Author of “Modern Chains.” Catholic. Husband. Father of two. Former Army Officer, AH-64 Pilot. BS in Art, Literature and Philosophy from the US Military Academy. MA in Philosophy from Holy Apostles College and Seminary.
Public Key
npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 Profile Code
nprofile1qqsr3gwdr05shx5f35jpthqsrhcgwrc4kuh2y0xmpt0647kgp5p06zgprpmhxue69uhhqun9d45h2mfwwpexjmtpdshxuet56m0w9j
Show more details
Published at
2026-08-09T03:31:50Z Event JSON
{
"id": "d7bd21a3dc5a9aee936a90ab879ee0a74cbc03793db80b73c5b9f795962eda97" ,
"pubkey": "38a1cd1be90b9a898d2415dc101df0870f15b72ea23cdb0adfaafac80d02fd09" ,
"created_at": 1786246310 ,
"kind": 0 ,
"tags": [],
"content": "{\"website\":\"https:\\/\\/www.modernchains.com\\/\",\"picture\":\"https:\\/\\/blossom.primal.net\\/3cb6c0e18be5a6dc40f018dcfe5ac0a245b52ee48dc911550932d1b7dccb7755.jpg\",\"display_name\":\"Neal\",\"about\":\"Author of “Modern Chains.”\\nCatholic. Husband. Father of two.\\nFormer Army Officer, AH-64 Pilot. \\nBS in Art, Literature and Philosophy from the US Military Academy. \\nMA in Philosophy from Holy Apostles College and Seminary.\",\"name\":\"hylomorphic\",\"lud16\":\"[email protected] \",\"nip05\":\"[email protected] \",\"lud06\":\"\",\"banner\":\"https:\\/\\/blossom.primal.net\\/d76d0ddf4f017f56ebbe1fd95095a9d2a42e2e42bce415c1e55d57510ebf5d8c.jpg\"}" ,
"sig": "4fc719ad1af9abade92f9c15332e32b3b01f9be710dda8db6f6e4eeb30d8513bdc0cc39ecaee2484597772769cd3ff8a6eebea1bbf72f702d12d7c8243872591"
}
Last Notes npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic if they tried another 110, i would run it becuase it’s better specs npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqs9hmkdxk7d97fees65q23zc24h7l833wl7wg3t9w698xzxa6nvapgurqq8u yup npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic the principles of bitcoin’s security remain this particular wallet had a particular vulnerability now people are aware and learned i know it sucks beyond belief, im sick. but how many people died along the oregon trail? we have to keep marching onward in their honor https://blossom.primal.net/51983c8c8f999733ff0de457a251bedf4e569fba2033852cea31ea006360098b.jpg npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic if nodes don’t control the network, then how does the network remain decentralized? #asknostr npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic For anyone in opposition or on the fence about 110, if you cannot point to how 110’s tighter limits inhibit your use of the network, then perhaps you don’t have a principled reason to oppose it. Dare I say, 110 probably better serves your interests. https://blossom.primal.net/2e393c659362d94579f4fa58cf5cb1f0e4c2c45395416526c62af96324f3f4f6.jpg npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic Regarding BIP110: If your argument depends on “how” “who” “what” or “when” while ignoring “why,” you’re doing battle against a strawman. npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic yeah, most definately npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic baffles the mind the things that must be said today npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic Why would anyone want a non-110 block? 110 blocks have better specs. What does a non-110 block do better than a 110 block? #asknostr npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic was looking again, 110 does cap UTXOs to 34 bytes, so spamming UTXO would still be marginally more expensive than it is currently, but again, it’s still not the cheapest way to get the data onchain and people wanting to put their spam/scam in a UTXO have some other incentive superseding the pure “economic” cost of the transaction npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic will have to wait and see npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic sorry i wasn’t clear on the point about “would "immediately URSF"” i mean i would start to build support and find a shelling point to actively prevent the harm. in order to preserve stability and order against something, i would try and rally the troops and like up across from the bad UASF. apples to apples, head to head I have thought this stage of the battle through, and i’m still working through a lot of all the scenarios from the best to the worst cases. atm, i do agree with u if there is a close but drawn out chain split, i think 110 prevails cause it is stronger. if 110 dies in the vine, it gets a little harder for me to decide right now. i have a never negative reaction to the possibility of changing PoW, i would be of a mind to try and try and sell people in a better BIP again, to save the chain. but i’m still working through that. i respect greatly that you have already gotten your ducks in a row. it took me too long to figure this first step out npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic yeah, it’s really milquetoast npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic yeah, if 110 broke something monetary, you could say it, point at at, but it doesn’t. most all the people i interact with, when i ask them how they use bitcoin, it’s just to make normal transactions. they are completely uneffected, wouldn’t know if we soft forked 110 or not. the people screaming have some other thing they are wanting to do, some other interest, and are trying to convince me to go along. they just throw out all this bs about censorship, neutrality, or stopping spam trying to get to forget about asking why do YOU yourself even use bitcoin in the first place i’ll carry my own water thank you not carrying water so someone can scam npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic that boring it puts you to sleep 😂 npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic Why I’m Runnint BIP 110. https://blossom.primal.net/f7f51bab4f0f5cee1885422674aa34659fb1a3436dd0320aed0857e605d917d0.mp4 npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic