btclnd
Bertha

Pleb

Public Key

npub1xn7j3fylz5sqva9rr583592k6t7ztz9w86n5sv0apmasgpkl8duq76a73f

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsrflfg5j032gqxwj336rc6z4td9lp93zhraf6gx87sa7cyqm0nk7qpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dsfjygpf

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1xn7j3fylz5sqva9rr583592k6t7ztz9w86n5sv0apmasgpkl8duq76a73f

Show more details

Last Notes

2025-05-27 03:44:50 CEST

- reply

I believe MMT started with good intentions. That said if your plan for say a railway system resulted in crashes every 5 to 10 years you’d reassess if it was working (hopefully).

2025-05-27 03:37:10 CEST

- reply

Also use keyword mentioned in a job posting and try and make a connection with any recruiters that work for the company.

2025-05-27 03:34:39 CEST

- reply

Optimize for snappy points that can be skim read in 10 seconds.

2025-05-27 03:32:50 CEST

- reply

Love Arizona

2025-05-27 03:30:06 CEST

I get most of my signal from the ridiculous news articles that are clearly paid for manipulation on TradingView.

2025-05-27 03:26:52 CEST

- reply

What a beautiful animal

2025-05-27 02:58:36 CEST

I think true innovation in Bitcoin still lives at the protocol level. Protocol enhancements should obsolete most service based businesses.

2025-05-27 02:52:50 CEST

- reply

lol

2025-05-27 02:15:35 CEST

Time locking sats with at time of withdrawal fee setting. Seems like the ultimate self custody tool?

2025-05-26 04:51:13 CEST

- reply

If the purpose of money is simple to understand then any complexity is a scam.

2025-05-26 04:21:03 CEST

Everyone knows we’re going above 112k quit trying to convince us otherwise

2025-05-26 04:02:56 CEST

When you sign a transaction you provide two bits of evidence. The signature of the hash of the transaction you are signing that is mixed with a random number, and a random point on the elliptical curve that was computed with the random number. With the random point plus the public key the verifier can validate you must have the private key to the public key and that signature was made with the same private key because they can produce the same random point with those two data points ?

2025-05-26 03:50:19 CEST

In school when you did algebra you were given various values for a or b or x and y and if you were given enough real life values for those things you could figure out all the values of the other letters in the equation.
When you sign a Bitcoin transaction you need to use a random number to prevent people eventually having enough values for the a/b/x/y and figure out your private key if you do multiple transactions with it.
Deterministic nonces (nonce = random number) are based off the hash of the transaction you’re signing so will only ever be used once. This prevents signers messing up the random number that protects your private key.
This is what I think I learned this weekend. Now I think I know why NVK keeps mentioning them in Bitcoin Review.

2025-05-26 03:11:33 CEST

- reply

Base case

2025-05-25 04:32:38 CEST

- reply

Is bitcoin.gov free?

2025-05-23 23:23:37 CEST

- reply

The top is in when I can sell my S19 for 2x the purchase price - nowhere near!

2025-05-22 13:09:25 CEST

- reply

Interesting fact I heard on a pod the other day was that Satoshi expressed some displeasure at his new GPU mining experiment because he was claiming so many rewards so he decided to get rid of a bunch of coins by spending a chunk to redistribute them - including the the pizza purchases. Legend!

2025-05-22 12:07:35 CEST

- reply

“There will be signs”
https://image.nostr.build/083e0e4ba2b38a01bd805d34921cbaffc0d7234621e9281a1a6236d0811aa6ce.jpg

2025-05-22 03:36:18 CEST

- reply

Dropping in isn’t always a bad move…

2025-05-22 03:26:41 CEST

- reply

I feel like their days are numbered with the ETFs and tradfi brokers as active participants. The only way to compete is with transparency and reliability and they are not scoring highly there.

2025-05-22 02:55:24 CEST

- reply

Assuming the worst this tactic only works for retail. But then again the narrative is that there is no retail interest. So they just have terrible tech???

2025-05-21 04:41:39 CEST

- reply

Things I don’t believe in:
Santa
Tooth fairies
Exchange balences

2025-05-21 03:11:53 CEST

- reply

Same - I saw 108

2025-05-21 02:59:27 CEST

- reply

116k to bury the 58k gang forever

2025-05-20 03:39:14 CEST

- reply

“But the founders of Tether are Bitcoiners” still doesn’t quite fit for me.

2025-05-19 15:40:34 CEST

- reply

Yeah the payout model is VERY appealing for me as a tiny miner, needing an Xverse account is not.

2025-05-19 03:36:57 CEST

- reply

Seems more defensible than boats.

2025-05-19 03:35:38 CEST

Let’s have some way of having vaults before states stack too much and get short term regulation ideas.

