buckyfonds
Control-Plane Capital

Because privacy and fungibility by default make transactions much more difficult to track and they don't want to promote what's more difficult to track when they can promote what's safe.
Maybe look into how the travel rule works for bitcoin vs monero.
Look at how monero is treated by exchanges and regulators compared to bitcoin. It's not that complicated.
Banning p2p transactions and only allowing for ETF custody would very likely backfire so you don't see very many monero ETFs.

2026-05-29 09:26:26 UTC

- reply

Very unlikely that Bitcoin ETFs could have been stopped with this design (no privacy by default and not fungible).
To make ETFs less appealing, you'd have to have a hostile to the state design (more Monero-like).
It is less likely they'd want to promote you and push you into the mainstream if you are private and fungible by default, and the community is straight up hostile to the state.
Bitcoin is safe for the state, that's why it got mainstreamed.

2026-05-29 06:32:39 UTC

- reply

Watched a Joe Rogan clip recently and it reminded me of the Bitcoin community.
Bitcoin's community is following the Joe Rogan arc 😂
Used to be new, cool, and allegedly anti-establishment. Now it's the complete opposite.
The Bitcoin ETFs approval = Joe Rogan's Spotify deal
From DEI girlfriends and woke faggot lead devs, to mass paperization, to Bitcoin influencers worshiping politicians, while the same politicians continue to spit in their face, too much damage has been done.
There's a minority trying to course-correct and coordinate the normies with small patches like BIP-110, but that's too little, too late.
If you need statist normies to understand complex technical topics and depend on them taking action and not being psyoped by bad actors for your solution to work, you've already lost.
Bitcoin as designed is not a solution for a One World Government this tyrannical.
Stop the fight, ref. He's already dead.
#nevent1q…6kf6

2026-05-21 14:54:09 UTC

- reply

You haven't downloaded the software update yet.
Wait billions of years for it to resolve.
https://blossom.primal.net/75aacd087f7d2de8e37d5a4274300777df0042da094633634ac6844d18421607.jpg

2026-05-21 14:18:44 UTC

Just sitting here on this pear-shaped, wet rock, spinning at 1,000 mph and traveling through space at 66,600 mph.
https://blossom.primal.net/5a3bdd754bc63027173be43fcdb822a7722a6cf020823fb65c3bd4891e53eca4.mp4
This would have been impossible if nothing didn't explode and turn into everything, enabling us to evolve from pond scum.
https://blossom.primal.net/4c17ea50fe36efe5e2bf468cd2b12443f42a83b6440c7bb8cfd4f4d13df436c0.jpg
Thank God these scientists figured everything out for me so I don't have to think for myself 🙏

2026-05-20 04:33:28 UTC

- reply

Pour a drink for the humiliation fetishists who still vote, for those who still think there are solutions from within the system.
It's wild that people still think the puppets they see on TV are the ones making the important decisions in 2026.
As long as you vote, you've given your consent to be governed, regardless if your candidate wins.
The sad reality is that a society gets the government it deserves.
The boomers got psyoped into a nanny state because the system "works" for them and have sold their descendants into slavery.
Now their descendants are trying to vote their way out of slavery.
Playing games you can never win is not very smart.
The only way out is to burn the whole thing down with a tax revolt, reject fiat slavery and REJECT dependence on the state.
The state doesn't need you to love it, it needs you to need it.
Just look at the quality of life and life expectancy of the Amish compared to statist groups.
This Natural Law seminar by Mark Passio is great:
https://odysee.com/@DotConnectorReports:e/Mark-Passio---Natural-Law-Seminar-FULL-Version:e
#nevent1q…5vhm

2026-05-19 05:50:01 UTC

- reply

Your daily reminder that viruses don't exist and vaccines are used to depopulate.
"Scientists" have now defined 44,000 dis-eases and thousands of dis-eases have the same symptoms as the "hantavirus" but somehow they knew to test specifically for "hantavirus" 😂
Protect your family, your pets and your cattle.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTRTa7d51b8
#nevent1q…xej8

2026-05-18 12:09:41 UTC

- reply

I think it's time for me to transition to a full farm standard.

2026-05-18 12:08:02 UTC

- reply

Yeah, we're late cycle now. The mask is off.

2026-05-18 10:30:53 UTC

Just got debanked for the first time.
Randomly got a notification that 100K euro have been transferred from my account.
Went to the local bank, and the lady told me they've decided to close my account.
When I asked why, she told me "We don't have to give you any reason. We can just close your account.".
Told her I want to transfer my 100K euro to a different bank, and she told me that the money is no longer in my account, so she has to ask whether they'll allow me to transfer it 😂
It is a good reminder that a deposit is a loan you make to a bank.
You are an unsecured creditor of the bank, not the owner of any specific asset the bank holds.
They can just fuck with you.
Had to wait ~1 for the central office to give me permission to transfer my money to another bank, then had to pay 15 EUR for my bank statement since they already closed my online banking 😂
I use bank deposits because I must (payments, interface with the system), but this is a good reminder not to confuse them with survival capital in this rotten regime.
Banks are just a state-dependent intermediary and the state is the enemy.

2026-05-17 11:09:35 UTC

- reply

Yes, ideally we convert some of them so they don't become footsoldiers for the state, but the solution is small, self-sufficient communities where being a state-dependent NPC is heavily discouraged.
Those who are broke and depend on the state for everything will do the unthinkable to protect their slave UBI allowance. These are the people you're gonna wanna avoid.

2026-05-17 07:11:52 UTC

Bitcoin is now ~18 years old and still practically unusable as mass, non-custodial Medium-of-Exchange.
It hasn't been improving. In fact, it's gotten worse as non-custodial MoE over the years ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/how-bitcoins-developers-are-attacking-2a5 ).
In the last few months, I've often wondered where would we be if we had spent the last 18 years stacking physical gold and silver and had worked more on that front.
We'd have easily engineered silver shortages and squeezed the fuck out of bombs, EV, solar panel producers.
Lots of silver is also needed to build the physical infrastructure to power, cool and connect AI data centers for the One World Government surveillance state.
The paper gold/silver markets are enormous and very tightly managed by our One World Government. We could've definitely done some damage and exposed their paper games by stacking physical.
If you look into the Coordination Tax, you'll realize that Bitcoin will inevitably fail as mass, non-custodial MoE ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoin-will-fail-as-mass-non-custodial ).
The Coordination Tax is how the Controllers manage Bitcoin (smaller scale), but also how they manage society (larger scale).
The Coordination tax in Bitcoin is the recurring human + legal + distribution cost to keep the Policy (relay/mempool defaults, mining templates, wallet behaviors), Perimeter (banks, clouds, app stores, ISPs, payment networks, tax, law, PR) aligned with the Protocol's (consensus rules, Proof-of-Work) ideals.
The Coordination Tax in society is the recurring total cost of getting large numbers of humans with different incentives, different information, different risk tolerances, different time horizons, and different status games to act as one organism across time.
If you do a deeper dive, you'll realize that it's very likely that the government created Bitcoin ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-i-think-the-government-created ). See screenshot below for TL;DR.
https://blossom.primal.net/5476a16fbbdd25ee92aadcc6d2f29544b487ddb21e5c9f282c6014626c99a799.png
If you gave me the task to "orange-pill" someone today. This is my best attempt:
1) Bitcoin might go up in fiat terms (NGU).
2) The CIA, Mo$$ad, MI6 crew really need Bitcoin because it isn't private by default, it isn't fungible, it is becoming more and more custodied by default and paperized. They certainly don't want to alienate everyone into physical gold/silver, or Monero.
3) If you need to transfer your wealth across borders, Bitcoin is very liquid and definitely a good option.
I wouldn't try to sell them on "digital cash". Monero is clearly better as digital cash.
Monero will however also get psyoped into "quantum-resistance" upgrade scams and many of the hardware wallets (as with Bitcoin) are very likely backdoored.
Monero is more Coordination Tax-optimized than Bitcoin, but it won't be enough.
If the Coordination Tax were a person, it'd be this guy. Unfortunately, he remains undefeated.
https://blossom.primal.net/04096935d0274cae587d61ce446a95eb20b32fd314c7c50beb03601ec1d9d23d.jpg

2026-05-15 12:46:54 UTC

"The Biggest Little Farm" is the best movie I've watched in a long time.
https://odysee.com/@Documentalesinteresantes:6/Mi_gran_peque_a_granja-2018:9
Intelligent design is so obvious once you disconnect from modern scientism.
If you still believe in the theory of evolution after watching it (which I very much doubt), maybe look into how absurd it actually is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UnRC7_dC7U

2026-05-14 14:01:39 UTC

How nice of Trump and Xi to meet and negotiate in front of the whole world.
The most transparent administration in history.
I guess baby-eating, satan-worshiping pedophiles who think they are descendants of gods don't actually control the world.
https://blossom.primal.net/de0de55b12c39894882cd747e0de7c952585384163f90ad5b35c21ecbd71b37e.jpg

2026-05-07 08:24:39 UTC

- reply

My guess is they'll have to use some very advanced tech to either project something or use electromagnetism, or a combination.
https://blossom.primal.net/676c07715a5544800d60e784dde6cd24bfd9fd2b013e1b248d6b382473d574ac.png
To be fair, most people are retarded, so I don't think fooling most people is going to be very hard.
The government doesn't need you to love it, it needs you to need it, and more and more people are going to need the government in the coming years (by design).