protocols enforcing boundsries is not censorship, period so tedious npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic working on a 10-15 min video/speech laying out my thought process so much rhetorical clamor it’s easy to lose the principles npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic i think everyone is pursing their interests. everyone runs software they like not really sure something that can be universally applied to a domain means much of anything. npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic ok 2021 npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic from my view it’s backwards, the filtering will always happen with relay policy. tightening protocol parameters, moving the boundary envelopes simplifies the types of transactions allowed. people using crazy “op_if 1 = 0 then (arb data) is just crazy to me. simply saying, the way the protocol was in 23 is better for the network than it is now, doesn’t compel me to think it’s some grave mistake. if it became changing the protocol consensus every month, then i would not support that because that would be more like trying to “filter” and i’ve been working through these issues with everyone else for over a year. we can only do what we think serves us best. that’s what makes bitcoin bitcoin npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic For me it all turns on defensibilty. 110 is either ≥ legacy legacy is either ≤ 110 with 110, we can win more defensibilty with legacy, we can win _____ How do you fill in the blank? Why should I play russian roulette? #asknostr #BIP110 #core #bitcoin npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic nakamoto consensu is sausage made from everyone putting their dick on the chopping block it’s not about being right or wrong it’s about putting it out there npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic Summary of back and forth i had yesterday: -110 censors, dont adopt110 if 110 censors, then legacy censors too -but legacy is legit censorship why is that? -it has adoption but that’s arguing don’t adopt 110 becuase it hasn’t been adopted.. how could it get adoption if not adopted? -….. npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic For the people who don't like conflict and the BIP110 war, just know it is necessary. It's a gift to both sides, no matter who comes out on top. If you don't test your ideas against proof of work and put them in the fire, you have no fucking clue what they are really made of. npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic From my view and participation in BIP110 dialog, it seems like all the tension is related to people processing the seeming paradox of a dynamic relation producing immutabley stable effects consensus is alive, it can change or adapt every block but we say 21M is fixed it’s fixed insofar as it is locked by incentives and self interest we participate with the network with action: running nodes, mining, transacting, hodling we feed it our self interest, and the consensus rules that emerge are the collective good of the network. how people act within consensus is “free market” and how people set consensus is “free market” both are good and necessary people doing valid things now dont like the idea of those things not being consensus in the future. other people think current consensus doesn’t serve them well and want different things to be consensus in the future neither is “bad” for the process the consensus rules remain or change by the people voluntarily running software that serves their self interest, as expressed by the main chain. i run 110 cause i think it serves my interests best. and thats ok if others don’t agree. all we have to agree on is the main chain is always right if it expresses something different than you think is best, it’s right and ur wrong, and that’s ok. it came up with a better answer for the collective good you could. i guess all im trying to say is it’s ok to be passionately opposed to others self interest, if u understand how bitcoin is processesing everyone’s self interest to produce a collective good, you don’t have to be scared or fearful of the output. 110 will either change consensus rules or it won’t. either case, bitcoin is doing what bitcoin does, it’s not ded, and there is no need to cry cause it does what it can only do. it’s stupid to say people advocating for their self interest is going to destroy bitcoin it’s stupid to say any change is going to kill bitcoin the censorship arguments are preformative contradictions the “what’s spam?” “what’s monetary?” “what’s arbitrary?”questions are answered by the protocol itself the free market is action is a domain and a establishes the boundary of the domain these things are not contradictions, even if they “seem” paradoxical npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic #bitcoin ‘s consensus is an expression of collective self-interest. I think not understanding that dynamic relation is the principled root cause of all #BIP110 contention. npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic Hunter Beast is making the technical argument that there are extremely sophisticated attack vulnerabilities which enforcing people to chunk data protects against. all spam bs aside, 110 prevents those attacks and is necessary Hunter Beast is making the technical argument that there are extremely sophisticated attack vulnerabilities which enforcing people to chunk data protects against. all spam bs aside, 110 prevents those attacks and is necessary i totally understand that there are legitimate reasons to be against 110, but I would also say there legitimate reasons to be for 110 as well. the clash of steelmen is more competitive that the meme npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic “Fiat is a corruption of the relation between acquisition and preservation.” npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic yeah, 1 is a reality check. 