Renaud
Renaud Nèvres

Public Key

npub1d0usdfqjjl4zulexrkulx6t2898g6rwntmdlqduq9v9xjv79gzrsgc5c5w

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsxh7gx5sff063w0unpmw0nd94rjn5dphf4aklsx7qzkznfx0z5ppcpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq32amnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwdehhxarj9ehx2aqc73077

Publishing to

Author Public Key

npub1d0usdfqjjl4zulexrkulx6t2898g6rwntmdlqduq9v9xjv79gzrsgc5c5w

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-07-16 11:21:34 CEST

Ah, il était beau et fier notre capitaine
Notre cher président aux lunettes bleutées
Quand il parlait de guerre les yeux pleins de peine
C’est bien tristement qu’il nous envoyait buter

2026-07-04 19:43:27 CEST

hier est mon pays
car hier c’était toi
et ton cul si joli
et tes lèvres sur moi
la neige sous nos skis
à Big Sky, Montana
le jour où tu faillis
te casser les deux bras
les souvenirs d’une vie
nos baisers nos dramas
Notting Hill une nuit
me cacher sous les draps
tes larmes Île Saint-Louis
cette chanson nos danses
le jour où je compris
que tu m’aimais je pense
un été à Paris
à baiser sous les toits
et ton cul si joli
ton beau cul, plus à moi
demain c’est l’Italie
contre un autre que moi
l’amour parfois finit
sans qu’on sache pourquoi
quelquefois dans la nuit
je me lève d’effroi
en pensant à ma vie
qui s’écoule sans toi
hier est mon pays
je vis là, autrefois

2026-06-14 17:09:29 CEST

- reply

Merci !

2026-06-10 18:36:14 CEST

hier est mon pays
car hier c’était toi
ah, ton cul si joli
et tes lèvres sur moi
hier est mon pays
Yosemite avec toi
et ton cul rebondi
ton beau cul, plus à moi
hier est mon pays
tes baisers tes émois
nos larmes Île Saint Louis
et nos rires en Savoie
demain c’est l’Italie
contre un autre que moi
hier est mon pays
je vis là - autrefois

2026-06-08 21:19:06 CEST

- reply

YakiHonne

2026-06-02 20:32:05 CEST

- reply

This is an other level of bullshit
This is sooooo wrong
Food. Agency. Freedom. Care. Power.

2026-05-02 18:43:52 CEST

- reply

It is sad then.

2026-05-01 19:15:24 CEST

- reply

They do exist. I believe ideally people evangelizing should give these solutions + a simple phone setup explaining the latter is equivalent to cash you declare or you don’t

2026-04-27 21:45:06 CEST

- reply

Great read
But muststopmurad was a bitcoiner before?
My god I did not know that!

2026-03-25 12:37:45 CET

- reply

Payments adoption impacts price as if widespread
- privacy is improved massively
- narrative bitcoin is useless disappears
- moat becomes even bigger
- can live off bitcoin without need for fiat rails so more attractive to store it
Store of value needed for payments that reinforce store of value in a virtuous circle and it all ends (in the positive scenario) with unit of account, the last one

2026-03-19 21:33:32 CET

- reply

Your soap is great and your deodorant is great too. Simple and great. Humble, as you say

2026-03-15 09:43:10 CET

- reply

It does not seem to be something he would write. He has no interest in writing that and it would be stupid

2026-03-15 09:42:19 CET

- reply

Is this a real tweet from Elon??

