jimbocoin
jimbocoin 🃏

The SUPERCYCLE guy.

Public Key

npub1v9qy0ry6uyh36z65pe790qrxfye84ydsgzc877armmwr2l9tpkjsdx9q3h

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsxzsz83jdwztcapd2qulzhspnyjvn6jxcypvrl0w3aahp40j4smfgpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpzfmhxue69uhhqatjwpkx2urpvuhx2uc5yfas8

Publishing to

nos.lol

purplepag.es

Author Public Key

npub1v9qy0ry6uyh36z65pe790qrxfye84ydsgzc877armmwr2l9tpkjsdx9q3h

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-08-02 15:49:26 UTC

A hardware wallet has ONE JOB: to protect your seed material from leaks during use.
A lot of people were using their devices for more than that, to their detriment. #Bitcoin

2026-08-02 15:39:42 UTC

- reply

There are plenty of ways of assessing if a specific bit stream is “random”. It basically comes down to measuring diversity of values and looking for patterns.
The simplest check is “all zeros” or “all ones”. Those are obviously non-random at the scale of a Bitcoin seed (128 bits plus).
But a repeating pattern is also non-random. So alternating zeros and ones (“010101010…01”) is also obviously non-random as is other alternating patterns (“00110011…0011”).
The problem in the ColdCard case is that all of the seeds they produced would have passed these checks. The problem wasn’t in the diversity of zeros and ones in the seeds, or patterns resident within a specific seed.
The problem was the distribution of seeds. No local check on the produced values can assert a global problem like that. The only way to detect that class of problem is by auditing the code, which no one sufficiently did until now.

2026-08-02 15:33:18 UTC

- reply

If you’re going to those lengths anyway, I’d encourage you to consider multisig.
A very simple multisig setup would be 2-of-2 where one seed is in software, and the other is resident on a signing device. A desktop wallet like Sparrow makes this relatively easy to set up.
If you use Sparrow, one of the seeds will just be in the encrypted wallet file already, so it’d not any more difficult, practically, to sign than if you only had the signing device.
A 2-of-2 multisig doubles the bits of entropy in your system, making it significantly more secure than single sig.
Everyone’s trying to figure out how to put all their eggs in the most secure basket. Multisig is basket-diversification.

2026-08-02 15:08:33 UTC

- reply

Yeah definitely. I think it’ll depend on the person. Some people like you and me take it super seriously and are sweating bullets in a sound dampened bunker. Other people are lazily throwing dice in their dining room (“this is neat! Now I’m bored”).
Dice are a good source of entropy. But the problem is the human element. The system does not consist of the entropy source alone. It’s the source + the person + the tech.
So with respect to dice, it can fail in any of those three ways. The dice could be bad (unlikely). The person could get lazy or otherwise fuck up (likely). The hardware could have been tampered with or have a bug (unlikely).
I designed my SeedPicker Solitaire solution to be:
1. Easy to perform.
2. Hard to fuck up.
3. Fast.
4. Produce enough entropy.
People say do 100 dice rolls because that’s prudent and gives you a buffer. But it also causes people to get bored and skip steps.
While dice are good sources of entropy proper, they’re not as good sources of compliance as they could be. Hard to do (effort). Easy to fuck up (laziness). Slow.
Anyway, that’s my rationale for inventing a deck-of-shuffled-cards based system. A shuffled deck of cards has enough entropy. The skill of shuffling is widely dispersed and easily learned. The Solitaire technique yields enough entropy even if the user fucks it up in one way or another. (It takes multiple categorical fuckups to reduce your entropy to an attackable level).

