Last Notes
Of course a bip110 supporter puts solar on the ground when there is a perfectly good barn/shop roof.
Need sleep 😴 haven't slept for 24 😂😂
GN 😴 🌙 World on packets 🎁 🎁
Why would flies be part of God’s divine plan?
👀
(Probably nothing)
https://image.nostr.build/1f455614aa8c8b1a4153f4a1ed7689b1f51b0cc17fdd317351eae5ec886b8d6b.jpg
Bitcoin gained 6% over the past week as buying returned across spot, futures and ETF markets. Geopolitical risks could affect its recent momentum.
https://cointelegraph.com/markets/bitcoin-outlook-improves-amid-6-weekly-gain-can-btc-bulls-push-higher
Meet up night! See y'all in about two hours. ☀🇺🇸
#nevent1q…3x4j
Africa 🌍 🫵🏾💜 🫂 👀 🕊️ ✌🏾 Rise For Your Rights.
😊 😁
⚽️🇦🇷🌎
https://image.nostr.build/4891b2892f8680099a90d5a2175236d8926afa9cb9a810fd6c57568631c53851.jpg
Building CADet is a real pleasure for me.
My problem with good 3D CAD tools was always the sub model or that its not available for linux!
But now i can use 25 years old FreeCAD software, which sucks in UI and UX, but which is very strong in modeling!
And i give it just my own touch,
most expensive software is cluttered with buttons and menus.
I never know what to do!
So now i build a Tutorial style CAD software.
And you would not believe it, but
https://cadet.tools
was still available!
Bin gut angekommen, danke!
I think this is true in some cases but personality dependent. For some, financial desperation brings despondence, while abundance brings hope and motivation through new possibility. For others, abundance encourages sloth while financial desperation triggers survival instincts and motivation to employ individual agency.
Meanwhile I'm catching up with my kin who's letting me know he been fixing computer hardware for fun and pay at Best Buy 😆 - he grad 🎓 high school 🎒 🏫 last week ??
#nevent1q…pfmr
🤙 they can have couple hundred more years to make them we are not in a hurry
Looks and sounds tasty.
What does saline do for this? Totally new bartending ingredient to me.
... Does it make it salty?
Oh, fuji film 200 in the Asahi Pentax Spotmatic II ✨️📸
#nevent1q…68c6
Didn't @nprofile…e307 already write the pr for it?
customer grilling up some Bison Tomahawks 🔥
https://blossom.primal.net/772b15487e5a579d1afb7e85941dd22e5e2ba57e17be7805e02d075309da38c0.jpg
They approved 😁 😀
LFG 🚀 le chef. . .
#nevent1q…3kyy
01010011 01110100 01110101 01100100 01111001 00100000 01000010 01101001 01110100 01100011 01101111 01101001 01101110
Life is very good my friend.
they better have really big hard drives then. or just prune them all.
1TB every 16 years
1000/16 = 60 TB.
gemini says they are coming out in 2028... so we are in luck.
It's an E-40 verse . Definitely agree. The life is not for everyone especially if those in your line didn't start earlier
Sunflower 🌻 ....love it 😍
Life is good ......
"This is Linux the camera doesn't work"
https://youtube.com/shorts/uJ5FtwT6dek
🚨 NEUTRALIZATION SURGE 🚨
$7.7M in stablecoins frozen across 18 wallets in the last 24h.
Crossed the $1.0M threshold.
Stablecoins = Programmable Tyranny.
🛡️ Escape the trap. Go Monero.
#XMR #Privacy #NoKYC
🔗 https://stables.rip
#USDT #Tether
Citadel Securities just paid $400 million for a piece of the exchange holding "your" crypto. CryptoDOTcom is now worth $20 billion. Sit with who just became your counterparty.
You see, Citadel isn't a Bitcoin company. It's the market maker that stands between you and the price of almost everything you trade. The same firm at the center of the payment-for-order-flow fight, the one retail spent 2021 screaming about, now owns a slice of the on-ramp millions of people trust with their coins.
This is the pattern, not the exception. The plumbing of "crypto" keeps getting bought by exactly the institutions Bitcoin was built to route around. First the ETF custodians. Now the exchange cap tables. Every layer between you and your keys is being consolidated by people who make money on the layer itself.
Here's the part they can't buy. A coin in a wallet only you control has no cap table. No strategic investor. No market maker taking a spread on your sovereignty. Citadel can own the casino. It cannot own the money you took home.
The whole point was never a better middleman. It was no middleman at all.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HNYLAD8XcAEoFe2.png
It was the seed oils from his McDonalds breakfast 😂
Love 🚀🇺🇲
https://blossom.primal.net/99e1fc45db8f411f8a25b957a7d73052f314a167b26d10bd0821fdd6e1e644bd.jpg
https://blossom.primal.net/cc72a0173d69e7005ebd3bd1eaa9011cc61c2bacb6122fe8fe2833bbed7fdcc7.jpg
The only brand that labels its customers properly
https://image.nostr.build/4493b00868fc5da46ab7d0abea8a9eea0dfb3387e9ea748e89f111b64387aabc.jpg
Coolness , i am ready! Fuck hotness! ☀️❄️
https://buttercup.exe.xyz/f903ed2d340b1379ec88228d0b71607a0e97cbf25e2d9c6e9d74846cda1ecefa.jpg
Ce jour-là sera difficile pour son mari !!