2026-03-14 07:59:07 CET

- reply

That’s not what bip 110 do : it changes rules at consensus level. knots itself allows you to run relay policy that is stricter (probably possible in core to but default much laxer and completely relaxed for op_return in core30)

2026-03-12 15:41:09 CET

- reply

I don’t understand why core 30 changed that. Even before core 30 a motivated attacker could (one of the arguments of core for changing) and it was indeed a situation where 99.9 pct of nodes were a running restrictive relay policy. And if you believe that most nodes having a restrictive or relax relay policy does not matter you can’t be mad at core 30 for changing that.
So my position is : “I wish consensus rules were different but they are the way they are and changing them is not not-costly and should be done carefully” and “I wish core did not change relay policy rule let’s continue to try to gather consensus first on this”

2026-03-12 10:35:40 CET

- reply

You are right ; we should continue. 20% of knots and 20% core 30 so 80 pct network running 80 capped op_return.
I would have preferred consensus to have capped op_return but the conservativeness in changing consensus is very important too (and, less so but also, the simplicity of consensus rules)
I disagree with changes implemented in relay policy by core. I believe it is reckless and arrogant. core has too much influence on the network through this type of changes I agree. But I am also happy that core can’t change consensus rules too easily.
I also want home solo mining to increase and I believe it will and we should aim for as much as possible designing own blocks through ocean
Then for BIP-110 itself I understand the motivation, the frustration etc, I am hesitating but it might be (at this stage at least) a bad precedent if it were to succeed and if does not reinforce core

2026-03-11 10:03:54 CET

- reply

Yes.
However trying to change consensus rules without broad agreement is not a good thing either even if the change itself is positive - I agree with Giacomo here. It must be very hard to change consensus.
IMO we should convince people / nodes to change their relay policy back to 80 cap on op_return and to solo mine with ocean defining their own block (at a cost in terms of expected profit and loss) as decentralized mining is very important too.

2026-03-10 10:24:08 CET

KYC: Kill Your Customer
https://www.lefigaro.fr/faits-divers/yvelines-un-homme-et-une-femme-sequestres-a-leur-domicile-900-000-euros-de-bitcoins-derobes-20260309

2026-03-08 15:40:49 CET

- reply

Does it have a special purpose the pumice? Also the whipped cream tallow it is for the face right? I use it for the face and find it great but checking 🤷‍♂️

2026-02-26 21:05:50 CET

- reply

Same, just received some, kept half gave half for people to see how much better it is!
And the whipped tallow cream is amazing!

2026-02-26 10:17:24 CET

- reply

Yes since then, I understood that once again you were right 🤓😀 and this is indeed the decisive argument.

2026-02-24 15:38:46 CET

I read more and learned more and now believes that Giacomo Zucco’s position regarding spam debate is the rationale one.

2026-02-21 23:02:14 CET

- reply

But even from him I have not heard decisive argument as to why if BIP-110 wins we would be much worse.

2026-02-21 23:00:56 CET

The only person that prevents me at this stage to signal for BIP-110 is @npub1au2…t53j because I respect him so much and knows he knows much more than me.

2026-02-21 22:57:54 CET

- reply

I respect your work to make people aware of wrench attacks : I am French.
But on this topic, you always offer more of the same, and that same is not convincing.
I know you don’t have to waste your time convincing anyone. But sometimes it can feel like, given the time you spend responding while mot doing so, as if you just don’t have any valuable argument.

2026-02-21 22:54:39 CET

- reply

How is capping arbitrary data a “technical argument” that can be judged by “technical judgement” rather than a philosophical position on what bitcoin is and what it should optimise for?
Deciding about this is much more about “should we take the risk of jeopardizing Bitcoin as money for its potential use as data storage” than anything technical.

2026-02-21 21:44:42 CET

- reply

1. Reducing attack surface on bitcoin.
2. Stated purpose is affirming it as money/ reducing attack surface, it does
3. Temporarily to minimize damage, and have time to reach consensus on better potential solutions
Nada. Nothing. Zilch.

2026-02-21 21:19:34 CET

- reply

Can be a lot of various people, mostly non-pedos I agree: states for instance
Seems very wise to open wide such an attack vector for something so loved by people in power

2026-02-21 18:41:26 CET

- reply

He published a 12 minutes video where he explains his position and asks you detailed questions.
What he says about your ethics in it is mostly : “it is hard for a man to understand something when his salary depends on him not understanding it”
Your reply is “he worked as a trader for Peter Thiel” 🤷‍♂️

2026-02-21 15:32:01 CET

- reply

I run knots (I know it is mostly core code) with its default relay policy
I don’t run bip110 version as I am not decided on this yet
I still did not hear any convincing argument as to why changing default relay policy was a good idea nor why BIP-110 is a reckless attack on Bitcoin.
What I hear mostly from your side is childish arrogance and authority arguments

2026-02-21 15:19:19 CET

- reply

How did the debate end exactly? Is it Jameson Lopp who decides unilaterally when debate end?

