-14 07:45:25 UTC

- reply

Sadly Paraguay is not a good option any more https://nitter.net/JAN3com/status/2031811241610502571

2026-03-12 12:51:32 UTC

- reply

When someone is calling for your death and walking towards you brandishing a knife, it's natural to kick them in the groin. It's called self-defence.

2026-03-05 07:05:51 UTC

- reply

It's way less when you price in custiodial/beta platform risks, locking capital for 6 months and the fees. I estimate the chances at below 2% but having my buy No trigger below 90%. The other side has plenty of margin to price in those factors.

2026-03-02 07:36:25 UTC

- reply

Community warning: a shitfork liar who pushes others onto the fork but refuses to swap sats to get more on its side, hence himself deeming it less valuable
#nevent1q…lymc

2026-03-01 16:24:54 UTC

- reply

In another words, the previous rules where whenever MASF will succeed. The altered ones are about if MASF+UASF will succeed. Big difference. The change was beneficial for those holding Yes shares (shares supporting 110).

2026-03-01 13:13:40 UTC

- reply

The previous rules concerned whenever 110 would activate and be enforced before the expected flag day activation.

2026-03-01 12:52:25 UTC

- reply

It’s a horrible precedent that you’ve changed the market while it was already running. You should have created an alternative market instead.

2026-02-26 14:28:18 UTC

Shitforkers launched an attack on our money. Don't let them carry out an attack on something even more precious: our time.

2026-02-26 10:35:49 UTC

- reply

They bent a little bit by not deprecating the datacarriersize setting

2026-02-26 10:21:54 UTC

21M [BTC] > 21M [BTC] + 21M [BLV]

2026-02-26 06:46:41 UTC

- reply

Community warning: a shitfork liar who provides a platform for the fork promotion but refuses to swap sats to get more on its side, hence deeming himself it less valuable
#nevent1q…tmpw

2026-02-26 06:44:06 UTC

- reply

Will you back up your words with sats? Otherwise, it’s an explicit shitfork promotion and proof that your words can’t be trusted. I can also offer a trustless swap of sats between the two chains. I’m willing to accept smaller amounts than @nprofile…5pxz does.
#nevent1q…tmpw
#nevent1q…u6ky

2026-02-23 06:09:30 UTC

- reply

It is not a debate but an attack on bitcoin. Time for debate is during the consensus‑building process, before announcing activation, which should be announced only for changes with a wide consensus.

2026-02-21 13:34:58 UTC

- reply

And shun shitforkers, the social layer defends bitcoin too 🛡️

2026-02-21 13:29:35 UTC

- reply

Community warning: a shitfork liar who pushes others onto the fork but refuses to swap sats to get more on its side, hence himself deeming it less valuable
#nevent1q…ddyp

2026-02-21 13:13:36 UTC

- reply

Community warning: a shitfork liar who sold out to provide a platform for the fork promotion but refuses to swap sats to get more on its side, hence deeming himself it less valuable
#nevent1q…ddyp

2026-02-20 11:34:24 UTC

- reply

Community warning: a shitfork liar who pushes others onto the fork but refuses to swap sats to get more on its side, hence himself deeming it less valuable
#nevent1q…lymc

2026-02-18 11:09:55 UTC

- reply

That's cool but then for that market creating it by me is not a good option. It would be shewed. The fork proponents wouldn't trust me. I will bet if you create a market with at least one month later date, for example 10/31 to be symbolic.

2026-02-18 10:35:06 UTC

- reply

Meaning who's an arbiter of truth and decides on outcomes when closing user created markets?

2026-02-18 10:33:21 UTC

- reply

When it comes to user created markets, who's settling them, creators or Predyx?

2026-02-18 10:22:21 UTC

- reply

Perhaps that wasn't clear but that's how Amethyst displays your profile. The profile is not domain verified. https://cdn.azzamo.media/c9beeb0eb0e3ff2653e6de885025b8ab603cd693786a064cc4b148b8e09178bc.jpg

2026-02-18 09:26:27 UTC

- reply

Does "no BS" mean that you don't run Knots?

