Ostry

Public Key

npub10q8sqmnpz2xnen0362kagauulkscg5q3u8dw7mq9996xcxlh6mvqu44qv3

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs8srcqdes39rfuehca9tw5w7w0mgvy2qg7rkh0dszjjarvr0madkqpy4mhxue69uhhstntda4xjunp9e5k7tmjdakk2med0pjkummw94nx77r5wfhhgqg5waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t0q2nxft

Publishing to

x.kojira.io/romeo-xenon-foxtrot

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

goskatespots.nostr1.com/beacon

nostr.mom

nostr.bitcoiner.social

Author Public Key

npub10q8sqmnpz2xnen0362kagauulkscg5q3u8dw7mq9996xcxlh6mvqu44qv3

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-07-19 10:59:08 CEST

- reply

Yes. Thanks. Most people fucked me over. Not in the literal scense either.

2026-07-19 10:56:06 CEST

- reply

Nope. Not in my case. At least, not very likely.

2026-07-15 09:58:06 CEST

- reply

Yes, thank you. Well, you know, it is a rather awkward position to be in.

2026-07-08 19:51:29 CEST

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/7f20f958b49d0be1127037b3563582a70134dacbacfaeac5b74e4b765a6a96fa.jpg

2026-07-06 04:00:12 CEST

- reply

I don't think the precondition holds.

2026-07-06 03:59:06 CEST

- reply

I have no trouble smiling. It is just hard to find reason to smile when a hostile environment is created and cultivated on an hourly basis. 😋

2026-07-03 14:40:16 CEST

- reply

No.

2026-07-03 04:12:59 CEST

- reply

Karmic debt?

2026-07-03 03:51:52 CEST

- reply

What pattern is that?

2026-07-02 01:22:32 CEST

- reply

Huh? I don't understand. Who claims this?

2026-07-01 11:42:41 CEST

- reply

Does it have to be 'either .. or ..'?

2026-07-01 04:27:14 CEST

- reply

It's not clairvoyance. It's intelligence and intuition. I let the signal get processed, combine with events I know are happening, and stresses and unnatural circumstances I know exist, I take or find hints or out-of-the-ordinary markers, and try to combine. I may be able to interpret certain signals well, but it's not magic. It is sensitivity and certain ability simulate, feel and empathize.

2026-06-29 04:29:17 CEST

- reply

Dude. I didn't *play* Minecraft. I merely *watched* Minecraft and immediately followed up with another video. It should be void already. But then, "rules" and "application flexibility" seem to vary extremely wildly according to opportunity for abuse.

2026-06-27 04:35:13 CEST

- reply

Yes, that is being under constant attack, constantly fighting back against abuse, constantly dealing with threats harassment and abuse, instead of developing solutions and doing good for society. I am quite vocal about it, but people who want me to be bad do not take me seriously when I do.

2026-06-27 02:13:18 CEST

- reply

I'm not. There are good reasons for that. 🤣

2026-06-22 13:14:59 CEST

- reply

That's rather pretentious, thinking you understand that individual in light of circumstances enough to make such claims. What if the unexpected is the extremely obvious?

2026-06-22 03:06:08 CEST

- reply

This is insanely sad, considering that people wanted to literally steal my own personal work because they "decided" I did not deserve it so it could be handed to someone who dropped an ongoing project before completion, for which ample practical feedback was provided.
People claimed I was bad for contributing time, experience, skill voluntarily without return or expectation, because by their "standards" and "values" their grand excuse is "they wanted money" instead of for any values or principles concerning privacy.
A lot of people fake security concerns.

2026-06-21 05:07:12 CEST

- reply

It's not that kind of situation. It is organized harassment, abuse and deception/manipulation. These weren't options. You are not properly informed of the situation.

2026-06-18 11:03:15 CEST

- reply

Dude. I live in a relatively small town. I've walked outside or from my parents' home watched the stars, with rel acceptable level of light pollution, at 3:00h for 1+ hour many times.

2026-06-17 14:34:10 CEST

- reply

I have been under attack for 11 years straight for no reason. This is going to be fixed.

2026-06-17 06:02:41 CEST

- reply

I'll also indulge in your examples:
Firewall enforces what exactly? It guards against unanticipated connections. A program is free to do as it pleases, unless problematic networking. It provides a form of guarantee that some unfavorable situations don't happen. But, for example, not all, if hackers piggy-back browser connections via javascript.
Encryption provides confidentiality for the "initiated", i.e. no key no information. It guards against access by the uninitiated. Encryption provides confidentiality by manner of a mechanism that makes information inaccessible without key.
I don't see how calling it all enforcement helps. Encryption doesn't kick unauthorized out. It simply ensures that the target of the unauthorized would switch to acquire the key, because brute force acquiring protected information is no longer viable.

