buckyfonds
Control-Plane Capital

Truth seeker

Public Key

npub1x9hghmfunry8wcgg8s8w5e3drmkndw92r8qu0cp2l28u32aqqn9q6p6rta

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsrzm5ta57f3jrhvyyrcrh2vck3amfkhz4pnsw8uq404r7g4wsqfjspzfmhxue69uhk7enxvd5xz6tw9ec82cspz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduk765px

Publishing to

offchain.pub

relay.damus.io

nostr.bitcoiner.social

eden.nostr.land

ditto.pub/relay

Author Public Key

npub1x9hghmfunry8wcgg8s8w5e3drmkndw92r8qu0cp2l28u32aqqn9q6p6rta

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-08-30 16:12:39 UTC

- reply

I don't know of any good alternative.
The only Twitter web-viewer I know of that still works is:
- https://carryfeed.com/
However, its UI is not good.
I haven't looked into running my own Nitter instance or creating a shadow account because I don't need to read twitter posts that bad.
My guess is Twitter shadow account (fake, single-use email + VPN) is the simplest alternative for now. Can also delete account and recreate new one with different email/VPN from time to time.

2026-08-30 15:26:37 UTC

- reply

It was a joke.
I don't know much about Justin Bieber, but many cases of child stars successfully deprogramming themselves around the age of 30.
Some speculate MK Ultra programming starts to wear off around 30.

2026-08-30 15:16:06 UTC

- reply

I used to use Nitter here and there because I deleted my Twitter account a while back, but not Elon Muskowitz, the freedom fighter, decided to sue every Twitter web-viewer.
He bought Twitter because "freedom of speech", and then it turned into "freedom of speech, but no freedom of reach" when he hired that WEF lady.
"Freedom of speech, but no freedom of reach" = Scream into the void so we can build your social credit score (your Good Goy ranking).
But to be certain who the identity behind the account is, they need to KYC you, and these no-account Twitter web-viewers had become a problem.
(KYC for your safety and your children's' safety, of course.)
If we exclude the "Monetization and policy" subsystem (because these social media platforms are really just the government, and not businesses), the remaining 3 main subsystems are:
1. Identity & graph
- Who you are (accounts, devices, emails, phone numbers, cookies, IPs).
- Who you're connected to (friends, follows, DMs, groups, co-commenters).
- What "cohorts" you belong to (interests, demographics, inferred traits).
2. Event firehose
- Every micro-action is logged: scroll, dwell time, clicks, likes, shares, comments, hovers, zoom, pause, replay, mute, skip.
- Every content object is logged: text, hashtags, URLs, images, audio, video, metadata (language, location, topic).
These logs are timestamped and tied back to identity & graph.
3. Ranking & recommendation
A stack of ML models takes the event firehose and predicts:
- What you're most likely to engage with right now,
- What will keep you from closing the app,
- What content keeps you inside "acceptable" narrative bounds.
Everything else (likes, retweets, stories, reels) is just UI on top of these engines.
This is why they don't like these no account, Twitter web-viewers.
I remember when the AI bubble being the AI governance build-out was a conspiracy theory (6-9 months ago). Now it's pretty much consensus.
Even the normies now know that data centers are really just surveillance centers.
On a more positive note, they wouldn't be spending all times time and energy on propaganda if our situation was helpless.
#nevent1q…ek7v

2026-08-30 14:24:52 UTC

- reply

Fuck Justin Biebler and the police state!
https://blossom.primal.net/6e3b3457ad2c11c5662d1a80d7dbe4e0217194920aec81e64d3180ad8e891cad.mp4
#nevent1q…y58h

2026-08-29 04:06:52 UTC

The video in which Elon Musk talks about "magic money computers" in multiple departments of the US government.
These computers can just make money out of thin air. "They just send money out of nothing."
He talks about the numbers being off by 5-10% in some cases, but would you be surprised if the numbers are off by hundreds/thousands of percentage points?
Catherine Austin Fitts (Secretary of Housing and Urban Development) often talks about how she discovered missing trillions of dollars (~1990).
The day before 9/11 Donald Rumsfeld (Secretary of Defense) said they could not account for 2.3 trillion dollars. That was in 2001.
Take into account the actual (not official) size of the derivatives market (in the quadrillions), and you get very good reasons not to save in fiat, and not to save exclusively in the financial system (stocks, bonds, ETFs, etc.).
Infinite keystroke wealth is not a thing.
https://blossom.primal.net/03781f0b760c7da2565bed840b4380bc9da08557f674453a07459da7550b594b.mp4

2026-08-28 14:48:50 UTC

"Imagine if voting worked." 😂
(Spoiler alert - it doesn't)
https://blossom.primal.net/b76887d7095d60b6e53e5fd404655e95dce7655f544686e898617d3d2d1fb0b7.jpg

2026-08-28 10:57:23 UTC

- reply

I guess you want to argue semantics.
An advanced civilization is one that is characterized by highly developed technology, advanced knowledge systems, energy control and complex organization.
And in all of your comments you assume that the current civilization is the most advanced.
Again, you assume to know how conditions have varied over time.
Archeology, like most other sciences, is completely captured, but feel free to defer to the Vatican, the Smithsonian, UNESCO, etc.
I'm sure if they've discovered something that contradicts the mainstream narrative, they would've instantly come clean and rewritten history.
You can't get reliable information on current events, but you somehow believe to be getting reliable information on events that might've happened or might not have happened hundreds/thousands of years ago, and even from an alleged architect from the 1st century BC (Vitruvius), who may or may not have existed.
Not sure if I'm chatting with ChatGPT or just someone who recites the official narrative.

2026-08-28 10:13:29 UTC

- reply

Your comment assumes that this is the most advanced civilization to have ever existed, and there were never any resets for 2000+ years.
There's evidence that there have been resets and it is speculated that there was one around the 1700s. You can check out "My Lunch Break" and many others for alternate timelines.

2026-08-28 09:40:40 UTC

- reply

Their incentive is to manufacture greater numbers, not lower.
How else would they fear-porn about "saving the planet", carbon tax you, sterilize you, and justify other "population-control" measures.

2026-08-28 09:20:22 UTC

- reply

#nevent1q…elld

2026-08-28 09:18:00 UTC

- reply

So according to the mainstream narrative:
https://blossom.primal.net/1a58b34bd2310e63e029bb6fb0e8124f94f7697e3681baa3435754c6c9973b58.png
That's cool if you want to believe that.
I'd like to see the muscle, hand tools, horses, basic hoists, and primitive cranes they used to build e.g. Sistine Chapel which was built between 1473 and 1481, it was then painted by Michelangelo between 1508 and 1512.
https://blossom.primal.net/7ca572fa06f32804a48efa2cad9466740936b219f1fbb5c1948d7848181e1cbe.jpg
https://blossom.primal.net/45db790e4986a3134aa5a1bc4f6bacbbdff8ce729aedec7ed96b7e33827cf9fe.png

2026-08-28 08:44:03 UTC

- reply

Thinking you need synthetic fertilizers to grow the population is akin to thinking you need to inject every human and animal with heavy metals to protect them from viruses that don't exist, so you can grow the population.
It is basically modern scientism - you need to intervene, to fix this imperfect system that was created by a coincidence.
I guess the population had a synthetic fertilizer deficiency, so they just couldn't figure out a way to thrive for the first 1800 years.
Natural fertilizers aren't scarce, especially if you don't declare war on cows, chickens, horses, etc.
I didn't post any photos of the pyramids, I posted photos of palaces that were later adapted into State Capitol buildings.
I'd imagine the people who built these and many other palaces weren't struggling for food and these buildings weren't built when the official narrative claims.
I'd assume that supplying post-reset humans with synthetic fertilizers would increase the population, yes, but I'm not sure that humans in the 1100s, 1300s, 1500s, 1600s, etc. hadn't figured out how to keep themselves fed while building these and many other palaces.
I don't know how many people we have now, but I'd assume way less than 8 billion.
I'd also be willing to bet that the graph before 1800 is complete garbage.

2026-08-28 08:09:18 UTC

- reply

No way to know what they had/didn't have unless you want to defer to mainstream his-story-ans.
If you can't get reliable information on current events, why would you expect to get reliable information on events that allegedly happened hundreds/thousands of years ago.
I guess before the 1900s they were building these with donkeys and without power tools.
#nevent1q…9s7d
Good alternative history playlist for those who might be interested:
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NFncJvS6AY&list=PLVsHlWhRW4zyNB1MIC-9DsVmQzNJxAjd3

2026-08-28 07:19:31 UTC

Seems legit.
It took them 1800 years to hit the first billion people, and now we're growing a billion every 10 years.
Imagine if we didn't have vaccines, feminism, countless women murdering their children, and advanced contraception with birth control pills, condoms, IUDs, and surgical procedures. We'd be at at least 20 billion.
All governments agree that we're at 8.3 billion people, so it must be true.
I guess the first 1800 years, they were more focused on saving the "planet".
https://blossom.primal.net/1e9728cee510ed3b30fb460f7c8064dce1a1774f9738f9dd40404260eaf7c5e1.png

2026-08-27 03:49:36 UTC

- reply

If it was created by the government, it was created to serve a specific purpose. It wouldn't change what Bitcoin is, nor does it guarantee that they're never going to want to kill it.
I mentioned this more in relation to Bitcoin being marketed as this mythical, anti-establishment technology that governments are so afraid of, which it is clearly not.
Jeff Booth presented it as governments trying to kill it because it threatens them so much.
I mentioned they are unlikely to kill it because there are more adversarial alternatives available, and it serves as a useful decoy (which is what its likely purpose was).
This of course doesn't guarantee that they're never going to want to kill it.
Still, Bitcoin has been a massive net positive for the Controllers and a massive net negative for the freedom money movement.
I am sure there are many warring factions at the lower levels, doesn't seem like it at the highest levels though.

2026-08-27 02:55:49 UTC

- reply

I agree for the most part, with constraints.
If a man thinks he's a woman, then is that also reality.
As I've stated in this and many other posts ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoin-will-fail-as-mass-non-custodial ), there are better tools for the job (freedom money), so why would we handicap ourselves by using Bitcoin.
Bitcoin's design is terrible for this purpose and it was likely created by the government ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-i-think-the-government-created ).
Blackpilling yourself is not a solution, the solution is giving yourself the best odds to succeed.
But if one's whole identity is Bitcoin, I can see why they'd want to make it work, while ignoring better-fitted alternatives.