2 is a trade off judgment call, and honestly i can respect anyone’s call on 2 if they accept 1. 3 follows from 2 if we cant agree on a common frame of the issue, we cant have a productive dia-logos it’s just a sterile exercise npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic what is the issue with this line of reasoning: 1) acknowledge 100k makes network less defensible that 83. 2) acknowledge benefit of 100k < defense of 83 3) acknowledge BIP110 > current consensus rules #asknostr #bitcoin #nostr #core #knots #BIP110 #v30 npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic oh man, when the blood of the chicken spills and the cow jumps over the moon, that man’s go 47x levered long until the cat plays the fiddle, then sell and go 32x levers short npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic arbitrary only if u deny telos that’s the principle behind any non-arbitrary boundary. The “why” behind the line. npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic i had a similar experience. spent more time than i care to admit over the last year steelmanning both sides and breaking down the the logic. wasn’t a waste of time because it’s great exercise, but fuck me it’s tedious work npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic at the end of the day, you are a rational creature. human beings have imperfect knowledge, yet someone we get out of bed in the morning. epestimic humility is necessary. “mistrusting” for the sake of mistrusting is fucking retarded npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic hmmm. I think there a distinction in the two: the meaning of “what happens” is only intelligible within a context of purpose. where as “why speed of light is constant” doesn’t require a purpose to answer or phrased differently, i think the outputs of those questions belong to different categories. would have to think more on that, very interesting stuff needless to say npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic “we should ask what the physics of Bitcoin requires” we need the “why” i think “what’s” have taken us as far as they can npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic I’m a bitcoiner, i’ll remain on the longest chain with the most energy whether it’s what I think is best or not. Bitcoin’s consensus making process, ie the longest chain with most energy, sorts through competing self interest and finds common interest. I accept the fact that bitcoin consensus is better than any product produced by an individual. “Bitcoin consensus” is very much so a distinct thing from “clamor about support” what people are running, what people are mining, that’s all that matters actions speak louder than words. the more this debate rages and boils over, the more I appreciate that bitcoin simply doesn’t care run whatever software best suits how you USE bitcoin. that’s all that is required. there is no wrong answer. feed the network your self interests, and it will give you a best answer for the network, like it or not. npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic yes, break the chains https://www.modernchains.com/ npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic people choosing what software to run, miners choosing what chain to mine on you’re right.. so much tyranny Ironically, ur arguing if people run software that you don’t want them to run, that’s somehow a “power grab” npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic i also love the “low IQ” as an insult. he is doing the meme your IQ is just my professor speed, has nothing to do with whether you are right or wrong would rather be retarded and right instead of wrong and a midwit npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic the “fork now” idea betrays the posture of superiority. people are organizing and planning according to 110s schedule. Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake vs Quick you better make a mistake right now! the dust will settle soon enough lol npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic “bullying” has a negative connotation i don’t think is accurate to reality. miners, nodes, and users all work together in unison, but they are not equals. node runners have to be point man, if they are not the conductor, the ensemble will sound like shit we will see how it plays out, but i don’t know what principles reason a miner would have to not mine BIP110 compliant blocks. if they had a URSF we would have a more accurate score card, but as is, act activation block height, if u a miner if you don’t click the button, other miners could blow u up, but if u click the button, you are safe. if there is no URSF, we will only know after the fact. and honestly i wont be surprised by either outcome i think we don’t get a chain split and switch to BIP110, and that’s cause i couldn’t get anyone to provide me with a valid principled answer to why v30 was good without contradicting themselves. maybe the miners have one. but i can only go off the best arguments i can gather npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic “how miners act” 💯 npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic they are caught in performative contradictions. the principled structure underpinning their position is either not accounted for at best, or denied at worst. npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic I just want to know why building 7 collapsed npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic the incoherence of core advocacy comes from the fact that what carries their thought doesn’t appear in what they think. modern day sophists npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic most people talk that way, but when it comes up natural u don’t notice. when its the same form/pattern over and over and over, that’s sticks out npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic