JackTheMimic

Hoch die anarchie. CTO at Sovreign.io

Public Key

npub1m50e65pv09ga73lglrkjgh5tlgj006pv9rce8xdg7rn5kps38gssh2glzq

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsd68ua2qk8j5wlgl503mfyt69l5f8haqkz3uvnnx50pe6tqcgn5ggpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0ds6c6nmg

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1m50e65pv09ga73lglrkjgh5tlgj006pv9rce8xdg7rn5kps38gssh2glzq

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-05-04 23:47:56 CEST

- reply

Cool bro, You're a super spy guy total enemy of the state type stuff. Have fun playing with your Monero.

2026-05-04 23:20:15 CEST

- reply

Yeah, these guys must be using public incorrectly, too.
https://brightlaws.com/public-vs-private-data/
https://nakamotoinstitute.org/library/cypherpunk-manifesto/
https://www.companysights.com/resources/private-data-vs-public-data-how-to-calibrate-the-difference

2026-05-04 18:18:59 CEST

- reply

I guess I would say, look into the IME if the CPU is is intel and why a lot of people opt for coreboot. The OS isn't the only vector of attack. Either way, I am not saying you can't have useful tools. This is also called an anti-pattern and is just as identifying as regular patterns. Having no digital footprint when you are a known person in meatspace creates a profile all its own.
This is beside the point. Most people ARE harmless so the intel agencies aren't wrong. You can try to obscure your network traffic, preserve your privacy, and control your UTXOs meticulously.
1, ONE counterparty you transact with can ruin all of that work. I think that's what I am trying to get across here. Using money (debt to other people for their good or service) necessarily involves public data. Use cash dollars, use Monero, use Bitcoin, use gold, whatever. No one is going to get paid and say "I wonder how I got this money, and from whom?" That just doesn't happen.
Using techniques to obsure your traffic so the average thug doesn't come for your corn is DOABLE. Obscuring you traffic so that no nation state can know your dealings? Impossible.

2026-05-04 18:02:58 CEST

- reply

You literally don't know what you are talking about.

2026-05-04 18:02:10 CEST

- reply

I know what these terms mean, you are mistaken.

2026-05-04 18:01:06 CEST

- reply

No that's YOUR thesis. I don't make that assumption.

2026-05-04 10:18:43 CEST

- reply

Try to square the paradox of transacting Bitcoin without owning a computer. THAT is my conclusion. Everyone in Monero is privacy-LARPing, and I'm kind of tired of seeing it.
As for content of your communications, there are ways to keep that data private to a point. But again, you have a counterparty that can ruin everything. The essence of networks is that we are relying on others. Which is fine for trusted parties but merchants are generally untrusted parties.

2026-05-04 09:11:22 CEST

- reply

On a tangentially related note, I just watched your latest appearance on What Bitcoin did, and I think you might have just gotten the world record of most analogies given in one hour. Absolute fire hose of signal.

2026-05-04 08:31:18 CEST

- reply

Dave, I am saying if you touch a network at all, you cannot expect privacy to the level that you can obscure yourself from a nation's state. There are things you can do to not be on their radar, but they are so extreme and so regressive that they are detrimental to human existence.

2026-05-04 04:29:21 CEST

- reply

A little primer for you on data:
Public data- is data that you allow to be known by untrusted parties.
Private data- is data you allow to be known by only trusted parties.
Secret data- is data you allow to only be known by yourself.
A transaction with a merchant is in the "public" sphere of data. I was not implying that every transaction is put in the newspaper and pushed onto people's Twitter feeds or something.

2026-05-04 04:25:55 CEST

- reply

Yes.

2026-05-04 04:25:26 CEST

- reply

Let me rephrase so there's no pedantic gotcha: Overwhelmingly the most common way people can be identified by address is via fiat on ramps and off ramps.
The agorist selling me soap and fucking beef jerky is not giving my info to the CIA, Square, Strike, and Coinbase are. Better?
Okay. Ready?
The shop can just not tie the transaction to the data!
Example:
For reporting purposes- the shop sold 15 widgets.
The customer data is a separate ephemeral database.
NO MATTER WHAT MONEY YOU USE THIS IS TRUE. Yes, including Monero.
So, what's your point here? That using money is a public act (like I said). Or obscurity is a technique not part of the protocol because no matter the protocol the counterparty needs to be trusted? (Also like I said)
In a mass adoption world if I got bitcoin, sent it to a single spend (non-deterministic) address and handed the keys to the shop owner where's the paper trail? This is a TECHNIQUE yet I preserve my anonymity. (again, something I said before)

2026-05-03 23:44:48 CEST

- reply

Thanks for your input, bot.