2026-06-17 04:35:32 CEST

- reply

I would, if I smoked.

2026-06-17 02:53:36 CEST

- reply

This is false. Security is quite literally concerned with certainty. You can accomplish certainty in a variety of ways. For example, a program without any errors, or an architecture fit to handle errors or an ability to recover. For example, "forever unbreakable encryption" or layers or periodic renewals. "Unbreakable protection" or not keeping data in the first place. "Perfect storage" or booting and working in-memory only.
Equating security to enforcement is lazy and shortsighted. Problems can be solved in multiple ways and at multiple levels.

2026-06-17 00:15:05 CEST

- reply

If this is supposed to be targeted criticism, you'll have to explain the supposed situation.

2026-06-16 02:42:26 CEST

- reply

This idea falls flat when "showing me who you are" is justification of arbitrary abuse, harassment and other malicious practices.
Extreme double standards; deceptive, manipulative and abusive practices tell something about the people claiming to judge.
If you happily lower the bar on your standards, norms, values and principles to the floor, then what's left to judge about another person to feel superior about?

2026-06-15 08:54:24 CEST

- reply

Asking for ongoing organized harassment and abuse to stop is not the same as asking for loneliness.

2026-06-15 03:00:35 CEST

- reply

What cult?!?

2026-06-12 05:21:19 CEST

- reply

No worries. It meant it as a joke. Yeah, some stuff going on. Not a bot account.

2026-06-12 04:35:29 CEST

- reply

Wai..wai..wait, @nprofile…jgrk u watchin' me? 😳

2026-06-12 04:22:37 CEST

- reply

Not telepaths. Logcal thinking, astute observation, knowing how and what to recognize, and puzzling out what does and doesn't make sense.

2026-06-12 04:21:33 CEST

- reply

This leaves a false impression. I am not "just being blocked". I have some psychos who are actively disrupting my activities in and around my home with malicious devices. That's more than just making silly decisions or being blocked.

2026-06-10 12:27:07 CEST

- reply

Why the repeat references to Thiel or Palantir? I only know Thiel from some old documentaries. And don't like/approve Palantir at all.

2026-06-10 12:24:07 CEST

- reply

Huh? For what?

2026-06-08 11:07:23 CEST

As a reminder, I complained and there turned out to be long-running coordinated effort to attack me. So yeah, that is rather dissatisfying.
#nevent1q…h9yw

2026-06-07 21:20:06 CEST

- reply

They attack with deception and manipulation, because all of their previous plans failed. They have a track record of malicious behavior and false accusations.

2026-06-06 19:27:01 CEST

- reply

If there is a quantum advantage, there is a serious problem. Just not with all parts of math (at least, in current understanding).

2026-06-06 18:48:05 CEST

- reply

Interesting. So the moment of exposure isn't strictly a problem in the protocol.
Maybe that's also an avenue worth exploring: give users certainty –in light of quantum computing– that their submitted transactions will get priority, such that any later submitted transaction cannot pose a risk. If the public key is only vulnerable after exposure, you've essentially eliminated the critical race condition.

2026-06-06 18:41:42 CEST

- reply

Actually, not strictly game-over, is it? If you make the transaction definitive, i.e. final sequence number, sufficient fee, then it cannot be overridden.
Is it then possible if you insert a literal competing transaction (created from cracked public key) for it to get priority treatment even though yours is first to enter the mempool?
That's the question I'm not clear on.
Though, maybe it's possible to retract the transaction from the mempool? Not sure. I haven't had to look into that before.

2026-06-06 17:58:56 CEST

- reply

I knew about taproot. Learned about this few months ago and was surprised about this design choice. SHA256 is fine, but they did break a significant nr of rounds recently (iirc) and I'm not sure about the extent of impact or influence on the whole. Yeah, the mempool race is still a risk.

2026-06-06 04:31:26 CEST

Whatever happens with quantum computers and whatever happens with bitcoin, most bitcoin addresses (IIUC both legacy P2PKH and segwit) publish the public key only upon spending the utxo (funds), thus the time of exposure is very limited, i.e. not vulnerable in rest. It's because those transactions include hashes instead of public keys.
Hashes are not inherently more vulnerable. In those cases, public key is only made known when the spending transaction is formed and submitted thus when the funds are moved. (But only if you didn't reuse P2PKH keys as is generally advised.)
Don't take my word for it. Read up on it yourself to be sure. Tell me if I'm wrong.
I'd love to know if there is an additional risk involving SHA256.