2026-02-21 13:55:51 CET

I really would like to be opposed to bip-110. I am not running it now. But I did not find any 1st principle solid argument against it including from people i admire who are against it

2026-02-21 13:30:39 CET

- reply

I mean this is all nice and good and I love what you do but you don’t win arguments that way.

2026-02-21 12:33:02 CET

I believe we should aim for minimum common denominator for bitcoin
Bitcoin is money
Bitcoin is permissionless for money
Money is important
Robustness is important
Mono-purpose usage limits the surface attack
Data limits is not censorship - censorship is very different. It is preventing people to say what they want or to transact with who they want / how they want. Limiting sizes of arb data on monetary network is not censorship.
A lot of devs that brought a lot to bitcoin don’t care about money. That’s fine. Work on other things. It is silly to give your effort and life for something you don’t care about. Bitcoin is a monetary network and protocol. Doing multiple things makes it more fragile for that important purpose.
@npub1au2…t53j clearly you are mot knowledgeable about bitcoin than me and you care about it as money and don’t favor spam. But i don’t understand your opposite too. To BIP-110 and i would like to. Consensus rules have changed historically. Reintroduction of op_return in 2014 was such a change. Why would (notably) limit Op_returns size at consensus level be an unacceptable change if it gathers consensus? Conservative position makes no sense if changes that harms the things we care most about have occurred. Only reactionary position makes sense then.
I agree with @npub1lh2…a9nk view that contiguous data being labeled arb data by the protocol is different morally and legally as non-contiguous being supposed to be something else. I disagree with a lot of Luke’s worldsview though but that I agree with. Minimum common denominator.
Then I really don’t want this thing to be broken. But I am not under the impression than BIP-110 is reckless : it takes a lot of precaution not to be. Core change of default relay policy 100kb for op_returns with little consensus was more reckless imo.

2026-02-12 16:52:42 CET

- reply

Yes of course and every woman prefers the second one ; however this is probably non-binary, and I would tend to think that the first one in a way helps the second one last longer in relationships
The second one alone is something that mostly happens in beginnings of relationships versus second one and first mixed

2026-02-12 16:44:47 CET

I have no idea anymore about this core vs knots drama.
I think bitcoin should be optimized for monetary use not for data storage. Changing default relay policy to 100kb seems to have little upside for monetary use. (I could understand a slight increase to help potential current / futures L2 without giving too much space for images)
The argument”otherwise spams go elsewhere in more harmful way” like in utxo set seems wrong to me.
1) they will continue doing that also as it is less expensive
2) I agree with Luke argument that it is not the same profoundly for an image (potentially unlawful) to be stored and coded in a place “specially done for arbitrary data so images for instance” in the protocol and in a place whose usage is changed by the spammers
So I don’t understand the core change in relay policy
However I see a lot of people I like and admire supporting the change and being obsessed by Bitcoin as money (and working on it hard) so I would like to understand genuinely their position (ignoring the toxicity of some of people on the other side or the willingness to show support to maintainers that have been harassed etc)
@npub185h…wrdp @npub1tml…ung4
@npub1au2…t53j (not supporting change in relay policy but strongly opposing BIP-110 so different pos)
@npub12rv…85vg

2026-02-07 22:15:57 CET

And their products are amazing I can attest.
Goal is Bitcoiners try the products because they want to spend bitcoin, and then, once amazed, offer some to non-Bitcoiners that then have to use bitcoin to get some more
#note1dhe…t4zw

2026-02-07 17:02:35 CET

Don’t nostr & wine you can end up sending spotify links to sad songs to everyone inc. ceo of spotify competitor.. and can’t delete..

