<unnamed>

Public Key

npub1cxqje22r8ewnr30rt625d58cr8gpdjnw405cq5765m2qsvghnmpquz6wtz

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsvrqfv49pnuhf3ch34a92x6rupn5qkefh2h6vq20d2d4qgxyteassprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0d4hhxarj9ecxjmntqyqqz9thwden5te0wfjkccte9ehx7um5wghxuet5qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnswf5k6ctv9ehx2aqwtrh93

Publishing to

relay.momostr.pink

relay.nostr.net

relay.primal.net

Last Notes

2026-06-27 15:43:18 CEST

STREAM: Making Live2D models move in Rust! 🦀
My from-scratch Live2D renderer works!!! 🚀
Let's add masking and parameters to make the model move!
🕐 Jun 28 13:00 JST / 04:00 UTC
▶️ https://youtube.com/live/wgG4hcBsOJo
#VTuber #ENVTuber #Live2D #Rust
https://media.vt.social/media_attachments/files/116/822/363/168/318/093/original/576191b6e6d8bb5f.png

2026-05-07 10:31:03 CEST

- reply

Yes, this means that anyone downloading "open" models potentially puts themselves in as much legal risk as torrenting a movie does.

2026-04-02 10:48:02 CEST

- reply

That's fair, but like, sigh.
It's really sad that in all these years nobody sat down and actually reported this properly... and we still don't know what causes it.

2026-02-12 13:51:36 CET

- reply

Also I checked my desktop client and it also broke, just differently. It does not agree on the number of people in the room. It also seems to think I'm not myself, or at least my avatar is gone (even though it displays on other rooms).
Jank, jank everywhere...
https://media.vt.social/media_attachments/files/116/057/747/160/329/713/original/fd4c2d567bc9ad2c.png

2025-12-01 17:06:27 CET

- reply

Aki.

2025-11-24 05:56:32 CET

LB: What is up with people in the open/repairable hardware orbit crashing out or tanking their company's reputation lately???

2025-04-16 12:33:55 CEST

- reply

Do CPUs desperately need more ILP? I thought modern CPUs were quite crazy good at that (Apple is a good example).
I think the issue is most software isn't parallelizable and sequential code is much easier to reason about... that's why VLIW didn't really catch on. Nobody wants to schedule instructions manually, and compilers aren't any better at it than superscalar CPU frontends.
That's how we ended up with the CPU/GPU dichotomy. Sequential code that can be parallelized at the batch level ("SPMD") runs on multicore CPUs, the subset of that which can process multiple data units at once uses SIMD (manually or autovectorized), and embarrassingly parallel code (low branching) that doesn't need low latency for dispatch ends up as SIMT on GPUs, while still being programmed mostly as sequential code working on a single unit (the parallelization is implemented in hardware/drivers).
At the end of the day there will always be underutilized silicon... any time you have different types of resources (ALUs, etc.) their distribution will never match the usage of real world workloads most of the time.

2025-03-20 11:30:42 CET

- reply

If you don't believe me, look at what happens when you configure an EQ with a reeeeally high Q (super steep/complex frequency response), and play back a click through it!
https://vt.social/media/media_attachments/files/114/194/293/504/019/267/original/159fd79ec11da4c4.mp4

2025-03-10 22:57:08 CET

- reply

It's possible to use HCI via firmware API (see `esp_vhci_host_send_packet()`), though there are probably very few applications that do this. Most would use direct and higher level Bluetooth APIs.
At the end of the day, the number of actual devices/applications where the undocumented commands have an actual security impact is probably close to zero...

2025-03-10 20:54:02 CET

- reply

Sorry, I don't know much about that stuff ^^;;

2025-03-10 13:48:20 CET

- reply

I think the idea is that ESP32 uses HCI internally within the same chip, between user code and the Bluetooth host controller. So it's still HCI, but in a use case where it doesn't really matter.

2024-10-07 15:56:52 CEST

From a Discord comment about this post:
> you know, i'm surprised lina and cyan talk about something so personal publicly
I think people don't write enough about healthy relationship dynamics. Sure, it's personal, but how are others supposed to learn what is healthy and what isn't if we don't talk about it?
The internet is full of horror stories about abuse, neglect, weaponized incompetence, cheating... but you almost never see long posts about positive relationship situations. The bad stories are a good reference for what not to do... but how are people going to learn what to do?
The way relationships are presented in media is very stereotyped, dry and often ritualistic (and sometimes actually veering on abuse or toxicity even when that is not the intent), but it's the only reference a lot of young people have for this stuff. Is that really okay?
I get the feeling a lot of people fall into "tolerable" relationships because they feel obliged to, or due to peer or family pressure, and they never realize that's not how it's supposed to be, because they just don't know. They think that as long as you aren't having regular fights with your partner and there is no physical abuse, that's a healthy relationship. But that's just the lowest bar...
I waited many years until I found Cyan, but I'm so glad I did. 💙
https://vt.social/users/cyan/statuses/113256887195850285

2024-09-10 00:28:39 CEST

4 days until our stream~ ✨
Each day we'll share a secret slide from our presentation! 💙
https://vt.social/users/lina/statuses/113104093914716150
https://vt.social/media/media_attachments/files/113/109/953/223/865/861/original/5423efbdfd656708.png