2026-05-07 07:47:33 UTC

Pastor Alan Dildo wants you to know that the CIA has informed him and a bunch of other pastors that aliens are real and God doesn't exist.
But don't worry, the government exists and is here to replace God.
https://blossom.primal.net/4868f8333d126cf676b95500eec9c644d3af80afee48a2aa17f0552ce09ff3ae.png
Organized religion = the government.
Everyone has their personal relationship with the Creator and people like pastor Alan Dildo should never be taken seriously.

2026-05-07 04:46:03 UTC

Mr Scientist, if you can't isolate any virus, how do we know viruses exist?
Mr Scientist: Trust the science, mr. Goy.
https://blossom.primal.net/f477453809198158147c3cf2d939b7b54149004505544da1e6c1f6e54151cc85.mp4
Viruses don't exist which means your government has been trying to maim/kill you, your family and your pets/cattle with vaccines for a very long time.
It also means we've been living under a One World Government for a very long time.
Will the Indians finally isolate a virus?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J52m2lHyVNE
Dr. Tom Cowan does a great job of summarizing why viruses don't exist in this video.
https://rumble.com/v6rh2e3-there-was-no-covid-virus-how-weve-all-been-duped-by-the-medical-establishme.html

2026-04-29 08:44:47 UTC

The DARPA "entrepreneurs" reading from the same script as always 😂
But guys, I thought Elon Musk and Sam Altman hated each other 😂
They've already sold their souls and they're trying to take as many people with them as possible.
The Amish always knew not to play their Jewish, Satanic games.
Their goal: a One World government that fully replaces God.
Government replaces God when it becomes the highest practical authority over meaning, morality, safety, identity, money, speech, movement, family, life, death, forgiveness, punishment, and the future.
The test is simple:
- Can you say "God says no" and still live?
The more the answer becomes "not really", the more the replacement has already happened.
https://blossom.primal.net/513373ff5aadcdfbde8767be1b4c95ad2ebd896d34ec12a011cbca745b8e0ce8.mp4

2026-04-20 14:38:26 UTC

- reply

Haven't seen this. It's interesting if real. Wouldn't say it proves they faked his death but an interesting "coincidence" for sure.

2026-04-20 08:35:38 UTC

- reply

Did the US government kill Charlie Kirk, or was it a lone gunman?
- assumes they didn't fake his death
Did Epstein kill himself or did the US government kill him?
- assumes they didn't fake his death
Did the US + Chinese governments create Covid or did it originate when a bat kissed a pengalin?
- assumes viruses exist
Did the US government organize Trump's assassination attempt or was it a lone gunman?
- assumes the "assassination attempt" wasn't faked.
Be a good goy, and only talk about what's allowed.
#nevent1q…aurs

2026-04-17 08:57:22 UTC

- reply

Backdoored Bitcoin/Monero hardware wallets are much more of a threat than Quantum computing.
There is zero credible evidence that Quantum can be engineered to scale cheaply and reliably enough to be broadly useful, and yet most of the attention is focused on Quantum and not the very likely case that most of the main hardware wallets are backdoored.
This video is great:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCKq9u-AL0A
If you spend some time doing objective research, you'll likely come to the conclusion that there is no neat solution that makes you "immune to the NSA". The best you can do is:
- Make mass, silent theft via one corporate/vended rail impossible,
- Force any serious adversary into messy, noisy, manual operations if they want you specifically.
The only real structural defense is collusion forcing:
- Heterogeneous multi-sig (different vendors + DIY),
- Multi-source entropy (XOR’d seeds),
- Passphrases kept off the compromised device,
- Independent stacks for different key shares.
A state-level actor can plausibly:
- backdoor RNG/nonces,
- exfil keys via signatures,
- coerce vendor into "minor tweaks",
- intercept shipping,
- or just use host+legal leverage.
There are very many attack vectors and in some places, you just have to trust as you can't verify.
Some of the attack vectors:
- Closed-source secure elements with opaque behavior.
- Compromised RNG -> predictable keys.
- Firmware "updates" that:
(a) leak shards,
(b) weaken PIN delays,
(c) selectively target flagged serials.
- Supply chain substitution:
(a) devices swapped in transit,
(b) chips with additional logic embedded.
If we assume Controller-grade adversaries and cooperation leverage over:
- silicon vendors,
- big wallet brands,
- customs/parcel systems,
then for mass-market users:
- "self-custody" often means: "I'm holding a compromised device that behaves like self-custody until it's politically useful to make it misbehave."
And of course, they don't need 100% coverage. If they can de-risk 80-90% of "self-custody" BTC/Monero via:
- hardware design,
- vendor pressure,
- update channels,
then most people hold just another pool of conditionally controllable assets.
Even if they never fully exploit it, the option exists.
If you think hardware wallets being compromised is a bit of a stretch, maybe look into Dual_EC_DRBG, operation Bullrun, Edgehill, the company Crypto AG, operation Rubicon, etc.
https://blossom.primal.net/219618dedfd0b7d99bf43bb8f14eae62742860bfa419689f643dc358a46f9254.png
Who knows what sorts of stuff people like Adam Back and co are up to.
#nevent1q…63cs

2026-04-17 08:13:15 UTC

- reply

All you can do is try to save yourself and your loved ones. Most people will get rekt. That's just how it always goes.
Many of the people who are preparing are misguided as well.
At this point, I think we have to assume that most Bitcoin/Monero hardware wallets are backdoored.
Instead of focusing how we can ensure at least some of the main hardware wallets are not backdoored (which to my knowledge, we can't), we are focusing on how to migrate to government-selected post-quantum scam algorithms and whose coins to freeze.
Most people never learn.
https://blossom.primal.net/b5703fa391d478ed2ffd636b0923640cdc9412c5f93a86e76f3829a6d084d24a.png

2026-04-17 03:33:33 UTC

They are already on their back-up plan. Banks are lending billions to Caiman Islands hedge funds who then buy trillions of Treasuries on leverage while the Fed and the Treasury keep volatility low so the hedge funds don't blow up.
https://blossom.primal.net/f58263667d2dbbae5f6dc091783cbad8567e1e1946a5c61a7ea8a2ab4fa63298.png
After the reset:
- the petrodollar falls,
- Gold is the top-level settlement asset for blocs,
- CBDCs are the day-to-day money,
- and almost everything else is a revocable license.
https://blossom.primal.net/6e13f6ffd94bdcd1ae25a5b92ac7a70c7abfd9637f7a2c5cc3e989ead24a9af3.png
So they certainly have a back-up plan. Hope you do as well.

2026-04-16 11:17:56 UTC

Don't know what to think of this one 😂
Not sure if coincidence or not.
https://blossom.primal.net/70350a44788c6d3d5df9f2b937a4f4fca128a974243249a50d0e11ad93c3bed1.png
If Bitcoin doesn't comply, they'll eventually have to suspend dividends and this thing will tank.

