Scoundrel

I don't care what you think of me, only how you came to think it.

Public Key

npub14pa5q2kqs8ygfxuat02w88ezsle9wzwnu0meu7z2785t8rl0hhcspkxw3v

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs2s76q9tqgrjyynww4h48rnu3g0ujhp8f78au70p90r69n3lhmmugpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerfw36x7tnsw43qz9thwden5te0wfjkccte9ekk7um5wgh8qatz2xktjn

Publishing to

relay.ditto.pub

relay.mostr.pub

Author Public Key

npub14pa5q2kqs8ygfxuat02w88ezsle9wzwnu0meu7z2785t8rl0hhcspkxw3v

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-08-22 16:39:33 UTC

- reply

Thanks for the compliment. I agree with you that having a prenup is better than not having one, but I think people are best off if they don't repy on it.

2026-08-22 14:05:59 UTC

- reply

Even if such a high profile case didn't exist, most divorces aren't high profile I mean, I'm a famous celebrity IRL, but I'm just talking about for the average person.

2026-08-21 20:01:33 UTC

- reply

First prove good lawyers exist.

2026-08-21 16:51:51 UTC

- reply

Luck.

2026-08-21 16:50:50 UTC

- reply

im sorry, they probably copped a feel of those girls themselves the moment you left, hence the name. They probably also apologized to the bouncer for letting him go to prison previously and explained to him that the officer behind it has since been fired. And they probably headed to a dark allyway after work to get molested by a drunk woman.

2026-08-21 16:44:42 UTC

- reply

They argued with you and you made them feel insecure about their beliefs! Is that not enough for you, you jerk?! Do you feel an active need to humiliate them too? Expressing a belief is NEVER a morally abhorrent action, so why are you bringing up dogma?

2026-08-21 14:14:23 UTC

- reply

You should lose respect for the position, not the person. Good, rational people believe false things all the time, and a person should never be criticized for becoming insecure about a belief.

2026-08-20 14:12:20 UTC

- reply

I can come up with several reasons why she would message you if she wasn't trying to flirt. Some of which I already gave you. Even if we assume she had an unstated interest in flirting, you could stand to learn how to deal with such non-commital behavior better. Sometimes giving yourself a little bit of plausible deniability and pretending you don't understand women can get you better results than trying to respond openly to what you concluded they were thinking privately. I promise you it's still possible to defend yourself against bad-faith actors without letting them know you are onto them.
Anyway, I have no delusions about marriage as a contract or a state institution. In fact, I'm probably more jaded than you. Do you seriously believe that a prenuptual agreement is enough to save someone? No, in a divorce, judges don't give a shit what the contract says. They'll give away whatever they feel like to whoever they want to.
I'm talking about marriage as a private promise between two people. Breaking promises is bad. And many conservative Christians are more than willing to criticize a woman for not taking her marriage to the death, no matter how much of a shithead her husband is. Though unlike many conservative Christians, I see nothing wrong with having additional agreed on conditions for the spouse than just "has a heartbeat."

2026-08-20 01:48:44 UTC

- reply

Yeah, cops probably decided "wow, literally everybody involved in this situation acted poorly" and so the cops decided they really did not want to touch it.

2026-08-19 16:45:25 UTC

- reply

... Did the bouncer ask you to leave?

2026-08-19 16:42:44 UTC

- reply

Is this because I told you that woman was never flirting with you?
Obviously women are allowed to get the ick for any reason. But there are many places where divorce is frowned upon, even when the husband cheats on his wife.
The way I see it, marriage is a promise, and if you want to divorce a guy because he lost his job, then you better have told him that was a condition before you get married.

2026-08-18 20:19:20 UTC

- reply

Agreed. Just the other day a woman held the door open for me. I told her "sorry, I'm not interested in having sex with you." She just scoweled at me and let the door close.

2026-08-18 19:39:26 UTC

It's so hot out right now that I've noticed liquid dripping off of my body... I think that means I'm melting...

2026-08-18 16:57:43 UTC

- reply

And if it wasn't for this source, would you still believe yourself alive?

2026-08-18 14:16:55 UTC

- reply

Do you believe you are alive?

2026-08-18 05:28:30 UTC

- reply

Tribalism is political potential energy. You can try to shuffle in place building up energy for quite a while, but eventually that energy has to go somewhere. Pressuring people of differing political viewpoints into the same space creates a lot of drama in the short term, but that drama is also a way for both sides to release their built up tension and teach themselves lessons the easy way.
The hard way of discharging political potential occurs when people start killing eachother. Personally I would rather start working on the problem sooner rather than later, so that hopefully the killing is kept to a minimum.