sats left the wallet, but not showing in poll.. hmm npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic I feel you. Standing up in public requires courage and conviction. The ethics of money got me to bitcoin, and they don’t change unless natural law changes. So till death do us part. But the good news, since ethics underpins all economics, when i’m swimming submerged in ethics, the surging and crashing economic waves dont matter at all. npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic https://youtu.be/tk9rq-SoLyU Appreciate the shoutout @nprofile…uxmv You crushed. npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic Must not have met many Catholics that’s ok. all the technical mumbo jumbo sits on invalid logic. here is a story to depict the error in reasoning. there was an open barn surrounded by a fence with a 80 bit gate. it does not follow logically that because the barn is open, you should tear down the gate. core v30 tore down the gate BIP110 puts a door on the barn, because v30 took down the gate. if core reverted their change, we wouldn’t need a door, because there is a gate. none of the big wig v30 advocates could articulate a principled reason why removing the gate is good for the network. it’s good for a few individuals, at the cost of the other network participates(miners, nodes, users) miners ultimately have to choose also, you keep saying hard fork, but that’s not true npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic unless the miners flip their breakers and mine the BIP110 chain. there is no URSF, so we will see how the game theory plays out if you had a URSF we could actually have a head to head race npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic Ad hominems just can’t be all of one’s argument. applied like salt to a nice tenderloin you should try some tenderloin btw they’re still fun, especially when true npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic lol you’re a vegan 😂 explains why ur immune to logic npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic “functionally the same” don’t tilt at windmills Bitcoin wasn’t bad on10-9-23. and making bitcoin on 10-9-23 consensus isn’t bad either. satoshi used relay policy to address data usage on chain. v30 said nah so consensus is the arbiter npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic he was also the one who made the first filter. what was functionally accomplished with relay policy prior to v30, is functionally the same accomplished at consensus with BIP110 just because you say the word “technical” does not supercede logic npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic you are still limiting what I can put in my transaction. why are u limiting me? npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic but they didn’t remove the limit, they moved the limit to 100k. So what’s the “technical” reason for 100k? why not 50k? why not 200k why not 4mb? you haven’t thought about the principles driving the decisions. npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic when ur saving and spending in bitcoin, you are still creating things in the world, creating value for others, anchored in, tethered to reality. trading is voyeurism speculation is a spectator sport i don’t understand the culture that celebrates cuckholds npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic We haven’t had a Y2K like panic yet, so it has to be prior to 2000. npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic if you use100k OP_Return just run core v30+ if you have no need for OP_Return over 80 then signal for BIP110 with ur node npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic functionally takes bitcoin back to what it was on10-9-23 before BIP379 Miniscripts. restores 80 bit limit on OP_Return from 100k as of core v30. what was then done with relay policy is now done at protocol consensus npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic not from me. i respect bitcoiners even when they disagree with me. that’s actually a feature of bitcoin’s consensus, it sorts out everyone self interest and finds common interest. but since i respect them as human beings, ill ask them questions i know they dont have answers to. for instance, if you dont like 80 as the limit, why should it be 100k? why not 200k? why not 4mb? why not 8mb?? both sides are advocating for enforcing a limit. maybe 80 isn’t the right number, but at least its standing in a valid principled reason npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic umm, i mean "the process" is the nature of softforks. its uncomfortable being contentious, but there again, that's the nature of it. I would say I wish it wouldn't have come to this, but it has, so whether i like it or not really doesn't have anything to do with what I must do. Like I would really love to have had genuine rational discourse about what is the optimal limit for arbitrary data for the network, because that is a legitimate issue, but again, that is not what has happened over the last year plus. the people actively advocating against BIP110 are caught in a performative contradiction. When I'm caught in a performative contradiction, meaning someone poitns out my blindspot and shows me what I am saying contradicts what I am doing, I thank them and either change my behavior or change what I'm saying. the people against BIP110 aren't doing that. through pride, lack of intelligence, or exploitative manipulation, they double down. I do ethics. I can't advocate for something or take actions I can't justify all the way down to first principles. So for me, my path is clear. npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic For me this circus showed me that bitcoin is what i thought it was, and people are what i thought they were. I’m always hopeful the people surprise me. I took to the issue like i take all philosophical inquires, gathering the