2026-05-28 13:01:34 CEST

- reply

😆 Nope. Also false accusations. 🖕🏻

2026-05-26 13:29:43 CEST

- reply

Bullshit. Nobody thinks this.

2026-05-24 14:45:34 CEST

- reply

2026-05-24 12:55:39 CEST

- reply

That's no excuse. That's an attempt at justifying 11+ years of malicious actions.

2026-05-22 05:03:35 CEST

- reply

Wait ... What are you saying? 🤨

2026-05-21 03:58:20 CEST

- reply

You don't have a goddamn thing to say about either.

2026-05-20 14:00:41 CEST

- reply

God prly better pray they don't exist because when I'm done, they're gonna need a new place to call heaven.

2026-05-20 06:22:07 CEST

- reply

Wait .. movie buff? Is there a ref to a movie?

2026-05-20 06:20:49 CEST

- reply

What about mini-jack? 😂

2026-05-20 04:31:07 CEST

- reply

You are missing the point. I literally have some abusive assholes engaging in local (offline) ongoing harassment and abusive practices. It isn't about losing the way. It is about a bunch of people who need to be locked up because they violate individual's rights and more on a daily basis.

2026-05-19 13:12:50 CEST

- reply

These things are not made up. Somehow, along the way, I started getting attacked for all the supposed bad things, but these abusive people also fabricated excuses to excuse arbitrary excuses for mistreatment. So now the original reasons turn out false and an immense shitshow of malice suddenly doesn't make sense but people never respected or considered my rights and did think they could maliciously dismiss some, and now it's a mess and a huge problem.

2026-05-19 07:12:50 CEST

- reply

Stfu. You all could've contributed positively. If all that time spent attacking *ME* was spent attacking *MY RESULTS* the whole world would've been different by now. 🖕🏻

2026-05-16 18:56:10 CEST

- reply

Stop fabricating narratives.

2026-05-15 14:27:29 CEST

- reply

That must be some strong tea. 😁

2026-05-15 11:35:00 CEST

- reply

No.

2026-05-15 10:30:09 CEST

- reply

You're being lied to about your motivation for posting this. Your a puppet being manipulated.

2026-05-15 05:54:44 CEST

- reply

Nobody knows me, because they're all preoccupied with finding smth to judge me badly, instead of understanding me. You can't be looking for something to complain about and also understand someone.

2026-05-14 19:47:19 CEST

- reply

Not mistake. People keep changing the narrative.

2026-05-12 15:41:14 CEST

- reply

This is an incorrect and cynical view.

2026-05-08 10:26:24 CEST

- reply

What cycle? Most likely no cycle. Scamming.

2026-05-06 04:25:50 CEST

- reply

Often, she's a bitch. If you are willing to rant on 10+ pieces of supposedly justified criticism but not willing to discuss them one by one to evaluate whether they're true, assumptions hold, there is misunderstanding and whether the attack is justified. If you're willing to harshly and loudly rant out an avalanche of supposed critiques, want me to shut up during that time, do not allow interruptions and then do not even want to discuss them afterwards. She's a bitch.

2026-05-05 05:16:39 CEST

- reply

In case this is targeted: do you realize that I actually have several people who, on a daily basis, try to attack me for literally no sensible reason, including with EMF emissions or sound waves or smth aimed at my skull, and other malicious practices.

2026-05-03 13:56:02 CEST

- reply

That implies that there is a connection. To some lead people the only connection is proximity and nobody asked me about 'connection'.

2026-05-03 13:54:45 CEST

- reply

That's not an excuse to terrorize soneone.

2026-04-30 23:47:54 CEST

- reply

Was it my advice, or again music lyrics, documentary podcast talk, or game conversations? It wouldn't be the first time. I got attacked for ".. burning bridges" which was from a video game character.

2026-04-30 09:07:17 CEST

- reply

There's a difference between defending my rights and some arbitrary rules.

2026-04-30 03:48:21 CEST

- reply

If it's targeted, state your claims.

2026-04-24 10:32:33 CEST

- reply

Was Vlad the Impaler talking about his penis?

2026-04-23 23:39:20 CEST

Japanese anime. Better than your local bunch of assholes by far.
#nevent1q…7a2s

2026-04-23 10:30:13 CEST

- reply

Am I supposed to understand what this refers to?

2026-04-23 09:27:42 CEST

- reply

What's this comment about a crown referring to?