2026-02-18 09:24:14 UTC

- reply

Wasn't that market created by Predyx? Normally, Predyx displays who the market creator is. It's not indicated for that market, so it looks like it's created by Predyx.

2026-02-18 09:13:29 UTC

- reply

Community warning: a shitfork liar who sold out to provide a platform for the fork promotion but refuses to swap sats to get more on its side, hence deeming himself it less valuable
#nevent1q…lymc
#nevent1q…c9wj

2026-02-17 13:42:34 UTC

- reply

Can you fix NIP-05 verification of this profile? It looks like a fake one.

2026-02-17 13:42:04 UTC

- reply

That market is not well designed, as unconditional activation will most likely happen a few days after the 1st of September. Also, after activation there need to be fresh UTXOs that are spent and violate BIP110 constraints. It looks like Predyx is run by Knotzis that want to make it look like the fork has higher chances of success.

2026-02-17 09:07:14 UTC

- reply

Markets at Predyx are clear: it’s a shitfork. Likewise all other markets. Indeed it’s also clear from the trustless sats swap market in the Polish 21 TG group, which you now own after my initiative... That’s why you should finally do your job @nprofile…cl8m and start enforcing the rules of the group. You should not allow it to become a platform for shitfork promotion. There has been a long-standing precedent for that in bitcoin communities since the blocksize war. The massive bitcoin community on Reddit is a good example.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/about/
https://cdn.nostrcheck.me/f35eaf3645c164803476e7413682eab0f1630e214c9d4bae2f364cc208a87cbb.webp

2026-02-16 08:03:52 UTC

Exercise your right of freedom of association and take care of your reputation by not associating with shitforkers who attack bitcoin. The social layer protects it too 🛡️

2026-02-12 20:10:11 UTC

- reply

I see your point but we should not underestimate our enemy. It's way easier to constrain bitcoin rules than to relax them. It's a shitfork even in the economic valuation of its proponents so they should be ostracized for promoting it and pay at least social cost for attacking bitcoin.

2026-02-12 15:36:19 UTC

- reply

I'm just offering to swap sats and checking who can be trusted and who sold out to become a shitfork promoter. Indeed gambling here is helping to push a contentious change onto bitcoin by platforming that propaganda. Moreover, not at your own expense but at the cost of all bitcoin users.

2026-02-12 15:31:06 UTC

- reply

I'm just offering to swap sats and checking if I can still trust you or if you sold out to become a shitfork promoter. Indeed gambling here is helping to push a contentious change onto bitcoin by platforming that propaganda. Moreover, not at your own expense but at the cost of all bitcoin users.

2026-02-12 15:18:55 UTC

- reply

Man, I have been looking for a single BIP‑110 promoter who doesn’t consider it a shitfork for over 3 months. I’m willing to swap smaller amounts via a trustless (on‑chain) multisig. It turns out, they’re all full of shit liars who push others towards a fork that they don’t believe will succeed.

2026-02-12 13:08:12 UTC

- reply

Do you care to save face and back your words with sats? Otherwise, you're explicitly providing a platform for shitfork promotion and showing that your words can't be trusted. I already offered you an opportunity to swap sats, so that you can double those on the fork side, in a trustless (onchain) manner.
#nevent1q…tmpw
#nevent1q…t863

2026-02-09 10:35:07 UTC

- reply

Will you back up your words with sats? Otherwise, you're giving a platform for an explicit shitfork promotion and proving that your words can’t be trusted. I can also offer a trustless swap of sats between the two chains. I’m willing to accept smaller amounts than @nprofile…5pxz does.
#nevent1q…ddyp
#nevent1q…u6ky

2026-02-09 10:22:13 UTC

- reply

Considering the organiser’s stance, a fancy one could be:
Shitforky Liar’s Walking Circus

2026-02-09 09:39:24 UTC

- reply

OMG, so now you’re promoting a shitfork backed by BS legal threats… By fighting with CSW, you’ve become like him. Do you want to swap some sats via a trust‑less multisig, doubling them on the fork’s side? If you honestly believe in its success and therefore don’t consider it a shitfork, then it’s a rational decision to make. You can be the first one who actually doesn't consider it a shitfork. If you don't have a whole coin to swap, I'm happy to swap smaller amounts than @nprofile…5pxz does.
#nevent1q…ddyp
#nevent1q…w3mz

