ESE

Yes, random people who bear arms, refuse to comply, and as a result become criminals by definition, in addition to the usual bad guys your typical criminals.

2025-11-15 19:16:57 CET

- reply

Cheap Sats are my favorite dish.

2025-11-15 19:15:50 CET

- reply

@nprofile…qedn
@nprofile…stwk
@npub1lh2…a9nk

2025-11-14 07:20:39 CET

- reply

And once soy boys and Karens take over, they ensure that lethal violence is reserved only for criminals.

2025-11-13 05:03:18 CET

- reply

Life and death are in the tongue.

2025-11-13 05:00:43 CET

- reply

I noticed the same thing; he's probably trying to stay neutral and maybe got some heat at the start when he was more anti-spam, so he's now hedging a bit. It's frustrating to watch as it unfolds, but hopefully we can get this fork thing going and put an end to the spam once and for all.

2025-11-11 15:20:28 CET

- reply

This guy counts

2025-11-11 15:19:15 CET

- reply

Uuidv7?

2025-11-11 06:50:49 CET

- reply

🐣 the salary

2025-11-09 00:25:28 CET

- reply

🍿

2025-11-05 08:19:56 CET

- reply

And if you need to use your own laptop, good luck getting paid.

2025-11-05 06:37:05 CET

- reply

How is it positive that SpaceX will get more taxpayer money for the failed Starship program?
https://youtu.be/EU6aJHqQKuU

2025-11-05 06:31:29 CET

- reply

And to induce more gun control

2025-11-05 04:11:11 CET

- reply

Ego — it’s all about their little egos. Thank you for sharing this; you are a hero!

2025-11-04 01:06:43 CET

- reply

Wow! This is good stuff

2025-11-04 00:47:13 CET

- reply

https://nym.bar/ is way better!

2025-11-04 00:36:27 CET

- reply

I wish we could sit together by this fireplace one day.

2025-10-27 07:01:03 CET

https://youtu.be/SIwvO-DUQNQ

2025-10-24 21:36:52 CEST

- reply

ACK!

2025-10-24 21:35:19 CEST

- reply

Thank you for sharing

2025-10-24 18:22:13 CEST

- reply

And fork

2025-10-24 18:02:19 CEST

- reply

Yes! Brilliant

2025-10-24 18:01:30 CEST

- reply

This makes a lot of sense. 🤟

2025-10-24 15:33:25 CEST

- reply

Roger Penrose proposed it should be called “AC” artificial cleverness because there is nothing intelligent in it.

2025-10-24 07:53:01 CEST

- reply

Not to mention the frustrating entitled people who get upset when they realize free speech can get you fired.

2025-10-24 07:35:00 CEST

- reply

In my somewhat wishful thinking, globalists are struggling now that free money has dried up. If history rhymes, it won't last too long. Oh well.

2025-10-24 06:58:40 CEST

- reply

Enemy of scale

2025-10-24 05:17:08 CEST

- reply

Thank you, I completely agree. Do you have any idea why they might not permit it? Do you think there's a technical reason?

2025-10-24 02:14:35 CEST

- reply

COIN and MSTR ARE THE SBR!!!

2025-10-24 01:19:39 CEST

- reply

Why don't you let users configure a personal custom node/spectrum? Do you want to spy on your users?

2025-10-23 22:37:10 CEST

- reply

Imagine signing deals with terrorist organizations.

2025-10-23 22:35:20 CEST

- reply

They're just panicking because Beyond Meat reached quantum supremacy last week.

2025-10-23 22:32:23 CEST

- reply

Can't blame them. I wouldn't be surprised if Frito-Lay's products kill more Americans per year than guns.

2025-10-23 18:26:07 CEST

- reply

PWA

2025-10-22 07:16:30 CEST

- reply

This is awesome, thank you for sharing!

2025-10-21 22:42:00 CEST

- reply

Too bed

2025-10-21 21:14:23 CEST

- reply

He is too busy signing deals with terrorists and people who hate America.

2025-10-21 05:51:12 CEST

- reply

I think you should go on Facebook and visit your local bank branch; it will help you feel better in no time.

2025-10-21 00:26:11 CEST

- reply

Building infrastructure across multiple regions is much more expensive, and most companies don't pay their employees or consultants enough to justify the effort.

2025-10-19 18:14:55 CEST

- reply

Different toilet

2025-10-19 17:40:01 CEST

- reply

I am betting on the soft fork ending

2025-10-19 17:32:18 CEST

- reply

Fork

2025-10-19 17:30:56 CEST

- reply

Xitrea

2025-10-19 03:13:17 CEST

- reply

Fork it is

2025-10-19 02:28:15 CEST

- reply

GDP joined the conversation.