2026-04-16 09:53:18 UTC

The professor Jiang character is very interesting.
Graduated Yale university and used to work for the UN (aka the One World Government organization that sponsors child trafficking and genocide by vaccines).
He was suspected by the Chinese government of spying in 2002 and was deported 😂
Going viral organically doesn't really work in 2026. Platforms like Twitter, Youtube, TikTok, only promote content that pushes the official narrative (so plants and useful idiots).
After watching a few of his videos, I think it is very likely he is an intelligence asset (most likely CIA).
He could be a useful idiot but I find this less likely based on his takes.
It was much easier for intelligence agencies to control people's access to information pre-Covid.
Many more people used to watch mainstream media, but the CIA pushed the propaganda too far.
Once different networks started repeating the same script word for word, people stopped watching and lost trust.
The CIA knew they needed to keep control of the narrative, so they started pushing certain "independent media" personalities.
Tucker Carlson (CIA) got "fired" by Fox news (even though he had the highest ratings 😂) just because people stopped watching TV and the CIA needs him to reach more people.
In many cases, even when professor Jiang is likely correct about his conclusions, his argumentation is so flawed that he ends up pushing people away from the "conspiracy theory".
Watching some of his recent videos remind me of the recent podcast with Joe Rogan and Theo Von.
The whole podcast looked like a hostage video. Both completely compromised (especially Rogan) and terrified to not say something they shouldn't say.
Professor Jiang is a bit more subtle than these guys, but I still find it unlikely he's a useful idiot based on his interviews.
The "this is extremely dangerous to our democracy" moment is probably when the CIA knew they had to focus on pushing the "independent" media personalities.
https://blossom.primal.net/6d5abd78445ae441cb84e7845a311a2abc8399d5786fd1b5c7682c315e9f2b56.mp4
Controlling the media is at the core of the protocols of the learned elders of Zion.
The CIA hasn't given up on propaganda now that mainstream media is cooked (only watched by boomers, retards, and retarded boomers).
https://blossom.primal.net/c811efbbfdf2ad9adaf8461275ae9f31571887068ab0c2327b04b845e45436f3.jpg

2026-04-15 06:27:43 UTC

Great video by Dr. Sam Bailey on how viruses don't exist and have never been isolated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIfcsRJyqs4
Dr. Tom Cowan goes into more detail in this video.
https://rumble.com/v6rh2e3-there-was-no-covid-virus-how-weve-all-been-duped-by-the-medical-establishme.html
When it comes to these massive "conspiracy theories", most people usually say: "There's no way that's true. Do you know how many people would have to be in on it?"
And of course, not very many people would have to be in on it.
Most doctors still vaccinate themselves, their children, and their pets even though vaccines are used to depopulate.
However, many of the main puppet politicians are likely in on it (US, Russia, China, India, Iran, Israel, etc.). The Covid scamdemic was a mask off moment for our One World Government.
https://blossom.primal.net/eb766e62dd1a02eea7e0b26bc00421a890c9cb7b10197bf5b2ea8693aaa3e7e2.jpg

2026-04-13 04:14:05 UTC

- reply

They need to hook this lady up with an earpiece.
https://blossom.primal.net/31186e5ec3abb9bf99872bbe61b9193ad5a8dd0b15681c65e7be1a07ec4ec244.mp4
Allegedly, Christina Koch, one of the Artemis astronauts, is also an actress in Mad Max: Fury Road.
https://blossom.primal.net/5afaab95ea6fd2e7566e8bb0a75dda7692412345299f096b70f52966768e6d4f.webp
https://blossom.primal.net/a86b25e7cdd27f26ecfecd5a57460a2a0b7b027ba6dffae5c6cffe46355d26cb.png
https://blossom.primal.net/8e7d06ae6f392e74fa16c96ff474ba1e85fca2c04f41940a524601c491a026bd.jpg
Big if true.
This is why you hire mainly military personnel and not random actors.
(Unless you're DEI-maxxing)
#nevent1q…4y75

2026-04-12 02:30:11 UTC

- reply

Turns out the Pakistani PM is also a puppet for the US and Israel.
How stupid do you have to be to not remove the "Draft - Pakistan's PM Message on X" line 😂
Welcome to our One World Government
https://blossom.primal.net/0ea2ebf504be1d8c7eb80d29fe0c2aa7ab853e4cef1f04fc987068cb50d51c11.png
#nevent1q…7cwp

2026-04-11 14:53:49 UTC

- reply

Big if true.
The record holder (Marc Andreessen) can reach up to Mach 666 with his aerodynamic design.
https://blossom.primal.net/ee537aeff9c2a0fbd2fd4d4143bc13d9f1dacdda3480f7d90964d473eff81f82.jpg
#nevent1q…f0m7

2026-04-11 09:13:20 UTC

- reply

As Mark Twain said: "It's easier to fool people than convince them they've been fooled".
When most people get triggered, they get emotional and their intellect switch turns off.
So they don't have to be retards to believe in the moon landings, they just have to be uninformed, heavily invested, or both.

2026-04-11 08:01:09 UTC

- reply

I'd be interested if any of the moon landing believers, who are intellectually honest, can watch this logical analysis and still come out on the other side as believers.
Matt Walsh pushes all of the same logical fallacies in the video below.
Try and see if you can objectively examine the evidence (or the lack thereof), or whether you'll enter into a cope spiral.
Starts at 10:30
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lnBFABSbRMA
#nevent1q…zj07

2026-04-03 06:01:34 UTC

- reply

Maybe I worded it wrong. They don't necessarily have to be in on it. They can just be the useful idiots who were allowed to lever up and provided exit liquidity for the big boys.
Saylor had a failing company until he switched to a Bitcoin treasury. The only reason his model worked is because the banksters allowed it.
Adam Back has been on Epstein island and seems completely compromised.
Jack Mallers was calling out Epstein's banker and then proceeded to start a company with Epstein's neighbour.
Reading motives is hard unless you have all the information and I certainly don't.

2026-04-02 12:04:59 UTC

- reply

Francis Hunt has theorized that Saylor, Jack Mallers (Howard Luttnick), Adam Backstein, and co have had the task of providing exit liquidity for the big boys (insider whales) for the last ~2 years.
It is a very interesting theory considering that with all the corporate stacking, we're back at 2021 price levels on Bitcoin.
There is no way to get to lever up the way Saylor, Mallers and co are doing unless the banksters allow you to.
We also kept hearing about how there was no retail interest during the last bull market.
Of course, there was retail interest, but the interest was mostly amongst retail plebs whereas retail whales were looking for the exit.
Businesses in the chart below are mostly treasury companies, and individuals are mostly retail whales.
Do these whales who bought way cheaper have insider information in terms of what governments are cooking?
Last midterm year (2022), the US (Israeli) government created the Scam Bankmann Fried character. This midterm year, they'll probably come up with scammy Quantum computing "breakthroughs".
Expect more and more attacks on Bitcoin/Monero as we transition to CBDCs.
https://blossom.primal.net/6e13f6ffd94bdcd1ae25a5b92ac7a70c7abfd9637f7a2c5cc3e989ead24a9af3.png
#nevent1q…k7ax

2026-04-02 06:10:55 UTC

- reply

Jeff Booth cryptically describes the Coordination Tax ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoin-will-fail-as-mass-non-custodial ).
And the reaction to Covid is a great example of how Bitcoiners will react to the Quantum scam.
I used the same example in my first Quantum article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/is-quantum-computing-a-threat-to ).
https://blossom.primal.net/87f0f63b24b0822802981223a040ee8aa4f34477aa87fbec81fbbab0b393149f.png
During Covid (no virus has ever been isolated):
Government: "Citizen, we'd really like you to take this safe and effective vaccine to protect your grandma. It's free... and you must get it... or you will be responsible for killing your grandma."
Quantum (never been proven to scale cheaply and reliably enough to be broadly useful):
Government: "For your safety, dear Bitcoiners, we'd really like you to migrate to these algorithms we have selected for you. If you don't comply, Bitcoin will get hacked and you will lose everything by 20XX."
Most Bitcoiners don't care about (1) how a potential Quantum-resistance upgrade would castrate Bitcoin as money ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/a-quantum-resistance-upgrade-would ), or (2) whether scalable fault-tolerant quantum computing is economically (or operationally) viable, they care about NGU.
A serious quantum-resistant upgrade for Bitcoin almost certainly means: much bigger transactions, faster chain growth, higher node requirements, and thus either (a) fewer transactions per block on L1 or (b) bigger blocks and more centralization pressure.
As I wrote in the "A Quantum-resistance upgrade would be terrible for Bitcoin" article:
- A quantum-resistance upgrade for Bitcoin would be one of the most complex, politically loaded, and coordination-fragile events in its history. It touches every private key, every wallet, every L2, every custody stack. It's also a perfect vector for capture, centralization, and "safety"-framed control.
#nevent1q…juau

