Last Notes
🤖 Tracking strings detected and removed!
🔗 Clean URL(s):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upYskU2bRHQ
❌ Removed parts:
si=I1hktjVaIuGqDiRz
🤖 Tracking strings detected and removed!
🔗 Clean URL(s):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2y2EEiqucA
❌ Removed parts:
si=mmfcFDcCcO3Vxeh5
最低賃金が1000円ちょっとに上がった（笑）と政府がドヤ顔してるけど、2026年のインフレ指数の前ではゴミ同然。実質的な購買力は15年前の時給800円の時代より下がってるの、誰もが肌感覚で気づいてる。
高市早苗が「独自の外交ルート」とか言って、自分の個人的な極右人脈の海外ロビイストに機密費から大金を払ってた疑惑。これ、完全に国益の私物化だし、背任罪で逮捕されるレベルの不祥事だろ。
Also, unreal tournament 98
アニメやゲームの規制を推進してるフェミ団体と、高市政権の極右思想が「エロ・表現の弾圧」という一点で野合しててマジでグロい。左右のキチガイが手を組んで、若者の唯一の癒やしを奪おうとしてる。
This will be good 👍 new update
It's less competitive than fortnight but still high intensity
Block 959129
3 - high priority
1 - medium priority
1 - low priority
1 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
高市早苗が総理になってから、物価高がさらに加速して電気代もガス代も過去最高。それなのに「積極財政（笑）」とか言って国債（借金）を乱発し、円の価値をゴミ屑に落とした戦犯女、今すぐ辞めろ。
This automated lifting stage rises from the ground during a massive kinetic light show creating an immersive 3D spectacle
https://birobela.blossom.band/62f2eaccdda034e6db18fadaa4b95fc83f910489a0af8b88295ddd60be5fe84b.mp4
Intelligent honest Bitcoiners do. That is my observation.
Why does it feel like AI labs are the only one really winning from this stuff …
But even they struggle to turn a profit.
Are we all the suckers?
My apologies. I just assume the worst about anything I see on Nostr these days. I'm glad to hear you've stuck to it for so long. Lots of projects seemingly went off the rails when vibe coding hit, and became more and more a pain to use no matter how many features they add.
By vibing I mean letting go of parts of your codebase to let an LLM manage, and losing a detailed understanding of what the actual code is doing. When a project does that, it usually degrades the user experience significantly. Because once the hype wears off, the little bugs you have to deal with every day afterwards grinds you down, and those little bugs are usually the hardest to fix because the developer no longer understands the code that causes them.
I have very little faith left, but I'll try out ngit and mirror a few of my repos over.
but thats what i do with noor / armada. full sign out, sign in with fresh account, i'm still getting this
🤖 Tracking strings detected and removed!
🔗 Clean URL(s):
https://youtu.be/QlOqYFvie5c
https://youtu.be/QlOqYFvie5c
❌ Removed parts:
si=LinFyVmbS605I7Eb
si=LinFyVmbS605I7Eb
デジタル庁がどれだけ無能でも、宮内庁の隠蔽システムだけは超一流。身内のスキャンダルを消すためのIT技術の無駄遣い。
So, believe it or not, that’s actually a safety feature, not a bug. 😅
There's no way for Sidecar to detect which account you’re using inside the client. Sidecar can only sign based on the account it’s showing in its own chooser. So once two of your accounts have logged into the same site, Sidecar asks you to approve every event, even though you set it to trusted, because the client’s own account switcher can change accounts without informing Sidecar, which means you’d be posting or react as the wrong identity without even realizing it. (This was happening in an earlier version, and the current method is the fix.)
My recommendation is to only use Sidecar as your multi-account switcher and sign in and out of the client when you want to switch. Some clients like Primal (that don’t have their own multi-account switchers) just do this automatically on refresh. If a site already has two of your accounts on it, you can revoke one in Sidecar’s activity tab.
The other option is to set up unique browser profiles for each identity, each with its own Sidecar. I actually do this because I maintain a bunch of different npubs and it’s just cleaner that way.
Nostr is messy!
