<unnamed>

Public Key

npub1v2n2g830p7pzgkrzzk7wyxudfvw87svxyt3dgahrj7xa4vf2edpsscetnt

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsx9f4yrchslq3ytp3pt08zrwx5k8rlgxrz9ck5wm3e0rw6ky4vkscpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgqgdwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkcqg5waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wdejhg4p2ee3

Publishing to

Last Notes

2026-03-14 22:29:18 CET

Canada loses most jobs in 17 years outside of pandemic! That's a bit... crazy?
https://blossom.primal.net/6e95669a417a08a3d73807a32e93f828be8121bd3d370a368cd77191bb18bf73.png
#economy

2026-03-14 22:20:12 CET

Another surprisingly cool album discovered on the depths of the internet
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzYD56hKF-8
#music

2026-03-14 11:27:09 CET

- reply

This guy (and friends) as soon as the Euro ends will sell the country to China. No gold, uncompetitive industry, old demographics, high debt.
And talking like they were in a position to say anything...

2026-03-10 16:30:22 CET

- reply

En que sentido, como era? Cual era la situación?

2026-02-23 13:09:35 CET

Never forget Aaron Swartz
The goal is freedom, not money. The goal is freedom.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vz06QO3UkQ

2026-02-22 14:59:01 CET

- reply

Yeah, I really don't see it like that. I think the decision of completely disallowing users to choose if they want or not to cap the OP_RETURN was not a good move by Core and Knots is better for allowing choice but:
This, on the other hand, is something else.
The risk argument is weak here. If and ONLY if there's a move by governments because of anything that is on the Bitcoin chain, THEN we should move there. Not now.
This is a weak move otherwise. Bitcoin doesn't need this right now.

2026-01-17 20:18:59 CET

- reply

Won't the FED lowering interest rates also lower mortgage rates?
That would be because of this latest idea/law of disallowing them. https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/16/trump-investors-homes-family-offices.html

2026-01-17 20:10:25 CET

Trump's greatest victory in this mandate might just be making real estate more available to people. This by lowering interest rates, providing more supply by reducing institutional demand, providing an easier path for that capital to flow into Bitcoin, etc.
If they solve that AND healthcare, the game changes dramatically in 2028 for the Republicans.
What do you think?
#bitcoin #politics

2026-01-17 13:58:22 CET

- reply

Yes, the new global/local banks will be multi-collateral. Bitcoin, gold, etc.
Although Bitcoin wins in the long term because it'll be much more widely accepted.
It might work at the big capital level-production, but that doesn't mean it will work for everything or everyone.
Capital networks are truly decentralizing. This is just another very large global player.

2025-12-10 17:55:47 CET

When all cars have AI, driving will be much safer.
Just a random thought.

2025-11-06 18:25:00 CET

- reply

I don't think gold is fake, I think that the gold system can be faked. In other words, most people buy gold through a system that is likely very fake (paper gold).
And apart from that, physical gold, which I do think can be a good investment now, is also not that useful in terms of medium exchange.
It's just a very captured system. When you buy gold you're buying into a system that is just very fake and artificial. And doing that in a world of Bitcoin is like buying a new gas car when the EVs are going to be much better in the long term. It'll still work but it's simply the past.

2025-11-06 17:48:11 CET

- reply

The only reason I dislike gold is that I can't emotionally disassociate it from fake money, fake system, fake people, etc.
It's a flaw because rationally speaking gold will be great in the next decades. But it's just annoying to invest in this fake system (gold), when you can just invest in a better system (Bitcoin), that can work better even though it'll likely be much more volatile.

2025-09-08 19:12:44 CEST

- reply

Yes, that's always what governments do. They called it Financial Repression in the 1940s. Everybody does the same thing since the Central Banks were invented, including Weimar Germany. Inflate the debt away with a soft or hard reset, i.e start "backing" your currency with hard assets, land, gold, oil reserves, Bitcoin, etc, launch a new currency or just monetize those assets by creating mechanisms that allow governments to use it as collateral somehow to borrow money, stuff like this, without creating a new currency.
There's many ways to do this, with a new or just the same currency, soft or hard links.
Basically governments monetize the asset part of their balance sheets, i.e land, gold, bitcoin, oil reserves, etc, etc, and then they do a soft or hard link between that and their fiat currency.
This time it's definitely going to be gold and Bitcoin because it's the easiest way to do it because Bitcoin is a neutral reserve system, very easy to be audited globally, etc. It's just the perfect collateral.

2025-08-21 12:40:52 CEST

- reply

Honestly, and this might not be what you want to hear, but I think abolishing the state has always been a very unrealistic idea.
Reforming the state is a much better idea.
Lately I've been diving into UBI and I now have more hope for an actual good use of the State.
The problem is that if you put yourself into very opositional/dualistic positions, life will feel very tough. Especially regarding the State. People that are truly anti-State are very few in society.

2025-08-04 17:10:23 CEST

- reply

Yeah, I think I get what you mean and I think we fundamentally agree with the ideal.
For example, if I may ask, would you move to and invest in an El Salvador, Bukele, ultra Bitcoin-based country somewhere in the world BUT that has a small 0,1% wealth tax to fund a UBI for the people?
You know what I mean? And in that sense it wouldn't be a tax per se because you'd be voluntarily invest in it because you believe in the project.
I think this is an example of a nation state of the future.
But like you're saying, I also think that we're going to have a bunch of communities like @nprofile…wtt3 eheh :D, pure voluntaryist, affordable, open, permissionless communities around the world and yes thus that absolutely means a collapse or a complete parallel, network state like, community (like I think you'd like to call it :D) or alternative to the current nation states.
I'm working on both ends/games. At the municipal/global parallel level (what I think you kind of call communities), with FreeVillages and then something else at national level, with something that I'm going to talk about soon for Portugal and any nation state in the world.
I think we should be working in both games simultaneously. The current nation state power structure and the new world (Bitcoin, Nostr). And then in the middle there will be the golden nuggets.

2025-06-23 14:00:37 CEST

- reply

Are they really companies? Or government workers?

2025-06-22 15:59:46 CEST

I find it incredible how people so willingly accept Government contracts. In practice everybody that accepts or is part of a government contract, especially if that government/State is not a direct democracy and the people didn't vote for that specific contract, it's in effect the most common and widespread form of legalized stealing.
I will never understand how people accept this.
Some benefit immensely by being close to the State, while others are oppressed and persecuted with everything.
Don't you think something has to be changed?

2025-05-24 17:46:24 CEST

- reply

What book in this case?