2026-05-03 23:43:18 CEST

- reply

Using money is a public act. That's the thing. You're talking about a system in which you go out into public and ask everyone around you to preserve your privacy. It is not something that is possible because there are counter parties who also know you are trying to transact with them. Privacy is selectively revealing yourself to trusted parties. And the problem with that is merchants are never trusted parties. That is the whole rationale behind having trustless money.
Treat privacy like you treat anything else. When you're walking down the street, you carry a weapon because the average thug can be repelled with a weapon. But if you think your privacy precautions are going to save you from a nation state, you are sorely mistaken. Obscurity and pseudonymous techniques are the equivalent of carrying a weapon with you.
As for your premise, that digital surveillance is the norm. It isn't the norm of humanity, it is the norm of a centralized monetary system. And again, it's not that Bitcoin is not private or at least obscured. The emergence of Bitcoin is trying to reconcile a centralized system against a decentralized one. The only reason anybody can tie an identity to a Bitcoin address is because of the fiat on-ramps and off-ramps using Bitcoin. If I mine Bitcoin or do a job for someone and receive the payment in Bitcoin, there's nothing tying my identity to that address. That is just a holdover of people trying to transfer their wealth from the controlled system to the decentralized one.

2026-05-03 23:27:20 CEST

- reply

This is a response in a thread, not a manifesto on privacy as a whole.

2026-05-03 21:10:39 CEST

- reply

Guy, I do cyber security and privacy for a living. I am not some novice. I am not ignoring the issue. I am stating that you create a larger problem trying to solve for a temporary use issue.
Very minor techniques can obscure your information. But NOTHING and I do mean NOTHING stops a nation state from finding and killing you for whatever reason they want. The only reason you are not dead is that you are not a threat. Not that your mask avatar or opsec has obscured your identity. You are a known entity and you have been deemed harmless.

2026-05-03 20:50:41 CEST

- reply

I didn't say that. I am saying you need techniques not protocol changes. Protocol changes add complexity when privacy is not as useful in the future. Techniques can be adopted in the early days then discarded later.

2026-05-03 20:40:20 CEST

- reply

So, very little. Got it.

2026-05-03 20:39:59 CEST

- reply

So what? Who cares. I spin up keys like every 5 minutes. Shit, I can't remember seeds I used like 6 months ago. "Huge issue" meaning what? Are we pretending that there aren't 2 parties involved in every transaction? What if your counter party tells a fed that you transacted with them? Where is your privacy then?

2026-05-03 20:35:47 CEST

- reply

Nah, I don't use centralized networks that can censor your content.

2026-05-03 20:33:50 CEST

- reply

Okay, nice argument. Glad you put so much thought into your response.
You probably say things like "cash is private" and think no deeper.

2026-05-03 20:11:05 CEST

- reply

Privacy is an issue for emergent systems because the set of users can be identified and crushed. But once there is ubiquity, on chain privacy is not a focal point of money. Minor pseudonymous protections (like no accounts tied to people but Public keys as the only identifier) serve well enough to use it as money.
So yes privacy is an issue NOW. but embedding privacy into the protocol is going to be vestigial with mass adoption.

2026-05-02 22:36:27 CEST

- reply

Oh my bad, I thought this was a NIP type situation.
The subjective part of Doxxing is taking a photo of a person at a particular location is doxxing, but also completely legal. Where that boundary becomes blurry is if you take a picture of them pulling into their house. Did you reveal where their house is or are you just taking a picture in public?
Anyway, never mind. I thought this was a top-down configuration proposal. Disregard.

2026-05-02 22:24:13 CEST

- reply

I just don't understand the situation where there's any "unconfigurable" moderation.
If you run the relay and don't configure it to block spam, no one with query your relay. Hosting CSAM is a crime and if you don't configure for that, you put yourself at risk. Doxxing is a subjective metric but can be configured as well. Making things "unconfigurable" is just your will being imposed on others. People will either make the right choice or face the consequences for making the choice they made.

2026-05-02 21:11:04 CEST

- reply

That was when Vine added "video upload" ruining it imo. That's a vine from 2013.