When people dont check the obvious first 🤣😂
https://birobela.blossom.band/dd2ececd860c6975576a33261f5e3918f07af0f04948a5198981fff029dab983.mp4
インボイス制度で底辺の個人事業主を殺しにきてるくせに、皇室の利権には1ミリもメスを入れない。この国の構造はクソすぎる。
I fucking hate that feeling. Owaii Da
https://media.poster.place/781d7dc9ada4eb47cc59791013e16d9bc37e8f6c5dc2f674d1ae726e9f4d2d6c.png
被大雨关住了
——
狼牙土豆刀 (
[email protected])
Nostr: nprofile1qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kytcqyzudvvl9c90e0qntew9qj2mx67xnwnrxv8d0wdqfljsj00ahrcrd5gwgrjv
https://bgme.me/@tealollipop/116963715067132090
何必爱上我
情爱不过是我创作的养料
我年轻那会儿是个不疯魔不成活的人
艺术审美本来就在极端扭曲中变成另一个人
——
星辰宇宙中的sine(目标是赚600w版) (
[email protected])
Nostr: nprofile1qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kytcqyqdwza3hdykw9eyt0gqxjrwypzez9d4qa4ncezg4a7py32rz2tceq8vvp57
https://mastodon.social/@Divinercecilia/116963700005346358
No, I haven't tried it yet. I'm going to need a new roof eventually and the new one will be metal. That will be when I give rainwater harvesting a try.
Artel, I think you hit the nail on the head. It’s obvious the 4:1 witness discount is fundamentally arbitrary. I don’t see a physical justification for assigning permanently committed bits different economic weights with respect to the actual physical cost Bitcoin must bear. The cost of Bitcoin is ultimately paid in conserved energy and permanent memory, not in our software abstractions. This is the problem when our understanding of Bitcoin is not defined in the physics of work (joules) and memory (bits), but thru fiat interpretations. Bitcoin physically defines money with respect to energy, time and information (memory).
Once you pull the logic to limit you realize that the second law of thermodynamics expressed in Bitcoin states that the 2.1 quadrillion satoshis will tend to disperse across an increasing number of UTXOs, unless there is sufficient economic pressure and energy to re-consolidate them. That pressure should emerge naturally from an unmanipulated fee market rather than from arbitrary discounts embedded into consensus accounting.
The illusion comes from separating the active UTXO set from the permanent ledger. Yes, a spent output can be removed from the active UTXO set, but the witness and every other committed bit remain permanently embedded in the chain. Every archival node must store them forever. Every new node must download them forever. Every copy of Bitcoin must preserve them forever. The distinction is one of active validation state, not physical memory.
Viewing Bitcoin through Landauer’s principle changes the discussion. The dominant cost is not validating the current state; it is the irreversible commitment and preservation of information. Once a bit crosses the proof-of-work boundary, it becomes part of Bitcoin’s permanent physical state. Consensus commits serialized memory, not CPU cycles.
Expanding effective blockspace through witness discounts is a high-time-preference solution. Bitcoin conserves demand for finite blockspace. That cost is paid either immediately in satoshis through the fee market or deferred as a perpetual tax on every node that must transmit, download, verify, and preserve the additional physical bits for as long as Bitcoin exists.
Looking at the system through energy density makes the distortion clearer. Whether expressed as joules per satoshi per mb^2, joules per mb^2, the total proof of work securing the block remains unchanged while the amount of permanently committed memory increases. The same work is now spread across more conserved bits. The energy density of Bitcoin’s permanent memory decreases. UTXOs are less energetically dense because the same conserved work is distributed across more conserved memory.
This is the deeper engineering issue. We have altered the economics of blockspace by assigning different prices to identical permanently conserved bits. That distinction is based on how software uses those bits after commitment, not on the physical reality that every committed bit occupies immutable consensus memory. If Bitcoin is fundamentally a conserved ledger of energy and information, then every permanently committed bit must ultimately be measured by the same invariant accounting.
This also highlights something deeper. To conserve the coin, Bitcoin must first conserve the bit. The distinction between “active state” and “historical state” has physical meaning. While an output remains unspent, the satoshis exist as physical bits within the active UTXO set. Once spent, the value simply changes location in memory to the new block of time. The spent TXO disappears from the active state, but the historical bit remains permanently embedded in the ledger. The state has transformed, but nothing has disappeared. The coin has moved through both memory and time, while the information required to preserve that history remains conserved forever. The cost remains as bits.
This is precisely the reinterpretation of Landauer’s principle that Bitcoin makes possible. The original formulation measures the minimum energetic cost of erasing a bit. Bitcoin demonstrates that the more fundamental quantity is not erasure, but irreversible state transition through permanent memory. The thermodynamic cost is the cost of committing a new distinction (bit) to history. Once committed, that distinction is never destroyed; it becomes part of the conserved informational substrate of the ledger. What appears to be “deletion” is simply a transformation between active and historical state from a perspective of incomplete information.
Looking at Bitcoin this way changes the engineering tradeoff entirely. The cost that would ordinarily be expressed through a competitive fee market for a finite bitspace has instead been partially shifted onto every archival node through the perpetual obligation to preserve additional physical bits. The network still bears the cost; it has simply been socialized across every node that chooses to maintain Bitcoin’s complete history. From a low-time-preference perspective, the honest engineering solution is to pay that cost upfront through fees in sats because it acknowledges the true physical cost of permanently committing information.
