<unnamed>

Public Key

npub1e37c4mperqtl8nt6xchhmykfamsjjj2x8x3sd0wk96weuc5gn6kqpmgdms

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsvclv2asu3s9lne4arvtmajty7acfff9rrngcxhhtza8v7v2yfatqpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejsz9rhwden5te0wfjkccte9ejxzmt4wvhxjmcpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqgg26zp

Publishing to

nostr.wine

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Last Notes

2023-06-07 10:21:06 UTC

- reply

📅 Original date posted:2012-07-09
📝 Original message:On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Stefan Thomas <moon at justmoon.de> wrote:
> As a user I don't want to
> be recommended a random client but the most sensible choice.
> ... wiki page ...
I think this is indeed a controversal topic. I just want to add the
remark, that it would make sense to have the wiki page *and* this more
"official" page. I would envision this official page as some kind of
"stamp of approval" which includes some sensible criteria, e.g. it
works for many users, the development hasn't stopped some time ago
(bitrot), code review, the author(s) is/are known to the community,
private keys aren't accessible by the webservice, etc.
The ordering should be by alphabet, in a vertical list with a short
unbiased description.
Harald

2023-06-07 02:43:42 UTC

- reply

📅 Original date posted:2011-12-16
🗒️ Summary of this message: Taaki questions the value of IBANs when Bitcoin addresses already have their own checksums, while the other person argues for compatibility with existing software solutions.
📝 Original message:On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 21:10, Amir Taaki <zgenjix at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Especially when we already have bitcoin addresses with their own checksums-
> what value do IBANs add?
Well, I'm not an expert like you, but one benefit would be to be
compatible with existing software solutions that are based on using
IBANs.
H