2026-08-02 13:22:22 UTC

- reply

HOW TO FUCK UP DICE ROLLS
The scenario we're considering is someone using a ColdCard to create a new Bitcoin seed with dice rolls. The question is, what can go wrong?
TOO FEW ROLLS
The simplest thing that can go wrong is entering too few dice rolls. For a fair die, 50 rolls is the minimum. 100 is plenty. If you only roll 20 times, your wallet will be at risk.
HUMAN LAZINESS
The most common way people screw up dice rolls is human laziness. People get bored halfway through and start mashing buttons or trying to "invent" random numbers in their heads, which drastically reduces entropy.
UNFAIR DICE
An unlikely thing to go wrong would be using wildly unfair die. A purist would recommend using casino dice, which are intentionally balanced, but many people will just use any available game dice.
A fair die encodes 2.585 bits of entropy per roll. Suppose your die so weighted that it NEVER lands on 6. In that case, you've only got log2(5) = 2.322 bits per roll.
At 50 rolls, you have 2.322 x 50 = 116.1 bits total. This is BELOW the minimum 128 bits required.
However, our hypothetical unfair die, rolled 100 times, produces 232.2 bits of entropy, which is ABOVE the 128-bit threshold. So even an unfair die can produce sufficient entropy if rolled enough times.
DATA ENTRY FAILURE
Hypothetically, the user could enter the values incorrectly. The buttons on a ColdCard are not always easy to press. Someone could roll the dice 100 times but fail to register some rolls, which would reduce the total entropy.
MENU SYSTEM FAILURE
Hypothetically, the user could fail to use the feature correctly. Maybe they got to the screen for entering dice rolls, entered all the numbers, but then hit BACK rather than proceeding to lock it in.
SUPPLY CHAIN ATTACK
Even if you do everything perfectly, you’re trusting the device.
One could imagine a scenario where the ColdCard had been physically tampered with (a supply chain attack) so that no matter what you enter for your dice rolls, it produces a seed the attacker already knows. A similar attack successfully drained funds from fake Trezor devices. While I haven't heard of it happening to a ColdCard, it's in the realm of possibility. https://www.kaspersky.com/blog/fake-trezor-hardware-crypto-wallet/48155/%5D(https://www.kaspersky.com/blog/fake-trezor-hardware-crypto-wallet/48155/
Those are the main failure points off the top of my head. I hope this helps!

2026-08-01 20:41:24 UTC

- reply

The sufficiency comes from the number of dice rolls.
If you roll one die, you get 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6. (6 options)
If you roll two dice, you get 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, or 66. (6 x 6 = 36 options)
If you roll three dice, you get 111, 112, 113, 114, …, 663, 664, 665 or 666. (6 x 6 x 6 = 216 options)
And so on. Each dice you roll multiplies the total number of options by 6.
So if you roll 100 dice, the number of options is 6^100 = 6.533×10⁷⁷ This is an unimaginably vast number.
Vetting that the rolls produce the seed is secondary. The important point is that each roll multiplies the search space, and 100 is plenty.

2026-08-01 14:38:58 UTC

#Bitcoin #memestr
https://image.nostr.build/f81c382804d208fc76b64e3243e486d6a5ccb8687098ea595b4a16bc6e97efb2.jpg

2026-08-01 00:18:00 UTC

E N T R O P Y
#nevent1q…az3h

2026-07-31 22:22:03 UTC

- reply

The point of the airgap is to reduce the likelihood your seed leaks during signing.
The alternative is to plug the device into the machine (USB) or have it communicate over some other channel (BlueTooth, camera + QR codes).
Airgapped with PSBT or QR is the least leaky available option. But again, the point is to protect the seed during signing.
Not to generate seeds. Not to protect data at rest.

2026-07-31 21:01:41 UTC

- reply

He’s saying that knowing where the coin went won’t get it back.

2026-07-31 21:00:55 UTC

Possession may be 9/10 of the law. But it’s 10/10 of the #Bitcoin
#nevent1q…h998

2026-07-31 21:00:02 UTC

- reply

Great question. At some point, in order to use Bitcoin, you’re going to need a computer.
Hardware wallets compute all the time. For example, they compute addresses from XPUBs. They compute XPUBs from seeds and so on.
A BIP-39 checksum word contains bits from the SHA256 of the actual entropy payload. Calculating this SHA256 sum by hand is intractable.
So, in my opinion, the hardware wallet SHOULD be wiling to generate a checksum word for you based on the incoming entropy. ColdCard will do this. I believe SeedSigner will as well. Last I checked, Sparrow WILL NOT do this for you. There are various other tools that may have this capability.
But yeah, at the end of the day, you need multiple independent vendors to perform these kinds of calculations:
- Generating the last word of a BIP39 seed phrase
- Generating an XPUB from a seed phrase
- Generating a master key fingerprint (XFP) from a seed phrase
- Generating addresses from an XPUB
Hardware wallets are powerful enough to do these things. Whether and how many is up to the vendor to implement.

2026-07-31 20:22:59 UTC

- reply

Well, I meant hypothetically 😅

2026-07-31 20:19:18 UTC

- reply

Plenty of months left in the year 🤝

2026-07-31 20:18:40 UTC

- reply

That’s the right question. Ultimately, that has to be done by a computer. It can either be a general purpose computer or a hardware wallet.
ColdCard has a way to enter dice rolls to generate a seed. SeedSigner also has this capability. There are other implementations as well.