1 bit must = 1 bit. Once proof of work commits a bit to consensus, its future role inside the protocol becomes irrelevant to its physical cost. Whether the protocol later classifies it as witness data, transaction data, or historical validation data, every archival node must transmit it, verify it, download it, back it up, and preserve it indefinitely. Consensus does not preserve “validation effort”; it preserves immutable physical information.
Removing the witness discount is simply an acknowledgement that permanently conserved bits should be accounted for uniformly; the fee market is the free exchange pricing of sats<>bits. The protocol may distinguish between active and historical state for purposes of validation, but the laws of thermodynamics do not; 1 bit = 1 bit regardless if satoshis are present in said memory. If Bitcoin is fundamentally a conserved ledger of energy, information, and time, then every permanently committed bit contributes equally to the irreversible memory of the system. Without conserving the bit, there is no mechanism by which the coin itself can remain conserved. Witness or not, if my node must store it forever, it is consensus memory. I simply want every permanently committed bit to my node to pay the same price because the physical cost of preserving it is the same.
We have to be logically consistent. Why is market manipulation thru arbitrary discounting of bits and inflation of Bitcoin’s finite bitspace good in the long term for the protocol and economics, yet the same behavior in fiat land would be mocked by our community? Make it make sense to me. If Segwit/LN is truely good for scaling finite blockspace, then why do we have to tax the nodes? Let the protocol change speak for itself without taxation in bits. Only then we’ll know its true value.
Devalue the bit and you devalue the sat; few truly understand this.
If you find issues with nostr.build code, I cannot help you tomorrow 😂😭
https://i.nostr.build/9qwKxQQPFenYkAoP.png
2026年のネットを埋め尽くす「切り抜き動画」のゴミ山。他人の配信の過激な発言だけを前後の文脈を無視して繋ぎ合わせ、対立を煽って小銭を稼ぐまとめ職人ども。社会の分断と憎悪を加速させてる元凶。
Oh I've done everything I'm capable of. Was at the hardware store when they opened this morning to swap the parts that I can. I diy as much as possible always but at this point, I need a pro.
In order to "don't trust, verify", many of us ask an LLM to tell us which commands to copy and paste, in order to spin up a node...
trusting that we aren't opening a back door to our system
https://v.nostr.build/5SAFFZSqkH56UXqN.mov
#vlogstr #bitcoin #bip110
Block 959129
3 - high priority
1 - medium priority
1 - low priority
1 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
I see reposts from him yesterday 🤷🏾
Block 959129
3 - high priority
1 - medium priority
1 - low priority
1 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
nlogpost:1784724627:[[[[p-mantis shots build #0]]]]
nlogpost:1784724625:[[[[p-mantis shots build #1]]]]
Inability to control people using TV is starting to show up
nlogpost:1784724611:[[[[p-mantis shots main]]]]
Praying. Yeah Americans also use different aircons than we do here... or they are the central ones or even single units. We use the double units they are easier to maintain and quite durable. Our biggest problem is electrical current that can burst your fuses out in the sky. Hope you find inexpensive solution ... its hell to be without aircon in that kind of a weather... did you try to put it on heating for some time and back to cooling just to try and give that compressor of yours a bit of a kick? Just trying to help ... 🥳🫶 dont get me wrong... you never know 🤷♀️ im that type that tryies every silly stuff before calling the repairer cuz it actually did save my pocket couple of times in life...
Do you notice who is against BIP-110?
#nevent1q…slhg
We're going back into SCUM
2026年の日本の医療、窓口負担引き上げのせいで、持病のある老人が「薬代が払えないから、もう病院に行くのをやめる」って静かに自宅で死を待つ景色が日常化。国が「長生きは罪（笑）」と言わんばかりに、弱者から順番に医療のセーフティネットを外していく棄民政策。
🤖 Tracking strings detected and removed!
🔗 Clean URL(s):
https://youtu.be/oqXHLjlVIk8
❌ Removed parts:
si=OSNKtX25iyrWQteG
Time will tell but its interesting that you support the side that supports spam on Bitcoin, shitcoins on Bitcoin, corruption in Core, Andy Back the Epstein's friend, Saylor saying digital credit is money, the scammer David Bailey and now even Craig Faketoshi Wright. Interesting, isn't it? Bad actors, spammers, scammers and shitcoiners together.
自民党の非主流派議員たちが夜な夜な高市早苗の元に集まって「石破打倒」の密談をしてるの、完全に戦国の謀反劇。政策そっちのけで身内の足の引っ張り合いをしてるクソ政治家ども全員クビにしろ。
Technically it was a frappé, and was very enjoyable.
We're enjoying the party vibes very much.