2026-02-02 12:14:14 UTC

- reply

Do you care to save face and back your words with sats? Otherwise, you're explicitly promoting a shitfork and showing that your words can't be trusted. I've already offered you an opportunity to swap sats between the chains in a trustless (on-chain) way.
#nevent1q…em7g
#nevent1q…t863

2026-01-30 06:14:53 UTC

- reply

Do you care to save face and back your words with sats? Otherwise, you're explicitly promoting a shitfork and showing that your words can't be trusted. I already offered you an opportunity to enter a trustless (on-chain) futures contract over two months ago...
#nevent1q…lymc
#nevent1q…w3mz

2026-01-29 19:33:11 UTC

- reply

That's all irrelevant in the context of the offer to swap sats between the chains. I despise NFTs, ETH and #BLV

2026-01-29 19:25:51 UTC

- reply

If consider bitcoin in its current form a shitcoin, why you don't want to swap your stash, or at least a part of it, for the fork? You can double your sats on the fork side.

2026-01-29 10:39:52 UTC

- reply

Pushing a contentious fork is gambling. Moreover, not only at your own cost, but at the cost of bitcoin users.

2026-01-29 08:49:14 UTC

- reply

2026-01-29 08:34:15 UTC

- reply

2026-01-29 08:09:29 UTC

- reply

Do you care to save your face and back up your words with sats? Otherwise you're explicitly promoting a shitfork and showing that your words can't be trusted. I already offered you an opportunity to enter a trustless (on-chain) futures contract over two months ago...
#nevent1q…ddyp
#nevent1q…w3mz

2026-01-27 11:21:32 UTC

- reply

Although that doesn't seem to make sense, I wonder if you checked the updated logic after the BIP has changed?
#nevent1q…w3mz

2026-01-24 06:16:38 UTC

- reply

2026-01-22 08:24:43 UTC

For over 2 months, I’ve been challenging shitfork promoters in my native‑language 21 group to enter a futures contract. There are actually a few of them in that group as @nprofile…cl8m allows the group to be used as a platform for promoting the shitfork. I can report that all of the promoters turned out to be full of shit liars who knowingly push others towards a cliff (explicitly promoting a shitfork, a fork they don’t believe will succeed). There’s no genuine support backed by sats in the Polish 21 community. There have been only folks who have expressed interest in taking the same side of the contract, defending 21M against the contentious fork.
My offer remains open and like @nprofile…5pxz I’ll give 10% of my potential winnings from the contract if you refer a BIP-110 proponent into actually making the bet with me but I’m happy to take smaller bets than Rob does.
So whenever you see someone promoting that shitfork, link them to this post so we can both make some bitcoin!
#nevent1q…tmpw

2026-01-13 15:00:43 UTC

- reply

Concerning, or even shocking, is the fact that you’re pushing others towards a fork that you don’t have conviction in. Your economic decision proves that you don’t believe the fork will succeed. Sats are the signal. I’m shocked that you can lie like that, faking confidence.
It’s also concerning that you can’t even come up with any BS excuse of why you’re negating your words with your economic action. I’m shocked that you’re replying with primitive personal attacks instead of honestly trying to address the matter.
I’m defending 21M here from the fork which is being pushed (activation announced) but for which consensus has not been built. Likewise defending the community from shitfork liars. The social layer defends bitcoin too! Also on Nostr.