2026-07-31 19:41:50 UTC

- reply

Ice cold

2026-07-31 19:40:59 UTC

- reply

Did not have that on my bingo card

2026-07-31 19:40:43 UTC

- reply

It depends on the computer. Generating good entropy on low power devices has long been a challenge.

2026-07-31 19:39:21 UTC

Listen, if you’re leaving ColdCard due to this issue and switching to Bitkey, just know that you haven’t changed your risk posture towards this class of issue.
You’re still trusting someone else with your seed generation. #Bitcoin

2026-07-31 19:26:00 UTC

- reply

The lesson of this whole debacle is that the only way to KNOW that no one else has your seed is to generate it yourself.
Therefore, any device that does not allow you to supply your own seed is unsuitable for use. Full stop.
So I would NEVER put serious amounts of coin secured by Bitkey, Ballet, Satscard, etc. because I can’t verify that their seed material has not been compromised.
I admit that my opinion in this matter is a bit of an outlier here.

2026-07-31 18:58:23 UTC

- reply

The ColdCard problem is bad entropy generation.
The OpenDIME doesn’t even try to generate entropy. It leaves that entirely up to you.
So this current problem does not apply to the OpenDIME. You could choose not to use it for other reasons, but it’s not vulnerable to the same problem.

2026-07-31 18:44:42 UTC

PSA: I’m available for podcast appearances if anyone needs someone to explain of the problem, describe mitigations, or discuss entropy generation approaches. 🙏 #Bitcoin
https://image.nostr.build/ae22194cadc095538df477bae4428b0a98c1117cbf7be1cb83e6cf4794af66fb.jpg

2026-07-31 18:25:41 UTC

- reply

Security is the only subject

2026-07-31 18:21:07 UTC

- reply

Yeah, this is a nightmare scenario for them. As I have said elsewhere, and maintain, the hardware wallet has one job: to protect your seed material during use.
It is not your hardware wallet’s job to generate entropy. It is not your hardware wallet’s job to resist an attacker long-term with physical access.
But, I accept that my stance is unconventional.
People get into this field with the “don’t trust, verify“ mentality, but then they place all their trust in the single most important thing that must not fail. The generation of their seed.

2026-07-31 18:01:07 UTC

- reply

Could be! That would make sense. It’s not a complicated algorithm. It’s basically SHA256 of the string representation of the concatenation of dice rolls.
There’s some nuance in how you byte encode the string for the binary SHA256 operation, but it would make sense for SeedSigner to have adopted ColdCard’s approach as a de facto standard.

2026-07-31 17:57:51 UTC

- reply

Great question. If your dice are fair, 100 is way more than enough. 50 is the real minimum threshold.
To assert that those rolls produce that seed, you need two devices from different manufacturers running the same algorithm.
For example, the algorithm ColdCard uses has been reproduced in Python. You could put the rolls into your ColdCard, write down the words, then put the same rolls into a computer and run the Python program to see that it yields the same words.
Of course, now you have a new problem: your seed has touched a general purpose computer. So ideally, you would use one that is eternally quarantined and has never touched the Internet.
Or, you can find another signing device manufacturer that uses the same algorithm. SeedSigner might. I’m not sure.
You can see now why just rolling dice is not the panacea that people make it out to be.

2026-07-31 17:44:25 UTC

- reply

100 dice rolls, and that there wasn’t a bug in that code path (that we know of, so far).

2026-07-31 17:43:21 UTC

In Bitcoin, ownership is what you KNOW. You either know the keys and can move coins, or you don’t.
So, how do you KNOW that nobody that you has your seed? The only way is to generate it yourself.
If you trust ANYONE ELSE to generate your seed material, then you DON’T KNOW that no one else has it.
Therefore, you MUST generate your OWN ENTROPY in order to KNOW that it’s safe. #Bitcoin

2026-07-31 17:30:47 UTC

- reply

This but unironically

2026-07-31 17:30:28 UTC

Your signing device has one job: to protect your seed material from leakage during use. The ColdCard has not failed in this.
People were trusting their ColdCards for an additional job: generating entropy. That was the mistake.
It does not help that wallet manufacturers encourage using the devices for entropy generation. #Bitcoin
#nevent1q…ezky

2026-07-31 17:20:32 UTC

- reply

Some of us have been talking about this for a loooong time.