2026-02-07 11:44:33 CET

- reply

She should never have been harassed. It is disgusting behavior.
In general, people on both sides of this debate should try to make the effort to consider that some on other side disagree not because they are compromised child rapists or retarded un-technical idiots but because there are trade offs

2026-02-07 10:35:14 CET

Lorsque le bitcoin s’effondre, la schadenfreude envahit le monde.

2026-02-06 09:23:23 CET

- reply

most investors have little knowledge of spam wars and fork potentials, but the ones that could be interested may have looked in details and thought “well no, then, this is too much of a mess”
For quantum not being the main catalyst, I agree with you but the argument that centralized altcoins would have fallen less : not sure, centralized altcoins have lost all credibility amongst serious people so trade as beta play and their narrative don’t work anymore anyway

2026-02-06 02:33:27 CET

https://youtu.be/109WLnpYkqE

2026-02-06 02:29:52 CET

The thing is drunk noting is much better - and worse - when you can’t delete

2026-02-06 02:28:03 CET

@npub1sg6…f63m we love you, you are doing so much
You have also the best head of strategy research at block, her name is Danielle Flam : she is so smart and a good person that it hurts
Also listen to this song you will like it I believe.
https://open.spotify.com/track/202UCWkwMAVLfdwYct8c2j?si=pAxiWMlXRq2KSQAxARVzpg

2026-02-06 02:24:34 CET

And I am so grateful for nostr
You will be adorable
And I will be staying on the west coast of Florida

2026-02-06 02:18:22 CET

Bought bitcoin for first time at 8k eur in 2020. I am at my cost now. It is fine and ready to sink with the ship. So much bigger than us friends ✊🫡

2026-02-06 02:06:20 CET

Non kyc bitcoin trades 15 pct higher

2026-02-06 02:02:15 CET

I believe it is the best song of the XXIst century but I am cute when it is late and bitcoin is down 30 pct in 3 days
https://open.spotify.com/track/202UCWkwMAVLfdwYct8c2j?si=afkeAAzhQnKKwGe4JcXe6Q

2026-02-06 01:59:39 CET

- reply

We love you. You are great. I think you and Odell should support Luke.
He is right on this. He is a weirdo and you are not, but he is right on this

2026-02-06 01:58:16 CET

I will lose my hair but not my fire
And you will be twenty forever
I will eat your body babe
And leave no crumbs
But it will not take the pain away when it comes

2026-02-06 01:55:55 CET

Spent all my non kyc bitcoin at a loss
Will buy more and spend it at a loss for eternity

2026-02-06 01:54:57 CET

I will never buy bitcoin kyc anymore.
Non kyc bitcoin is the way
Lost all my kyc bitcoins anyway

2026-02-06 01:53:08 CET

Andre Herman Dune aka Stanley Brinks is the best writer of sad songs.
We need him on nostr

2026-02-06 01:50:13 CET

Bitcoin is down. Let’s listen to sad songs.

2026-02-06 01:49:35 CET

You will be adorable
And I will be staying on the west coast of Florida
In a decent shelter from hurricanes and storms
But it won’t take pain away when it comes

2026-02-06 01:48:25 CET

https://open.spotify.com/track/202UCWkwMAVLfdwYct8c2j?si=5KZEHfOOQySvCy3Nuqe-Bg

2026-02-06 01:47:35 CET

The mere thought of you makes me cry
It fills my heart with a sour girth
I can’t get over the fact that you will die
And there will be nothing else on earth

2026-02-06 01:46:24 CET

https://open.spotify.com/track/0nXuoo7jMrjZXxzJ0m7MyV?si=VKDWph_SScehxsYLsAicJg

2026-02-06 01:35:43 CET

If ripple goes to 0 and ether to 300 usd then it was worth it
This is possible. Why should you hold these.

2026-02-06 01:32:25 CET

When it is 1m a bitcoin and people say I was lucky I will just laugh.

