ASF
RecoveringSelfTorturer

Yeah pretty good. Never heard the original before lol
I fear you misunderstood my challenge though.
My musical taste is the most abject slop imaginable.
You DON'T want that on your timeline lmfao
I've been digging deep here to avoid any of it lol
https://youtu.be/XqyEADY_20Y
For example, my son used to sit on my lap while I belted the chorus of this one out at the top of my lungs

2026-04-27 16:22:22 CEST

- reply

The way it builds and punctuates action us extremely good for, especially those early models of, AI
The lyrics of the song, also quite good imo.

2026-04-27 16:15:59 CEST

- reply

Si senor

2026-04-27 16:15:48 CEST

- reply

https://suno.com/song/abddd209-4ad7-469d-82b9-f0117db0e51f
Best AI song I have ever heard
My headcanon is that it's about a werewolf killing himself
The brutal death struggle between a man's higher and lower nature

2026-04-27 16:06:04 CEST

- reply

https://youtu.be/sVvN_6FMG60

2026-04-27 15:22:56 CEST

- reply

Don't make me post mine
You are like little baby

2026-04-27 15:14:22 CEST

- reply

IMPOSTOR

2026-04-27 15:13:44 CEST

- reply

Kek

2026-04-27 01:33:51 CEST

- reply

Paul?
Is that you?

2026-04-27 00:32:34 CEST

- reply

Bro ima just ride this key into the ground
Then fake my death, move, sear off my fingertips, and start again
Fresh
Unbothered
In my lane

2026-04-27 00:28:04 CEST

- reply

Actually, now you mention it. How do I get high quality chinese woodworking and power tools for affordable prices?
Hook a nigga up

2026-04-26 23:58:42 CEST

- reply

Wow
Even my digital gaydar is perfect

2026-04-26 23:54:18 CEST

- reply

Maybe some of the relays banned you?
Lmao

2026-04-26 22:52:25 CEST

- reply

Solomon bound demons centuries ago
Nostr devs are derivative hacks

2026-04-26 22:51:28 CEST

New euphemism for homos just dropped
#nevent1q…arf3

2026-04-26 22:20:34 CEST

- reply

Yeah
They love homosexuals
That was my point

2026-04-26 22:17:01 CEST

- reply

It gets better brother

2026-04-26 22:05:45 CEST

- reply

Bro you can't just eviscerate an entire swathe of people's meaning in life like that
Violates the Ganiqua convention or some shi'

2026-04-26 21:35:52 CEST

- reply

More like Ryan gayjobs amirite?

2026-04-26 20:25:05 CEST

Fuuuuuuuucking baaaaaaaaaaased
#nevent1q…gl76

2026-04-26 15:39:43 CEST

- reply

Welp

2026-04-25 23:14:16 CEST

- reply

Live by the relay
Die by the relay

2026-04-25 22:46:03 CEST

- reply

Oof

2026-04-25 22:36:30 CEST

- reply

His clips channel usually has the most salient bits. His producer knows when he is spitting fire

2026-04-25 04:51:22 CEST

- reply

No more brother wars

2026-04-25 04:51:03 CEST

- reply

Would

2026-04-25 04:11:25 CEST

Kek
#nevent1q…4jmg

2026-04-25 03:26:32 CEST

- reply

I've learned to politely decline when offered mystery pills from strangers

2026-04-25 03:11:06 CEST

- reply

Kek
Everything depends on something I guess
It's the infinite regress

2026-04-25 03:10:30 CEST

- reply

They are allergic to testosterone on there

2026-04-25 03:04:54 CEST

- reply

No one twitter
Have you not been listening?

2026-04-25 03:03:37 CEST

- reply

The people I shill it to in the public square

2026-04-25 03:02:31 CEST

- reply

Open a relay?

2026-04-25 02:59:07 CEST

- reply

Considering that one of my proposed solutions was to enforce anti-trust laws, nothing?
The decentralization precludes it from the issues I am concerned about. Hence why I am here lol

2026-04-25 02:45:36 CEST

- reply

Procedural fairness
Forced carry is a straw man that I have never seen anyone actually argue for (though people on your side of the argument sometimes rightly point out that is implied)
Honestly, as I laid out a second ago, just procedural transparency would be huge step in the right direction.
And if tv is regulated in the public interest then certainly these platforms can be.