2026-07-31 17:18:43 UTC

- reply

The lesson here is don’t trust your seed generation to a computer, ever.

2026-07-31 17:17:05 UTC

- reply

Yeah, the failure rate is about 1:2500.

2026-07-31 17:16:18 UTC

NOT YOUR KEYS, NOT YOUR COINS.
NOT YOUR ENTROPY, NOT YOUR KEYS.
#Bitcoin
#nevent1q…d85p

2026-07-31 17:13:42 UTC

- reply

Truly sorry to hear that. 🙏

2026-07-31 15:05:09 UTC

- reply

It’s not just “move your coins”. You need to generate seed material using your OWN ENTROPY.
If all you do is move from ColdCard to a seed generated by SeedSigner or BitBox or Trezor, you haven’t changed your risk exposure to this class of vulnerability.
You’ve gone from one straw hut to another.

2026-07-31 14:37:47 UTC

- reply

Think of it this way: a single dice roll produces a number from 1-6. The information content of this is log2(6) = 2.585.
That is, each roll produces about two and a half bits worth of entropy.
A 12-word seed phrase encodes 128 bits of entropy. 128 / 2.585 = 49.516. So, yes, to generate a 12-word seed phrase, you need to combine the entropy from 50+ independent dice rolls.
The same logic holds for a 24-word seed phrase which encodes 256 bits of entropy. For that you need the combined entropy of 100+ dice rolls.
BUT the key factor here that most people miss is HOW those rolls are combined. Somehow, your sequence of dice rolls (5-4-5-2-1-…-6-6-4) has to be converted into words (bacon-celery-zoo-…).
If that mechanism is the hardware wallet, then you’re STILL TRUSTING the device, albeit a different code path. How do you know that those rolls produce THAT seed?
So yes, dice rolls are a big step up from just trusting the device’s random number generator. But you’re still vulnerable to other not-yet-discovered bugs in the hardware.
To immunize yourself from ANY hardware bugs, you have to roll your own seed material OFFLINE.

2026-07-31 14:28:54 UTC

#Bitcoin #memestr
https://image.nostr.build/4ec5d49b697b306cc106508c113c2e85939e45ea541687342ec880345d5ef92b.jpg

2026-07-31 13:56:19 UTC

If you roll the dice and put them in the machine to produce your seed, you’re STILL TRUSTING THE DEVICE.
How do you know that those dice rolls yield THAT seed?
You’re out here thinking you’re paranoid using dice with a hardware wallet. I’m telling you, you are NOT PARANOID ENOUGH. #Bitcoin

2026-07-31 13:53:44 UTC

- reply

Hear me out, but there are at least one more level of paranoia you’re missing:
If you put the dice in the machine to produce the seed, you’re still trusting the dice-to-seed mechanism. How do you know that those rolls go to THAT seed?

2026-07-31 13:45:09 UTC

- reply

Not sure what relay I need to be on, but I can’t see the message you’re replying to.

2026-07-31 12:55:56 UTC

- reply

The problem affects single-sig wallets generated by the ColdCard from March 2021 onwards.
Defenses include:
- Roll your own seed words offline
- Add entropy to seeds (dice)
- Use a passphrase (25th word)
- Use multi-vendor multisig
While it’s fine to change vendors, just changing vendors but sticking to single sig doesn’t protect you from future vulnerabilities like this being discovered.
The single, fastest, easiest mitigation is to roll a new seed with your own entropy and sweep your coins into it.

2026-07-31 12:23:20 UTC

- reply

When you generate your seeds, don’t just let the device produce it. You have to add your own entropy in some form. Many people use dice rolls. I use playing cards.
Multi-vendor multisig is ideal. That way, if any particular vendor has a vulnerability (as in this case) your attacker still can’t move your coin.

2026-07-31 12:19:19 UTC

- reply

If you used your ColdCard to generate a seed from March 2021 onwards, it was done without sufficient entropy.
This means an attacker may be able to brute force guess your seed and move your coin. It has already happened. It’s an ongoing, live exploit.
Only single-sig wallets are known to have been affected so far.