strongest arguments on both sides, asking all the biggest loudest voices for their arguments. Sadly, the strongest arguments for v30 are logically invalid, inconsistent, arbitrary, or performative contradictions. I understand why v30 can be good for some individuals, but not how it can be good for the network. What relay policy functionally accomplished in 2023 was not bad then. And no one can put together a coherent argument for why protocol consensus functionally accomplishing the same thing is now bad. npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic analyzed from first principles, both sides are advocating for a limit. but only one side acknowledges that. BIP110 the v30 side is stuck in a performative contradiction every time they open their mouth on the issue. they can’t answer “why not 200k?” or “why not 4mb” BIP110 at least has a logically valid and rational justification. for 80. sure, maybe some other number for the limit is optimal, but it’s the failure of v30 to produce one valid argument for why 100k is the correct limit. npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic I think as long as money remains a means ultimately aiding us to our final end, God, we can confidently walk forward through our lives. When money becomes the end, it’s an idol and it can only lead to misery. npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic something like that. Money enables us to coordinate human action with people you don’t know, would never have the opportunity to get to know, and have no concrete reason to “trust” npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic huh, thought i relied but it’s not showing.. I don’t know the answer. personally, right now i would argue “no” just off the principle of what “arbitrary” means. but i accept there are many externalities beyond my understanding, so am open to “yes” npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic i do not know the answer. for me personally, on principle, i would argue “no” on the basis of what “arbitrary” means. but i accept that there are externalities i cannot see, and open to “yes” so some smaller amount, which does not expose the networks belly, is probabilistically optimal. npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic Ironically, both sides of the v30 vs BIP110 debate use the same principle to establish a limit. The only difference is the accident of what the limit is: 80 vs 100k If one limit is “cEnSoRInG” then so too is the other. “I want to make a full block single transaction and am willing to pay a miner for it. How dare the network censor me!” Arguing the limit of 80 censors while the 100k limit does not is a performative contradiction. It’s non-rational and invalidates itself. No matter what possible limit is in place, they all are subject to the same scrutiny. What are the tradeoffs? Why not 160? Why not 100k? Why not 200k? Why not 4mb? Hell, why not 8mb? What are the benefits? Why is the limit placed were it is? Why is the placement best for the network? What changed? Before v30, relay policy functionally prohibited OP_Return >80. There was no issue then. If protocol consensus enforces the same functional prohibition, why is that an issue now? These questions require affirmative answers and would have answers if we were engaged in good faith rational discourse. That’s the principled root at the bottom driving this entire mess. It’s probably the only producive debate anyone could have. All the other shit is a literal circus. 🤮 @nprofile…5hgl @nprofile…hw9w @nprofile…stwk @nprofile…ql08 @nprofile…xxx2 @nprofile…g6jt @nprofile…y689 @nprofile…wncc @nprofile…tnt2 @nprofile…tqyx @nprofile…c90s @nprofile…hqk9 @nprofile…krmc #BIP110 #v30 #Core #knots #bitcoin #nostr npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic “paying for the bits” everything has a essence, and with tools those essences are functions. the thing they do. satoshi made it perfectly clear the design is to function as money, the UTXOs as cash. that is not to say it can’t do other things as well, but it does establish a hierarch of functional purpose. you can use an axe to drive in a stake but it comes at the cost of chopping. discussing those tradeoffs is a legitimate discussion, i would never dismiss anything out of hand. it’s always been about the tradeoffs, and even v30’s limit of 100k betrays this. why 100k? why not 200k or why not just open it up entirely to the full block? why not double the block size? all these questions have answers implicitly, but no one advocating for v30 ever said them outloud. what is the principle driving this limit? the 100k limit inherently means that >100k would be worse than 100k. so in your garden analogy, it’s not about identifying types of weeds. it’s just saying for every carrot you want to plant, you get X amount of space to do whatever you want with, plant anything or nothing. there are trade offs associated with every number you could answer with. v30 doesn’t allow a person to fill the entire block with one 4mb transaction, even if they would pay the miner for it. is that bad? ironically, the driving principle is idenitcal on both sides of the debate. Both use the same principle to establish a limit. If one side is “cEnSoRInG” then so too is the other. the only difference is the accident of what the limit is. npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic “This the distinction between monetary vs non-monetary is fiat.” the spending of a UTXO is the monetary distinction, so all transactions on bitcoin are monetary. a transaction isn’t monetary because you paid a miner to pick it up, it’s monetary because you are spending UTXOs. but that is not the issue. arbitrary means discretionary, meaning it literally doesn’t matter at all what is in it. OP-Return is non-monetary by design, those bits do not spend UTXOs. it can have nothing in it, it can be full of text, or anything. it rides ontop of the monetary transaction. the issue in contention is what parameters (ie size) for the arbitrary data are best for the network. 