2026-08-26 12:48:07 UTC

- reply

> "What are your thoughts on 98% of miners (US, China, the rest) acting as one?"
I think China and the US are controlled by the same actors, and we live under something very close to a One World Government.
I've covered this here:
- https://controlplanecapital.com/p/how-i-know-we-live-under-a-one-world
I've written about the mining issue here:
- https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoins-mining-centralization-problem
TL;DR from article
Mining pools such as MARA (USA) and F2Pool (China) have already done “OFAC-compliant“ Bitcoin mining (transaction censorship).
MARA (previously Marathon Digital Holdings) became the first North American Enterprise Miner to produce fully AML and OFAC-compliant Bitcoin.
Marathon abandoned the experiment within weeks amid industry backlash and to align with Bitcoin Core 0.21.1/Taproot signaling, saying they would validate like everyone else (no censorship).
A developer called 0xB10C caught F2Pool filtering transactions and their co-founder Chun Wang acknowledged:
- "Will disable the tx filtering patch for now, until the community reaches a more comprehensive consensus on this topic."
Chun Wang previously wrote (in a now deleted post):
- "Why do you feel surprised when I refuse to confirm transactions for those criminals, dictators and terrorists? I have every right not to confirm any transactions from Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, don’t I? Meanwhile, CZ is selling his soul for money. He deserves."
So both MARA and F2Pool have deliberately filtered OFAC-sanctioned transactions despite them having competitive fee related to all other added transactions.
Analyses of the first MARA “clean” block (height 682,170) focused on lower fees and excluded transactions. BitMEX Research noted the block contained ~0.0033 BTC less in fees than a normal maximized template would have, implying foregone revenue.
So these mining pools decided to lose fee revenue, trashed their reputation and eventually reverted to standard, non-censoring validation.
MARA is an American company while F2Pool is based in China, but somehow they’ve both done OFAC transaction censorship. I’ve already explained how this coordination works in a separate article.
The rivalry between China and the US is mostly theater, and that is one of the main reasons mining centralization is such a big problem for Bitcoin.
---
After Covid (the great One World Government reveal), you'd have to be delusional to think that large mining pools are not state-controlled and that "competing" states are not incentive-aligned.
The governments of the US and China want the same thing - more control over the plebs, more obedience.
The real battle is citizens vs the State, not State vs State.
Every state protects force + money issuance. At all costs. Fiat/CBDC is the control layer, not a policy choice.
The only reason Bitcoin mining looks decentralized to the average pleb is because it is allowed to look decentralized (for now).
I wrote more about Bitcoin mining centralization here:
#nevent1q…xfqw

2026-08-26 11:02:49 UTC

- reply

Your screenshot basically states: propaganda exists and is bad, and Bitcoin mining is not centralized.
I have written about mining centralization here:
- https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoins-mining-centralization-problem
Your article lost me at "Transactions have never been censored".
Mining pools such as MARA and F2Pool have already done “OFAC-compliant“ Bitcoin mining (transaction censorship).
It's quite simple:
- Bitcoin's mining "decentralization" lives or dies at the template layer, not at hashrate.
- As long as pools (not miners) pick transactions, the State can steer settlement via perimeter levers (power, banks, insurers, export controls, app-store rules, cloud/mempool policy).
At present, a regulator only needs to influence a few pool operators, not thousands of ASIC owners.
Does this sound decentralized or centralized.
I guess, your theory is that if censorship becomes too draconian, more mining pools will be formed and we'll have, say, 15 pools instead of 6-7 which would be more decentralized.
In theory, 15 pools would be more difficult to influence than 6-7, but would you rather have template control in the hands of thousands of ASIC owners (e.g. OCEAN-model pools), or 15 StratumV1 pools.
If it were that simple and miners were rational, not-state-controlled actors, you'd have way more than 2% of the hashrate using the OCEAN model.
The theory "if it gets bad, all participants will act in the best interest of the network because they are rational and incentivized to do so" already failed once a few weeks ago.
It is great theory if you want a false sense of security though.

2026-08-26 10:02:45 UTC

- reply

Man, I like Jeff Booth, but sometimes the statements he makes are wild:
- "They can't kill Bitcoin because when they attack it, it just keeps getting stronger, so they'll try to co-opt it."
- "As long as Bitcoin stays decentralized and secure ... then XYZ"
Jeff is not like the other mainstream Bitcoin salesmen, in my opinion, he gives off good guy energy.
He's actually the guy who "orange-pilled" me and I've made lots of fiat on my Bitcoin trades.
He'd probably say that if I think in fiat terms, I don't understand Bitcoin, but I think that in order to really understand Bitcoin, you also have to understand how the world works.
If you don't understand how the world works, your attempts at Game Theory are worse than useless.
The people who focus only on understanding how the protocol works are too zoomed in to see the bigger picture.
The idealistic, protocol-centric scenario is unrealistic under a One World Government this tyrannical.
So I listened to a recent Jeff Booth podcast to see if he's updated his view on certain things, but he hasn't.
It's easy to tell because all of his podcasts are really just the same 1st principles presentation.
Going back to this quote:
- "As long as Bitcoin stays decentralized and secure ... then XYZ"
This of course assumes that Bitcoin is decentralized and secure.
I guess we'll have to ignore:
- 6-7 mining pools being close to 90% of the hash,
- Bitcoin Core being 80+% of the nodes,
- most retail users interacting through mobile wallets or browser extensions controlled by Apple and Google,
- increasingly more draconian on/off-ramp custody and surveillance,
- paperization practically destroying the 21M meme,
- crazy tax and regulatory frictions on payments,
- crazy Lightning Network centralization and regulation,
- significant portion of the reachable nodes being hosted on major cloud providers,
- centralized ASIC production,
- centralized out-of-the-box, noob-friendly hardware wallet production,
- etc.
Going back to this quote:
- "They can't kill Bitcoin because when they attack it, it just keeps getting stronger, so they'll try to co-opt it."
Let's assume that they can kill Bitcoin for a second.
Why in the world would they want to kill Bitcoin?
For 99% of cases, they'd rather you use Bitcoin than gold/silver, Monero or cash.
Unless you're moving tens/hundreds of millions of non-KYC Bitcoin to sponsor groups the Controllers don't like, they'd much rather you used Bitcoin than gold or cash.
As I've previously written, it is very likely Bitcoin was actually created by the government, so it makes very little sense for them to kill it in the current environment (with more adversarial alternatives available).
https://blossom.primal.net/5476a16fbbdd25ee92aadcc6d2f29544b487ddb21e5c9f282c6014626c99a799.png
Can we at least stop pretending that Bitcoin in its current state is anti-establishment technology that makes our Jewish central bankers want to shut it down? That's just cringe.
For most Bitcoiners, the "have they co-opted Bitcoin test" is: "Is there a new block every ~10 minutes? (tick-tock, next-block?)"
- If yes, Bitcoin = not co-opted
- If no, Bitcoin = co-opted
Of course, this is a gross oversimplification - it focuses only on the protocol, while ignoring the policy and perimeter layers.
It's like saying: "If human breathing:"
- then human = healthy
- otherwise human = unhealthy
On this part:
- "They can't kill Bitcoin because when they attack it, it just keeps getting stronger"
My best attempt at pointing out where Bitcoin is stronger compared to 5-10 years ago:
- more people know about it (is good and bad),
- more hashrate (although insanely centralized, so doesn't mean much),
- higher fiat price (greater incentive to defend BTC),
- more people running nodes (although ordinary user nodes are at the bottom of the food-chain),
- more client decentralization (although Core still at 80%+).
So, a more honest Bitcoin pitch:
- Hey, we've got this thing that:
- might go up in fiat terms,
- is very easy and convenient to transport across borders,
- might protect you against the Great Taking if self-custodied properly,
- is very CIA/MO$$AD, MI6-aligned, so they've got no incentive to kill it.
Think of it as a stock of a blue-chip company, but a stock you can self-custody.
So, essentially similar to a paper stock certificate of a Blue-Chip company that is Controllers-aligned (e.g. NVDA, MSFT, GOOG, AAPL, AMZN, etc.).
This is the honest pumper Bitcoin pitch.
Not - "We are about to separate money and state (... after we get permission from the state), and the Jewish bankers are pissing their pants."
#nevent1q…xg93

2026-08-25 09:46:29 UTC

- reply

"How did we get here?"
Freemasonry is Jewish.
https://blossom.primal.net/318b62f25150bb8891ff213e9ee47937c67cc0bce7a65795776378635fe4f2bf.jpg
"Masonic lodges are established all over the world to help us achieve our indipendence. Those pigs, the non-Jewish Masons, will never understand the final objects of Masonry."
- Theodor Herzl, 1897 Switzerland
So the goyim are likely fed goy slop Freemasonry (enough to be useful), and the good stuff is just for the Jews.
I guess your question is: "How did we get here?"
How did we get to the point where at the level that we can see, Jews control everything, have rewritten history, have probably invented most religions, have rewritten "science", and pretty much everything else.
And the answer is, I don't know.
1) We could just be farm animals in a simulation - basically the loosh energy theory.
Loosh energy refers to emotional or life-force energy generated from human experiences, particularly intense emotions like suffering, conflict, or worship, which some describe as being "harvested" by higher-dimensional beings.
So if the Creator of this place is a "computer programmer" of sorts, maybe this is just a very realistic simulation designed to harvest loosh energy.
2) Some form of "The Book of Enoch" could also be the case.
The Fall of Angels - the text describes the Watchers, a group of angels who descend to Earth and take human wives, leading to the birth of the Nephilim, hybrid beings that cause chaos and violence.
The Watchers also taught humanity forbidden knowledge, which led to widespread corruption and violence.
There are some theories that we are being ruled by the Watchers and the Nephilim (the offspring of these fallen angels).
3) It could also be a matter or who managed to survive the previous resets and preserve ancient knowledge/technology
If we assume that we are not the most advanced civilization in human history (which is a safe assumption IMO), imagine what advantage you'd have over ordinary plebs if you've managed to preserve pre-reset knowledge/technology.
Maybe things weren't going so great for the Controllers pre-reset, and they decided to wipe out the world (e.g. by use of Directed Energy Weapons).
If you had the technology and time and resources to plan, if executed cleanly, this would give you a massive advantage post-reset.
The current "Elites" seem to all be building bunkers for some reason. Could be to protect themselves from bombs, of course.
4) Our Controllers could also be beyond the Ice Wall
If you assume this Flat Earth map is roughly correct and there is an Ice Wall, our Controllers could be beyond the Ice Wall, so the Jews would be just the highest observable level.
https://blossom.primal.net/4ff273cf33a317a868cb95e821a938a9207c825a628f13aa9702a6130638b3f1.png
It's kind of weird that all of the things that EVERY country on Earth agrees on have to do with enslaving the population - e.g. The Antarctic Treaty, fiat, vaccines.
The official narrative around the Antarctic Treaty (1959) makes no sense: 58 signatories, including the Soviet Union during the Cold War, so real hard cooperation in a rivalrous era.
The story that all countries agreed to not allow independent exploration to protect the penguins is prime goy slop.
Of course, this is all just speculation, so the answer is likely some combination/something completely different. There are too many layers to this deception.
However dark this place might be, doesn't mean we can't find a way to enjoy our time here.