2026-04-21 04:36:58 CEST

- reply

Anger has a reason. Diminishing anger as the problem is both dangerous and disrespectful of the values of the individual.

2026-04-20 05:40:08 CEST

To be clear: I DID NOT DO THIS. I went to try and figure out WTFH is going on. All the engagement and unexplained attacks and everything else, is *all* malicious agenda by people who tried to attack me.
I have said repeatedly: I need information on what was going on starting some 8 years back up to smth like 6 years back. I know there were malicious actions before and since, but there was commentary I do not understand.
Most likely involuntary and abusive actions by malicious people. I never *asked* for any of this, because I had intentions to resolve the attacks, not to find assistance or support towards some goal.
#nevent1q…aqzq

2026-04-19 16:55:51 CEST

- reply

Not everything requires change. Not everything you consider a problem, is a problem, or is your goddamn business. Not every change being demanded is reasonable. Not everything you dislike is a problem. Not everything you think of as normal is normal. Not everything needs to be normal. Not everything you dislike is a problem for you. If you dislike it, does not mean you can make arbitrary demands.

2026-04-17 19:38:52 CEST

What's this about?
#nevent1q…gpd2

2026-04-17 16:38:18 CEST

- reply

Do I need to understand what this refers to?

2026-04-16 09:34:09 CEST

- reply

I have been under persistent, constant attack for 8 years. You have no right to call it a grudge. It is long-term organized abuse.

2026-04-15 03:09:52 CEST

- reply

I would love to know which "illusion" was "projected". As with everything, I strongly wonder where people got their bad information.

2026-04-15 02:59:05 CEST

- reply

I have been waiting for an explanation for years now. I am most likely attacked while I was the victim in the first place. So, state your claims.

2026-04-10 10:22:05 CEST

- reply

Aaaaaawwhh, you think I'm cute 🥹

2026-04-09 23:34:06 CEST

- reply

You're asking for a dick-pic, aren't you?!? 🤨

2026-04-08 23:49:14 CEST

- reply

That is not an excuse to excuse years or large-scale organized harassment and abuse. It also does not clear a society from massive prejudice and bias, and it does not excuse years of prior malicious actions.
Do you also blame torture victims for speaking badly about torturers?

2026-04-08 16:28:14 CEST

- reply

They blast emf waves at my head for protacted periods of time. It is deliberate harm, abuse.

2026-04-08 12:40:49 CEST

If this is supposed to be criticism, I have too little context.
#nevent1q…wuku

2026-04-07 13:20:42 CEST

- reply

Nope. Someone beaming EMF microwaves to fry my brain is still a more likely candidate.

2026-04-07 10:34:57 CEST

- reply

.. about religious belief.

2026-04-05 04:28:03 CEST

- reply

How far *I* have come?!? Are you that blind!?! It has been nothing but undeserved organized abuse.

2026-04-03 13:56:16 CEST

- reply

Missed opportunity to include the fat lazy Thor.

2026-04-03 05:19:22 CEST

- reply

Prly 🤠

2026-04-02 18:15:38 CEST

- reply

No, that was definitely not it.

2026-04-02 15:51:28 CEST

- reply

Why would you think I think otherwise? I have had this experience for as long as I've been on the internet. Any malicious actions did NOT come from me. There are indicators of foul play. The same for some suspicious activities offline. I did NOT have a hand in such malicious actions.

2026-04-02 02:58:46 CEST

- reply

Not only in memory. Not appreciated, so needs to make room for more rude version that can survive under massively abusive circumstances.

2026-04-01 04:59:59 CEST

- reply

Ontology is also used by the original web 3.0, a.k.a. the semantic web: OWL is Web Ontology Language. It isn't a bad word in itself. Just an aspect of information structuring.

2026-03-30 18:13:46 CEST

- reply

Which ones are you referring to?

2026-03-29 20:00:12 CEST

- reply

Stable in relation to what? 🤨

2026-03-28 13:09:52 CET

- reply

Yeah, but it's obvious as to why: the dad doesn't have to feel the obligation/responsibility to take care of them. The pets find the one that isn't hell-bound on bothering them.

2026-03-26 14:10:09 CET

To some abusive people: nice try; not a valid excuse for abuse.
#nevent1q…tl5y

2026-03-26 11:26:30 CET

- reply

No.

2026-03-26 05:56:00 CET

- reply

You don't know anything. You make the wrong assunptions and consequently the wrong conclusions. You have no clue about the situation.

2026-03-25 04:14:38 CET

- reply

Another issue is the abusive and toxic people we have to deal with every day, who pray on both trauma and manipulation for hostile intentions.