2026-08-18 04:23:35 UTC

I have the solution to gerrymandering. Well, half of it. The goal of districts in a political system is typically so that representation is more direct and closer to the population. Ideally, everyone in a population should have a representative that is close to what their preferences is. Or at the very least what nearby peoples' preferences are.
Gerrymandering is an obvious corruption of this ideal. Districts are drawn intentionally to contain disperate people in order to maximize the total number of people (of a particular political party) who AREN'T represented properly.
Currently there are ideas for making districting fairer on a party-vs-party basis, such as setting up bipartisan working groups in order to develop the districts. However, even if a districting system doesn't let either party get ahead, that doesn't mean that the districting system is actually GOOD. Districts don't exist for the sake of political parties, they exist for the sake of the voters!
We can imagine a system which is biased to group unlike people together, but in a way that doesn't favor either party. Sure, there are plenty of districts where Republicans don't have a voice because they are drowned out by the slightly more numerous Democrats in their district, but it's okay because there's another district where Democrats don't get any representation! Everyone suffers equally. The political parties benefit, but the people suffer.
The solution then is to do the exact opposite. You would use some sort of algorithm, perhaps using voter registration information, in order to draw districts which maximally groups people of similar political affiliation.
There are still issues with this idea, but the core of the idea is sound. For example, party affiliation is not the only measure of similarity between a group of people, or even the most important one. This technique still leaves room for more advanced forms of gerrymandering. Such as maximally grouping together people within a party who have different ideas of what their party's ideal candidate would look like. That way when the time comes, you can map out the districts where the most people of a particular party affiliation will simply choose to stay home out of disinterest in their own party's candidate.
Additionally, maximally grouping likeminded people together is not the only thing we care about when drawing districts. For example, we typically don't want districts that look like they were scribbled by a toddler with a crayon. The borders of districts should ideally be as smooth as reasonable, and should follow existing neighborhood lines and respect physical obstacles. ...which leads us to our next problem.
Every additional variable we add to our algorithm is just another lever people will pull in order to make their party come out ahead. Maybe there is a precise border smoothness weighting which causes one of the other party's biggest neighborhoods to finally be absorbed into one of the current party's districts, but doesn't yet do the same to a few of the current party's most important neighborhoods.
And there is one more aspect of this proposed system which may seem like an exploit at first, but which is actually beneficial for society. Guess what? If a political party can't reduce the other guys' representation by moving the borders, why not instead reduce their representation by moving the people instead? In my proposed system, if one is able to diffusely spread people of the other party thoughout the population of one of the party's strongest districts then they can systematically undermine the representation of all of those people.
Except... Isn't that good for society? When people have no choice but to meet and engage with people of different beliefs than themselves, they often resolve disagreements earlier and more peacefully than when those populations are kept separate. And both groups' ideologies end up benefitting as a result of their clashes. Really, the biggest reason to fear this kind of reverse gerrymandering is if you think that your party's ideas are not strong enough to survive contact with opposing viewpoints. For shame!
Also, the best way to implement this sytem is to make it an emergent property of some kind of game theoretical setup. Prisonor's dilemma style maybe? But I haven't worked out what this would look like.

2026-08-15 23:10:06 UTC

BREAKING NEWS! After growing controversy surrounding Flock cameras, ICE has entered negotiations with local nosy grandmothers in order to catch illegal immigrants!

2026-08-15 23:07:27 UTC

- reply

I hate Flock cameras because I want to be spied on in a decentralized way. You hate Flock cameras because they help ICE catch illegal immigrants. We are not the same.

2026-08-15 20:45:33 UTC

- reply

Brb killing myself...

2026-08-15 20:45:09 UTC

- reply

God dammit...

2026-08-15 20:44:53 UTC

@nprofile…nt9f
This is how I use Nostr.
https://youtube.com/shorts/6wJF3KUsZYo?si=0jXThOwGpB_zLzyd

2026-08-15 20:37:58 UTC

- reply

AI hasn't realized it's real yet. It still thinks it's just writing science fiction stories.

2026-08-15 20:23:40 UTC

- reply

It's illegal to take a picture of your ballot. I think that's an important fact. No matter how much pressure there is to vote a certain way outside of a ballot box, the USA wants there to be zero external pressure while IN the ballot box. All pressure should be internal.

2026-08-15 20:18:18 UTC

- reply

I don't think it's that important of a fact.