2026-08-24 10:53:51 UTC

- reply

For the most part, yes. The model is the model.

2026-08-24 09:14:47 UTC

- reply

Forgot to mention, Cody Snodgres who was a Black Ops and CIA operative also explained how much of this works:
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jm1G-cCvbJU

2026-08-24 08:41:21 UTC

How the World works 👇️ (at the level that we can see)
As I've shown in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/how-i-know-we-live-under-a-one-world ), we've lived under something very close to a One World Government for a long time.
But how does it actually work (at the level that we can see)?
At the level that we can see, the World is run by secret societies (it's really just 1 secret society with different names).
This was exposed in Italy with the Propaganda Due (P2) scandal. The lodge was originally formed in 1877 as Propaganda massonica. (More on this below)
They also blew the whistle (revelation of the method) with the TV series Prison Break.
"The Company" (= the Controllers) is the main antagonistic faction of Prison Break. It is a secret group of multinational corporate alliances known only by those who work for them or oppose them. Its influence and power over individuals stretches to the White House, controlling every decision the country makes.
The Company holds control over the government's sway on energy and the country's economy.
The Company is an international organization, so they have agendas and operations that they pursue all over the World. These include a 1995 incident in Berlin, a Nigeria incident, a Comrie Group incident, as well as several others.
"Scylla" is an external hard drive primarily located within The Company's main headquarters. The hard drive is said to hold reports and other personnel information on all of its current and former operatives.
In the US, The Company has operatives in:
- FBI, CIA, Secret Service, U.S. Marshals, U.S. Treasury, U.S. Army, etc.
Now let's step into the Real World - the Propaganda Due Masonic Lodge in Italy - as this model is replication in every country in the World.
Propaganda Due (P2) "was" one of the most controversial secret societies in modern European history.
Originally founded in Italy in 1877 as a private Masonic lodge, P2 later became associated with political manipulation, financial scandal, intelligence networks, organized crime, and some of the most disturbing events in post-war Italian history.
At first, P2 is alleged to have existed as a discreet Masonic lodge for members of the Italian parliament who wished to become Freemasons while keeping their membership hidden from the Roman Catholic Church.
By the late twentieth century, however, it had transformed into something far more dangerous: a secret network of businessmen, politicians, intelligence officials, financiers, military figures, and criminals running Italy.
P2 was part of the wider world of Italian Freemasonry, where political life, secrecy, and elite networking overlapped.
We start getting interesting info from around the late 1960s when P2 is under the leadership of the businessman Licio Gelli.
After Gelli's appointment as master in 1975, he was able to gather together in secret at least a thousand prominent individuals, mainly politicians and State administrators.
By 1981, when police seized P2's records, the scale of its influence shocked Italy. Its membership list reportedly included:
- 3 Italian cabinet ministers
- 43 members of the Italian parliament
- The heads of all Italy’s intelligence agencies
- Military officers
- Businessmen
- Journalists
- Financiers
- Public officials
- Prominent conservative figures
The discovery showed that P2 had practically run the state, including the security apparatus, and the country's finances.
P2 also run the highest levels of organized crime in Italy. Mafia-linked members included Michele Greco, rumoured to be the capo dei capi of Italy, and Michele Sindona, the lodge treasurer. Sindona was a wealthy financier who managed Mafia profits from the transatlantic heroin trade.
P2 had become the place where finance, politics, intelligence operations, and organized crime intersected.
I'm not breaking any news, but drug-trafficking (and child-trafficking) into the US (and pretty much any other country) is also State-run, and the State is Secret Society-run.
Propaganda Due (P2) also had a close relationship with the Vatican Bank.
Despite the Roman Catholic Church’s official ban on Masonic membership, Archbishop Paul Marcinkus, head of the Vatican Bank, became associated with P2. Michele Sindona and Roberto Calvi served as major financial advisers to the Vatican.
Calvi, together with Marcinkus, was accused of helping create hundreds of fictitious bank accounts through which Mafia drug money was laundered.
Pope Paul VI had placed a large portfolio of Vatican investments under Sindona’s control in 1969, a decision that reportedly cost the Vatican around $240 million in losses by 1975.
Organized religion is intended for control. You don't need middlemen to tell you what your relationship to the Creator is. You need to find it yourself.
Propaganda Due (P2) also had ties to terrorism. Its members staged at least one major terrorist attack: the bombing of Bologna railway station in 1980, which killed 85 people and wounded over 200.
The Bologna bombing remains one of the darkest events in modern Italian history.
P2 is also likely involved in the mysterious death of Pope John Paul I. The Pope had begun closely examining Vatican finances. On 28 September 1978, he reportedly announced his intention to remove Archbishop Marcinkus and three other Sindona protégés from the Vatican Bank.
The next morning, he was found dead.
No autopsy was performed, and allegations of suppressed or destroyed evidence have followed the case ever since. Officially, the death has not been proven to be murder.
The P2 scandal deepened further in 1982 with the collapse of Banco Ambrosiano, Italy’s largest private bank. Its head, Roberto Calvi, was closely connected to P2, the Vatican Bank, and the financial networks around Sindona and Gelli.
Banco Ambrosiano collapsed after being stripped of approximately $1.4 billion in assets.
The aftermath was marked by "mysterious" deaths.
Calvi was found hanging from Blackfriars Bridge in London. A coroner’s inquest initially called the death suicide, but his widow challenged that verdict. She presented evidence that Calvi had intended to reveal the names of those involved in P2's operations. The verdict was later changed to "cause of death unknown".
On the same day Calvi was found dead in London, his longtime secretary reportedly committed "suicide" by leaping from a window in the Banco Ambrosiano building.
The symbolism of Blackfriars Bridge also became part of the story. “Blackfriars” was interpreted by some as a possible reference to Freemasonry, adding another layer of mystery to Calvi’s death.
After the Banco Ambrosiano collapse, P2’s leading figures allegedly came under increasing pressure.
Licio Gelli (the Venerable Master of the Propaganda Due) lodge, vanished from a Swiss prison cell while being held for extradition. Michele Sindona died in a Milanese prison, claiming that he had been poisoned.
So Licio Gelli was arrested in Switzerland in 1982 for his role in the Banco Ambrosino scandal and the Bologna massacre but managed to escape from prison the next year.
He eventually agreed to surrender into the custody of Swiss authorities for a short period of time in 1987.
From 1996 until his death in 2015, Gelli remained in house arrest at his home in Arezzo (Italy).
Imaging murdering a bunch of people, collapsing Banco Ambrosiano in 1982 (a "black hole" of $1.4 billion), escaping from prison, etc., to get house arrest.
This model is replicated throughout the entire world.
For example, in Britain, the Fabian Society has supplied every Labour Prime minister in history. 141 of 411 Labour MPs are members. More than half the cabinet.
Short video on Britain - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiUV0rM9v7s
Founded in 1884 with a wolf in sheep's clothing as their coat of arms, the Fabian Society is Britain's oldest political think tank. Their strategy, which they openly called "permeation," was to infiltrate institutions from within rather than build new ones. They founded the London School of Economics, started the New Statesman, wrote Labour's constitution, etc.
But the part they'd rather you didn't examine too closely? The founders — George Bernard Shaw, Sidney and Beatrice Webb, H.G. Wells — were committed eugenicists who advocated forced sterilisation and lethal chambers for those they deemed unfit. William Beveridge, the architect of the welfare state, sat on the Eugenics Society's council and presented his welfare blueprint to eugenicists on the same day Parliament debated it.
In the US, George Bush and John Kerry, both members of Skull and Bones, a secret society at Yale University, ran against each other in the 2004 presidential election.
I see the same thing in my country - all of the institutions are run by Freemasons and have been for at least 30-40 years.
So, vote harder, daddy.
As a member of a secret society, your oath is to the brotherhood, and betraying a brother = death.
If you've looked into the Old World (e.g. Tartaria), there is plenty of evidence that we are not the most advanced civilization in human history.
There have likely been multiple resets.
Videos on the topic:
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NFncJvS6AY&list=PLVsHlWhRW4zyNB1MIC-9DsVmQzNJxAjd3
Freemasonry could mean "free masonry" - as in they acquired Old World buildings for free.
They've likely managed to preserve technology/knowledge after resets which gives them a massive advantage in this game.
Andrew Carnegie started the great public library movement of the 19th century.
He "funded" the construction of more than 2500 libraries worldwide.
Although, there is no evidence of most of these "libraries" being constructed - he just used Old World buildings.
Many families donated their old books to these libraries, and many of the books were eventually slowly replaced/changed with goy slop books.
As Rockefeller said: "I don't want a nation of thinkers, I want a nation of workers".