2026-07-31 12:16:29 UTC

Worried about your #bitcoin seeds?
Shuffle up and deal your own. https://jimbojw.github.io/seed-picker-solitaire/seed-picker-solitaire.pdf
https://image.nostr.build/6d0a8e8a7fef4f0680056870ce730601f24d2d2fe3c9dedeaff1f7b27f63339b.jpg
https://image.nostr.build/bcaf4a86fc852d4542139e7e834d8b9798f51a53cbc9665971e2022fc5816966.jpg
https://image.nostr.build/67a5ccdb2bf3f44bece7710f0d30e931a1506932acad5bfeb73ab44ed867d7ae.jpg
https://image.nostr.build/c5be610ada77c456c10ddfb899a9e6821461f9d197a4a5cdb86401414931eaf3.jpg

2026-06-24 01:39:40 UTC

- reply

Tit for tat with forgiveness is the optimal strategy in repeated interaction games

2026-06-24 01:38:09 UTC

Where were you in 1994? #asknostr

2026-06-13 01:19:39 UTC

- reply

Not on my watch

2026-06-12 16:46:14 UTC

- reply

It’s working now, but it’s been less than two hours.
https://video.nostr.build/f4c02a86d0ff1d72b91fc3e6150a2d1dd8ca2e7649bb63853e347b80d1670708.mp4

2026-06-01 22:02:59 UTC

- reply

Hermes?

2026-05-31 22:25:35 UTC

- reply

What are you using to build this?

2026-05-26 13:27:56 UTC

- reply

I guess you could say that paper straws… suck? 😎

2026-05-24 23:39:10 UTC

“Alexa, renew my passport.”

2026-05-24 18:26:12 UTC

- reply

That’s it! https://www.bugguide.net/node/view/2333789

2026-05-24 18:19:24 UTC

- reply

Updated guess: https://www.bugguide.net/node/view/483638

2026-05-24 18:14:33 UTC

- reply

Painted lady? Not exactly, but I’m guessing similar family.

2026-05-20 10:12:13 UTC

- reply

Kratter? I thought he went BIP-110?

2026-05-17 22:34:00 UTC

- reply

Congrats on the big win. And for the lotto too.

2026-05-17 17:36:13 UTC

“The faux-young boomers feel betrayed, forced back into the labor pool, but unable to cope with the implant-accelerated culture of the new millennium, their hard-earned experience rendered obsolete by deflationary time.” —Accelerando by Charles Stross, p. 147 #quotestr
https://image.nostr.build/7c729e0bb18248ac12ab7a08ce0d8449795aba802426b2f40d9494fe78e47c2d.jpg
https://image.nostr.build/af1c6458ca653fe333ddb009fa5f26c1a1dbb82bb1bc808a52b60bc3e527d78a.jpg

2026-05-16 16:29:51 UTC

- reply

I’m 90% confident there are no differences, but I’d have to run it through software to be totally sure.

2026-05-16 15:23:05 UTC

- reply

Yeah, no judgement on writing it out. Post Mt. Gox it wasn’t clear it’d recover.
I’m just arguing that we won’t get a Mandibles scenario because we have a superior money available everywhere.

2026-05-16 15:15:48 UTC

- reply

Nah. Shriver had to write Bitcoin out of her story specifically because it prevents the downfall she was trying to narrate:
> “The dollar is a historied currency that’s stabilized the international economy for over a century, Wilbur. The bancor is an upstart pretender whose constraints are unworkably strict. We just have to hold our nerve. After all—look at what happened to bitcoin.”
No one will be holding their nerve to save the dollar.

2026-05-15 21:44:24 UTC

- reply

Tunuk tunuk tun da da da

2026-05-14 10:50:43 UTC

- reply

Paywalled

2026-05-11 13:13:07 UTC

- reply

But why sell into a melt up? The trend is your friend, no?

2026-05-04 15:25:51 UTC

- reply

Sure thing. You’re in the list once I get my ToR working again

2026-05-03 16:39:09 UTC

- reply

Ok thanks. I need to fix my ToR service, then I’ll try

2026-05-03 16:32:33 UTC

- reply

Yeah, to open a channel I’d need host:port, not just the pub key, as I understand it.

2026-05-03 15:35:48 UTC

- reply

I couldn’t find you on amboss.space

2026-05-03 15:25:07 UTC

- reply

Thanks! I don’t need inbound currently, just outbound because my others got closed.

2026-05-03 14:23:20 UTC

Who wants some inbound Lightning liquidity? I want to open some channels. #lightning #bitcoin #asknostr

2026-04-23 12:25:57 UTC

- reply

https://image.nostr.build/2507fba7ae340a8dcedb0b0be57c0ac8064dad01834b5b2a9460aeb6dea5ef21.jpg

2026-04-22 15:21:53 UTC

- reply

These regimes aren’t gonna change themselves

2026-04-21 10:09:00 UTC

- reply

I looked at the site. Is there API documentation on the URL format? Or is one expected to used nowhere to generate the URLs?