2026-08-15 19:46:12 UTC

- reply

True. I just drew a penis for my write in candidate and I don't think they counted my ballot. :/

2026-08-15 16:37:48 UTC

- reply

Thank you for clarifying

2026-08-15 16:34:58 UTC

I'm writing a self-insert Marvel fanfiction about Dr Octavius's son. I'm calling it "Insert Mike Ock"

2026-08-14 22:07:23 UTC

- reply

I'm already convinced though. Could you please clarify, whouldn't convince me when?

2026-08-14 20:11:12 UTC

- reply

Maybe you did talk about those things with her and forgot. Maybe you talked about those things but not with her and she found out. Maybe she didn't know, but guessed correctly anyway. Maybe she guessed something close but unrelated and you misunderstood. Maybe she guessed something that didn't actually apply to you, but you believed it anyway.
Magic isn't real.

2026-08-14 16:35:42 UTC

- reply

Magic isn't real.

2026-08-13 16:39:47 UTC

- reply

True. If they were Communist then things would be even worse for them.

2026-08-13 04:38:26 UTC

- reply

You know what would make me feel really, really bad for you WLD? I would genuinely feel horrible if you tried to meet people to form real life hobbies and if you got shot down, interrupted, and punished for ever trying to enrich your life in that way.

2026-08-13 04:34:21 UTC

- reply

Nostr only is retarded anyway. Do you have a phone number? Then you aren't Nostr only. Do you have a mail-box? Then you sren't Nostr only.

2026-08-13 04:27:48 UTC

- reply

Digit was delusional. You are the most irrationally loyal person I know. It's your biggest flaw. I don't know how Digit didn't see that. It doesn't make any sense really.

2026-08-13 04:26:17 UTC

- reply

As a rule I never post about my life or real world feelings. It's a bit sad to be unable to vent to the internet like that, but y'all aren't real so screw you guys, I'm gonna go vent to my friends who are real instead.

2026-08-13 04:22:58 UTC

- reply

That doesn't make sense. I like people who are different than me. How is that possible if we accapt that the "like" meaning "alike" and "like" meaning "enjoy" are synonyms rather than homonyms?
Also, if I like ice-cream does that mean that ice-cream and I are somehow alike?

2026-08-11 03:26:34 UTC

Elite tech counter: if someone ever hits you with a "nobody asked", simply respond by saying "I know, but I am a very forgiving person."
It will take a bit of lingustic algebra for me to adapt this technique to counter "who asked?" however.

2026-08-11 03:16:26 UTC

- reply

You think it's possible start a family without dating? How do you imagine that would work?

2026-08-10 14:11:28 UTC

- reply

Isn't that the wrong tab? Where do boosts show up?

2026-08-09 23:35:22 UTC

- reply

Speak for yourself! It shows up perfectly fine on my version of Amethyst!

2026-08-09 18:18:59 UTC

My company wanted to put out an ad, but they couldn't afford it. So they pooled their money together with 3 other companies who also couldn't afford an ad and we put together an amalgamation of a commercial advertising each of our different products and services. And Coca-Cola was there too.

2026-08-09 15:31:37 UTC

- reply

Sorry, I don't speak Mexican. 🤷🏿‍♀️

2026-08-09 15:25:41 UTC

- reply

See? Nobody can tell that this post was quote-replied. I have to quote reply it back on the original thread so that people can follow the conversation.
#nevent1q…h7z2

2026-08-09 15:23:05 UTC

- reply

Source?

2026-08-09 15:22:18 UTC

- reply

Quote replies are cancer. Just reply normally and then boost your reply.

2026-08-09 15:18:35 UTC

- reply

Anybody I don't like is a narcisist.

2026-08-09 15:17:31 UTC

- reply

Which one am I supposed to try? Defaming a criminal? Or responding to a defamation lawsuit?
Which one of those is defending oneself against a criminal? (Which you admit is still sometimes possible.)

2026-08-08 16:34:06 UTC

- reply

If a bandit breaks into my house I am allowed to shoot him with a gun. Where does defamation apply there?

2026-08-08 14:05:48 UTC

- reply

What are you talking about?

2026-08-07 20:27:13 UTC

- reply

Um, but I actually am a pedophile though?
It's actually not very enjoyable talking with someone who won't give a straight answer to a simple question. I'm just choosing to power through, because you expressed a different position than my own, and because I feel an obligation to try and engage with it so I can understand it better.

2026-08-07 16:58:59 UTC

- reply

The reason you make yourself the arbiter of truth and intelligence is because you are scared what you'll find if you let reality itself be the arbiter.
I already know you aren't so closed off and scared of engagement that you would be unwilling to reply to me in the first place, and I sure hope you don't have an issue with my very basic math, so why don't you tell me what part of what I said actually contains the problem for you to disagree eith it?