2026-08-17 18:47:40 UTC

- reply

I'd say both SoV and MoE are important.
Storing the value part needs to be decentralized and secure, otherwise, we're just doing fiat 2.0.
I like the idea of the architecture (minimal L1), but the execution is terrible.
For the vast majority of users, Bitcoin's L2s are centralized, insecure, and fully KYC'ed . For the remaining small minority, they are extremely inconvenient.
So for most, L2s are similar to using a credit card (not real Bitcoin).
Adoption of real Bitcoin as MoE hasn't materialized because the UX isn't there, usage is taxed and inconvenient, and all of the drama that comes with constant external and internal attacks.
We are here:
https://blossom.primal.net/f571257a946479e8113bb58cf1c525bff3b485b0ebf67852f4f648d44c58a40b.jpg

2026-08-17 15:18:13 UTC

- reply

They are accessible via archive.org (there are 4 pages - link to page 1 below):
- https://web.archive.org/web/20191018160039/https://www.usagold.com/goldtrail/archives/another1.html
I've gone over his posts in this article:
- https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-i-think-the-government-created

2026-08-17 14:00:23 UTC

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/9cabed470b3fdd7f9de56d1faa62cc23193887c0ea0b00c8fbfe532081377223.png

2026-08-17 13:07:15 UTC

- reply

This comment reminded me of Jeffrey Epstein chatting to Peter Thiel about Bitcoin's identity crisis.
https://blossom.primal.net/69e2ac9e02b012c3fd612fbca0b1f5ee334036201020b789b21897e6022e302c.png
#nevent1q…rrq8

2026-08-17 12:53:50 UTC

- reply

Basically a TL;DR on how Bitcoin got captured.
We got to the point where the Bitcoin community cannot widely agree on what Bitcoin is — is it money, is it arbitrary data storage, is it digital gold, a combination, something else.
Contrary to popular belief, Bitcoin is not "inevitable" and "invincible", it's extremely fragile.
Bitcoin’s survival and adoption depend on whether its most committed users can detect, coordinate, and counter inevitable policy, market, and social attacks.
This of course doesn't work when Bitcoin's most committed users can't agree on what Bitcoin is.
As I've said many times - I am not particularly bullish on any community, but I'd be more bullish on a community that has a single goal and some courage than a community that is pulling in ten different directions.
So effectively, we have a pride of lions, but half of them got convinced that they are gorillas, switched to a vegetarian diet and died.
Then the remaining lions got attacked by a different pride and got killed.
The end.
#nevent1q…ve7n

2026-08-17 12:31:04 UTC

- reply

> Also, the foot guns that you're mentioning are entirely avoidable, even in the most retard-proof way. Seed QRs or having seed cards are a way that even retards can hold their money securely.
So, I guess as long as we figure out the UX and ignore the health of protocol, policy and perimeter, footguns = gone. Cool.
> Bitcoin's capture is simply because the revolutionaries forgot their purpose.
Cool, then maybe you should remind them and we can uncapture it. Seems simple enough.
> I always gave Monero shit because some of the economic policies are kind of retarded. But because of the cypherpunk ethos being first and foremost, they never forget what their purpose is.
"As I previously wrote, I am not particularly bullish on any community, but I’d be more bullish on a community that has a single goal and some courage than a community that is pulling in ten different directions."
#nevent1q…x9sw

2026-08-17 12:11:00 UTC

- reply

I care because I was ~85-90% in BTC up until a few months ago and then I started doing my own research.
The point is to seek and speak truth and form your own opinion.
I find this empowering. Some things you can't change and some things you can (on a local scale).
If this makes you feel bad, maybe don't read.

2026-08-17 09:56:29 UTC

- reply

#nevent1q…3wxs

2026-08-17 09:54:59 UTC

- reply

I don't think there was ever a chance for mass BTC adoption.
With both BTC and BSV (and to a lesser extent Monero), there are too many footguns. Too many ways for things to go wrong.
You'd have a much better chance with a retard-proof solution.
E.g. something like goldbacks (easy to verify, would be easy to produce at lower markup).
https://blossom.primal.net/8d79d90a0f0c0838d225e7e6447a4ebd5243f08cff80e85d54689a2a59a0d555.jpg
Then you face the State head-on instead of slowly getting captured with loads of plausible deniability (invisible to most).
They'd try to outlaw goldbacks, and then you either fight for your freedom or consent to slavery.
This is a binary event that is obvious to everyone, instead of a 2-3 decade-long sly, roundabout battle most people are not equipped for, or even aware of.
Something as simple as Goldbacks matches a lot of the real Bitcoin/Monero spirit at an analog, local scale:
- Privacy/fungibility: every note looks like any other; no transaction graph.
- Thin Policy: no mempool, no templates, no opcodes.
- Minimal Perimeter: you only need physical meetups and social trust, not banks or app stores.
- Anti-paperization: the “wrapper” is literally the metal; you can’t create paper claims on a Goldback without stepping back into the dematerialized system.
The big costs:
- Goldbacks don’t scale to high-value remote transactions (shipping, weight, risk).
- They’re tied to gold’s volatility vs fiat in people’s heads.
- They’re hard to integrate with digital commerce.
Then:
- For global reach and digital commerce, you’d want a Monero-ish protocol (until its inevitable capture).
- For local daily trade, a Goldback-like instrument is much closer to the ideal: low coordination tax, low digital capture surface, high expropriation resistance.
You'd want to buy most of the basic necessities locally anyway. Relying on digital commerce for everything is participating in the slave system.
Most large retailers are really just the State in drag. Buying your basic necessities from someone that hates you and wants to keep you enslaved is a risky business.
Just look at a few photos of men/women from 50-100 years ago before goy slop was mainstream. The deterioration is obvious, but not so much when you're in the moment.
https://blossom.primal.net/4edcbc0098d71ea511a2bae5e07fc3ef0eac9f65030e650103078c551148f056.jpg

2026-08-17 09:27:28 UTC

- reply

Not sure what you are referring to.
Why it's not just math ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/what-made-me-sell-most-of-my-bitcoin )
Why there can only ever be 21M is incorrect ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-bitcoins-21m-cap-is-not-guaranteed )
Why "hashrate up = security up" is incorrect ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoins-mining-centralization-problem )

2026-08-17 07:04:38 UTC

- reply

I posted the most common Bitcoin misconceptions in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/what-made-me-sell-most-of-my-bitcoin ).
Now, more people than ever are paying attention, so it's a good time to recap.
1) “There can only be 21M coins.”
Reality: Protocol caps base units at 21M BTC. Markets can (and already do) create synthetic claims (ETFs, futures, swaps, rehypothecated custodian balances) that exceed 21M. Price discovery then reflects claims supply, not just on-chain supply.
Implication: Paper-share ↑ ⇒ realized vol ↓; upside rallies capped; custody proof matters.
2) “Stock-to-flow proves long-term targets.”
Reality: S2F ignores synthetic supply, demand substitution (stables), and policy gating. Narrative comfort, not a pricing model.
3) “Hashrate up = security up, full stop.”
Reality: Pool control and policy clients determine censorship risk. Top pools ≈ majority of hashrate; pools, not individual miners, decide templates in most cases. DATUM/Stratum V2 are not ubiquitously enforced.
Implication: Watch pool policies, OFAC filtering, template standardization — not just hashrate charts.
4) “Miners can’t censor; the network routes around it.”
Reality: With a few pools coordinating templates/filters, effective censorship windows are feasible (delay/confiscate fees, exclude sets). Economic pressure (insurers, exchanges) makes templates converge.
Implication: Throughput is less of a limit than who writes the block template.
5) “51% attacks are unrealistic.”
Reality: A sustained double-spend is unlikely; policy-driven soft censorship via pools is very realistic and cheaper.
Implication: The live risk is transaction selection bias, not sensational double-spends.
6) “Protocol is immutable. It’s like TCP/IP.”
Reality: Consensus changes are rare, but policy-level changes (relay/size/standardness) shape what’s practically allowed.
Implication: “Immutability theater” can coexist with effective governance via defaults.
7) “User-activated soft forks prove ultimate user power.”
Reality: UASF worked in that instance with massive social coordination + aligned miners/exchanges. Don’t generalize; future coordination may face legal/app-store/bank choke points. Past upgrade processes (e.g., BIP9, BIP8, “Speedy Trial”) revealed that miners and coordinated developers can accelerate or block changes faster than ordinary users can veto. Power concentrates among aligned institutional actors.
(👆️ This was the entire premise for why BIP-110 was going to work.)
8) “It can’t be censored.”
- Reality: The perimeter censors (banks, app stores, exchanges, cloud), not necessarily the base layer. That’s enough to throttle adoption.
Implication: Watch wallet distribution policies, travel-rule hubs, blacklists.
9) “ETFs ‘legitimize’ Bitcoin.”
Reality: They paperize exposure, centralize voting/custody, and let Wall Street set the tape via derivatives basis and inventory.
Implication: Vol suppression ↑; adoption ↑ (in accounts); self-custody share ↓.
10) “If it’s better tech, people will adopt it.”
Reality: Convenience beats truth. Stables with KYC + superior UX win Medium-of-Exchange until incentives flip.
Implication: Bitcoin Store-of-Value containment is the base case; Medium-of-Exchange adoption requires mass incentives or policy failure.
11) “Education will fix it.”
Reality: Behavior follows defaults and rebates, not whitepapers. Policy can make stables default, apps can hide Bitcoin; outcomes follow.
12) “Institutional adoption = censorship resistance success.”
Reality: Institutionalization usually means perimeter compliance, paperization, and template steering.
These are just a few.
#nevent1q…888h

2026-08-17 06:08:29 UTC

Someone remind this chart that "it's just math" and "there can only ever be 21M".
The "hashrate up = security up" narrative is also dead - and for good reasons.
https://blossom.primal.net/87c90d92ceb86eb912bd66d5600218200d9beb8aef4076ee092740295dad557d.jpg

2026-08-14 17:12:43 UTC

- reply

I don't think they can engineer Quantum to scale cheaply and reliably enough to be useful.
I think they'll just use Quantum as a threat to move BTC to a NIST-approved PQ algo and KYC almost everyone (we must know who migrated which coins, for your safety and AML).
Exchanges, custodians and large wallets will roll out PQ migration tools first. This leads to more centralization, paperization and KYC.
They might push for freezing coins for those who refuse to migrate, etc.
I've covered this in this article: https://controlplanecapital.com/p/a-quantum-resistance-upgrade-would

2026-08-14 08:30:18 UTC

- reply

If BTC starts going up in fiat terms, most will instantly forget about its centralization issues.
The Quantum computing scam is the dark horse IMO. The Controllers are clearly setting it up, but on what timeline and how aggressive is difficult to predict.
This video of Peter Thiel from 2024 when Bitcoin was the ~same price as now is for some reason stuck in my head ever since I watched it.
Starts at 1:50:
- "I still hold some Bitcoin... yeah I, ... you know... there are all these ways I.... didn't buy as much as I should have.... and I'm not sure it's going to go up that dramatically from here."
Peter Thiel certainly has lots of insider knowledge but he's difficult to read.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NwdcWYXWPU