2026-04-20 06:00:48 UTC

The Snack Food Alignment Chart #meme
https://image.nostr.build/810a9e694d50c067ab2b96bca4c4a5f5dea1687c550a658882cab37ac4aaa2a9.jpg

2026-04-19 23:45:56 UTC

- reply

Bad AI interpretation:
https://image.nostr.build/8a0eb2cae4f95224aa75cd8dbb03c5312716a853d17524cf1201379576b6d120.jpg

2026-04-19 23:42:21 UTC

- reply

Lawful Good: Cocoa
Lawful Neutral: Caffeine
Lawful Evil: Cocaine
Neutral Good: Chocolate
True Neutral: Coffee
Neutral Evil: Coke
Chaotic Good: Cacao
Chaotic Neutral: Covfefe
Chaotic Evil: Crack

2026-04-19 21:02:48 UTC

- reply

Now we just need to invent Cacoa and Cocao to complete the 2x2 matrix.

2026-04-13 16:29:33 UTC

Is it pronounced “either” or “either”? #asknostr

2026-04-11 21:49:21 UTC

I saw a flag on a house today that said:
ABOLISH I.C.E.
And I’m like, yes… along with the rest of the federal government. #liberty

2026-04-11 21:48:12 UTC

- reply

Fighting the good fight

2026-04-11 14:10:57 UTC

- reply

What do the protesters want?

2026-04-11 01:56:22 UTC

- reply

We’ve all been there

2026-04-11 01:53:19 UTC

- reply

Zing

2026-04-09 16:13:29 UTC

- reply

Probably just accepting zero-conf. These are known entities wanting to do repeat business. You could maybe rip off the Iranians with a double-spend once, but good luck on your next trip.

2026-04-08 22:14:57 UTC

Why the Strait of Hormuz matters for #bitcoin
Hamid Hosseini, a spokesperson for Iran's Oil, Gas and Petrochemical Products Exporters' Union, told the Financial Times that Iran needs to "monitor what goes in and out of the strait to ensure these two weeks aren't used for transferring weapons." He added that once Tehran completes its cargo assessment, payment is collected in Bitcoin within seconds, a method he said ensures the funds “can't be traced or confiscated due to sanctions.” https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/2026/04/08/will-be-destroyed-irans-bitcoin-toll-sparks-100k-price-prediction/

2026-04-08 19:02:10 UTC

- reply

Usually Ubuntu. Sometimes Qubes. On occasion Tails.

2026-04-06 21:10:39 UTC

Friend: You must be disappointed in #Bitcoin price action.
Me:
https://image.nostr.build/a29658cdac8d8df3cd725d2e29a355ed11a72c98c7a693017528629a33f28169.jpg

2026-04-05 18:21:39 UTC

- reply

Money growing on trees would be a significant improvement over the status quo in terms of hardness.

2026-03-12 22:25:51 UTC

- reply

I once paid more than 1 sat/vbyte, just to see what it felt like.

2026-03-12 21:57:41 UTC

- reply

Maybe the answer is more NIP-13 proof of work?

2026-03-12 21:57:00 UTC

- reply

Same

2026-03-12 00:39:00 UTC

- reply

https://media1.tenor.com/m/IOWx34hXWREAAAAd/boo-boo-this-man.gif

2026-03-11 23:58:00 UTC

- reply

Please report any bugs you find. At the bottom of the menu is a Report Bug link. Or you can tell me here on Nostr (though bug report is better).
https://image.nostr.build/20e8fbe324f8ce5c0123de194c2ac0abd59a5da50e8d909f03cfb8af0da2ae64.jpg

2026-03-11 23:37:02 UTC

Are any of you out there Magic the Gathering players? I have something I wanna show you. #asknostr #mtg #edh https://franticsearch.gg

2026-03-09 18:38:40 UTC

#asknostr 👇👇👇
#nevent1q…sdw6

2026-03-05 18:09:29 UTC

- reply

But seriously

2026-03-05 17:51:18 UTC

- reply

The first one. The car in the second steals attention.

2026-03-05 14:26:23 UTC

- reply

And it’s only 30%. Could have been worse!

2026-02-19 11:36:53 UTC

FEW
#nevent1q…npcj