2026-01-12 13:05:35 UTC

- reply

2025-11-19 12:16:14 UTC

History will remember with glory those who stood up and defended the 21M from contentious forks

2025-11-19 12:14:50 UTC

- reply

Indeed, the fee market achieved that, considering the spam went away and we have <1sat/vB and non-full blocks

2025-11-18 09:52:14 UTC

21M won't turn into 42, #Lukecoin won't happen or will gravitate to 0

2025-11-17 11:46:58 UTC

Bitcoin will survive the #knotsi attack and emerge stronger afterward

2025-11-14 08:27:18 UTC

We'll fight back with words
We'll back up our words in futures/prediction markets
We won't platform the contentious fork propaganda
We'll fight self-custoding our sats
We'll fight running own #Core nodes
We'll fight with our BS blackmail resistant hashrate
We'll crash the #knotsis

2025-11-10 12:14:54 UTC

- reply

I asked a few days ago in my native language group offering flexibility on amount. Although there are people manipulatively pushing non-techie lemmings on that highly contentious and rushed fork no one is willing to back their words with sats. Moreover one of the main BIP444 promoters there, earlier explicitly answered that he believes that the fork has more than 50% chance to become more valuable. Verified, #BLV supporters are full of shit and should not be trusted.

2025-11-10 08:59:15 UTC

- reply

Let's see if the author of the BIP really puts sats behind his words. It's a digital-only new account so it's easy to throw words when long-term you're not risking reputation.

2025-11-05 19:04:57 UTC

- reply

Will you share the code/instructions so that others can also challenge #444clowns from their circles?

2025-11-03 12:22:47 UTC

- reply

Haha the "nothing to worry about" bit was read in between my casual Polish lines, not liable for anyone getting rekt when driving ;)

2025-11-03 05:57:04 UTC

- reply

It's unlikely the bitties would get smaller, prob AI-generated

2025-11-02 09:30:36 UTC

- reply

You mean chopping with Bitaxes?

2025-11-02 06:12:45 UTC

#444clowns of the paranoiaclypse

2025-11-01 06:22:35 UTC

When clowns perform, enjoy the show, it's the peak #tooSoftToFork

2025-10-30 09:43:32 UTC

- reply

Why not cash on #BitcoinWalk?

2025-10-27 19:31:44 UTC

- reply

It sounds like you've attracted a lot of fedposting mate

2025-10-19 06:27:19 UTC

Bitcoin's immune system has clearly misfired and created an autoimmune condition attacking own cells... That's what happens when hatred towards shitcoins clouds rational thinking and creates hysteria.

2025-10-18 11:10:18 UTC

- reply

That's the point that there's not much of a story about Bitcoin Luke Vision as it would require some balls

2025-10-18 06:05:44 UTC

CSW is gone but knotsis took the baton from him and the harassment of Core devs continues... it's a pity though that they don't want to fork off BLV and let the market speak

2025-10-17 11:47:24 UTC

"Bitcoin Core's view (going all the way back to Satoshi, AFAICT) is that Bitcoin is a system secured by economics and self interest.
The knots vision of Bitcoin seems to be a system (in)secured by altruistic hope and populist theocracy-- by cancel culture and paper straw bans."
HRF's Finney Freedom Prize laureate

2025-10-15 15:09:18 UTC

- reply

May be worth to consider switching off or calibrating ads as junk food ads are shown there currently

2025-10-14 06:07:10 UTC

- reply

Nope, got pruned ;)

2025-10-13 13:08:16 UTC

- reply

Interesting term: Positive Return on Coercion
Likewise: Impact Weighted MTH

2025-10-12 15:25:09 UTC

- reply

The parallel here is socialism. Regulation would be telling animals what, when and how to eat and enforcing it by putting non-compliant ones in cages

2025-10-12 15:11:31 UTC

- reply

Sorry not sorry but no receipt, such low value zaps are considered spam #satsAreTheFilter

2025-10-12 15:01:32 UTC

- reply

Happy to provide value

2025-10-11 19:50:39 UTC

- reply

In Poland an engagement ring is worn on the right hand

2025-10-11 12:26:30 UTC

- reply

Be sure it moves to the right hand when you're back in Poland

2025-10-10 16:07:44 UTC

- reply

It's an odd question so to elaborate it's about how market participants value privacy and self-custody. With the arrests of Samourai founders my valuation of bitcoin went down by an order of magnitude. It's still above the current market value though.

2025-10-10 15:38:17 UTC

- reply

Careful about stating it publicly as your heard may baa you for not applying the new filters and not larping nicely in that hysterical whac-a-mole virtue signaling game

2025-10-10 15:26:58 UTC

- reply

Indeed I have studied CS and in particular Computer Networks and Distributed Systems hence can make a competent judgment myself on what actually fights spam and minimizes its impact versus what brings more harm.