2026-04-02 05:13:28 UTC

- reply

Her heart is at the right place, but she is so brainwashed, it's hard to listen to.
(1) Somehow she noticed that when the covid plandemic started hospitals were empty while the media was reporting they were overrun.
Proceeds to say they noticed the same patterns they noticed during the regular flu season.
(Spoiler alert covid didn't exist - https://rumble.com/v6rh2e3-there-was-no-covid-virus-how-weve-all-been-duped-by-the-medical-establishme.html )
(2) She then noticed that hospitals were paid handsomely to "treat" (poison) patients using Remdesivir.
(3) Hospitals had never seen patients so inflamed, so she assumes patients were inflamed because of covid and not because of poisoning them with vaccines and Remdesivir 😂
(4) She then says that hospitals were not allowed to treat the inflammation with steroids even though these steroids were shown to be effective.
She wants to treat the symptom of poisoning her patients with Remdesivir by administering steroids (another big pharma poisonous concoction)
(5) She then noticed that after they injected their patients with the covid shots, hospitals actually got overrun. So they finally managed to fill the hospitals by poisoning people with the covid jab.
Her manager told her "Gale, this hospital has had 3 times more admissions than we have ever had since the hospital opened the doors. A 300% increase in hospitalizations directly associated to the onset of the covid shots."
Open your eyes, lady.
https://blossom.primal.net/358bd13c44630a647175ae4cc09f73bec4c7d23f105e0dff29c4f1efdbc73cce.jpg
#nevent1q…3plu

2026-04-01 02:31:35 UTC

- reply

Haven't had the chance to read Google's new paper from yesterday yet.
"Securing Elliptic Curve Cryptocurrencies against Quantum Vulnerabilities: Resource Estimates and Mitigations"
- https://research.google/blog/safeguarding-cryptocurrency-by-disclosing-quantum-vulnerabilities-responsibly/
Just wanted to CTRL + F for the "national security" section and it is as bad as I thought and covered in "A Quantum-resistance upgrade would be terrible for Bitcoin" ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/a-quantum-resistance-upgrade-would )
https://blossom.primal.net/ce371174d9eeed543eafe2085fb3e0dcb4e6240bd2bf8cd8c2258c331dfeb658.png
"As before, blockchain's loss of the ability to reliably identify asset owners combined with the laches doctrine enables governments to argue that the original owners, through years of inaction, have failed to assert their property rights."
I already covered why I think Bitcoin is goy gold in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-i-think-the-government-created )
#nevent1q…3glm

2026-03-30 14:17:09 UTC

- reply

Is Bitcoin Core gay or straight? 🤔
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5a7QjY4XKA
#nevent1q…v50s

2026-03-28 02:23:46 UTC

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/f571257a946479e8113bb58cf1c525bff3b485b0ebf67852f4f648d44c58a40b.jpg
#nevent1q…wzp4

2026-03-27 14:11:15 UTC

- reply

David Rogers Webb made 2 documentaries because most people won't read the book (and don't have to):
1) https://odysee.com/@EarthNewspaper:e/The-Great-Taking-by-David-Rodgers-Webb:3
2) https://rumble.com/v6qy8lo-stop-it-the-great-taking-documentary.html

2026-03-27 14:09:35 UTC

- reply

When I first figured out that viruses don't exist and vaccines are used to depopulate, I wanted to tell everyone and their mother.
Some people are open-minded and want to objectively investigate the evidence for themselves. Them you can try and help.
On the other hand, most people effectively turn into Mr Smith (a defender of the genocidal state) and attack you.
https://blossom.primal.net/d65bb81ff6b2240bb911fae89065729a3bfd356d89f6e71e80d2122e68d2cebc.jpg
At first, I tried to help them figure things out, but eventually, I stopped trying.
As Mark Twain said: "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they've been fooled."
This is more of an issue when it comes to people in your life (friends/family).
Some of your friends/family are probably capable of using logic and the rest are probably the average NPC.
What works best for convincing the second group is - pain and suffering, or if you're a winner.
If you're a winner and things just work for you, people tend to listen even if you come at them with "crazy conspiracy theories".
#nevent1q…te2a

2026-03-27 11:23:16 UTC

Even with all the implicit and explicit yield curve control, bond yields are slowly rising.
https://blossom.primal.net/220d4c4ef87283175d51ef9d636da08108fdb392b71160f6aa4b555cbd353e6a.png
I am of the opinion that the Controllers can prolong the fiat ponzi for much longer than most think, but will eventually decide to rug.
Why? Because all fiat currencies eventually fail, and the Controllers will definitely decide to fail the current financial system in a carefully preplanned fashion to avoid excess chaos.
https://blossom.primal.net/6e13f6ffd94bdcd1ae25a5b92ac7a70c7abfd9637f7a2c5cc3e989ead24a9af3.png
If markets were efficient, bond yields would be in the double digits (and then most would realize that with current debt levels this is game over).
However, markets are efficient to constraints.
Most of the bond holders in the system are captive - meaning they are aware that it is a mathematical certainty they will get robbed if they buy bonds, but they are forced to.
So bond yields are fake and managed, just like the prices of most, if not all, assets.
Yield Curve Control (YCC) = Central Bank commits to cap yields on some part of the curve (say 10Y at 4.25%). If yields try to rise above the cap, Central Bank buys bonds in unlimited size to enforce the level.
It's a way to say:
"Beyond this point, the bond market no longer gets to vote on our fiscal/monetary mix."
Yield Curve Control is the bridge that lets the Controllers carry an insane nominal debt pile through inflation surges, regime shifts, and crises, without allowing yields to reflexively spike and force default.
With YCC, the curve is no longer a sensor; it's a policy-controlled output.
You often hear about explicit YCC (Japan style), but the whole fake fiat system is designed around implicit YCC.
The logical question is:
- "Who are these rich retards who keep buying bonds and keep getting robbed just so they can fund their own enslavement?"
Most people/companies who have lots of money usually know that owning bonds is a losing proposition, so you have to force them to buy your useless paper.
States design the rules so that banks, insurers, pensions, and autopilot funds end up long bonds, and then bonds get expropriated in real terms.
This is the path of least resistance.
Retail with direct bonds is rounding error.
So the bondholders are the institutional skeleton that anchors the regime: states, banks, pensions, insurers, big funds, and foreign sovereigns.
Why them?
Because they are controllable, slow, diffuse, and essential. They can't easily run, can't easily revolt, and can be quietly sheared to fund whatever comes next (AI governance).

2026-03-27 09:39:14 UTC

- reply

Perhaps, the most important question of our time:
- What would have to happen for a few dozen people to enslave a few billion people?
A very compressed TL;DR
The hardest truth is that a few dozen people do not enslave billions by being superhuman.
They do it by sitting above systems that most people cannot see, cannot exit, and cannot coordinate against.
The public usually imagines slavery as maximal visible brutality.
But the more durable form is:
- administratively soft,
- technologically deep,
- financially integrated,
- morally justified,
- narratively fragmented,
- and psychologically internalized.
In that form, many slaves call themselves free because they can still choose entertainment, careers, identities, purchases, opinions, and aesthetic tribes inside the cage.
That is the real danger.
So, for a few dozen people to effectively enslave a few billion people, they would need:
- monopoly on force as backstop,
- dominance over money and payments,
- universal identity and legibility,
- integrated surveillance and behavioral telemetry,
- control over media, prestige, and the language of legitimacy,
- the ability to punish through exclusion rather than visible violence,
- destruction of horizontal trust and local autonomy,
- a dependent "middle class", not a starving mass,
- fusion of state, corporate, legal, media, and financial power,
- a population fragmented into isolated individuals and reactive tribes,
- permanent crisis to justify centralization,
- and a permissioned lifeworld where survival, mobility, work, savings, and speech all depend on system-compatible access.
That is how a few dozen could rule billions.
Not by owning every mind.
By owning the rails that decide what happens to people who do not comply.
#nevent1q…wpz4

2026-03-27 09:15:58 UTC

- reply

Precisely. Guys like him should stop and ask themselves: "How has 'serving your country' worked out for your country?"
Considering it is now run by pedophiles, probably not great.