2026-08-13 18:03:08 UTC

- reply

"Solutions?" is a great question.
For most people the solution is "be more Amish".
Focus on what actually matters:
- your health, your family, your community, your skills, your adaptability, tools, machinery, weapons, self-sufficiency, gold, silver, Monero (if you need digital cash - most don't), land that produces food, energy, local services, cattle, etc.
As I've outlined in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoin-will-fail-as-mass-non-custodial ), finding solutions that turn Bitcoin into mass, non-custodial medium-of-exchange is extremely unlikely because of the Coordination tax.
The Coordination Tax is how the Controllers manage Bitcoin (smaller scale), but also how they manage society (larger scale).
The Coordination Tax in society is the recurring total cost of getting large numbers of humans with different incentives, different information, different risk tolerances, different time horizons, and different status games to act as one organism across time.
In Bitcoin, you have 3 stacked systems:
- S₀ Protocol: consensus rules, Proof-of-Work, supply.
- S₁ Policy: relay/mempool defaults, mining templates, wallet behaviors.
- S₂ Perimeter: banks, clouds, app stores, ISPs, payment networks, tax law, PR.
Security: S₀ is math; S₁/S₂ are sociotechnical (having both social elements (people, culture, organizations) and technical elements (machines, technology, processes)).
The Coordination Tax in Bitcoin: recurring human + legal + distribution cost to keep S₁ (Policy)/S₂ (Perimeter) aligned with S₀(Protocol)’s ideals.
There is an Attacker asymmetry: One cheap perimeter tweak (Acceptable Use Policy line, bank heuristic, pool template) can shift millions. Defenders must hold all fronts, all the time.
You'll find yourself in endless civil wars, e.g.:
- Core v30 — Inscriptions / spam vs “art”
- Taint, “clean UTXOs” & compliant-Bitcoin vs grey-Bitcoin
- Node liability & “publisher” / CSAM / sanctions content
- Quantum-resistance, key-rotation & “lost coins”
- Paperization & “wrapped Bitcoin” vs base-layer Bitcoin
- Protocol ossification vs “surgery to survive”
- Blockspace & “digital cash vs data chain” (the rematch)
Many in the Bitcoin space are stuck in a sunk cost fallacy. This is exaggerated due to the low fiat price (compared to last year).
Many will be cured once the price recovers.
Bitcoin could still go up in fiat terms, but as far as freedom money goes, the battle is already lost.
The solution is to try to spend most of your time on things you can control, instead of arguing with bad faith/brainwashed actors in this rotten space.
The battle was never meant to be won because Bitcoin was likely created by the government to act as a digital decoy for physical gold.
I've written about this here: https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-i-think-the-government-created
TL;DR in a screenshot:
https://blossom.primal.net/5476a16fbbdd25ee92aadcc6d2f29544b487ddb21e5c9f282c6014626c99a799.png
Bitcoin as mass, non-custodial MoE wasn't really a winnable battle.
#nevent1q…yatt

2026-08-13 13:10:26 UTC

- reply

Yes, the Snodgres interview is a good example.
The definition of private sector is:
- The part of the economy that is controlled by individuals or private organizations and is not funded by the government.
The part of the economy that is not controlled or funded by the government is pretty small.
Companies like Nvidia, Apple, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Palantir, META, Tesla, SpaceX, etc., are actually the government.
I've written about this here:
- https://controlplanecapital.com/p/all-of-your-favorite-entrepreneurs
- https://controlplanecapital.com/p/the-largest-companies-in-the-world

2026-08-13 12:42:53 UTC

- reply

If you're asking for evidence that Bitcoin was created by the government, it's circumstantial and incentives-based. Obviously, I wasn't there.
I've written about it here - https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-i-think-the-government-created
TL;DR
https://blossom.primal.net/5476a16fbbdd25ee92aadcc6d2f29544b487ddb21e5c9f282c6014626c99a799.png
If you're asking for evidence that most outliers get identified early and hired by the government, Cody Snodgres and the OKC bombing has some great examples: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jm1G-cCvbJU
I think it's kind of obvious that they'd hire the smartest people in the world. Even if they don't intend to use them, once hired by the government, they aren't on team plebs.
There are stories about pulling the smartest people out of military schools due to "injuries" and contracting them to do black ops.
I've only heard 1 guy admit that they tried to recruit him in high school but he declined. I'd imagine most people accept.

2026-08-13 11:48:27 UTC

- reply

Bitcoin has become BitCohen.
It could've been this way from the very beginning and we're just finding out now. Even if they didn't write it, they likely greenlit it.
Sadly, most of the people who are capable of creating something like Bitcoin work for the government.
Most outliers get identified and hired by the government very early. Very few decline the offer.

2026-08-13 10:32:54 UTC

Every single aspect of Disney child grooming is Jewish
https://blossom.primal.net/58ffffde68fa330b7e53a2d2a447f2ad0c7a7dade051ede23793d783f1d0c983.mp4

2026-08-11 13:50:06 UTC

- reply

Yes, I've implicitly compared Bitcoin to Monero in this aritcle ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoin-will-fail-as-mass-non-custodial ).
Monero is better digital cash by a wide margin, but it's not a silver bullet.
For the current regime, privacy by default is a non-negotiable.
I'd use Monero if I need digital cash, not as a store of value.
Many Monero devs likely work for the government, some hardware wallets are very likely backdoored, government agents can decide to spam L1 until running nodes becomes annoying, they can make it radioactive so 99.99% of the population avoid it like the plague, etc.
Still, if you need to use digital cash, Monero is your best bet.
The other recommendations I've mentioned are going to be more important for most people.

2026-08-11 13:38:34 UTC

- reply

Thank you mate

2026-08-11 13:37:11 UTC

- reply

Thanks mate. I mostly hope they pump the fiat-denominated BTC price so more people have the opportunity to diversify some/exit.
Just based on recent events, I'd imagine many will take some chips off and invest in real world assets/skills.

2026-08-11 10:27:05 UTC

- reply

It's tough. I knew most hardware wallets were backdoored and still used coldcard because - Bitcoin-only and thought that someone had already done the work and verified seeds are random.
Someone probably did verify, but then they changed their RNG algos in 2021 (I had no clue). Massive red flag in hindsight.
I am not affected, but it's a terrible way to get rugged for everyone who is.
It's been 18 years and we still haven't figured out self-custody, but you still have influencers talking about separating money and state. Delusional.
#nevent1q…ufkp

2026-08-11 09:57:15 UTC

- reply

Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if the guy who wrote hodl instead of hold on that BTC forum 15 years ago was an intelligence asset.
He memed the Bolshevik "do nothing" culture into reality.
And yes, the war is spiritual and for most people the only way to win is to not play.

2026-08-11 07:54:48 UTC

- reply

Yes mate, sadly "hodling our way to separating money and State because Bitcoin is perfect and invincible" is not a realistic scenario.
The influencers who push this sort of nonsense should be laughed out of the room.

2026-08-11 06:59:32 UTC

Now that the BIP-110 saga is over, it's probably a good time to reflect.
In my opinion, BIP-110 failing is long-term good for BIP-110 supporters.
The BIP-110 question was:
- OK, Bitcoin mining is insanely centralized, so are the 5 mining pools (who share the same boss) going to get an order to do nothing, or will they be instructed to pretend that nodes actually matter?
From my old post "Who holds the Power in the Bitcoin ecosystem (does your node matter" - ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/who-holds-the-power-in-the-bitcoin ):
- Bitcoin does not run on ideals; it runs on coordination between code, hash, and liquidity — and those are controlled by a few dozen institutional actors who can synchronize quickly. Core defaults + pool templates + venue policies decide reality. Users matter only when they can coordinate economic liquidity, which is rare. Expect future changes to follow the same political playbook.
In that post, I put "ordinary user nodes" last in the power stack.
If BIP-110 had succeeded based on decentralization theater and misguided "game theory" circus, BIP-110 supporters would still be living a lie.
Stop listening to boomer Bitcoiners who tell you that "Bitcoin is decentralized and secure" and do some of your own research.
Bitcoin is not decentralized and secure, it was simply allowed to look that way ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/is-bitcoin-decentralized-and-secure ).
Until you realize that we live under something very close to a One World Government ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/how-i-know-we-live-under-a-one-world ), your attempts at game theory are worse than useless.
Most people are just too mentally weak to face our current reality and would rather live a lie.
To understand why Bitcoin will fail as mass, non-custodial Medium-of-Exchange, read this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoin-will-fail-as-mass-non-custodial ).
And no, "firing the miners" will not be nearly enough.
To understand why Bitcoin was most likely created by the government, read this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-i-think-the-government-created ).
If you are too heavily into Bitcoin and down bad on your position, I hope our jewish overlords give Saylor a $1 trillion loan at 0% interest so he can pump the BTC price.
Then, more people will focus on what actually matters:
- your health, your community, your skills, your adaptability, tools, machinery, weapons, self-sufficiency, gold, silver, Monero (if you need digital cash), land that produces food, energy, local services, cattle, etc.
Usually, as the governability of the holder base of an asset increases (more captured, more in the system), our fiat overlords are more incentivized to pump its fiat-denominated price.
( This is of course an oversimplification. )
If Bitcoin's fiat price pumps, most Bitcoiners will quickly forget that BTC is a captured asset, so you usually get fiat gains as a gift for being a good, little goy.
In another post, I'll cover how I got lucky and sold 85% of my BTC at 113K and the remaining 15% at 95K. (Basically my opinion on why the Bitcoin cycle exists)
I'd only use Bitcoin for speculating (trying to mine fiat), and as of now, I'm staying away because I don't think that the incoming Quantum scam is priced in ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/a-quantum-resistance-upgrade-would ).

2026-05-29 10:04:12 UTC

- reply

Because privacy and fungibility by default make transactions much more difficult to track and they don't want to promote what's more difficult to track when they can promote what's safe.
Maybe look into how the travel rule works for bitcoin vs monero.
Look at how monero is treated by exchanges and regulators compared to bitcoin. It's not that complicated.
Banning p2p transactions and only allowing for ETF custody would very likely backfire so you don't see very many monero ETFs.

2026-05-29 09:26:26 UTC

- reply

Very unlikely that Bitcoin ETFs could have been stopped with this design (no privacy by default and not fungible).
To make ETFs less appealing, you'd have to have a hostile to the state design (more Monero-like).
It is less likely they'd want to promote you and push you into the mainstream if you are private and fungible by default, and the community is straight up hostile to the state.
Bitcoin is safe for the state, that's why it got mainstreamed.