2025-05-15 14:42:18 CEST

- reply

Never trust a call from a helpful Coinbase employee…

2025-05-14 13:31:36 CEST

- reply

I pulled the latest and I can see cashu tokens in the logs 🥜
I tried connecting macadamia and cashu.me but there was an issue. Macadamia reported that the keysets for the mint were not available.
I can program but not much of a developer! I’ll keep playing with Windsurf and see where I get to. Windsurf thinks it’s an issue with the HASH unit keysets being unretrivable given the Custom unit.

2025-05-13 14:53:43 CEST

- reply

Love it, I’ll check in later! No pressure just playing at the moment but was really easy to get setup and this hash pool concept is amazing 🙌

2025-05-13 05:15:48 CEST

- reply

34254…
Looks like I’m creating ecash shares 🙌 but how do I get access to them or see them outside the log statements?
The shares are coming from my local pool in the container right?
https://image.nostr.build/150d3b19cef06e2c446aa35ee1a7b71e1ec5bd9a16d2205def53b4283bd9098e.jpg

2025-05-13 04:14:01 CEST

- reply

Actually 34255 looks like the correct port.

2025-05-13 04:00:24 CEST

- reply

I have the containers up and running. Once the bitcoind syncs do you attach miners on localhost:34254?

2025-05-12 03:51:57 CEST

- reply

Yes such a strange comment / almost defensive yet the game plan was clear.

2025-05-11 15:01:43 CEST

- reply

All logical - 3 is a strong point to my cocktail based rambling. My bias is to think of Bitcoin in biology terms because that’s when I first encountered game theory. Through that lens I had my first “oh sh**” moment when reading about Bitcoin.
I think that software needs to improve and change to stay relevant but I need to distinguish protocol from regular software.
Thanks for the reply.

2025-05-11 06:28:27 CEST

- reply

* many risks to that strategy but if life forms don’t evolve they become extinct

2025-05-11 06:26:34 CEST

BITCOIN SEASON 2 is one of the most thought provoking podcasts i listen to.
My gut is that Bitcoin needs to evolve to stay alive as that’s how it came to life.
Many risks in that strategy but rolling if life forms don’t evolve they become extinctZ

2025-05-11 06:14:26 CEST

I don’t really mind the concept of Citrea building on top of Bitcoin. I guess it’s the free market in action. Success or failure will happen.
That said more focus on self custodial features would be my preference. Self custodial features preserve and strengthen the baseline value proposition of the network. But increasing those features has a less obvious payoff for market participants.
I would hope that such features benefit miner pools to retain the incentives. I would pay 10x fees to lock my coins up in a way that prevents spends for a period of time but allows transactions in the future - obviously there are probably better setups and that requires more thought.
The incentives of promoting self custodial confidence seems like a long tail opportunity.

2025-05-11 05:35:56 CEST

- reply

Beautiful pool

2025-05-09 14:04:09 CEST

- reply

Thanks for the new piece of knowledge- I didn’t know that. I could find the original piece but there is a Bitcoin audible episode read 🙏
https://image.nostr.build/07826b036f6df817ce7e7b22ca3700a2321887529174fb6d500287866e191e7a.jpg

2025-05-09 06:49:42 CEST

- reply

Very interesting. Totally unrelated but I think the early code used a lot of conventions promoted by Microsoft which makes me smile thinking about an open protocol written in a style promoted by one of the most closed source companies of the time.

2025-05-09 06:18:36 CEST

I often hear people say that Satoshi wasn’t the best coder or early versions of Bitcoin were a mess.
I think that yes the whole codebase probably had many flaws.
BUT the ability to synthesize so many influences into a working solution in maybe 2 years is still an engineering achievement of a genius.

2025-05-09 06:06:29 CEST

- reply

Nostr based decentralized fee estimator based on input from network of pleb nodes?

2025-05-09 05:55:24 CEST

How does Bitcoin survive and flourish?
In evolutionary terms does Bitcoin aim to be the crocodile, a design that has lasted the test of time, or does it evolve quickly and continually like a virus to stay ahead.
Note to self to read Brandon Quittem’s essay which I assume suggests Bitcoin’s DNA makes it a fungus
https://brandonquittem.com/bitcoin-is-the-mycelium-of-money/

2025-05-08 05:02:49 CEST

- reply

Gonna be challenging to reserve assets with forgotten private keys…

2025-05-06 12:42:34 CEST

When do we get vaults? Can we get that after the high priority OP_RETURN change is done?

2025-05-06 05:38:09 CEST

- reply

I think umbrel has “Public Pool” as an option, in fact I think someone won a block with that setup a month or two ago. If your miners are on the same network as the umbrel should be pretty easy to point them to the umbrel node.