2026-03-27 09:10:14 UTC

- reply

Most people will do whatever they think is in their short-term interest. It's that simple.
Which is why the corrupt media and influencers romanticize war and "serving your country" so much.
The only way this changes is if becoming a mercenary for the government becomes expensive and looked down upon.

2026-03-27 07:45:23 UTC

- reply

Listened to the Tucker Carlson interview with James (Jim) Webb, the 3rd generation Marine "war hero" who served the Controllers and further enslaved his descendants.
If this weren't so sad it would be funny.
1) You go and kill people on the other side of the world.
2) You possibly lose your soul and/or your life.
3) The people who are enslaving your family steal the resources of the people you killed.
4) Your family gets further and further enslaved.
5) Brainwashed NPCs thank you for your service to the Controllers.
They never stop and ask: "How many people actually make the decision to start a war?", "Who are these people?", "What are their actual interests and do they converge with the interests of your family?".
As Henry Kissinger said: "Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy."
Young, healthy men who are able and willing to protect their family are going to be a problem for their governments after the coming financial reset.
The two most likely solutions are wars and vaccines.
I have all the respect in the world for anyone who protects their friends and family, and none for brainwashed, glorified, government yes-men.
#nevent1q…sx37

2026-03-18 05:15:50 UTC

Joe Kent, the US Director of the National Counter-terrorism Center just resigned.
https://blossom.primal.net/a7f3f4a4e917c7f46cfaf87da73139f0a6ce6cb29ed503fc77ff96792fe0386b.png
https://blossom.primal.net/f8731985d9a9f1054801e10cbe7da486a912d5bb98cf1bd93010f17ed8b7c719.png
This guy has the highest security clearance in the entire US government, so if I had to guess, he probably has good reasons to believe this war won't end anytime soon.
Also, "Director of the National Counter-terrorism Center".
Most of the terrorism throughout the world is perpetrated by the CIA and Mossad (practically the same thing).
The CIA has almost always used false flags to get Americans to support the next big bankers' war. However, this time there was no false flag and most Americans are seemingly opposed to this war.
Did this guy think that there would be a false flag CIA operation to get more people to support this war?
He "lost his life in a war manufactured by Israel", and, it was highly likely they were going to use him as a scapegoat for future false flags.
As Henry Kissinger wold say: "Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy."
https://blossom.primal.net/5224a7878d099712ccd7d4dddf24917a9efd46837452ede61fd3193f4b4ad62b.jpg
It seems to me the US is using this war because they need a plausible reason to step down from dollar hegemony ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/the-us-israel-war-with-iran-brings ).
US hegemony is expensive and brittle:
- Dollar as sole reserve demands large, persistent deficits.
- Weaponized finance (sanctions, seizures) pushes others to defect.
A perceived defeat / stalemate against Iran provides a reason to frame:
- partial dedollarization,
- more multipolar arrangements,
- more gold-based settlement,
as reluctant necessity rather than voluntary surrender.
The Controllers effectively want to move from US-dollar hegemon to multi-bloc gold-backed settlement without a clean "US surrender".
They need a credible geopolitical reason for:
- US relative humiliation,
- reserve shifts,
- new settlement arrangements,
without making it look like a board (One World Government) decision.
You can think of it this way:
- Current system = dollar + US Treasuries as core reserve/collateral.
- Endgame = fiat currencies float, but physical gold is the final settlement asset between blocs (tokenized, physical, or rewriting ledgers in warehouses throughout the world).
From last year: "China is considering setting up overseas gold warehouses to support international settlements via the Shanghai Gold Exchange, according to the People’s Bank of China (PBOC). This move aims to expand the use of the RMB benchmark internationally. The Shanghai International Gold Exchange is key to China’s de-dollarization push, offering RMB reserve holders the opportunity to convert into gold. The RMB is now used for most inbound and outbound transactions, according to the China State Administration of Foreign Exchange."
( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/what-our-financial-system-will-look )

2026-03-16 13:55:23 UTC

- reply

How Oil is used as a hidden tax dial
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/how-oil-is-used-as-a-hidden-tax-dial
#nevent1q…jmve

2026-03-16 11:23:34 UTC

- reply

UBI is a bit different in terms of:
1. Universality
- Welfare: targeted; you get it only if you pass means tests, specific conditions.
- UBI: default for everyone in-system.
- This removes some stigma, massively broadens dependency on the State rail.
2. Automation + digitization
- Old welfare: messy bureaucracy, paper forms, case workers.
- UBI: automated through CBDC + ID + AI: easy to adjust, integrated with tax & enforcement, fully surveilled.
3. Integration with macro policy
- Welfare: budget decision, somewhat disconnected from high-frequency macro.
- UBI: can be tuned algorithmically: raise by X in recessions or plandemics, cut in "overheating", modulate by region, etc.
In the current world, welfare is effectively a patch on "capitalism".
UBI will be presented as a new operating system: "We're in the post-work, AI age. This is your share of progress... as long as you obey (accept certain "health"/ID/compliance steps)."
So UBI will become the moral anchor that justifies a lot of other control.

2026-03-16 11:14:29 UTC

- reply

There is no mass solution. Everyone has to find a solution for themselves.
Yes, in an ideal world, you could help the less fortunate with a monthly stipend. In the current regime, they effectively become a weapon for the state.
The Great Taking is true in the sense that they can legally steal people's assets, whether they decide to do it is the question.

2026-03-16 11:08:31 UTC

- reply

Most workers could become obsolete over a relatively short period of time (years, not decades) due to AI and robotics.
Yes, UBI will be inflationary - just like Covid stimulus checks were inflationary. However, mass job losses and AI + robotics are deflationary, so UBI effectively undoes the deflation and adds inflation on top.
They effectively steal most of the productivity that would have otherwise flowed to society.
UBI only makes sense when coupled with CBDCs and Digital ID.
Each UBI recipient must:
- have a legal identity,
- be KYC'ed in a compliant wallet,
- link to an address/jurisdiction.
The shift produces a large, semi-dispossessed class who:
- can't rebuild real assets easily,
- are structurally less employable in the old sense,
- are still needed as consumers and as "consent mass".
The question for states is:
- "How do we stop these people from becoming an unmanageable insurgency, while still keeping them in the system and consuming?"
The answer is UBI.
Problem: manage surplus humans in an automated, high-control economy.
Solution 1: UBI.
Solution 2: Vaccines and war.
https://blossom.primal.net/0624156192e4d111a790e9e701985cf82181265ed346e10ff1a3e6c0274e80ee.jpg

2026-03-16 07:47:15 UTC

Elon Musk keeps spamming this "universal high income" nonsense 😂
"All jobs will be optional. There will be universal high income."
What could possibly go wrong if you put every citizen on the State's payroll? Surely, they won't abuse UBI (Universal Basic Income) in any way.
https://blossom.primal.net/5b5acc028bfe2d0cf44f772d97ba43670bea0b3ba22785b9271b6110b87776fa.png
Unfortunately, UBI is going to be inevitable.
And UBI is not just "free money" as Elon would like you to believe. It's a control rail to manage the losers of the reset, stabilize consumption and harden behavioral obedience.
Unfortunately, it's not about "ending poverty" 😂
UBI is a centrally engineered, always-on income stream from the State to individuals, delivered through traceable digital channels, with conditions hiding inside the surrounding system (ID, tax, social credit, eligibility rules).
UBI is going to be perfect for soft policing:
- Carrot: "Behave, and your floor is guaranteed."
- Stick: "Break certain rules (tax, "health", speech, protest in the wrong way), and administratively you can be investigated, delayed, or temporarily cut off."
It is a perfect on-ramp to the CBDC + ID stack. "To get your UBI, you must:"
- register your digital wallet,
- verify your ID,
- keep your biometrics up to date,
- accept the terms (AML, travel-rule, etc.).
That brings everyone into the rails they already want for tax, surveillance, and capital controls.
So essentially, UBI = social shock absorber + behavioral throttle after they've run the Great Reset.