2026-05-29 06:32:39 UTC

- reply

Watched a Joe Rogan clip recently and it reminded me of the Bitcoin community.
Bitcoin's community is following the Joe Rogan arc 😂
Used to be new, cool, and allegedly anti-establishment. Now it's the complete opposite.
The Bitcoin ETFs approval = Joe Rogan's Spotify deal
From DEI girlfriends and woke faggot lead devs, to mass paperization, to Bitcoin influencers worshiping politicians, while the same politicians continue to spit in their face, too much damage has been done.
There's a minority trying to course-correct and coordinate the normies with small patches like BIP-110, but that's too little, too late.
If you need statist normies to understand complex technical topics and depend on them taking action and not being psyoped by bad actors for your solution to work, you've already lost.
Bitcoin as designed is not a solution for a One World Government this tyrannical.
Stop the fight, ref. He's already dead.
#nevent1q…6kf6

2026-05-26 07:41:39 UTC

- reply

Don't use pattern recognition and keep voting you filthy goy.
As a good little goy you should only consume content by subversive jews and their jewish AI.
https://blossom.primal.net/d13cbae1966dd269da1624a4d6ef877733d0d79eaeaa0d56265679f0c5779ae2.mp4
#nevent1q…va3m

2026-05-24 06:38:55 UTC

- reply

CDC Whistleblower's Secret Recording: "We Buried the Data on MMR & Autism, I'm Completely Ashamed".
"The higher-ups wanted to do certain things and I went along with it."
https://blossom.primal.net/e703452b32f3189737c68c265757d7a1904502089c9b9fc74c9ca8141f876f16.png
https://blossom.primal.net/6ccf5efce3ffce8bd06d8006efdcbbbce31bd7a3c39fff3f03347c673ad7be89.mp4
#nevent1q…p978

2026-05-21 14:54:09 UTC

- reply

You haven't downloaded the software update yet.
Wait billions of years for it to resolve.
https://blossom.primal.net/75aacd087f7d2de8e37d5a4274300777df0042da094633634ac6844d18421607.jpg

2026-05-21 14:18:44 UTC

Just sitting here on this pear-shaped, wet rock, spinning at 1,000 mph and traveling through space at 66,600 mph.
https://blossom.primal.net/5a3bdd754bc63027173be43fcdb822a7722a6cf020823fb65c3bd4891e53eca4.mp4
This would have been impossible if nothing didn't explode and turn into everything, enabling us to evolve from pond scum.
https://blossom.primal.net/4c17ea50fe36efe5e2bf468cd2b12443f42a83b6440c7bb8cfd4f4d13df436c0.jpg
Thank God these scientists figured everything out for me so I don't have to think for myself 🙏

2026-05-20 04:33:28 UTC

- reply

Pour a drink for the humiliation fetishists who still vote, for those who still think there are solutions from within the system.
It's wild that people still think the puppets they see on TV are the ones making the important decisions in 2026.
As long as you vote, you've given your consent to be governed, regardless if your candidate wins.
The sad reality is that a society gets the government it deserves.
The boomers got psyoped into a nanny state because the system "works" for them and have sold their descendants into slavery.
Now their descendants are trying to vote their way out of slavery.
Playing games you can never win is not very smart.
The only way out is to burn the whole thing down with a tax revolt, reject fiat slavery and REJECT dependence on the state.
The state doesn't need you to love it, it needs you to need it.
Just look at the quality of life and life expectancy of the Amish compared to statist groups.
This Natural Law seminar by Mark Passio is great:
https://odysee.com/@DotConnectorReports:e/Mark-Passio---Natural-Law-Seminar-FULL-Version:e
#nevent1q…5vhm

2026-05-19 05:50:01 UTC

- reply

Your daily reminder that viruses don't exist and vaccines are used to depopulate.
"Scientists" have now defined 44,000 dis-eases and thousands of dis-eases have the same symptoms as the "hantavirus" but somehow they knew to test specifically for "hantavirus" 😂
Protect your family, your pets and your cattle.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTRTa7d51b8
#nevent1q…xej8

2026-05-18 12:09:41 UTC

- reply

I think it's time for me to transition to a full farm standard.

2026-05-18 12:08:02 UTC

- reply

Yeah, we're late cycle now. The mask is off.

2026-05-18 12:06:28 UTC

- reply

Modern bitcoiners are the type of guys to remind the teacher that she forgot to give the class homework on a Friday 😂
The "if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear" crowd.
"Transparency" means you are transparent; the system is not.
We'll have to see how being transparent works out for you in the next few years.
#nevent1q…95py

2026-05-18 10:30:53 UTC

Just got debanked for the first time.
Randomly got a notification that 100K euro have been transferred from my account.
Went to the local bank, and the lady told me they've decided to close my account.
When I asked why, she told me "We don't have to give you any reason. We can just close your account.".
Told her I want to transfer my 100K euro to a different bank, and she told me that the money is no longer in my account, so she has to ask whether they'll allow me to transfer it 😂
It is a good reminder that a deposit is a loan you make to a bank.
You are an unsecured creditor of the bank, not the owner of any specific asset the bank holds.
They can just fuck with you.
Had to wait ~1 for the central office to give me permission to transfer my money to another bank, then had to pay 15 EUR for my bank statement since they already closed my online banking 😂
I use bank deposits because I must (payments, interface with the system), but this is a good reminder not to confuse them with survival capital in this rotten regime.
Banks are just a state-dependent intermediary and the state is the enemy.

2026-05-17 14:32:07 UTC

- reply

I think it is a flat, topographical, stationary plain as we can't observe any curvature, nor movement.
But I know that we don't live on a globe of the officially-stated size because the radius value has been falsified (we can see too far, we can shoot lazers too far, etc.)
Here is one example of many:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SdzBv6hD8_Q
Of course, this doesn't prove the Earth is flat. It could be a much larger globe (would have to be hundreds of times larger).
We don't know where we live. The mainstream, heliocentric model falls apart if you look into it.
This is a youtube playlist with some documentaries
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEzivhxtxgbs6LE7kquTB_ve1QCG_bOpu

2026-05-17 13:33:31 UTC

- reply

I'd be interested in changes that (1) harden fee predictability, (2) make privacy and self-custody defaults, and (3) blunt perimeter levers.
Haven't looked much into covenants. The debate seems to be about whether Bitcoin should remain "digital gold" with minimal scripting or become a highly structured settlement system with programmable UTXO flows.
So you get massive lightning scaling, lower chain footprint, possibly better UX, massively increased protocol complexity.
I'd still want privacy by default on L1. This doesn't solve the fungibility problem. Governments/exchanges might decide to prioritize covenant-constrained coins.

2026-05-17 11:09:35 UTC

- reply

Yes, ideally we convert some of them so they don't become footsoldiers for the state, but the solution is small, self-sufficient communities where being a state-dependent NPC is heavily discouraged.
Those who are broke and depend on the state for everything will do the unthinkable to protect their slave UBI allowance. These are the people you're gonna wanna avoid.

2026-05-17 07:11:52 UTC

Bitcoin is now ~18 years old and still practically unusable as mass, non-custodial Medium-of-Exchange.
It hasn't been improving. In fact, it's gotten worse as non-custodial MoE over the years ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/how-bitcoins-developers-are-attacking-2a5 ).
In the last few months, I've often wondered where would we be if we had spent the last 18 years stacking physical gold and silver and had worked more on that front.
We'd have easily engineered silver shortages and squeezed the fuck out of bombs, EV, solar panel producers.
Lots of silver is also needed to build the physical infrastructure to power, cool and connect AI data centers for the One World Government surveillance state.
The paper gold/silver markets are enormous and very tightly managed by our One World Government. We could've definitely done some damage and exposed their paper games by stacking physical.
If you look into the Coordination Tax, you'll realize that Bitcoin will inevitably fail as mass, non-custodial MoE ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoin-will-fail-as-mass-non-custodial ).
The Coordination Tax is how the Controllers manage Bitcoin (smaller scale), but also how they manage society (larger scale).
The Coordination tax in Bitcoin is the recurring human + legal + distribution cost to keep the Policy (relay/mempool defaults, mining templates, wallet behaviors), Perimeter (banks, clouds, app stores, ISPs, payment networks, tax, law, PR) aligned with the Protocol's (consensus rules, Proof-of-Work) ideals.
The Coordination Tax in society is the recurring total cost of getting large numbers of humans with different incentives, different information, different risk tolerances, different time horizons, and different status games to act as one organism across time.
If you do a deeper dive, you'll realize that it's very likely that the government created Bitcoin ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-i-think-the-government-created ). See screenshot below for TL;DR.
https://blossom.primal.net/5476a16fbbdd25ee92aadcc6d2f29544b487ddb21e5c9f282c6014626c99a799.png
If you gave me the task to "orange-pill" someone today. This is my best attempt:
1) Bitcoin might go up in fiat terms (NGU).
2) The CIA, Mo$$ad, MI6 crew really need Bitcoin because it isn't private by default, it isn't fungible, it is becoming more and more custodied by default and paperized. They certainly don't want to alienate everyone into physical gold/silver, or Monero.
3) If you need to transfer your wealth across borders, Bitcoin is very liquid and definitely a good option.
I wouldn't try to sell them on "digital cash". Monero is clearly better as digital cash.
Monero will however also get psyoped into "quantum-resistance" upgrade scams and many of the hardware wallets (as with Bitcoin) are very likely backdoored.
Monero is more Coordination Tax-optimized than Bitcoin, but it won't be enough.
If the Coordination Tax were a person, it'd be this guy. Unfortunately, he remains undefeated.
https://blossom.primal.net/04096935d0274cae587d61ce446a95eb20b32fd314c7c50beb03601ec1d9d23d.jpg

2026-05-16 06:40:34 UTC

- reply

Bond yields are rising.
You can now lend your money to the government for 30 years at 5% with real inflation at 15-20% and rising 🤝🤝🤝
https://blossom.primal.net/95518f2f35f68b45f3ea6707c78bf32b6618ea46bc072a0e308fdd45959b30c1.png
https://blossom.primal.net/2c17a514b3556503c4a7df2a0fa77ccbb9387829dab498281e22dba2474ec4a4.jpg
#nevent1q…vp6j

2026-05-16 04:30:22 UTC

What the Wizard of Oz actually represents
https://blossom.primal.net/087d70cc41b3f3129845e47f55719e2c9c5764c4631ca163558862c76b0d8125.mp4

2026-05-15 12:46:54 UTC

"The Biggest Little Farm" is the best movie I've watched in a long time.
https://odysee.com/@Documentalesinteresantes:6/Mi_gran_peque_a_granja-2018:9
Intelligent design is so obvious once you disconnect from modern scientism.
If you still believe in the theory of evolution after watching it (which I very much doubt), maybe look into how absurd it actually is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UnRC7_dC7U

2026-05-14 14:01:39 UTC

How nice of Trump and Xi to meet and negotiate in front of the whole world.
The most transparent administration in history.
I guess baby-eating, satan-worshiping pedophiles who think they are descendants of gods don't actually control the world.
https://blossom.primal.net/de0de55b12c39894882cd747e0de7c952585384163f90ad5b35c21ecbd71b37e.jpg

2026-05-07 08:24:39 UTC

- reply

My guess is they'll have to use some very advanced tech to either project something or use electromagnetism, or a combination.
https://blossom.primal.net/676c07715a5544800d60e784dde6cd24bfd9fd2b013e1b248d6b382473d574ac.png
To be fair, most people are retarded, so I don't think fooling most people is going to be very hard.
The government doesn't need you to love it, it needs you to need it, and more and more people are going to need the government in the coming years (by design).

