petri

"af6270ca34fef5de0ddcfb6186c85f05d54491416c5611a8785e908b0726831c751e7e622a81d8d48c37ca3c06cde8808578b9b0addeed871d3100840a8f7e3b"

Last Notes

2025-09-25 15:28:39 UTC

@npub1n0s…lahe What are these white triangle symbols with an exclamation mark that populate the feed suddenly?
https://cdn.nostrcheck.me/e417ee3d910253993ae0ce6b41d4a24609970f132958d75b2d9b634d60a3cc08/6077f12b11eaa4267f75976dfc279e0d94a4324e939fe4908dd3a3cce6fc1690.webp

2024-05-06 09:18:41 UTC

- reply

It seems that only a few are genuinely interested in building based on an open-protocol, and the rest want to gain control and maybe dress on the openness if it fits the marketing strategy.
It may require exceptional level of clarity and vision to use open-protocol to capture enough value to sustain the business effort of building it. The VC money is also not attracted to less than brilliant cases and it’s easier to pitch/build another Twitter/X etc. clone with the hockey stick growth projections.

2024-04-07 13:38:35 UTC

”The program remains fully independent of NATO. France is the only member of the alliance that doesn’t belong to its Nuclear Planning Group, and President Macron holds full authority over potential use.”
”The U.K.’s smaller and less versatile nuclear force is, by contrast, fully integrated into the NATO command. Lacking an air component, it relies on American-supplied Trident missiles for its four submarines and possesses a total of under 260 warheads.”
https://www.wsj.com/world/europe/can-europe-still-count-on-americas-nuclear-umbrella-511c8ba0

2024-03-29 11:08:13 UTC

- reply

Mastodon has a bit larger limits:
https://docs.joinmastodon.org/user/posting/#attachments

2024-03-26 18:09:54 UTC

- reply

The real Web

2024-01-28 17:47:01 UTC

Any other European countries doing this, and already for how long?
https://nostrcheck.me/media/petri/655823e8a2de4822b41d7f746360fd0f772615ce8524b4d3da650b2a1f4dfdb8.webp