2026-05-02 20:03:56 CEST

- reply

Can you tag me in it?

2026-05-02 20:01:46 CEST

- reply

That's why Vine was so creative. Having a constraint makes creativity very resilient.

2026-05-02 20:00:12 CEST

- reply

Nope. You have to put something infront of a camera lens.

2026-05-02 19:59:31 CEST

- reply

That's Vine baby. Real, raw shit. Six seconds, no heavy modifications.

2026-05-02 19:51:35 CEST

- reply

Right. And I am say this sovereign application is lying to its users. I am asking the creator (rabble) and someone who is very promotional of that app (you) if that was an intended feature. Not saying it CAN'T do that, it clearly can. Just curious (and stating my opinion about it)

2026-05-02 19:36:24 CEST

- reply

I understand, I am able to view the content, that's not the issue.
My question is why there is a UI for "restricted content" in the first place. The Application should not be doing that. Divine's relay may block the upload or delete it if it doesn't fit its policies. I have nothing marked to be filtered out. And especially a post as mild as this should never be blocked anyway.

2026-05-02 19:30:58 CEST

- reply

I guess my point is that each relay is a service, and people should treat them as such. Clear delineation of the content parameters is the best path.
Maybe something that says what is not allowed (generally a shorter list unless a specialized relay) and users agree before using it as an inbox.
Applications could use these parameters as a GUIDE for Outbox model but one person's slop is another's gold so, That would be the most difficult to get right because if the stated spam filtration doesn't see AI response (for example) as spam, it wouldn't filter.
Either way users need to grow some balls and take responsibility for their selections. Relays need to give users the tools to make that selection.

2026-05-02 06:11:24 CEST

- reply

Applications follow the protocol. The relay select what they store and send. That's where "moderation happens. This isn't hard to understand.

2026-05-02 06:03:58 CEST

- reply

Just wear a rubber dude.

2026-05-02 06:00:36 CEST

- reply

Nostr doesn't need moderation. Relays can set their own policy.

2026-05-02 05:56:10 CEST

@nprofile…62p3 @nprofile…2szn Divine WTF is this?
Not only should an application not do content moderation, this is retarded.
https://blossom.primal.net/f1f77bc824c5bcbc63a9da45f3ba1d7953e05d723c505a4a8627db4716580b09.jpg
https://blossom.primal.net/2f5ba8c283e974acaaf6565e5327be5d858c823066b09f75832677892e3b2197.mp4

2026-05-01 20:28:26 CEST

@nprofile…62p3
Just a few notes on Divine.
- After 10 mins of use the app slows down significantly. (Sluggish, slow to respond to button presses, video loading very noticeable)
- The square video recording should not ever display in fullscreen as it cuts off most of the side frame.
- Pressing the Home icon should scroll feed to the top most recent in the category selected (for you, new, or following)
- Make profiles selectable from the comment feed.
Positive Notes:
This app so far feels like 2013 vine. Amazing to see people figure it out all over again.
I love finding gems and seeing that they have a great sense of humor or art and finding a fresh new follow.
Love how most won't even realize it's using Nostr as a backbone. Great job.

2026-05-01 19:27:31 CEST

- reply

I didn't need one but I just updated mine from the test flight version.

2026-05-01 19:03:07 CEST

Help, I've started Vining again and I don't know if I can stop.

2026-05-01 18:09:29 CEST

- reply

I was on the original one, I will be back on this one. Just trying to determine if I make a new Nym for it.

2026-05-01 05:14:13 CEST

- reply

Yes. Possession has reversed causality to what people think. The demonic (or divine) is not possessing you, you are possessing them in physical form. They are the idea, you are their manifestation.

2026-05-01 03:55:14 CEST

- reply

Manners.

2026-04-30 23:07:16 CEST

- reply

By Enclave, what are we talking about? Is this hardware that has unknowable data? Or is it secured data? And if so, by what or whom?
If it is secured by encryption, who/what knows the passphrase?(leads to rugging)
If unknowable data, how does one prove the firmware on the hardware is genuine? (Wasn't secretly copied, leading to rugging)
I have been trying to design an enclave and this has always been the problem:
- You either can't trust the data hasn't been copied prior to its generation .
Or
- You can't trust that the purported firmware is genuine.
If this problem has been solved, there are going to be two awesome projects coming out soon.