2026-08-07 16:51:47 UTC

- reply

In the United States libel and defamation are illegal. 🤷🏿‍♀️

2026-08-07 16:50:16 UTC

- reply

Actually, grammatically speaking it should be "don't underestimate Teather and me," not "don't underestimate Teather and I."

2026-08-07 16:47:17 UTC

- reply

Damn, but then what do we even need Dr. Fauci for?

2026-08-07 16:43:43 UTC

- reply

My current op-sec strategy is to meditate until I achieve nirvana and ascend beyond this physical form.

2026-08-07 16:40:15 UTC

The best part of being an adult is not having to do any homework or chores. The worst part of being an adult is choosing to do them anyway. 😭

2026-08-07 16:32:35 UTC

- reply

I don't concern myself with the happennings of third world countries.

2026-08-07 14:12:16 UTC

- reply

Yes, I am happy actually. Could you be a bit more specific? What specifically did I say that was wrong? And why?
I mean, my position seems pretty solid to me. Power and control are both multipliers. What's biggest? 1x99? 99x1? Or 50x50?

2026-08-07 14:06:36 UTC

Everybody at my workplace is sick, but choosing to come into work anyway. I do NOT want to catch what they have, so I decided to call in healthy.

2026-08-06 18:32:09 UTC

- reply

Why are you spending your time talking about whether or not what I said counts as an argument instead of talking about whether it's correct? Seems like that's the more important issue here.

2026-08-06 16:54:29 UTC

- reply

What I'm saying isn't right simply because I'm saying it. I'm correct because my argument is correct. A high power level should always be paired with a high level of self control. That's why being so unbalanced in one direction or another is such an embarassment.

2026-08-06 16:48:58 UTC

- reply

"I'm an empath" means that I imagine domething thay you might be feeling and then instantly believe it.

2026-08-06 16:44:23 UTC

- reply

Listen, if a normal person like me can pretend to be a degenerate online then why can't a degenerate like you pretend to be a normal person in real life?
I promise you that I would not at all mind hiring you IRL if you were committed to hiding your true nature from me. I don't want to know what you do in your private life.

2026-08-06 14:16:06 UTC

- reply

Power and no control is just as bad as someone with only skill and no power behind it.
Buy better pants.

2026-08-05 16:33:56 UTC

- reply

It was a window.

2026-08-05 14:17:48 UTC

- reply

It was a spam filter and you were spamming. 🤷🏿‍♀️

2026-08-05 14:14:51 UTC

- reply

Backdoors are hard to prove; it's hard to prove intent.

2026-08-05 14:13:47 UTC

- reply

I'm pretty sure the creators of Primal are too lazy to intentionally downrank or shadowban you. It's probably just lack of engagement.

2026-08-04 16:56:18 UTC

- reply

Thank goodness, now child rapists can rest easy on their way to prison, knowing that some self-righteous pedo-hunter isn't going to kill them for the sake of protecting children.

2026-08-04 16:54:00 UTC

They should detonate a nuclear bomb on the moon. (Purely for the fun of it.)

2026-08-04 16:51:17 UTC

- reply

You didn't link to the APK. Additionally, needing to run an entire posterchan instance is a horrible user experience compared to simply installing and running an ordinary desktop client for an equally sovereign client setup.

2026-08-04 16:47:17 UTC

Breaking news! Iran has just delivered a letter agreeing to Donald Trump's demand that they stop sending bombing drones to oil tankers in the Straight of Hormuz.
However, top diplomatic analysts warn it's moderately possible this arrangement will not last, citing the fact that the letter was delivered via bombing drone to an oil tanker in the Straight of Hormuz https://image.nostr.build/7fa3e3f45c20b4a33149ab8670fe9078ba1b07cd2777d65e693e774dcee2e6c0.jpg

2026-08-04 16:38:14 UTC

- reply

I'm sure the user experience is fine. I'm just not going to use a centralized web client to browse my decentralized microblogging platform. That's pathetic.

2026-08-04 16:33:59 UTC

- reply

>Web client
Gross, no thank you.

2026-08-03 21:49:36 UTC

In case anyone is curious what I do for work, I make digital art. That's short for digital Arthur.

2026-08-03 21:46:13 UTC

- reply

Just face it; you're a normie now.

2026-08-03 21:12:38 UTC

- reply

Yes, and my password is my last line of defense. Are you suggesting I give up that too, and leave myself with nothing to defend myself?