2026-02-06 01:30:51 CET

Non KYC bitcoin volumes are so low that it prevents a lot of mistakes.

2026-02-06 01:29:31 CET

- reply

And this is great

2026-02-06 01:29:04 CET

The thing is bio 110 or bip 444 will win cause there will be only crazy people left at 30k

2026-02-06 01:03:07 CET

Only when u have bitcoin can u feel inflation in days not months
Argentinians or Zimbabweans they need 1 month to lose like 15 pct in purchasing power.
We just need one day

2026-02-05 20:14:58 CET

- reply

Can someone articulate a reasonable reason why this change in default relay policy was needed? Seriously. This is a change with serious potential risk and consequences. Why the fuck was it needed? Can someone say something more convincing than “fee predictor” or “because we want JPEGs on chain” or “content agnostic”
The use case is money. Why the fuck do we need this change in standard relay policy??

2026-02-05 20:11:13 CET

- reply

In the end, things are not binary. Default relay policy matter: entering a deal with a miner to put CP on the chain is a very identifiable way to do something illegal, which is not comfortable for the potential miner and the user that does it. Much easier for bad actors if non identifiable and miner can say not on purpose.

2026-02-05 08:11:10 CET

- reply

I was troubled by ChatGPT denying op_return max size was changed in core30 relay policy. He only agreed he was wrong when I told him grok disagreed 😀
While I can understand the logic of open later above, I believe
1. There is a difference between a “deal” to add for instance csam between a miner and a user and csam being easily propagated on network. It is unlikely that such deals will exist for csam as miners will look really bad (much less the case when propagated as they can say they did not see / filter)
2. There is a difference also to add csam through complex ways in segwits that require interpretation and just straight easily in common interpretation in op_return
These are real threats that op_returns size increase make much worse. Saying people are idiotic or obsessed by those or puritans won’t make those threats disappear and is not a way to argue.
The fees prediction improvement seems minor compared to the change of how bitcoin is used / can be used (or attacked) in practice.
Here too I agree with knots that change of default policy are shaping what the network is in practice. We don’t live in a theoretical word. Things are non binary : a chain where arbitrary can be added but it is non standard / non natural is very different from one where it is normal use. Keeping the network very simple, mostly monetary by keeping defaults optimizing for that seems the easy win.
Otherwise, we risk losing the monetary use, that is the use that matters to most bitcoin users, and what it was invented for.

2026-02-05 00:47:01 CET

- reply

Thanks. Can understand reasoning. Not sure 100 pct understand exact change on relay policy though so will study further.

2026-02-05 00:21:03 CET

- reply

Strike or peach bitcoin and Robosats for non kyc. Non kyc is in the end the second best thing after getting paid in sats (and very close)
Non kyc and spending is good combination

2026-02-04 23:46:52 CET

- reply

What does it allow that is absolutely necessary beyond being “logical” (if it is saying that people would spam in more harmful ways otherwise, or that people cannot define spam etc, all that is not very convincing)
What is the practical need for this change, I think there is one, is not there?

2026-02-04 23:09:56 CET

- reply

Yes it is indeed very disappointing
Was this change to default relay policy really worth it? Was it worth it to apply it once it appeared strong opposition even if from vocal minority? What does it bring that is incredibly necessary? (All genuine q)

2026-02-04 00:24:12 CET

- reply

How/ when did she jump ship? Did not follow

2026-02-03 18:46:49 CET

- reply

I don’t know. My experience is that you can buy gold coins (non collection) at 2 to 5 pct premium and sell at same discount. And that for 1kg bar it is more 1pct each side

2026-02-03 17:43:37 CET

- reply

As much as I would want to believe this, it is not true

2026-01-28 09:39:19 CET

- reply

Courage to you and all friends and family. Thinking about you.

2026-01-13 08:47:45 CET

- reply

Much less than portrayed yes, not zero though, something like 3/4 pct a year inflation adjusted total return in SP500

2025-12-31 11:09:09 CET

- reply

So beautiful. Is it still to be purchased? What are the dimensions? Many thanks!