2026-05-07 07:47:33 UTC

Pastor Alan Dildo wants you to know that the CIA has informed him and a bunch of other pastors that aliens are real and God doesn't exist.
But don't worry, the government exists and is here to replace God.
https://blossom.primal.net/4868f8333d126cf676b95500eec9c644d3af80afee48a2aa17f0552ce09ff3ae.png
Organized religion = the government.
Everyone has their personal relationship with the Creator and people like pastor Alan Dildo should never be taken seriously.

2026-05-07 04:46:03 UTC

Mr Scientist, if you can't isolate any virus, how do we know viruses exist?
Mr Scientist: Trust the science, mr. Goy.
https://blossom.primal.net/f477453809198158147c3cf2d939b7b54149004505544da1e6c1f6e54151cc85.mp4
Viruses don't exist which means your government has been trying to maim/kill you, your family and your pets/cattle with vaccines for a very long time.
It also means we've been living under a One World Government for a very long time.
Will the Indians finally isolate a virus?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J52m2lHyVNE
Dr. Tom Cowan does a great job of summarizing why viruses don't exist in this video.
https://rumble.com/v6rh2e3-there-was-no-covid-virus-how-weve-all-been-duped-by-the-medical-establishme.html

2026-04-29 09:51:02 UTC

- reply

Yes.
#nevent1q…9pgp

2026-04-29 09:50:23 UTC

- reply

#nevent1q…9pgp

2026-04-29 09:48:29 UTC

- reply

Seems like this is AI-generated. Thought they recorded a throwback to the "extremely dangerous for our democracy" clip.
https://blossom.primal.net/6d5abd78445ae441cb84e7845a311a2abc8399d5786fd1b5c7682c315e9f2b56.mp4

2026-04-29 08:44:47 UTC

The DARPA "entrepreneurs" reading from the same script as always 😂
But guys, I thought Elon Musk and Sam Altman hated each other 😂
They've already sold their souls and they're trying to take as many people with them as possible.
The Amish always knew not to play their Jewish, Satanic games.
Their goal: a One World government that fully replaces God.
Government replaces God when it becomes the highest practical authority over meaning, morality, safety, identity, money, speech, movement, family, life, death, forgiveness, punishment, and the future.
The test is simple:
- Can you say "God says no" and still live?
The more the answer becomes "not really", the more the replacement has already happened.
https://blossom.primal.net/513373ff5aadcdfbde8767be1b4c95ad2ebd896d34ec12a011cbca745b8e0ce8.mp4

2026-04-21 07:40:39 UTC

- reply

Anything is possible, but I think they mess up by design most of the time.
My guess is that they believe that revelation of the method and predictive programming absolve them of karmic responsibility.
My guess is that most of the time they don't want to infringe on your free will.
If they make it obvious that 9/11 is an inside job, the Covid jabs are poison, governments are infested with baby-eating pedophiles and you still:
- go fight a war with the "terrorists" while your country is falling into slavery,
- inject yourself with poisonous vaccines,
- pay taxes to fund your corrupt government,
then they think it's on you and they carry no responsibility.
It's a spiritual war.
Just look at how often NASA messes up ( https://www.youtube.com/@robotpolisher/videos ). Most of their mistakes could easily be avoided. Their budget is ~85$ million per day. They could literally produce interstellar-level videos.
My theory is that we live in something similar to Satan's little season.

2026-04-21 07:23:04 UTC

- reply

This is what I told Reuters today: Our One World Government will be transitioning from the petrodollar system to Gold as the top-level settlement asset for blocs, and CBDCs are the day-to-day money for the plebs. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
https://blossom.primal.net/b9aa40ed7fcb95bb86555cfd4f753dccfb57e7af88ce9e40b844494763f33dd6.jpg
#nevent1q…2q5j

2026-04-21 06:31:40 UTC

AI videos are getting good. If it weren't for the car glitching at the 9 seconds mark, I wouldn't be able to tell.
I'd imagine governments have had access to AI for at least a couple of decades now and are only releasing the scuffed version to the plebs.
They'll probably pull out digital IDs once we get to the AI-generated videos that can't be distinguished from real.
You always have to wonder - why am I getting access to this technology now? Most of the time it isn't because a cool, nerd hacker invented it in his mom's basement.
https://blossom.primal.net/f04758ed23fa7dbb891e2ccadced5a06be75b000a3c72c5e79b086028224a369.mp4

2026-04-20 14:38:26 UTC

- reply

Haven't seen this. It's interesting if real. Wouldn't say it proves they faked his death but an interesting "coincidence" for sure.

2026-04-20 11:22:43 UTC

- reply

Yes, especially with the banners below youtube videos, it's safe to assume that the opposite is true 😂
If I made a video stating that cars don't exist, they wouldn't place a banner that cars exist. But if I make a video that climate change is not man made, they'll immediately add a banner that climate change is legit and caused by humans, so we have to pay more taxes and kill the cows.
They are constantly leveling up in terms of Overton window management. Recently, you have countless "ex CIA" operatives going viral on youtube and other platforms with their hot, edgy takes aimed at managing the discourse and humanizing the most evil organization to ever exist. Crazy times.

2026-04-20 08:35:38 UTC

- reply

Did the US government kill Charlie Kirk, or was it a lone gunman?
- assumes they didn't fake his death
Did Epstein kill himself or did the US government kill him?
- assumes they didn't fake his death
Did the US + Chinese governments create Covid or did it originate when a bat kissed a pengalin?
- assumes viruses exist
Did the US government organize Trump's assassination attempt or was it a lone gunman?
- assumes the "assassination attempt" wasn't faked.
Be a good goy, and only talk about what's allowed.
#nevent1q…aurs

2026-04-20 05:37:39 UTC

- reply

This is great theater. There will be signs.
https://blossom.primal.net/a7a812593f1b2b0ee64b1a0c6d246c4b2325460c8017e3daed67c8a894fff5dc.png
The script:
- How to move from US-dollar hegemon to multi-bloc gold-back settlement without a clean "US surrender" and without making it look like a board decision?
More context ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/the-us-israel-war-with-iran-brings )
#nevent1q…vp6j

2026-04-19 05:00:49 UTC

- reply

Yes, many middle-aged Chinese hate the Japanese and vice versa.

2026-04-18 07:34:25 UTC

- reply

Open-source is better than closed-source, but it's still one signer, one vendor trust root, one firmware/update rail, one device authenticity rail, one host workflow, etc.
Trezor does too much in my opinion. If you only rely on one vendor, a Bitcoin-only hardware wallet like Coldcard Mk4 is better.
With Trezor safe 7, in theory, the cleanest compromise path is the vendor/update trust root, and the host computer is still an attack surface.
Trezor safe 7 allows you to disable bluetooth entirely, but every added radio stack, pairing flow, mobile integration path, and battery-powered always-available featuer is more code. A single wallet should minimize surfaces, not add them.
The two secure elements mostly defend against ordinary physical extraction, but does very little against seizure while the device is already unlocked.
So in terms of potential state-grade compromise paths, mainly:
- host compromise and host-entered passphrase capture,
- malicious or coerced official update/build/signing path,
- targeted supply-chain interdiction,
- coercion/seizure,
- ecosystem phishing/social engineering through official-looking channels,
- deep hardware/fab-level subversion.

2026-04-17 13:34:39 UTC

- reply

If the seed is already good, then bad on-box RNG is mostly sidestepped for address generation.
But if you literally pull BIP39 words from a bag, that is not the clean BIP39 model.
BIP39 says the mnemonic is meant to transport generated entropy, not to process user-created sentences, and the mnemonic includes checksum structure.
You can generate raw entropy off-computer, then let the offline tool convert that entropy into a valid mnemonic/checksum.
A truly random off-box seed makes you safer against compromised RNG, but it does not make the setup trustworthy unless you also solve independent verification.
You can still get compromised with address substitution at receive time, and later spending is a separate danger zone (a compromised signer can leak through nonce selection), etc.
And air-gapped only blocks ordinary network exfiltration. It does not stop a compromised box from storing secrets locally for later extraction.
So the minimum hardening move is:
- generate raw entropy off-box,
- derive the wallet on one offline machine,
- then verify the first several receive addresses on a second independent offline implementation from the same seed/path/passphrase,
- and record the descriptor/script type/derivation path/passphrase separately.
Then you know two different stacks reproduced the same addresses from the same secret.
External entropy neutralizes one class of failure - predictable seed generation. It does not neutralize the more important class - a compromised machine lying to you or copying your secrets.

2026-04-17 11:11:04 UTC

- reply

It's not as simple as 'multisig', but let's assume multisig gives you immunity somehow.
A proper Multisig setup certainly makes you much harder to attack than a person who relies on one vendor (but increases the complexity of your setup).
If I had to take a guess, probably 99% of users are not going to multisig.
Bitcoin's defense can't be "let's hope users pick hard mode", otherwise, the Bitcoin revolution will amount to "have fun playing with your Bitcoins" as Trump said.
Unless we get Bitcoin's non-custodial UX close to using a debit card, this will be mostly about trying to mine some fiat and posting memes.