0 ? 40? 80? 100k? 4mb?? if a person cannot make the affirmative case for why they think a specific number is best for the network, they aren’t tall enough to ride. if i really care about embedding data in the place that doesn’t care about the data, i have no legs to stand on in opposition if people want to make reduce the size of the place. and i think that’s where people get it wrong on both sides about the “fuck you bits” the monetary bits moving UTXOs are fuck you bits the arbitrary bits are arbitrary it doesn’t matter what anyone puts in the OP_Return. the content doesn’t matter. if the content mattered, then its censorship the consensus change is about size, not content. yes, if the size is smaller, certain content can’t fit, but that’s not the change i have no use at all for arbitrary bits, and would be perfectly served if the data carrier limit was 0. but i think a small allowance for arbitrary data, 40-80 bits is probably better for the network as a whole. anything beyond that i think introduces risk to the network and hurts network performance. and why i run BIP110 npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic yes, including any quasi standardized relay policy riding ontop of consensus protocol. protocol said nothing about arb data because satoshi chose relay policy as his solution to the problem. v30 makes relay policy match consensus protocol BIP110 makes protocol consensus match relay policy of 2023. npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic absolutely. npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic It’s easy to fall into focusing on “similarities.” “This is like that” you can say a lot of true things that mean little to nothing. Philosophy is all about making the right distinctions. npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic “shouldn’t” is a category error. businesses have to serve the needs of the market else they cease to exist, minus some central planning type subsisies. also “cost more” in what terms? npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic the summer of 110 is heating up. npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic can’t go back one way ratchet npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic politics makes sense once you realize the purpose of “political squabbling” is to distract people and obfuscate what the monetary system is doing. #bitcoin npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic welp, spaceboi is literally retarded. “cAn’TteLlWhATsPaMIS” isn’t even a midwit response i’m sorry he can’t tell the difference between a whale and an gorilla. the object of censorship is the content of what’s being said, sent etc and by whom. the object of filtering is the form, size, or shape. npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic privacy, like freedom, is a means not and end in itself reality is the ultimate public domain. npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic as a neutral party, the better team won tonight 🤣 enjoy the celebration! npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic that’s odd, it’s a poll but i only see one option to select. good thing the only answer allowed is the right answer npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic The main point of my advocacy is showing people that the money isn’t broken. the title of that book has sent people down the wrong path in terms of advocacy. macro is noise. ignores the essence of money. majoring in the minors describes when u need prescription economics is gay if you don’t understand the ethics it derives from npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic 40th time is the charm! npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic they aren’t throwing the money printer in mount doom 🤣 but maybe one of us small folk could have a chance npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic i remember going to tbr midnight showing for matrix 2. it was on a school night too lol npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic morality is direction, not the sophistication or magnitude of a vector. npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic 💯 npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic peter mccormack said “you would get along with my bitcoin friends.” so my money is on “not yet” he definately understands the federal reserve system npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic 💯 npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic I’m not numb, as in there is a feeling there that is being snuffed out. i am happy to be free, to be outside of fiat. on a bitcoin standard, im always better off. either my savings power is ripping or my purchasing power. thats the best thing about being on a btc standard. subsume the. volatility. make it yours. you can’t do that if you think of btc as an investment. that’s still using a fiat dollar denominator. npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic If you still have the feels for the fiat price of bitcoin, quell any anxiety knowing that bitcoiners set the fiat floor. npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic it’s a great read no too long, very engaging and entertaining npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic but the big beautiful bill will make us great! ….. it’s a bad joke npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic we can cut the word “widely” it’s a wiggle word and not necessary the act of exchange itself is what brings money into existence npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic if a well armed society is a polite society, how polite would society be if we each had a killdozer? 🤔 npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6 hylomorphic what do they have you on?