2025-12-15 21:09:36 CET

- reply

It is a rad fitness flex…

2025-12-14 17:45:06 CET

- reply

It is very difficult to be lucid about one’s own family affairs.
My sister named her first son the name of our father, with whom she has a very special and complex relationship. She denies it has anything to do with him.

2025-11-12 08:38:40 CET

- reply

Unit of account rather

2025-10-28 07:06:10 CET

I am yet to hear a counter argument to this that would make sense
#note1ldr…spdx

2025-09-15 15:52:31 CEST

- reply

Used it it’s amazing! Thanks so much and continue the good work!
For delivery it went ok in the end sorry for that

2025-09-15 12:03:58 CEST

Thanks @npub1zzm…w5wy well received looks and smells much better than any soap I ever tried
https://image.nostr.build/412a453fa2a6c23d75d32012467155a6ba24fba32c1fccf04badb10cf0f270d8.jpg

2025-08-21 14:06:33 CEST

- reply

Bitcoiners having this opinion might be Fiatlings with a superiority complex^2

2025-08-19 16:03:08 CEST

- reply

And France still managed to be champion of crazyness

2025-08-13 23:50:55 CEST

- reply

Satoshi shared the white paper the anniversary date of the lutherian thesis being placated on churches and (Oct 31) and started the network anniversary date of Luther excommunication (Jan 3)

2025-08-11 11:57:47 CEST

- reply

I think the eating hornet is just taking revenge on the mantis / trying to save the eaten hornet that happens to be the love of his life ❤️

2025-08-11 08:14:35 CEST

Breaking: study finds bitcoiners as gullible as 5 times boosted college girl studying sociology at Boston university
Of course it’s @npub1rtl…jtfs cranking @npub1cj8…rz4u and @npub1hu3…h8nh you fools
#note1d8a…vvf5

2025-07-26 21:14:54 CEST

- reply

Hello I made this pre order long ago but I have had no news nor can’t I see where it is on this could you help with that! Many thanks!
https://buy.daylightcomputer.com/o/38fc0d1e158bcbe9838c9b912fcd45cf/a/58739460bad7f26dabd722e5301b81b3

2025-07-26 14:37:03 CEST

- reply

Yes precisely given mNAV it is give me 2 bitcoins and get exposure to 1 that will become 4 if enough people do like you 😀

2025-07-25 13:33:50 CEST

- reply

Us not global

2025-07-21 22:39:26 CEST

- reply

Welcome to Nostr!

2025-07-20 15:18:26 CEST

- reply

Peut être que le Salvador a pré acheté 3 ou 5 ans de 1 bitcoin par jour en vue de l’accord IMF ?

2025-07-18 15:57:25 CEST

- reply

Comme ethereum le prouve, on peut tromper 1000 fois 1000 personnes

2025-07-12 17:48:59 CEST

- reply

Nobody is trying to convince you little peacock.

2025-07-12 16:15:00 CEST

Not trying, you are dumb as a brick, proud as a peacock, and not everybody is as patient as her.
#note1pvr…xut4

2025-07-12 12:23:29 CEST

- reply

What I don’t understand with people like you @npub1g7l…8yd9 , interacting with @npub1a2c…w83a is : how don’t you get it in the fucking end? How big must your ego be so that each time you do your little stupid trolling she replies nicely and intelligently without even getting annoyed and showing you humbly why your perspective is limited / comes from a position of not having thought carefully and deeply about it??
How is that possible?? You are so lucky to have her, and you don’t even take advantage of it you idiots…

2025-07-12 08:15:33 CEST

- reply

20k was a blow off top that lasted less than a month
You could also say we were at 3k 5years ago, in march 2020 and it would not make more sense

2025-07-11 10:28:11 CEST

- reply

It was in January

2025-07-11 10:15:54 CEST

- reply

Nearly I think it was 104
But yeah, it is finally above 100k eur again