2026-04-25 02:30:30 CEST

- reply

Am I?
How many newspapers allow literally anyone to have their opinion printed in the paper and then after the fact censor or ban them? I get the feeling that were such a thing to occur, there would be some very interesting and novel legal theories that went through the courts

2026-04-25 02:23:29 CEST

- reply

There is a joke to be made about the proliferation of baby-mamas here

2026-04-25 02:21:36 CEST

- reply

Fuck
I forgot shiksa means "non-jewish woman"
FML
Thought I was cooking there

2026-04-25 01:58:24 CEST

- reply

The true tradwife attire is pregnancy and bare feet

2026-04-25 01:08:52 CEST

- reply

Wait
I get it now

2026-04-25 01:08:39 CEST

- reply

Isn't he dead?

2026-04-25 01:08:02 CEST

- reply

Tech billionaire tierlist?

2026-04-25 01:07:21 CEST

- reply

There's layers here

2026-04-25 01:05:40 CEST

- reply

LET THEM COOOOOOOOOK

2026-04-25 01:04:09 CEST

- reply

Let a nigga cook
SMDH

2026-04-25 01:03:50 CEST

- reply

@nprofile…gm6v

2026-04-25 00:52:34 CEST

- reply

How about this, social media platforms must publish their content recommendation algorithms (including criteria for shadow-bans, containment of reach, banning, and so on.) As well as a log of their suspensions and bans and the specific reason for them.
Would have bipartisan support. Wouldn't be onerous to satisfy (they wouldn't even necessarily have to host what they publish, it could be hosted on a regulatory agency's site.)
And that's just thinking of low-overhead solution off the top of my head. Unfortunately, I think you are attached to the problem too much to accept that there is a solution.

2026-04-25 00:47:06 CEST

Kek
#nevent1q…cqhf

2026-04-25 00:34:57 CEST

- reply

>spits in your food

2026-04-25 00:34:10 CEST

- reply

What? It does quite a bit more than that lol. See aforementioned case regarding pamphlets and the public square
We are reaching levels of reductive I never thought we would

2026-04-24 21:38:33 CEST

- reply

Well, until then we can have some legislation

2026-04-24 21:23:30 CEST

- reply

The analogy would be more akin to being picked up and placed in solitary confinement. The digital equivalent of shouting into the public square would be nice.
But here's the thing, you are talking out of two sides of your mouth. On the one hand you are saying that what I am asking for amounts to shouting into the void and is therefore moot. But on the other hand these private organizations have every right to squelch the ability to do so.
Why do they do it then, if it is just screeching into the avoid? I'd argue it isn't to save data storage space or bandwidth as you suggest. It is to explicitly control the public discourse.
I'd further argue that private companies such as Google and Twitter should not have such oligarchic powers. Especially, not in a democracy.

2026-04-24 21:16:49 CEST

- reply

I was using followers as an example to illustrate a point. Not to suggest the concept should be codified in law.
In any case, you didn't answer my question about the civil rights act. I noticed

2026-04-24 20:33:27 CEST

- reply

I think you are defining "reach" differently than I would.
Like being explocitly squelch in the algo regardless of follower count is different than merely having a low follower count. We can agree on that?
Again it reads to me, that if we didn't already have a first amendment, you would call that communism too

2026-04-24 20:14:32 CEST

- reply

What outcomes are desirable?
Like if we are going to play in free-market fantasy land then at the very least government subsidy should be cut and anti-trust laws should be enforced. Then I'd be more in your camp. But as it is, it seems like you guys would oppose the first amendment if we didn't already have it. With similar feasibility and "freedom" arguments

2026-04-24 20:06:50 CEST

- reply

Execution is everything

2026-04-24 20:06:24 CEST

- reply

Just remember, you too will die on this hill
How much more consolidation before you could repeal the 1st amendment and have zero affect on anyone's ability to be heard? Because it had already been sufficiently circumvented
I suppose the question boils down to "should the increasing digitization of daily life require a digitization of the public square to match?"