2026-04-30 22:53:53 CEST

- reply

What is the patch exactly? It seems like such an ephemeral exploit. I'm not sure how a system could integrity check files in RAM for permissions.

2026-04-30 22:50:46 CEST

- reply

With Microsoft shitting the bed so hard with Windows, it's no wonder that we're seeing more discovered exploits on Linux. Now we get to test how resilient this open source kernel really is.

2026-04-30 22:17:57 CEST

- reply

You are missing my whole point about trustlessness. Lightning is trustless. Coupons for gold are not. There is no trustless way to transact cheaply and instantly with gold. There is with Bitcoin. That's my point. Nothing to do with the components of hard money itself. And yes, it does escape Gresham's Law by this fact.

2026-04-30 19:46:36 CEST

- reply

Yeah because Gresham's Law was made before public/private key cryptography and an issued currency without an issuer. I didn't "make it up" I applied logic to WHY the law is true instead of taking it prima fascie.
The reason people choose the "fast money" is because it is more easily transactable, portable, and more easily obtainable.
Bitcoin is also those things WHILE being hard money. That has never existed. This is like FTL travel being invented and someone going "Einstein's Relativity would like a word." Yeah, it's been obsoleted.

2026-04-30 09:11:46 CEST

- reply

Also "not a big deal imo" you are telling on yourself a bit there. It's a big deal if you are influential. Just like getting bitcoin into self-custody is a big deal if you have a lot of Bitcoin.

2026-04-30 09:07:02 CEST

- reply

I understand most people use exchanges to hold bitcoin too. That doesn't mean that should be the default. And it also means Nostr Devs need to make the convenience of remote signing (even from the same phone they have the client on) better so it would just be dumb to not implement it.

2026-04-30 05:54:06 CEST

- reply

Gotcha and there are no clear winners so if someone makes a good one, there just an XKCD comic about 500+1 implementations.

2026-04-30 05:33:47 CEST

- reply

Well, the Verification code might open spam possibilities so maybe not that but something similar to a bitcoin message verification?

2026-04-30 05:32:42 CEST

- reply

Is there a straight forward implementation? Challenge/Response style? Even an auto-sent DM with a verification code to that Npub would suffice right?
I just can't see how the, sign a defined message with a private key linked to a public key is difficult.

2026-04-30 05:07:51 CEST

I am a Bitcoin guy, not that deep in the Nostr NIP weeds. Is there a reason why these VERY USEFUL AND INNOVATIVE Nostr apps (Drivestr, Ridestr, BitTasker...etc) never implement remote signing or Nsec Bunkers for login? Yet every twitter clone has it?
Is there a technical reason for this?
@nprofile…pt5w @nprofile…cy6q @nprofile…jejf

2026-04-30 00:23:45 CEST

- reply

And he's a registered business with the SEC and he's extorted for taxes as well, so as long as the Bitcoin appreciates, he is either forced to sell or continue pumping more fiat into the system. This is not an escape velocity strategy.
He is a giant target that will either be liquidated or a criminal in the future. There is no third option for him.
So again, don't self incriminate to the government and transact with Bitcoin however you feel is appropriate.

2026-04-29 23:52:47 CEST

- reply

#1 doesn't happen without #3.

2026-04-29 23:08:33 CEST

- reply

Okay, I think discounting the free will of humanity to choose a bad outcome is not a good position to hold. Just my 2 sats.

2026-04-29 23:03:04 CEST

- reply

Imposing seems like the wrong word. Maybe Offering or providing a path to.

2026-04-29 22:59:59 CEST

People want everything to be:
Awesome
Convenient
Perfectly polished
Decentralized
Private
Resilient
The world is currently built on centralization and optimizing for the first three points and totally neglectful of the last three.
The first three are the why of the things you use in life and the last three are the how.
When you don't care about how things are done, you can be controlled. But when you focus on the how and do things the hard way, first, everything gets easier as things get more awesome, convenient, and polished, while remaining decentralized, private, and resilient.
Keep building, sure. But also do the hard thing now that gets better over time.

2026-04-29 22:03:03 CEST

- reply

Trusted exchange coupons are not bitcoin. This is tantamount to saying "dollar bills are physical bitcoin"
Ecash is interesting, not bitcoin though.

2026-04-29 20:33:31 CEST

- reply

A non governmental money and owing tax are mutually exclusive. Also, you HAVE to self-incriminate for this to be true.

