Goodeye8

Public Key

npub1vdte06zdhmelvnc5feuy4987864n8u8wmgqmtlwu0hstqvhwxfjqxad0vw

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsxx4uhapxmaulkfu2yu7z2jnlra2en7rhd5qd4lhw8mc9sxthryeqpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgqg5waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t0qyxhwumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmvkccv2f

Publishing to

relay.primal.net

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1vdte06zdhmelvnc5feuy4987864n8u8wmgqmtlwu0hstqvhwxfjqxad0vw

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-01-28 10:13:58 UTC

- reply

In case you were not paying attention you said Valve has to remove abusive clauses, which there is only one in question here and that's about price parity, so other stores could compete. At not point did you mention any actual laws and at no point did I mention anything remotely related to laws. I said you thinking that removing that one clause will make other stores competitive is delusional thinking.
EDIT: And I got blocked. I guess that says all there is to say about OP.

2026-01-28 09:40:28 UTC

- reply

If you think removing those abusive clauses will have an impact on the market you're delusional.
Third party sellers have no reason to have a lower price on a different store, unless the store itself is paying them the offset of a lower price. That's only going to suffocate smaller stores that don't have money to burn.
And the stores with first party games can already create a bigger incentive for their store by keeping their games store exclusive because it would be the only place to play that particular game (it's why streaming services have gone down the route of exclusivity). Also having the game with a higher price point on Steam would just lead to a controversy which will hurts sales and damage the reputation of the company.
Removing the price parity clause will do nothing.