2026-04-17 08:57:22 UTC

- reply

Backdoored Bitcoin/Monero hardware wallets are much more of a threat than Quantum computing.
There is zero credible evidence that Quantum can be engineered to scale cheaply and reliably enough to be broadly useful, and yet most of the attention is focused on Quantum and not the very likely case that most of the main hardware wallets are backdoored.
This video is great:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCKq9u-AL0A
If you spend some time doing objective research, you'll likely come to the conclusion that there is no neat solution that makes you "immune to the NSA". The best you can do is:
- Make mass, silent theft via one corporate/vended rail impossible,
- Force any serious adversary into messy, noisy, manual operations if they want you specifically.
The only real structural defense is collusion forcing:
- Heterogeneous multi-sig (different vendors + DIY),
- Multi-source entropy (XOR’d seeds),
- Passphrases kept off the compromised device,
- Independent stacks for different key shares.
A state-level actor can plausibly:
- backdoor RNG/nonces,
- exfil keys via signatures,
- coerce vendor into "minor tweaks",
- intercept shipping,
- or just use host+legal leverage.
There are very many attack vectors and in some places, you just have to trust as you can't verify.
Some of the attack vectors:
- Closed-source secure elements with opaque behavior.
- Compromised RNG -> predictable keys.
- Firmware "updates" that:
(a) leak shards,
(b) weaken PIN delays,
(c) selectively target flagged serials.
- Supply chain substitution:
(a) devices swapped in transit,
(b) chips with additional logic embedded.
If we assume Controller-grade adversaries and cooperation leverage over:
- silicon vendors,
- big wallet brands,
- customs/parcel systems,
then for mass-market users:
- "self-custody" often means: "I'm holding a compromised device that behaves like self-custody until it's politically useful to make it misbehave."
And of course, they don't need 100% coverage. If they can de-risk 80-90% of "self-custody" BTC/Monero via:
- hardware design,
- vendor pressure,
- update channels,
then most people hold just another pool of conditionally controllable assets.
Even if they never fully exploit it, the option exists.
If you think hardware wallets being compromised is a bit of a stretch, maybe look into Dual_EC_DRBG, operation Bullrun, Edgehill, the company Crypto AG, operation Rubicon, etc.
https://blossom.primal.net/219618dedfd0b7d99bf43bb8f14eae62742860bfa419689f643dc358a46f9254.png
Who knows what sorts of stuff people like Adam Back and co are up to.
#nevent1q…63cs

2026-04-17 08:13:15 UTC

- reply

All you can do is try to save yourself and your loved ones. Most people will get rekt. That's just how it always goes.
Many of the people who are preparing are misguided as well.
At this point, I think we have to assume that most Bitcoin/Monero hardware wallets are backdoored.
Instead of focusing how we can ensure at least some of the main hardware wallets are not backdoored (which to my knowledge, we can't), we are focusing on how to migrate to government-selected post-quantum scam algorithms and whose coins to freeze.
Most people never learn.
https://blossom.primal.net/b5703fa391d478ed2ffd636b0923640cdc9412c5f93a86e76f3829a6d084d24a.png

2026-04-17 03:33:33 UTC

They are already on their back-up plan. Banks are lending billions to Caiman Islands hedge funds who then buy trillions of Treasuries on leverage while the Fed and the Treasury keep volatility low so the hedge funds don't blow up.
https://blossom.primal.net/f58263667d2dbbae5f6dc091783cbad8567e1e1946a5c61a7ea8a2ab4fa63298.png
After the reset:
- the petrodollar falls,
- Gold is the top-level settlement asset for blocs,
- CBDCs are the day-to-day money,
- and almost everything else is a revocable license.
https://blossom.primal.net/6e13f6ffd94bdcd1ae25a5b92ac7a70c7abfd9637f7a2c5cc3e989ead24a9af3.png
So they certainly have a back-up plan. Hope you do as well.

2026-04-16 09:53:18 UTC

The professor Jiang character is very interesting.
Graduated Yale university and used to work for the UN (aka the One World Government organization that sponsors child trafficking and genocide by vaccines).
He was suspected by the Chinese government of spying in 2002 and was deported 😂
Going viral organically doesn't really work in 2026. Platforms like Twitter, Youtube, TikTok, only promote content that pushes the official narrative (so plants and useful idiots).
After watching a few of his videos, I think it is very likely he is an intelligence asset (most likely CIA).
He could be a useful idiot but I find this less likely based on his takes.
It was much easier for intelligence agencies to control people's access to information pre-Covid.
Many more people used to watch mainstream media, but the CIA pushed the propaganda too far.
Once different networks started repeating the same script word for word, people stopped watching and lost trust.
The CIA knew they needed to keep control of the narrative, so they started pushing certain "independent media" personalities.
Tucker Carlson (CIA) got "fired" by Fox news (even though he had the highest ratings 😂) just because people stopped watching TV and the CIA needs him to reach more people.
In many cases, even when professor Jiang is likely correct about his conclusions, his argumentation is so flawed that he ends up pushing people away from the "conspiracy theory".
Watching some of his recent videos remind me of the recent podcast with Joe Rogan and Theo Von.
The whole podcast looked like a hostage video. Both completely compromised (especially Rogan) and terrified to not say something they shouldn't say.
Professor Jiang is a bit more subtle than these guys, but I still find it unlikely he's a useful idiot based on his interviews.
The "this is extremely dangerous to our democracy" moment is probably when the CIA knew they had to focus on pushing the "independent" media personalities.
https://blossom.primal.net/6d5abd78445ae441cb84e7845a311a2abc8399d5786fd1b5c7682c315e9f2b56.mp4
Controlling the media is at the core of the protocols of the learned elders of Zion.
The CIA hasn't given up on propaganda now that mainstream media is cooked (only watched by boomers, retards, and retarded boomers).
https://blossom.primal.net/c811efbbfdf2ad9adaf8461275ae9f31571887068ab0c2327b04b845e45436f3.jpg

2026-04-15 06:27:43 UTC

Great video by Dr. Sam Bailey on how viruses don't exist and have never been isolated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIfcsRJyqs4
Dr. Tom Cowan goes into more detail in this video.
https://rumble.com/v6rh2e3-there-was-no-covid-virus-how-weve-all-been-duped-by-the-medical-establishme.html
When it comes to these massive "conspiracy theories", most people usually say: "There's no way that's true. Do you know how many people would have to be in on it?"
And of course, not very many people would have to be in on it.
Most doctors still vaccinate themselves, their children, and their pets even though vaccines are used to depopulate.
However, many of the main puppet politicians are likely in on it (US, Russia, China, India, Iran, Israel, etc.). The Covid scamdemic was a mask off moment for our One World Government.
https://blossom.primal.net/eb766e62dd1a02eea7e0b26bc00421a890c9cb7b10197bf5b2ea8693aaa3e7e2.jpg

2026-04-13 08:57:35 UTC

- reply

Sadly, I don't think any of the politicians in European countries make any of the important decisions, so this is mostly just theater.
The European Union, which was likely created by the CIA, centrally controls everything that matters.
Feel free to pick your preferred puppet politician locally though. Because democracy!
Richard Werner does a great job of explaining how the European Union came to be and how it closely resembles the Soviet Union in this video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53rigihjVZ8
#nevent1q…486n

2026-04-13 04:14:05 UTC

- reply

They need to hook this lady up with an earpiece.
https://blossom.primal.net/31186e5ec3abb9bf99872bbe61b9193ad5a8dd0b15681c65e7be1a07ec4ec244.mp4
Allegedly, Christina Koch, one of the Artemis astronauts, is also an actress in Mad Max: Fury Road.
https://blossom.primal.net/5afaab95ea6fd2e7566e8bb0a75dda7692412345299f096b70f52966768e6d4f.webp
https://blossom.primal.net/a86b25e7cdd27f26ecfecd5a57460a2a0b7b027ba6dffae5c6cffe46355d26cb.png
https://blossom.primal.net/8e7d06ae6f392e74fa16c96ff474ba1e85fca2c04f41940a524601c491a026bd.jpg
Big if true.
This is why you hire mainly military personnel and not random actors.
(Unless you're DEI-maxxing)
#nevent1q…4y75

2026-04-11 08:01:09 UTC

- reply

I'd be interested if any of the moon landing believers, who are intellectually honest, can watch this logical analysis and still come out on the other side as believers.
Matt Walsh pushes all of the same logical fallacies in the video below.
Try and see if you can objectively examine the evidence (or the lack thereof), or whether you'll enter into a cope spiral.
Starts at 10:30
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lnBFABSbRMA
#nevent1q…zj07

2026-04-10 15:04:24 UTC

https://blossom.primal.net/1eb321b10929d96fdfd9503b94ca334479f64e06320180ff3ddf2632ae1ceee0.mp4

2026-03-30 14:17:09 UTC

- reply

Is Bitcoin Core gay or straight? 🤔
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5a7QjY4XKA
#nevent1q…v50s

2026-03-27 11:23:16 UTC

Even with all the implicit and explicit yield curve control, bond yields are slowly rising.
https://blossom.primal.net/220d4c4ef87283175d51ef9d636da08108fdb392b71160f6aa4b555cbd353e6a.png
I am of the opinion that the Controllers can prolong the fiat ponzi for much longer than most think, but will eventually decide to rug.
Why? Because all fiat currencies eventually fail, and the Controllers will definitely decide to fail the current financial system in a carefully preplanned fashion to avoid excess chaos.
https://blossom.primal.net/6e13f6ffd94bdcd1ae25a5b92ac7a70c7abfd9637f7a2c5cc3e989ead24a9af3.png
If markets were efficient, bond yields would be in the double digits (and then most would realize that with current debt levels this is game over).
However, markets are efficient to constraints.
Most of the bond holders in the system are captive - meaning they are aware that it is a mathematical certainty they will get robbed if they buy bonds, but they are forced to.
So bond yields are fake and managed, just like the prices of most, if not all, assets.
Yield Curve Control (YCC) = Central Bank commits to cap yields on some part of the curve (say 10Y at 4.25%). If yields try to rise above the cap, Central Bank buys bonds in unlimited size to enforce the level.
It's a way to say:
"Beyond this point, the bond market no longer gets to vote on our fiscal/monetary mix."
Yield Curve Control is the bridge that lets the Controllers carry an insane nominal debt pile through inflation surges, regime shifts, and crises, without allowing yields to reflexively spike and force default.
With YCC, the curve is no longer a sensor; it's a policy-controlled output.
You often hear about explicit YCC (Japan style), but the whole fake fiat system is designed around implicit YCC.
The logical question is:
- "Who are these rich retards who keep buying bonds and keep getting robbed just so they can fund their own enslavement?"
Most people/companies who have lots of money usually know that owning bonds is a losing proposition, so you have to force them to buy your useless paper.
States design the rules so that banks, insurers, pensions, and autopilot funds end up long bonds, and then bonds get expropriated in real terms.
This is the path of least resistance.
Retail with direct bonds is rounding error.
So the bondholders are the institutional skeleton that anchors the regime: states, banks, pensions, insurers, big funds, and foreign sovereigns.
Why them?
Because they are controllable, slow, diffuse, and essential. They can't easily run, can't easily revolt, and can be quietly sheared to fund whatever comes next (AI governance).

2026-03-27 07:45:23 UTC

- reply

Listened to the Tucker Carlson interview with James (Jim) Webb, the 3rd generation Marine "war hero" who served the Controllers and further enslaved his descendants.
If this weren't so sad it would be funny.
1) You go and kill people on the other side of the world.
2) You possibly lose your soul and/or your life.
3) The people who are enslaving your family steal the resources of the people you killed.
4) Your family gets further and further enslaved.
5) Brainwashed NPCs thank you for your service to the Controllers.
They never stop and ask: "How many people actually make the decision to start a war?", "Who are these people?", "What are their actual interests and do they converge with the interests of your family?".
As Henry Kissinger said: "Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy."
Young, healthy men who are able and willing to protect their family are going to be a problem for their governments after the coming financial reset.
The two most likely solutions are wars and vaccines.
I have all the respect in the world for anyone who protects their friends and family, and none for brainwashed, glorified, government yes-men.
#nevent1q…sx37