<unnamed>

Public Key

npub1cpxwma0gzj4psea07fk0ukc923mcut40t6kn4s2kp5xdkm3gqlxq37msgp

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsvqn8d7h5pf2scv7hlym87tvz4gauw96h4atf6c9tq6rxmdc5q0nqpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dsd9xs5a

Publishing to

nostr.wine

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Last Notes

2023-06-07 10:24:35 UTC

- reply

📅 Original date posted:2012-07-23
📝 Original message:Hello,
Even though I'm not a dev, I can't agree more, and would like to know if
they are expected steps being taken, some fixes coming, or whatever?
Thank you all for your hard work.
Raphael
On 07/23/2012 12:37 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> Given a testbed: Pentium 4 1.8GHz single core, 2GB ram, FreeBSD 8,
> disk is geli aes-128 + zfs sha-256, bitcoin 0.6.3, Tor proxy,
> An estimate is made that by the end of the year bitcoin will
> completely overrun the capabilities of this reasonable class of
> machines.
> It already takes a month to build a new blockchain, let alone keep up
> with new incoming blocks.
> Yes, it also has workstation duties, yet even if those were removed,
> it would probably choke by mid 2013.
>
> It would appear bitcoin has some *serious* scalability hurdles coming
> down the road.
> Most certainly if the user expects to independantly build, manage, and
> trust their own blockchain.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development

2023-06-07 10:06:30 UTC

- reply

📅 Original date posted:2012-05-02
📝 Original message:Too technical if you ask me. We want a webpage for the dumbest end-user
I think.
Java? C? What the heck is this? Blockchain? Qt?
Regards,
Raphael
On 05/02/2012 09:34 PM, Gary Rowe wrote:
> How about keeping it simple?
>
> Bitcoin-Qt
> * Requires the entire blockchain
> * Standalone client
> * Designed for continuous operation
> * Available for Windows, Mac, Linux with installer
> * Developed in C
> * Website: https://bitcoin.org
>
> MultiBit
> * Requires a reduced blockchain
> * Standalone client
> * Designed for occasional use
> * Available for Windows, Mac, Linux with installer
> * Developed in Java
> * Website: http://multibit.org
>
> Armory
> * Requires the entire blockchain
> * Dependent client of Bitcoin-Qt
> * Designed for occasional use
> * Available for Windows (64-bit only), Mac, Linux (self-build)
> * Developed in Python
> * Website: http://bitcoinarmory.com/
>
> Electrum
> * Requires no blockchain
> * Dependent client of Bitcoin-Qt (on server)
> * Designed for occasional use
> * Available for Windows, Linux (self-build)
> * Developed in Python
> * Website: http://ecdsa.org/electrum/
>
> Bitcoin Wallet (Android client)
> * Requires a reduced blockchain
> * Standalone client
> * Designed for occasional use on mobile
> * Available for Android only
> * Developed in Java
> * Website:
> https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.schildbach.wallet&hl=en
> <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.schildbach.wallet&hl=en>
>
>
> On 2 May 2012 20:25, Amir Taaki <zgenjix at yahoo.com
> <mailto:zgenjix at yahoo.com>> wrote:
>
> This is like the most annoying thing about email. Often with group
> emails, we'll be having a conversation then someone will click
> reply instead of group reply and the convo will go on for a while.
> Eventually I'll realise the persons are missing and add them back in.
>
> On Yahoo mail (which I use for spam/mailing lists), to do reply
> all involves clicking a tab, scrolling down and clicking Reply
> All. Normally I instead go through the steps of reply, delete To,
> re-enter bitco... select drop down, click send.
>
> Anyone know how to make reply all the default in mutt? And how can
> I exclude it from re-including my own email when I do a group
> reply so I don't get the same email again.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik at exmulti.com <mailto:jgarzik at exmulti.com>>
> To: grarpamp <grarpamp at gmail.com <mailto:grarpamp at gmail.com>>
> Cc: bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> <mailto:bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 7:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org
> <http://bitcoin.org> clients page
>
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:58 PM, grarpamp <grarpamp at gmail.com
> <mailto:grarpamp at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> Try "Reply to All"
> >
> > That puts the sender in 'to' and list in 'cc',
> > which dupes to the sender and eventually
> > blows out the to and cc lines as everyone
> > chimes in and doesn't trim. 'reply to' solves
> > most of that. assuming the list sw can do it.
>
> "Reply-To" Munging Considered Harmful
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>
>
>
> --
> Jeff Garzik
> exMULTI, Inc.
> jgarzik at exmulti.com <mailto:jgarzik at exmulti.com>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond.
> Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in
> malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> <mailto:Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond.
> Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in
> malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> <mailto:Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20120502/cabd51c1/attachment.html>