2026-04-29 12:00:44 CEST

- reply

Answer: we killed most of the other hominids. Now the only human physiological differences are still crossbreed compatible.

2026-04-29 11:57:01 CEST

- reply

It is. Search "BitTasker"

2026-04-29 10:49:38 CEST

- reply

The fact that MicroStrategy is not one of the biggest lightning nodes called MicroPaymentStrategy is one of the biggest losses of capital of our time.
I would say Michael Saylor hire me but, I'm not down with his ethos so I'll let him have that one for free.

2026-04-28 19:18:59 CEST

- reply

Say "I'm UTXO"
And if that needs further clarification, "The man"

2026-04-28 04:26:03 CEST

- reply

Are these the floor system stats?

2026-04-27 03:38:13 CEST

- reply

Well, if you replace your workers with AI, you also replace your customers and thereby go out of business. So, it's just as detrimental for corporations to do as the worker.
HOWEVER, if the efficiency matches a low cost. The price of everything falls dramatically. Now you need 1/5th of the money to live buying the same consumer goods.
Regardless, you need a healthy foundation to find efficiency within, (which the world is not built on). So, very likely the efficiency will funnel into systems that don't work.

2026-04-27 03:31:45 CEST

- reply

Maybe I'm a dumb but embedded nodes seem like a better strategy for IRL payments.
The way I always thought about it:
Embedded phone node funded with my at home recieve node (for nostr). Now I have "always on" inbound liquidity and a phone node that has outbound ready to spenny.

2026-04-25 19:39:45 CEST

- reply

I'm just wondering why so many people don't have that. I didn't do much work to arrive at "Do onto others as you would have them do unto you." I read it. It made sense logically. It made sense spiritually. Does it really not make sense to others to adhere to that no matter the cost?

2026-04-25 19:24:01 CEST

- reply

Principles have logical underpinnings. Morals have spiritual underpinnings. Both are important but I mean morals in this context because I say "believe" repeatedly.

2026-04-25 19:11:11 CEST

Does anyone have morals today? My parents were both teens when I was born. I didn't have some grandpa telling me the moral foundations. I was barely going to church until I was 12. The only thing I can think of is hearing the Golden rule and thinking "Yeah, that tracks."
How are so many people willing to sell themselves? If you hold a position, "I believe in [X]" Is that true at all prices? If you are paid millions do you still believe [X]? If your family is threatened do you still believe in [X]? If YOUR life is threatened will you still hold [X] true?
Why do people not have scruples? Do you realize that makes for sale? Nothing more than a slight tax for evil to persist?
If the price of your morality is not your life, you are a line item for evil's budget. You are for sale.

2026-04-24 22:48:16 CEST

- reply

That probably means your neutral connection is loose if the voltage is not equivalent with the ground...
I mean, jizz stuff.

2026-04-24 07:51:24 CEST

- reply

That would be the blue square. I don't know what anarchistic right-wing businesses pay tariffs.

2026-04-24 04:01:30 CEST

- reply

https://youtu.be/d6CGlZv-OnA

2026-04-24 03:59:47 CEST

- reply

This is more likely due to some Laser Defense Systems inability to burn targets with certain blue colorations.

2026-04-24 03:08:04 CEST

- reply

What a shame, he was JUST about to make America great again, too...

2026-04-23 23:09:04 CEST

Americana https://blossom.primal.net/7ae05e6cccba219f68b6784bde875b006846284b28950de4a7001fdb4d650466.jpg

2026-04-22 03:29:14 CEST

- reply

Guy, who said "proxy for violence"?
Does that JDAM cost money? Congratulations, you've just made my argument.

2026-04-22 00:13:43 CEST

- reply

Okay, so the spending and recieving is NOT the innovation in power projection I am talking about. It is the ability of the miner which the military can at the very least project considerable energy into that allows or disallows the expenditure of those unique coins. By merely dumping hash power into the network with your own templates, you can stop your adversaries from being able to purchase weapons or pay soldiers or things of that nature if you can identify their addresses and their coins. This power projection has a similar effect to being able to control the centralized systems of the legacy system.
I'm sorry I can't really explain this like you're 10. This requires a more detailed explanation. That's why I tried to put it in bullet points earlier.
By using military energy (oil reserves, nuclear power, and others) you can increase the hash rate considerably, thereby making all other actors in the mining space less likely to mine a block, and therefore less likely to control the template of additions to those blocks. This allows financial censorship if not considerably decentralized in the near future. That is power.