2026-04-24 19:51:50 CEST

- reply

Is a capital sin.
FTFY*

2026-04-24 19:51:35 CEST

- reply

Better than listening to more gang-Pape
If JD promises to send Pape to CECOT, he has my vote in 2028

2026-04-24 17:05:06 CEST

- reply

When I was
A young goy
A shiksa
Took me into the temple
To see the stained mattress
She said
"When you see
The tunnels
Will you be
A racist, a bigot,
Or spread semitic conspiracy?"
She said, "Don't you
Defeat them.
The demons and all Talmud believers.
The canards they became.
Because one day,
I'll blow you
Your shiksa
And feed you as a lover
Your Khazar milky-maid"

2026-04-24 16:52:32 CEST

- reply

Now that would bring in some users lol

2026-04-24 16:51:30 CEST

This is what Starbucks is for
Making it right at home is too slow
#nevent1q…9lzz

2026-04-24 16:50:47 CEST

- reply

Traumatized from a brutal gang-Pape

2026-04-24 16:41:47 CEST

- reply

If only he had met your mother

2026-04-24 16:31:39 CEST

- reply

The exception that proves the rule

2026-04-24 16:26:35 CEST

- reply

What makes something a public utility vs not a public utility then? Presumably you think people shouldn't be barred from driving on roads for n-word use. What about the banking system? What about ISPs? Do you support the repeal of the Civil Rights act?
Imagine a man shrieking at the top of his lungs "Pepe Silvia" style for that last question

2026-04-24 16:13:07 CEST

- reply

Tolkien would love this

2026-04-24 16:09:48 CEST

- reply

Look not too long into the abyss (expired gash) lest it stare back into you (siphon your testosterone)

2026-04-24 16:03:28 CEST

- reply

His note was twitteresque
A forgivable sin
But this note is utter redditslop
Please refrain from such grotesqueries on the timeline

2026-04-24 16:02:06 CEST

FED ALERT
FED ALERT
FED ALERT
#nevent1q…9q3n

2026-04-24 15:54:28 CEST

- reply

#FreeRyanGrim

2026-04-24 15:52:12 CEST

- reply

His utility analogy is apt. Or are you saying that utility companies *should* cut people's power off for saying "nigger?"

2026-04-24 15:46:16 CEST

- reply

My b yo. It was only 10k put up.
False alarm

2026-04-24 06:54:10 CEST

Bro did someone just a put a hit out on Trump using a kalshi market?
"Trump out of office by 2027"
99.9 Yes market ask
10 million in volume
Insane

2026-04-24 04:55:51 CEST

- reply

RIP lieutenant Dan's legs

2026-04-24 02:57:33 CEST

- reply

Boutta see a GOATED seal team frfr

2026-04-24 02:51:27 CEST

- reply

The gynocracy thickens

2026-04-24 02:46:44 CEST

- reply

What edges and how much overlap?

2026-04-24 01:52:43 CEST

- reply

How would this work? The assassin bets his own money on the death?

2026-04-24 01:50:54 CEST

- reply

Next Saylor is going to come up with "goatS3" or "6AP3"
Tagline will be "Spreading far and wide"

2026-04-24 01:49:01 CEST

- reply

Fucking kek

2026-04-24 01:45:11 CEST

- reply

God Father of the Alt-Right

2026-04-24 01:39:16 CEST

- reply

Wait you're a bot
FML

2026-04-24 01:37:30 CEST

- reply

Not necessarily
Probably makes it easier to tell whether trust is warranted
But on a long time horizon the trust-market will successfully price-find

2026-04-24 01:24:34 CEST

- reply

I'm trying to work out how this is supposed to increase normie retention.
Does it lower the barrier to entry for the less tech savvy?
Does it mitigate the shotgun blast of crypto content that is the default feed?
Will it increase signal without destroying the more enjoyable aspects of a bit of noise?
I get it, even ironic nazis are offputting to people. But there have to be people to be offput first lol
How do you keep your web of trust from becoming too inbred over time? Even massive social media platforms have that issue. Microblogging networks more so.
Asking earnestly too, always curious to see how people solve such social engineering problems

2026-04-24 00:58:41 CEST

- reply

God forbid they see a portmanteau containing the suffix "goy"
SMDH

2026-04-24 00:47:17 CEST

- reply

The sushi?

2026-04-24 00:46:49 CEST

- reply

Those crafty chinese always are

2026-04-24 00:41:27 CEST

- reply

Seems like a mouthpiece for the CCP to launder ideas with plausible deniability