2025-10-18 23:33:24 CEST

- reply

It’s the same cycle throughout history: temples taxing grain, kings minting coins, banks printing debt, algorithms mining attention. Each era finds a new way to harness the energy of life. Centralize. Extract. Justify. Collapse. Repeat.

2025-10-18 20:05:18 CEST

- reply

cvdt; can’t verify don’t trust.

2025-10-18 19:56:24 CEST

- reply

Absolutely

2025-10-18 19:55:32 CEST

- reply

MSTR IS THE SBR

2025-10-18 17:56:49 CEST

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/c1a3a96045a84520292c11e710ae223104e601821c793ae6dc0a672f15c3cb82.jpg

2025-10-18 17:55:43 CEST

- reply

Dr. Robotnik

2025-10-18 06:00:49 CEST

Had some free time today: Introducing the big 2025 housing crash
https://youtu.be/CR9EYIT6vTI

2025-10-17 23:34:49 CEST

- reply

🥇

2025-10-17 23:34:05 CEST

- reply

I mentioned River Link because it is also custodial like Cashu. They are very different solutions technically, but I think River is a much better option for orange-pilling "normies." The tradeoff is that you do get KYC'ed for their proof of reserves, so the chances of getting rug-pulled are much, much lower.

2025-10-17 20:39:06 CEST

- reply

Great job @nprofile…4umg @nprofile…y0r3, this is what real leadership looks like.
#nevent1q…qeyp

2025-10-17 14:13:43 CEST

- reply

You're completely right.

2025-10-17 10:23:16 CEST

- reply

Let's go!

2025-10-17 10:20:34 CEST

- reply

Just like Executive Order 6102 previously stated about gold, it will not be “seized”. MSTR will be required to sell it to the government at a price set by the government, which will not be the fair market value.

2025-10-17 09:26:16 CEST

- reply

When Bitcoin starts capturing a significant share of gold's market cap, a bill will be introduced to make it official.

2025-10-17 09:10:20 CEST

- reply

I agree with everything you say. I just think that River link https://river.com/river-link, for example, is a much more appropriate solution, while Cashu serves as a distraction. Aside from being technically impressive and complex, it misses the point. By the way, @nprofile…fyhk are excellent and the right approach to using mints because they are, by design, distributed. The entire product is built in a way that clearly defines the trust involved and the social aspects of the mint guardians, extending into the physical world. Cashu is a distraction because it creates a lot of noise and shifts attention away from Fedimints and genuine solutions like River link.

2025-10-17 06:02:50 CEST

- reply

You’re absolutely right that the IBD can’t be changed without a 51% attack — consensus security remains intact. But that’s not the point I’m making. Consensus and data availability are different things. Pruned nodes can verify the current state, but they can’t independently rebuild the chain history or proofs if archival nodes go offline.
KIP-6 itself acknowledges this dependency: “Such a proof could only be generated before the transaction was pruned (or by using an archival node).” So while the IBD hash guarantees integrity, the ability to rebuild trust without relying on a subset of archival nodes is what’s lost over time. That’s the decentralization part of the trilemma — mathematically, as state size increases, the number of entities able to hold the full history decreases.
So yes, the 51% rule still protects the ledger, but the independence of verification diminishes — and that’s exactly why no system “solves” the trilemma, it only shifts where the pressure lies.

2025-10-17 05:58:15 CEST

- reply

That’s a fair question, but the thing about the trilemma is that it isn’t something you “solve” — it’s a set of trade-offs you can only balance. If scalability increases, either security or decentralization must give way somewhere; it’s a mathematical inevitability, not a design flaw.
So when I say there “won’t be enough” archival nodes, I’m not implying a specific threshold — I’m pointing out that at scale, the cost curve and hardware requirements push the network toward fewer independent verifiers. That’s not just a theory; it’s the core of the decentralization aspect of the trilemma. The problem isn’t with consensus safety — it’s that verifiability gradually shifts from something anyone can do to something only a few can afford.

2025-10-17 00:44:54 CEST

- reply

I did use it, and my experience is the same I agree, but it's a UX issue that I think a well-funded company like Signal has a better chance of solving than Zeus. Also, even if the node is not running in the app and Signal runs it, it is way better because it cannot be rugged, although you sacrifice absolute privacy, so there are trade-offs. There is no one-size-fits-all solution; in an ideal world, we would have both Lightning and Cashu on Signal.