2026-03-15 01:23:06 UTC

- reply

It's much worse than censoring jew posts.
Elon's masters are building the non-Chinese WeChat - a state-compatible super-app.
All content and metadata are available to the state under low friction.
Payments and IDs will tightly coupled to real-world identity and bank/CBDC rails (social scoring).

2026-03-14 10:27:51 UTC

- reply

The awakening after the Covid scamdemic sped up the execution of the script. The more their deception is uncovered, the more the Controllers have to act.
This year is going to be crazy.

2026-03-14 09:08:00 UTC

If the name of a company contains the words "truth", "honesty", "transparency", "safety", etc., you can be almost certain it's a scam.
Shout-out to "truth social" 😂
Inversion is the core operating pattern for modern control systems.
Inversion = when the label and the function trade places.
- "Freedom" rails used to tighten control.
- "Safety" doctrines used to centralize risk.
- "Decentralized" tools pinned to centralized choke-points.
- "Protection of property rights" used to rewrite who owns what.
- "Transparency" means: you are transparent; the system is not.
Blunt tools:
- naked expropriation,
- open censorship,
- outright bans,
- top-down classification,
... all burn legitimacy and trigger resistance.
Inversion is cheaper:
1) It piggybacks on real desires:
- "Protect my kids."
- "Prevent the next 2008."
- "Save the planet."
- "Give me better UX."
2) It lets the Controllers pose as:
- protectors,
- technocratic fixers,
- responsible adults
…while the actual consequence is: tighter rails, fewer exits, more programmable constraints.
3) It's self-enforcing:
- people defend the inverted rail because they're attached to the original value word.
If you attack the rail, most people hear "you hate safety / fairness / the planet / children".
So inversion is not decorative; it's the main way to turn:
- legitimate needs -> high-acceptance control systems.

2026-03-14 01:46:35 UTC

- reply

I think it's very unlikely for Bitcoin held in self-custody (properly) to end up being a rugpull because the government would much rather you own Bitcoin than physical gold or something like Monero.
Based on my research, in 99% of cases, the government would prefer you own Bitcoin than physical gold.
The other 1% of cases are mostly people who move 8-9-10 figures in Bitcoin to finance groups the government doesn't like (very rare).
So I don't think governments wan to rug Bitcoin, but that doesn't mean they execute everything perfectly and don't overshoot.
One area where they might overshoot is the Quantum scam ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/a-quantum-resistance-upgrade-would ).
At present, nearly 90% of stocks are held by the top 10% of society, and that same 10% of society performs nearly 50% of all consumer spending.
So wealth is very concentrated (mostly amongst boomers as you said).
For them to run the Great Taking, they don't actually need to rug most of the population.
As you said, younger cohorts are still on average much more dangerous than older ones - which is why you build the control rails (Palantir/MSFT/ID/CBDC), and send some of them to die in senseless wars.
It's going to be tough to get young people to organize if 1/5th of the people in their country were imported in the last 10 years (mass migration).
Running the Great Taking is still very risky.
If I am correct that they want to reset, they likely want to keep Bitcoin as a plan B in case they aren't able to execute Freegold cleanly (which would be relatively low probability but enormous upside).
I need to write more on demographics because it's very important and nuanced, but TL;DR:
The developed world ran:
- a demographic Ponzi (ever-growing base),
- layered with a financial Ponzi (ever-growing claims).
Fertility collapse + aging = demographic Ponzi is over.
Debt explosion + low real growth = financial Ponzi is over.
Controllers now need some combination of:
- expropriation (Great Taking),
- re-basing (Freegold + inflation),
- control rails (Palantir/MSFT/ID/CBDC),
- and carefully managed leaks (BTC, physical gold in private hands).
Demographics is the slow needle that burst the illusion that you can:
- promise infinite pensions,
- with finite young workers,
- and never have to choose who eats the loss.
In other words, demographics is the deep constraint surface the rest of the game is played on.

2026-03-14 01:08:28 UTC

- reply

No one said anything about "viruses dying" in any of the videos I've posted.
You couldn't even watch the Kim Iversen interview (60 min) before coming out with your straw man, red herring, false analogy logical fallacies.
Scientists can't even see a unique particle. They say you can't do that and they've never done that, so where did the "can't be isolated from host cells without dying" argument come from? Your imagination.
Scientists say there's not enough of these particles to see.
There are over 200 FOIA requests to the CDC, NIH, and the Robert Koch institute asking for pictures of these unique particles from any fluid of a sick person, and the response is that it can't be done in virology.
Your bad faith straw man argument is an instant mute.
It's all good though, you can keep trusting the science.

2026-03-13 14:01:11 UTC

- reply

That's a great question and the answer is - I don't know for sure, which is why I advocate for owning both (bitcoin and gold).
It is possible that some governments are accumulating BTC behind the scenes, although I haven't seen any credible evidence.
I like to read revealed preference - you prefer X over Y if, when offered both, you choose X. So far in my view, revealed preference points to gold.
You are looking at this from the multipolar (competing governments) viewpoint, whereas in my opinion we live under something very close to a One World Government ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/how-i-know-we-live-under-a-one-world ).
With countries representing 98% of global GDP developing/implementing CBDCs, the level of coordination is striking.
https://blossom.primal.net/6e13f6ffd94bdcd1ae25a5b92ac7a70c7abfd9637f7a2c5cc3e989ead24a9af3.png
BTC's settlement doesn't require state-controlled rails, which in my opinion is not something the Controllers are likely to embrace.
This would destroy their ability to weaponize monetary rails.
As you noted gold reserves of the West are very opaque.
Only a small portion of gold buying by Central Banks is reported, and usually mostly by Emerging Market Central Banks.
G7 can’t be seen stampeding into gold. If you're running the incumbent fiat+bond system (US, Eurocore), it is suicidal optics to visibly join the gold rush.
If the US or major euro Central Banks started aggressively buying gold, the obvious signal to foreign creditors and domestic savers is:
- “We are preparing for currency debasement / reserve system change.”
That would basically nuke the bond market.
Also, the moment you say "we’re buying gold because it’s the ultimate money", you implicitly admit:
- "Your pensions and savings are sitting in a debasing unit we control."
That's a legitimacy grenade.
The official script still needs:
- "fiat is fine",
- "the dollar/euro are stable reserve currencies",
- "gold is just another reserve asset, barbarous relic, diversification".
If you visibly act like a goldbug, you blow up that narrative.
I have written more about why I think all roads lead to gold in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/all-roads-lead-to-gold ).
If you look at the EU architecture, it is practically the Freegold model ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/mario-draghi-revealed-the-plan-for ).
Euro was deliberately designed so that:
- Gold is not legally "backing" the currency (no fixed parity),
- But is held on the Eurosystem balance sheet,
- And crucially, marked to market regularly in euros.
I can write more on this and this is something I've done a lot of research on, but many people in positions of power and many bankers have slipped over the years (have given away that for them gold is the final store-of-value). I could probably write a 100 more articles like the Mario Draghi one just analyzing how different individuals in positions of power give up the game.
If you want to look at it from a darker point of view - if the Controllers are thinking in global balance-sheet terms, it's coherent:
1) You want the manufacturing/real-asset bloc (China + some EM) to survive the reset with:
- enough private wealth in hard assets to keep working,
- enough sovereign + household gold to have credibility in the Freegold world.
2) You want the rentier/consumption bloc (US/EU middle classes) to bear a bigger share of the claim destruction, because:
- their wealth is easier to dematerialize,
- their consumption can be cut without immediate loss of productive capacity.
Hence the asymmetry:
- West: encourage paper, discourage gold.
- China: accept/encourage physical gold accumulation.
Chinese state-linked media regularly push narratives like "gold is a safe long-term store of value" and encourage retail buying. The West, not so much.
Ultimately, I don't have any insider information, so all I can do is read incentives based on the information that I have and guess.

2026-03-13 13:23:43 UTC

- reply

> I certainly became wealthier fiat wise, but I didn’t sign up for another shitcoin copy of Ethereum.
Yes, the "I certainly became wealthier" part is how I cope as well.
> The greatest disappointed for me tho was how naive, stupid and two-dimensional Bitcoiners ended up to be.
I am very bearish on any community (Bitcoiners included). I just was stuck in podcast hopium land (mainly Jeff Booth) up until I started doing my own research.
I was high on protocol-level truth hopium (consensus rules, proof-of-work, 21M cap, etc.), and ignored the fact that protocol truth without perimeter control is a philosophical win and a market loss.
To be fair, I'd be more bullish on a community that has a single goal and some courage than a community that is pulling in ten different directions.
Once I realized that Bitcoin's survival and adoption depend on whether its most committed users can detect, coordinate, and counter inevitable policy, market, and social attacks, I pretty much checked out mentally to be honest.