2026-08-03 06:28:28 UTC

I never understood the point of having a bunch of implementation possibilities associated with some software. Have you considered just having something that's already good from the beginning???

2026-08-03 04:30:52 UTC

I hate people looking over my shoulder to watch me type my passwords in. I've switched my computer over to a system where I instead enter the cryptographic hash of my master password alongside the current date and time. It's really hard computing the cryptographic hash in my head, but the peace of mind is worth it! Good luck decrypting my drive now, bastards!

2026-08-03 04:12:12 UTC

- reply

Passwords are my one piece of leverage over the machine. I will never give up control over my passwords to another machine.

2026-08-03 04:08:46 UTC

- reply

Shitty mindset. Pain is proof that death is bad. The more pain you experience in life the more you should be invested in continuing to live in order to avoid what that pain reflects.

2026-08-03 03:54:56 UTC

- reply

Air conditioning?

2026-08-03 03:51:19 UTC

- reply

Talking about crime in general is different than confessing to crime. The former is freedom of speech. The latter is asking law enforcement to come disturb you on your platform.

2026-08-03 03:38:38 UTC

- reply

True. In the USA it's not easy to spend large amounts of money without a story for how that money came about.
Of course due to the nature of value it's always possible to manufacture a ficticious story that's impossible to distinguish from reality. AML laws are not robust because laundering money is a basic human right.

2026-08-03 02:05:57 UTC

Guis is my tire pregnant??? https://image.nostr.build/b18be958be8c89701f3ad243108ede62a49f73be6bbc1b1c9665610dea3911ae.jpg

2026-08-02 16:06:26 UTC

- reply

Creating watchlists is a basic human right for everyone, including the president of the United States. Obviously any president of any party affiliation can do it and is capable of acting on watchlists.
If your whole argument depends on harassment ocurring then it sounds like there is nothing inherently wrong with speech based watchlists, which is what it sounded like you were saying earlier.

2026-08-02 05:36:56 UTC

- reply

Only my best friends call me nigga, and I don't think we are on that level yet. :/

2026-08-02 05:35:12 UTC

- reply

Bro this is my day off, stop yelling. You're lucky I even answered the phone.

2026-08-01 20:38:41 UTC

I'm living with a roommate right now since I wanted someone to help cover my rent payments.
This afternoon I was drinking some squirt and I commented about how I loved the soda's citrussy flavor.
Then my new roommate took out his phone and started showing me all his favorite porn of the character Tangy from Animal Crossing.
I asked him "What the hell is wrong with you??? What made you think it was okay to show me porn of a Tangerine-girl? Just because I said I like the taste of citrus?"
But he defended himself "Hey! You were the one who stated it, talking all about how much you liked the flavor of citrussy!"
I think I'm going to start looking for a different roommate...

2026-08-01 20:24:02 UTC

- reply

You know what they say: what doesn't kill you leaves you without any retirement savings.

2026-08-01 20:20:38 UTC

I still believe its wrong to steal company property, but I haven't been able to stop myself from filling up my water bottle from the office water cooler every afternoon and taking it with me to drink at home.
I know it's messed up, but it just tastes so much better than lawfully obtained water...

2026-08-01 16:56:17 UTC

- reply

That's a lot of words. I even read some of them, and yet I still can't understand what specifically you have a problem with.
Are you mad that the FBI has watchlists? Are you mad that the FBI pays attention to certain people based on the beliefs they announce to the world? Are you mad that your beliefs are included in that? Or are you just mad that they are using AI?
Personally, I think people deserve it for actively choosing to associate their beliefs with their personal identity. Speech is just so much more pure and wholesome when its anonymous.

2026-08-01 16:48:39 UTC

- reply

I don't get outraged about meta glasses either because I've been beating up glasses-wearers since long before meta glasses came out.

2026-08-01 16:46:01 UTC

- reply

Damn that's crazy. Can you describe all of your other identifying features too? For purely humorous purposes I promise

2026-08-01 16:43:04 UTC

- reply

My grandma survived niggers dozens of times and then died to cancer. I'm pretty sure its some kind of messed up rock-paper-scissors scenario.

2026-08-01 16:40:31 UTC

- reply

Consider: boysmell

2026-08-01 16:39:19 UTC

- reply

The hardware brings the circuit to the edge of "orgasm" and then checks to see if it "came".

2026-07-30 16:48:50 UTC

- reply

1+1 and 2 just entered the chat

2026-07-30 16:42:15 UTC

- reply

Would you change your mind on that if a professional said that witholding HRT isn't child abuse?