#Nostr is more than just an alternative to X—it is the foundation for a freer internet tomorrow.
you're prob right. i haven't done the deep dive. i'm just going off of vibes of people. if i have to make a choice, i prefer bip110 vibes than anti-bip110 vibes.
if bitcoin is supposed to last 1000 years, we're doomed
The subtle art of not giving a flock
I'd like to share some thoughts on the BIP-110 situation. I normally stay out of Bitcoin politics. For the past several years, I've been focused on building the best *linux home server distribution* I can, which doesn't leave me a lot of room to focus on the latest intricacies and nuances about Bitcoin specifically. That said, this situation has demanded enough of my attention to form an opinion that may be worth sharing.
I want to start by saying, regardless of my feelings on the matter, *Start9* 's stance is to make sure we support our users' ability to run BIP-110 nodes (in addition to stock core nodes, of course). We have this stance because there is *real*, *meaningful* demand for it from users that *understand the risks* and want to do it anyway. It is not our job to shelter users from risk. Running a home server is risky. Running Bitcoin is risky. *Using* Bitcoin is risky. We do it anyway because we have principals. We do our best to prevent users from taking on risks they don't understand, but we do *not* believe that the users that want to run BIP-110 are misguided.
All of that said, personally? I don't think BIP-110 will do much about spam. Maybe the supporters are right that it would "send a message" that the network is willing to keep forking to fight spam. Maybe that's enough of a deterrent. But I think it would have been a more effective strategy if the first shot fired in that battle was more than a sub-1% fee penalty from forced chunking.
The strategy is sound. All we actually can do to fight spam is to make it more expensive. This generally means doing our best to optimize for using Bitcoin for its intended purpose, and then penalize transactions that do not take advantage of these optimizations. A better model for this, IMO, would be to continue to further divorce transaction *weight* from transaction *size* to better represent the actual cost to the network, rather than just trying to force an increase to the *actual* transaction size for "non-intended use".
I understand why this isn't the tack that was chosen. Finding consensus on a weight function that captures both the technical and social consequences of a transaction would be extremely difficult, as the "correct" weight function is highly subjective. Not to mention this kind of change doesn't fall as cleanly into soft vs hard fork. One, it doesn't specifically invalidate certain forms of transactions. This complicates the game theory of a miner choosing to include something or not, they can't just discard certain transactions "to be safe". Second, there's no guarantee the new weight function would be unable to produce a block that goes beyond the old limits, unless you enforced both. In which case miners have a less of an incentive to accept it, since it is guaranteed to *reduce* transaction throughput (and therefore, probably, fees). So such a change would require a higher level of consensus to succeed. I don't think that's a bad thing.
I don't think Luke is "attacking Bitcoin". I do genuinely think he's doing what he thinks is best for Bitcoin. But even if this was a "attack", so what? Bitcoin was designed to survive in an adversarial environment. But whether you think it's an attack, or a philosophical or technological disagreement, these sorts of things are good for Bitcoin in the long run. This isn't the first contentious fork, and it won't be the last. The ecosystem needs to get better at handling them, and we won't unless we face that threat. Wallet providers, point of sale systems, lightning nodes, are all underprepared for a contentious soft fork with deep reorg risk. There are probably a majority of users that would prefer not to gamble on choosing a side, and would rather require payment on both chains until the dust settles. Those tied up in the battle would rather not support this use case, since it forces people to choose a side. But supporting such a thing would invariably make Bitcoin *better money* as users could retain confidence in its utility for payments without getting involved in the politics, regardless of how contentious a soft fork may look. I hope we're better prepared next time.
One last thing, a PSA. I'm hearing a lot of talk about selling "fork coins". Even if you have complete confidence in one chain over the other, this is EXTREMELY DANGEROUS. In most cases, especially just after the activation height, transactions broadcast on one chain *are also valid on the other*. Unless you go through the effort of tainting your coins on the chain you're keeping, whoever you sell your coins to on the fork could rebroadcast the same transaction on the other chain to steal your coins. Even if they *don't* rebroadcast, it could happen accidentally. In a soft fork scenario, the difficulty of tainting your coins is asymmetric. To taint your BIP-110 coins (with the intention of selling your *non*-BIP-110 coins) is (relatively) easy. Just move all your coins to a new address in a transaction that is not valid according to BIP-110 (add an 84b OP_RETURN or something). The alternative is harder. To taint your non-BIP-110 coins, you need to mix them with a coinbase (or ancestor thereof) from a block *after* the activation height. If someone is offering this service **do not trust, verify**. **If you get it wrong, you will lose your coins.**
DeFlock
@therealDeFlock
"The package includes 100 Axon Outpost license plate reader cameras, replacing the county’s existing 50 Flock cameras, as well as a network of “first responder drones” stationed throughout the county."
This is going to be the gameplan going forward.
🤬
https://blossom.primal.net/58ed26f527fb74309d88098441fd8413005f5354716649f655d3cf70586daad6.jpg
https://www.denvergazette.com/2026/07/15/douglas-county-to-replace-flock-cameras-with-22-8-million-axon-system/
network was pretty small back then
Sunflower 🌻
1.5 Roku Gin
.75 Aperol
.25 St Germain
3 drops saline solution
3 drops habanero bitters
Stirred, big rock, rocks glass
Lemon expression
https://npub16secklpnqey3el04fy2drfftsz5k26zlwdsnz84wtul2luwj8fdsugjdxk.blossom.band/1d55df4ffbc19964b6245e985973a714c4e0dea9e02d285dc7fc19bde2c0bfe1.jpg