2025-10-17 00:40:56 CEST

- reply

The “too much” is very subjective, and I don’t see how enclaves can help with rugging; they do work for privacy.

2025-10-17 00:07:45 CEST

- reply

🤣

2025-10-17 00:04:47 CEST

- reply

“Customer funds are safe"—famous last words.

2025-10-17 00:02:58 CEST

- reply

Sir, I see what you did there.

2025-10-17 00:02:24 CEST

- reply

First, they confuse you; then, you get rugged.

2025-10-17 00:01:31 CEST

- reply

Yes

2025-10-16 23:59:08 CEST

- reply

@nprofile…yh75 runs a lightning node integrated into the app; there are no excuses.

2025-10-16 23:57:52 CEST

- reply

🤣

2025-10-16 23:53:53 CEST

- reply

Cashu is not better than mob

2025-10-16 23:53:29 CEST

- reply

I agree with almost everything you said, except about the Cashu, because if I were Signal, I wouldn't want to explain to my users that their coins are gone from the app. That would happen if the mint rugged them, whether it was a random mint or a dishonest Signal employee rigging the official Signal mint.

2025-10-16 23:37:37 CEST

- reply

Word!

2025-10-16 23:36:43 CEST

- reply

It’s not vanilla signal, and it's Cashu, not Bitcoin. Don’t waste your time on it.

2025-10-16 23:34:32 CEST

- reply

Nailed it, use your brain, don't trust calle

2025-10-16 23:33:32 CEST

- reply

Word, Cashu is a distraction.

2025-10-16 23:32:41 CEST

- reply

No, you accept the risk of being rugged at any moment.

2025-10-16 23:30:55 CEST

- reply

I do believe that sats on Lightning are real sats, but set aside, you can't be rugged by a centralized mint on Lightning.

2025-10-16 23:27:26 CEST

- reply

It's correct that pruned nodes can maintain IBD continuity through pruning proofs, but those proofs must be generated by full archival nodes. That’s straight from KIP-6: “Such a proof could only be generated before the transaction was pruned (or by using an archival node).” So if archival nodes become scarce, new pruned nodes can still verify, but they cannot independently regenerate or validate the roots of those proofs.
The issue isn’t that IBD data disappears; it’s that the network’s ability to independently rebuild its trust base diminishes as archival nodes consolidate. And mathematically, with Kaspa’s projected block rate and scaling targets, that consolidation isn’t hypothetical—it’s inevitable. That’s why claiming the trilemma is “solved” instead of acknowledged is so misleading.

2025-10-16 23:10:41 CEST

- reply

You’re right, the IBD itself isn’t lost. A pruned node still maintains a valid, verifiable state. What it can’t do is independently reconstruct or generate proofs for pruned history. KIP-6 even states it clearly: “Such a proof could only be generated before the transaction was pruned (or by using an archival node), but could be verified indefinitely.” According to the math of space complexity, the question isn’t if full archival nodes will become few, but when it’s inevitable—if Kaspa gains real adoption—because the data growth rate will always outpace what the average users can store. At that point, it’s essentially Ethereum all over again: still decentralized in theory, but practically dependent on a handful of data-center operators. If the Kaspa devs simply admitted that Kaspa is basically a better Ethereum because it’s a DAG and written in Rust, this conversation wouldn’t even exist. But insisting they’ve solved the trilemma, which isn’t possible due to the laws of network and computational trade-offs, while blocking anyone who shows the math, is extremely telling and a huge red flag.

2025-10-16 22:54:34 CEST

- reply

Cheaper sats coming soon to let more people accumulate before we hit 150k.

2025-10-16 22:52:26 CEST

- reply

MSTR is the SBR

2025-10-16 22:50:49 CEST

- reply

I totally agree, I’m a bit salty we don't have zaps on vanilla signal, hence my comments.

2025-10-16 22:43:27 CEST

- reply

Cashu is not Bitcoin; we need Lightning in the Signal vanilla app.

2025-10-16 22:39:32 CEST

- reply

Exactly pruning proofs makes verification cryptographically sound, but it doesn’t make it independent. Pruned nodes verify state transitions using proofs that come from full archival nodes. If the number of those full nodes decreases, the network’s ability to recover or audit history depends on trusting that small group. That’s the real risk—not that the math breaks, but that decentralization quietly diminishes. What worries me most is that Kaspa’s developers, especially Shai, refuse to acknowledge this trade-off while claiming they’ve “solved the trilemma.” When I shared the data, they blocked me instead of addressing the issue.

2025-10-04 02:38:56 CEST

- reply

Shitcoin promoters pushing gambling want your sats.