2025-05-03 04:12:56 CEST

I understand why people say that only economic nodes matter and could dictate consensus changes. I still think a network of small node runners makes a difference and has a say.
To transmit transactions to peoples’ wallets there needs to be a wider network of facilitators. If those nodes block transactions the economic nodes become impacted and less valuable. If the majority of the nodes act according the economic nodes and miners become more centralized and thus less Bitcoin like, and more likely to be the failed fork?

2025-05-02 05:20:49 CEST

I like Bitcoin because it’s Thermodynamic law x Darwin’s theory of evolution x Math x Distributed computing.

2025-05-02 05:08:40 CEST

Would be cool if there was a way to sign against an anonymous utxo set to prove ownership of an unspent amount at the same time nodes could verify no “double spending of utxo proofs”. I don’t know exactly what I’m saying but verifiable proof of ownership against the issuance might be a future Bitcoin self preservation feature against paper bitcoin.

2025-04-29 05:22:29 CEST

Won’t every US politician want hands on proven experience running a bitcoin reserve before the next president is elected?

2025-04-28 19:21:56 CEST

- reply

Usually I setup up the self custodial node and channels - zero inbound liquidity.
To free up some inbound liquidity I download Zeus and setup a “node in the phone” then send myself some sats to Zeus. Then I shut down Zeus and drain the sats back to my own on chain address.
I don’t even know if I’m doing it correctly but if that could be automated it would be great!

2025-04-28 04:53:10 CEST

v(ibe) 2
https://video.nostr.build/971dbb6982e331e0fbfa9ef38e9a9500da52f5a8c371855782ca4911f4324e36.mp4

2025-04-28 01:31:28 CEST

Windsurf and Claude just vibe coded me my own #solomining pool from scratch. Explained the code to me, and now my #bitaxe is happily sending shares 🥹🤯
https://video.nostr.build/2501d5049bd34b9749dbf37892bca6fadaece282bd8acec9a2ed09849f02c106.mp4

2025-04-26 04:43:26 CEST

- reply

Same - the bidding page is very complicated even for someone who has mined before. Unclear what you’re paying for or if you’re throwing sats in to the ether.
Assuming good intentions - the idea of collectively mining a block as a small pool is nice idea. The bidding page gave me the same vibes as reading a crypto white paper.

2025-04-26 03:54:32 CEST

Vaults via hardware wallets instead while waiting for true onchain solutions was a really exciting idea surfaced on @BitcoinReview.

2025-04-26 03:49:11 CEST

Mini Mac form factor with a Bitcoin core node installed with a button to trigger automatic update with signature checking. Button to display QR code similar to Zeus that allows wallets to connect easily.

2025-04-24 04:49:36 CEST

- reply

Are we talking about XRP?

2025-04-22 04:12:07 CEST

- reply

In financial wars everyone is looking for new weapons?

2025-04-21 04:34:31 CEST

- reply

Impressive

2025-04-21 04:06:08 CEST

- reply

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

2025-04-21 04:05:14 CEST

- reply

🧡

2025-04-21 03:58:25 CEST

I do most of my bitcoining on old hardware that I added upgrades to. Everything runs flawlessly as you’d expect for an apex internet protocol.

2025-04-20 19:18:58 CEST

- reply

There are definitely benefits of multisig - but recovery and ease of use is definitely in the single sigs corner!

2025-04-20 15:35:40 CEST

Current thought:
I imagine a lot of people run 2/3 or 3/5.
Now we have miniscript so we can do degrading multisigs.
But both require safe harbor for a descriptor or unique wallet software.
In the worst case scenarios, regulatory attack, or duress perhaps funds can still be lost.
Can predated presigned transactions be useful here, if the multisig is accidentally or intentionally destroyed?
Laser engrave 10 presigned transactions with different fee rates set to an nlock time (?) N halfings in the future. Receive address is a standard single sig (memorized).
I am almost certain this could be a #footgun so other thought….
Dream episode of @npub1qdc…zclt where plebs get to submit their unique ideas to prevent coin loss and @npub1az9…m8y8 @npub17u5…t4tp @npub1mxr…0htc rip them apart - “footgun review”.

2025-04-18 04:40:54 CEST

@npub1emd…c9aw if I set up two miniscript wallets with the same xpubs and shape such as a 2/3 decaying to single sig BUT I used different time lock criteria on each wallet - are the addresses and keys still compatible as long as the time constraints are satisfied trying to spend from either wallet?
I guess I’m trying to ask if I could recreate a functional wallet from the xpubs if I remembered the shape of the wallet but not the original time constraints used?