2026-04-21 23:50:27 CEST

- reply

...New to military application. Are we speaking past each other here? If I learned something 10 minutes ago and you say that it's new, is it not really new because I knew it already?

2026-04-21 17:51:57 CEST

- reply

Orbot disabled, same issue.

2026-04-21 17:48:54 CEST

- reply

Yeah, not ones that I use. I keep most apps updated within 1-2 days of update release.
I run mostly Open-source stuff out of Zapstore or Accressant.
I run Orbot and Amber in background almost always. That's all I can think of.

2026-04-21 17:45:58 CEST

- reply

As you can see I have a few Nostr apps, I think I'll survive but thanks for checking it out. The only reason I report it is I enjoy Wisp.

2026-04-21 17:42:21 CEST

- reply

The problem recurred today.
https://blossom.primal.net/4412181aa50494ab4c4d37af297085063bcf3554559726b5f6d250bb3c908ced.mp4

2026-04-20 23:17:37 CEST

- reply

Seems to fix it. (I swear I have done that before but it recurs) I will try to catch a screen recording if it happens again.
From my experience with apps it seems memory leaky, but I'm not certain without looking at logs or anything.

2026-04-20 23:10:56 CEST

- reply

0.18.0

2026-04-20 23:09:38 CEST

Hey @nprofile…tkue , Wisp keeps locking the application [I.E. freezing, Unresponsive] when I click the Notification tab. Or sometimes upon launch (after loading finishes)
Have you gotten other reports like this?

2026-04-20 18:31:52 CEST

- reply

My PFP knows...

2026-04-19 20:14:02 CEST

- reply

What if you've been fat since you were 12?
And you literally only drink water 4 days a week? While having a truck driving job?(no time or ability to go to a gym)

2026-04-16 22:26:40 CEST

- reply

What command can I run to know that? Does this take into account tail emissions or subsidy increases?

2026-04-16 20:34:03 CEST

- reply

You are outside of your depth about Bitcoin as far as what can be gleaned on chain. What "audit" means in this context, and what the "government" is capable of within the Bitcoin chain.
I think Monero is neat. I am a big fan of I2P. But Monero not a hard money. Productivity is not made on the black market. You won't have steel mills creating gerders for Monero. There is a chance for that to happen for Bitcoin.

2026-04-16 10:04:19 CEST

- reply

And yet, republicanism and democracy persist as well without the realization of that same simple truth.

2026-04-16 05:26:14 CEST

- reply

Can you tell me how many Monero(XMR) are in existence?
Can you tell me what entities have merge access for Monero Consensus?
Can you put forth what Consensus IS in Monero?

2026-04-15 18:32:19 CEST

- reply

Oh, can anyone with with a computer audit supply? Also curious on how to determine the main chain consensus code merge access.

2026-04-12 22:10:45 CEST

- reply

All I know is it really pisses me off when I go to spend my Bitcoin on a bill and Trump said something an hour earlier that made the price tank separating me from more sets than I wanted to.

2026-04-11 04:27:57 CEST

- reply

What possible update could include something that would kill someone's older phone? If it's an incompatibility issue, you can have a flag that makes older versions incompatible with that specific part of the update while retaining everything else, including the security updates. This is planned obsolescence and a very lazy approach to updates.

2026-04-10 09:11:20 CEST

- reply

As long as taxation exists, UBI is retarded. Why take money from people and then give it back to them when you could just not take it from them in the first place?

2026-04-10 04:01:52 CEST

- reply

Can it a cloud back up, only allow storage for certain file thresholds, only allow encrypted data, and keep adding storage as your customer base grows.
This is a direct connection so, keep security standards. Compete by offering lower prices.

2026-04-10 03:25:32 CEST

- reply

It's a long distance RAID format drive basically.

2026-04-09 20:52:37 CEST

- reply

I thought quantum computers were cool. Now there's a quantum vacuum? My wife is going to be so excited.

2026-04-07 21:39:17 CEST

@nprofile…jejf on Wisp.
I don't know if it's my pixel 6 or what but the UI for videos is not consistent. Sometimes I can hit the buttons at the top and other times they are not accessible.
https://blossom.primal.net/a7f33865913d6d5a3aeddd987541f810921134ca3c637047a069a942233b51b9.mp4