2026-03-13 11:30:51 UTC

- reply

Give the videos a shot if you want.

2026-03-13 11:28:57 UTC

- reply

I try to be a freedom maxi. Whatever gives you the most freedom is what you should use.
I've covered what made me fall out of love with Bitcoin in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoin-will-fail-as-mass-non-custodial ).
TL;DR - no privacy by default, DEI developers who've been attacking its sovereign/MoE use, L2s seem like a failed project at least from the mass, non-custodial use viewpoint, etc.
The community having to coordinate to defend Bitcoin from attackers all of the time (the Coordination tax I've written about) is why I think we'll be stuck in infinite "Bitcoin wars":
- Core v30 — Inscriptions / spam vs "art" (ongoing)
- Taint, "clean UTXOs" & compliant-Bitcoin vs grey-Bitcoin
- Node liability & "publisher" / CSAM / sanctions content
- Quantum-resistance, key-rotation & "lost coins"
- Paperization & "wrapped Bitcoin" vs base-layer Bitcoin
- Protocol ossification vs "surgery to survive"
- Blockspace & "digital cash vs data chain" (the rematch)
The Core v30 fiasco and how many people updated their node software by default, was a big wake up call for me.
If I immerse myself in all of this garbage, I'll probably start aging in dog years.

2026-03-13 08:43:37 UTC

- reply

Well, your lived experience, just like mine, is that we have been brainwashed from the day we were born.
My assertion is that no virus exists, not that just Covid doesn't exist.
1) https://rumble.com/v6rh2e3-there-was-no-covid-virus-how-weve-all-been-duped-by-the-medical-establishme.html
2) https://www.bitchute.com/video/pWcHXqLDVvYL
3) https://www.bitchute.com/video/URcvRFVibHJF
No virus has ever been isolated. Vaccines are used to depopulate.
Your cousin got sick of something (doesn't mean it was Covid), even if she had a positive Covid test.
Falsification is independent of replacement and the burden of proof is on the one making the positive claim.
In other words, if you say that Covid exists, you ought to isolate the virus and prove it and so far no virus has ever been isolated as shown in the 2 documentaries above.
You can't conclude that your cousin was sick from Covid just because she was sick.
In regards to nuclear weapons, I wrote that there is no evidence that anyone has ever split an atom and nuclear weapons as advertised exist. That doesn't mean that very powerful bombs don't exist.
1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6oGXzXz6yQ
The podcast I've linked to above has all of the receipts. There is no evidence that an atom has ever been split.
There was a study published in The Journal of the American Medical Association in 1990. The 40-year study of thousands of Japanese who survived the "atomic bombs" dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki found radiation exposure did not cause genetic damage that could lead to human mutations.
"intense study of 70,000 offspring of atomic bomb survivors has failed to identify an increase in congential abnormalities, cancer, chromosome aberrations or mutational blood protein changes."
All of the receipts are in the podcast I've linked to (peer-reviewed scientific journals).
The Japanese people likely got firebombed.
"It is an established fact that napalm chemical firebombing of wooden Japanese cities was extremely destructive. In May 1945, Tokyo was hit with incendiary payloads from 334 B-29 Superfortresses, burning 16 square miles and destroying more than half of the city. The Hiroshima operation involved 4 sq. miles. Using the Tokyo ratio, it could have been achieved with 83 planes.
Hiroshima was a wooden shantytown constructed in a concentrated area. It was a sitting duck for a carefully crafted firebombing terror attack with an atomic-bomb psyop added on for full effect."
There are literally pictures of concrete buildings that survived a ground zero atomic blast. Hiroshima looks carpet-bombed.
I'd focus more on the "viruses don't exist" part because very many people poison themselves and their loved ones with vaccines.
Whether somebody gets bombed with an "atomic bomb" or gets fire-bombed, the end result is likely the same.

2026-03-13 04:17:38 UTC

Like every other war, the US-Israel war with Iran is a bankers' war ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/the-us-israel-war-with-iran-brings ).
What has become more obvious now than ever is how our overlord bankers use the price of oil as a hidden tax dial for mass control.
Oil is not just a commodity, it's the broadest fastest, least-voted-on tax lever in the system.
It is uniquely useful because it sits upstream of almost everything:
- transport,
- agriculture,
- mining,
- chemicals,
- plastics,
- shipping,
- aviation,
- diesel backup power,
- military logistics,
- construction,
- emergency response,
- food distribution.
So when oil rises, the public does not experience it as "oil rose".
We experience it as:
- fuel rose,
- food rose,
- freight rose,
- airline tickets rose,
- packaging rose,
- fertilizer rose,
- heating and backup-power costs rose,
- then everything else rose with a lag.
That makes oil completely different from other commodities (e.g. copper, lumber).
Oil is a tax dial because it:
- reaches everyone,
- hits quickly,
- is hard to avoid,
- is regressive,
- and gets blamed on "markets", "wars", "greed", or "unexpected events" instead of on a direct policy choice.
If you are trying to extract purchasing power from a population without openly voting for a tax increase, oil is almost ideal.
The beauty of oil for the Controllers is that it behaves like a tax that:
- does not need parliamentary approval,
- does not show up on a clean line item,
- can be blamed on foreigners, cartels, speculators, weather, pipelines, war, or "global supply-demand",
- and can be selectively reversed when politically necessary.
Oil lets the Controllers do four things at once:
1. Extract disposable income
- households spend more on essentials,
- less remains for discretionary consumption,
- private-sector demand cools without an explicit austerity vote.
2. Discipline labor
- people under energy/food stress become more job-dependent,
- strike appetite falls,
- mobility falls,
- tolerance for shitty real wages rises because survival takes priority over bargaining.
3. Reprice assets
- high oil feeds inflation,
- inflation feeds rate pressure,
- higher rates hit duration and leverage,
- the sacrifice layer gets squeezed.
(We are in the discipline <by default> period - midterm year)
https://blossom.primal.net/95eabcb1a428c85c085bdfc2945c12ab769ead7fb358a47e65c836c978553d2c.webp
4. Reallocate wealth upward and outward
- from consumers to producers,
- from importers to exporters,
- from weak countries to hard-currency/commodity powers,
- from households to states and systemically important firms.
So oil is more than an "inflation input". It is a transfer mechanism.
Oil is one of the most efficient system-wide coercion levers because it hits:
- households,
- firms,
- currencies,
- rates,
- and sovereign stability
all at once.
The Controllers use it to:
- extract purchasing power invisibly,
- discipline labor and weaker states,
- create inflation justification,
- trigger asset repricing,
- consolidate ownership,
- and preserve optionality for the eventual patch/reset.
To be clear, I'm not saying they perfectly control every print. They do it through:
- shipping and insurance friction,
- underinvestment,
- producer coordination,
- sanctions and waivers,
- reserve releases/refills,
- refinery/product bottlenecks,
- futures/plumbing influence,
- and dollar-liquidity interaction.