2025-04-18 04:09:02 CEST

- reply

58k > 85k

2025-04-15 03:19:05 CEST

- reply

👀

2025-04-15 03:15:50 CEST

- reply

More Miniscript wallets and signers would offering some unique self custody and time lock options maybe.

2025-04-15 02:51:00 CEST

- reply

Fiat always finds a way

2025-04-14 02:44:48 CEST

One thing that strikes me is the panic in the markets at 10% moves.
Bitcoiners are a funny mix of bearish takes but also inbuilt optimism and resilience that no matter what happens we are going to be ok.

2025-04-14 01:59:44 CEST

- reply

The regulatory embrace and fast tracking of “stable coins” says everything.

2025-04-09 04:55:55 CEST

New scam template just dropped
https://image.nostr.build/3a01b8b76a08f6bddb5724daf259fc4384507a2285e505dd24153b6f398c8c47.jpg
https://image.nostr.build/adf42cb9ad891c0270531b2faee7877b72d94de5bf7e46b82f7a43292a3ddb19.jpg

2025-04-03 02:52:58 CEST

Tick Tock, everyone is waiting

2025-04-01 14:46:18 CEST

- reply

I assume the scammers accumulated big BTC bags from last cycle or two and most people are staying well away from them this cycle.

2025-03-31 04:28:44 CEST

Peter Schiff right now
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ntG50eXbBtc

2025-03-31 04:15:54 CEST

So you’re telling me no coins are heading to exchanges to be sold ?? Bullish.
https://image.nostr.build/76bff6bfab196d2506a19a8ea6e922441fcb33b05e5f66ada8450294f802d124.jpg

2025-03-31 03:48:28 CEST

- reply

First time I read about Bitcoin I had no idea what problem it solved. Age taught me that, I expect that’s why most people ignore it, don’t realize there is a problem.

2025-03-31 03:34:08 CEST

- reply

I don’t know what multi vendor single sig looks like but it’s an extra option between single vendor single sig and multi vendor multi sig.

2025-03-31 03:27:17 CEST

Would be cool if there was a single sig seed generator that you could plug in modules from
different vendors that contribute entropy to a seed. Multivendor single sig.

2025-03-29 01:09:42 CET

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

2025-03-29 00:48:33 CET

- reply

I run both too, I like Luke and Ocean, and also have massive respect for the core team.

2025-03-29 00:44:59 CET

- reply

Protocols > Companies

2025-03-28 17:57:13 CET

- reply

Both

2025-03-25 03:02:07 CET

- reply

To infinity and beyond as a wise man once said

2025-03-25 03:01:11 CET

- reply

diminishing returns narrative when most of the world has no idea of what bitcoin is seems anti common sense.

2025-03-23 18:43:39 CET

- reply

Nice tip!

2025-03-23 17:18:09 CET

- reply

I’d love to see a key only service just as you describe. That would be really cool.

2025-03-23 14:49:15 CET

- reply

I’m reading “sovereignty through mathematics” by Knut Svanholm and he mentions that there are two ways to solve conflict, speech or violence - and that’s why we need as much freedom to say what we want as possible.

2025-03-23 13:09:04 CET

- reply

Someone should fund a “fix the code” campaign for XRP that removes the ability for it to be printed at will by Ripple.

2025-03-23 05:35:23 CET

- reply

Companies like Unchained and Swan must KYC you because they provide financial services but Nunchuk and Casa don’t so as long as you can’t be identified from the email you use then they are probably your best options to look into. I think both allow you to pay in bitcoin too so there won’t be a credit card on file either.

2025-03-23 04:42:38 CET

- reply

Nunchuk and Casa are no KYC options.

2025-03-23 03:17:46 CET

- reply

The pleb home miners are winning.

2025-03-23 02:43:15 CET

- reply

For sure a fake but is it intentional so when the price starts to pump tomorrow there’s something to blame it on and delay others from doing the same. Fun hopium conspiracy theory.

2025-03-22 19:34:14 CET

- reply

Seems possible to me

2025-03-22 18:47:49 CET

- reply

Had an omega candle dream last night and fees are increasing. In a 300 dollar range.

2025-03-22 18:46:04 CET

Feeling like something’s about to happen.

2025-03-22 04:53:23 CET

It’s not the size of the miners pleb miners run that counts, it’s the number of plebs running miners that counts. 100 plebs running 1TH miners provides more decentralization and censorship resistance than a single pubco running a single 100TH miner.

2025-03-21 14:52:34 CET

- reply

“Don't speak negatively about yourself, even as a joke. Your body doesn't know the difference. Words are energy and they cast spells, that's why it's called spelling. Change the way you speak about yourself, and you can change your life.” - Bruce Lee