<unnamed>

Public Key

npub1g49uyac6d83sss7sln8aumsstle7m3wxwwvc8mmpqsnr8e9f2cdq6ltqvs

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsy2j7zwudxnccgg0g0en77dcg9luldchr88xvraassgf3nuj54vxspp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqprfmhxue69uhhg6r9vehhyetnwshxummnw3erztnrdaksz9mhwden5te0ve5kcar9wghxummnw3ezuamfdejszyrhwden5te0dehhxarj9emkjmn9qy28wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtn0wfk8jtnyv4mq5fq0s5

Publishing to

Last Notes

2026-07-11 13:42:48 CEST

- reply

for me personally, i just upgraded 1 TB node to 5 TB.
it's going to cost:
$110 for 5 TB hardrive
$20 for labor
$25 upgrade internet from 100 GB to 300 GB for the month
$155 to signal for Bip110 for 1 month.
$25 per month thereafter
i could be buying $155 of bitcoin, upon any potential chain fork, i could sell $155 of X token and buy Y token, thereby "voting"
what is more valuable?
1 node signaling for BIP110
or 155$ of selling X and buying Y?
I believe this is "Economic voting", and I'm unclear at what point does economic voting = node vote.
the question i'm asking myself is the following:
if the largest holders of Bitcoin could pay a cloud service to run bitcoin nodes of their choosing, how much bitcoin would they sell/forgo in order to attack the node network to maintain the network of their choosing...?