2025-10-09 20:44:33 UTC

- reply

It sounds like you've been just dreaming about running #Core as there's no automatic update function. Moreover Core provides patch releases (most importantly including security fixes) for two previous versions and there's culture of running old versions for safety of the network. Compare it with pressure to update to get the latest filters. It's like asking for a bug to seriously harm bitcoin. For example imagine impact of the accidental LevelDB hardfork if more node runners had rushed to update.

2025-10-09 08:52:14 UTC

- reply

Stay humble and eat steaks

2025-10-06 06:43:56 UTC

Within less than a month over half of #Knots users updated their nodes... perhaps their prophet should save their time and implement auto update if they give him such blind trust

2025-10-04 15:16:29 UTC

- reply

Based as fuck, considering that such a post and every interaction with it may be deemed an arrestable offence in George Orwell's country

2025-10-04 15:02:47 UTC

- reply

He's prob thinking: she's such a good mother, we need to stack more babies

2025-09-29 20:40:28 UTC

- reply

A billhook on a #BitcoinWalk day keeps $5 wrenches away

2025-09-27 18:47:14 UTC

- reply

On #Poznan #BitcoinWalk "look at my fucking orange trousers" call emerged
#nevent1q…k5hj
It's so based it won't be stopped by a centralized blog: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/style/look-at-my-fing-red-trousers-how-one-blog--ruined-the-ultimate-u/

2025-09-27 14:38:18 UTC

- reply

London calling: look at my fucking red trousers!

2025-09-21 19:29:44 UTC

#Poznan #BitcoinWalk #proofOfWalk https://cdn.nostrcheck.me/ab0540e5a16a6496b4bde042c7a3383535005f6678dc668f644e3063d16e1150.webp

2025-09-17 19:13:41 UTC

- reply

Have you considered cash trades? There's significant bitcoin community in Madeira so it should be doable.

2025-09-17 18:00:26 UTC

Zapraszamy na #Poznan #BitcoinWalk
https://bitcoinwalk.org/poznan/

2025-09-01 12:15:45 UTC

- reply

Can you cover the topic of photoaging please?

2025-08-08 09:11:34 UTC

A precedent around privacy and self-custodian services has been set but the price has not moved…

2025-08-04 19:10:15 UTC

- reply

To be fair, statistically speaking there was definitely less than 21% chance of being wrong with that assumption

2025-08-03 19:37:33 UTC

#proofOfWalk #Poznan #BitcoinWalk
https://cdn.nostrcheck.me/cc3380c86f5f79f892d2ebbfcb5924a91203a01b59e0beb5a77cd175fe274223.jpeg

2025-08-03 09:01:22 UTC

Lulu Cafe Avenida g. 12. Zapowiada się, że ciągle będzie padać wczesnym popołudniem, więc aktywujemy plan C ale w Avenidzie bo to ma większy sens biorąc pod uwagę, że mamy gości przyjeżdżających pociągiem. Jeżeli potem się wypada, rozważymy spacer.
https://www.avenidapoznan.com/gastronomia/lulu-cafe/

2025-08-02 21:04:45 UTC

- reply

We'll go ahead with plan B: #nevent1q…02az

2025-08-02 20:57:09 UTC

- reply

Plan ₿: #nevent1q…02az

2025-08-02 20:53:14 UTC

Zapraszamy na #Poznan #BitcoinWalk
https://bitcoinwalk.org/poznan/

2025-08-01 11:17:35 UTC

- reply

What you are describing is getting informational about reputation from trusted sources, not anonymous reports.
How it could be good for men, if they can't access the platform and women there are anonymous? Such an app could also provide the same functionality for men as there are many bad women too in the dating market. The creators chose to discriminate based on sex as probably they're are feminatzis full of hatred towards men.

2025-08-01 08:46:30 UTC

- reply

In the first place, they should not create a sexists app designed to dox and defame men which violates an ancient rule of law that accused should learn who their accuser is... Indeed they are designed in a way that men can't even check if they're being accused of something hence can't defend from false accusations...