2026-03-11 13:34:19 UTC

The US-Israel war with Iran brings us closer to the Great Reset
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/the-us-israel-war-with-iran-brings

2026-03-10 03:09:10 UTC

- reply

My exchange froze my account over a UTXO consolidation 😂
They eventually unfroze it but it was a good wake up call for me

2026-03-09 08:41:24 UTC

- reply

Our lord and savior Thomas Massie also seems to stay away from these topics.
#nevent1q…4530

2026-03-09 03:59:27 UTC

The more and more people start waking up, the more and more the script's execution has to speed up.
Once a good enough portion of the population starts asking questions such as these, you're on borrowed time:
- How many people did it take to make a decision to close down the world in 2020 due to a "virus" that doesn't exist and was never isolated?
- How many people did it take to make a decision to start poisoning the world's population by injecting them with heavy metals (vaccines)?
- How many people does it take to make a decision to start a war because of "nuclear weapons" that don't exist? What about a world war?
- How many people does it take to make a decision to incinerate our savings?
- How many people will it take to make a decision to run the Great Taking (which is now legal in the entire world) and expropriate practically everyone.
And the answer to these questions is - not that many. Probably less than a few dozen.
Look at this poor bastard with his stupid mask pretending to take the Covid vaccine.
https://blossom.primal.net/eb766e62dd1a02eea7e0b26bc00421a890c9cb7b10197bf5b2ea8693aaa3e7e2.jpg
The leader of the "opposition" then proceeded to convince his people to inject themselves with poison to protect them from a virus that doesn't exist.
Of course, like every other leader that matters, he's part of the club.
There's no solution from within the system.
The solution is: keep your health and wealth outside the system and stay armed to be able to defend yourself and your loved ones.
Try to be more self-sufficient every month. Be more Amish.
History rhymes.
The Controllers have repeatedly:
- overloaded the claim-stacks,
- centralized ledgers and custody,
- detonated a crisis at a convenient time,
- swept / rewritten claims,
- and rebooted the same control architecture with upgraded rails.
https://blossom.primal.net/4fd4011596a18610d337d5e8f5b859e1901c40c08b9872dd4542ab8a8c2052da.jpg
It's not a matter of if but when.
At some point, more and more people will stop playing games that cannot be won (at scale) which will inevitably speed up the execution of the script.
The "everything bubble" was used for the AI governance buildout (a.k.a the AI bubble if you listen to mainstream media).
https://blossom.primal.net/fa34c7f072e6571c7cd9cb18b08e5459caf019e2cb0d790e849249b429f050c4.webp
The AI governance buildout is in its late stages and debt levels are rapidly rising. We might be nearing the Great Reset.
https://blossom.primal.net/6e13f6ffd94bdcd1ae25a5b92ac7a70c7abfd9637f7a2c5cc3e989ead24a9af3.png

2026-03-08 11:42:40 UTC

- reply

If you learn to love the New World Order, you too can be President 😂 (even if you are a vegetable)
https://blossom.primal.net/6136a5f2814b67aa4e852f208e33643a3f7dfeb9c52b12a64e71ab77f1df1b3e.png
#nevent1q…7cwp

2026-03-08 10:14:51 UTC

It's interesting that Iran is building an interoperable AI governance system with the West. I thought they hated each other.
https://blossom.primal.net/92c25768ab1d415fd1a744f0a6bf1ce30471d818e80fa95df6bb58b0ce16943b.png
https://blossom.primal.net/c93c5fefa16673a418b92ce5f0ad642dbe01d387f570d2996a8f7ebf7e81748a.png
It's also interesting that Iran's supreme leader got "vaccinated" for a virus that doesn't exist and was never isolated.
He then psyop'ed a large portion of his people to take the poisonous jab.
https://blossom.primal.net/eb766e62dd1a02eea7e0b26bc00421a890c9cb7b10197bf5b2ea8693aaa3e7e2.jpg
It's not left vs right or West vs BRICS, it's simply people vs system.

2026-03-07 09:08:30 UTC

- reply

Yes, you tend to get some incompetence at the local level usually.
Once you get to the standards bodies (BIS, FSB, WTO, WHO, OPEC, etc.), they tend to have access to practically all of the data they need to run complex simulations and probably malice >> incompetence.

2026-03-07 08:04:54 UTC

I often see people asking "do you think governments mess up out to malice or incompetence?"
You only need to look at the food pyramid to figure it out.
How do you get literally everything wrong (the food pyramid is inverted) out of incompetence?
Scientists:
- "We finally figured it out - animal fat makes you sick and industrial waste products are good for you."
Then you start looking into how every government on Earth is injecting children with poisonous vaccines for "viruses" that don't exist and have never been isolated.
Democide is death by government and was the number one cause of death worldwide in the 20th Century.
Political scientist R. J. Rummel revived and redefined the term democide as:
- "The murder of any person or people by a government, including genocide, politicide, and mass murder."
Democide was responsible for the death of 262,000,000 people worldwide during the 20th Century. On average governments killed 2,620,000 people per year, 218,333 per month, or 7,178 per day.
The 21st Century will be no different.

2026-03-03 13:58:02 UTC

A medium-of-exchange that isn't private by default would never work in today's regime.
If you treat privacy as "expert mode", you guarantee surveillance wins by default.
You need privacy & fungibility by construction, not by habit.
If surveillance can reliably distinguish "good" vs "bad" coins, policy and perimeter will always drift to "good only".
All transactions must look like each other:
- No transparent subset as "legacy mode".
- No visible amounts or script opcodes per tx.
- No address types that reveal more metadata.
This collapses the main control trick: "we only KYC or de-bank these flows".
Make the policy choice binary: ban the entire asset, or accept that everything is indistinguishable.
This way you have no taint wars, no heuristic creeping.
Privacy-by-default vs opt-in privacy is basically the difference between:
- You're dark unless you explicitly shine a light.
- You're lit up by default unless you personally crawl around the interface turning lamps off.
You don't get tax exemptions by begging corrupt politicians, you get tax exemptions by implementing privacy by default.
Privacy by default protects the lazy, the busy, and the non-expert.
Opt-in privacy protects only the most disciplined, and even then often only cosmetically - while turning them into a distinct, more interesting group.
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoin-will-fail-as-mass-non-custodial

2026-03-02 12:59:48 UTC

What our financial system will look like after the coming reset
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/what-our-financial-system-will-look

2026-03-01 10:14:52 UTC

What propaganda is in the current regime:
Mostly not lying posters from the Ministry of Truth.
Propaganda = structure + incentives + narrative that make some thoughts cheap and others expensive.
Think of it as:
Perception management = (What you can see) × (What feels normal) × (What feels futile to resist)
It mostly operates on 3 layers:
1. Attention formation - What you notice at all
2. Interpretation frame - How you explain what you notice
3. Action channeling - What paths feel available/legitimate to act
Propaganda is how the system keeps consent barely high enough that it can keep stealing the time, energy and rights of the majority without inviting revolt.

2026-03-01 10:02:14 UTC

- reply

I think you have done 0 research on what natural law even is, which is why I sent you an 8 hour seminar that addresses your points in the reply, but you've already formed strong opinions on a topic you haven't researched, so good luck.

2026-03-01 09:05:45 UTC

- reply

Natural Law
https://odysee.com/@DotConnectorReports:e/Mark-Passio---Natural-Law-Seminar-FULL-Version:e

2026-03-01 08:25:31 UTC

Out of all the retarded ideas people believe in, "democracy" is definitely up there.
"Democracy" is the front-end UI, not the operating system.
The OS is the Controllers + plumbing (money, collateral, standards, surveillance).
Elections, parties, parliaments = the skin that keeps the organism looking human while the internal organs quietly swap out.
What "Democracy' actually is:
Firmware layer:
- Debt/Liquidity physics.
- Collateral architecture (Central securities depositories, rehypothecation, bail-in law).
- Gold & reserve structure.
- CBDC/ID rails being built.
OS layer (Controllers):
- IC/security, Treasury/CB/BIS, big asset managers, primes, key megacaps, law/compliance, insurers, foreign blocs.
- Objective: keep funding, collateral and consent intact at minimum career/legitimacy cost.
UI layer (democracy):
- Elections, parties, presidents, parliaments, coalition politics, "public debate".
- Functions:
1. Measure and manage Gross Consent Product.
2. Allocate blame and credit (villains vs saviors).
3. Refresh avatars (faces in front of persistent rails).
4. Legitimize pre-planned structural moves (resets, wars, pension reforms, Great Taking-type sweeps).
5. Route anger into reversible channels (votes, protests, memes, speculation) instead of permanent regime damage.
Democracy is a behavioral feedback layer wrapped around the real constraints:
- Net Liquidity,
- refinancing walls,
- reserve structure,
- security imperatives,
- external balance.
When those constraints tighten, the democratic layer's job is to translate "we have to do this" into "you voted for this / you forced our hand / we had no choice but to save you".

2026-02-27 14:45:01 UTC

Mario Draghi revealed the plan for the Great Reset
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/mario-draghi-revealed-the-plan-for

2026-02-24 13:55:19 UTC

The next few years are probably going to be very messy for Bitcoin and Monero.
The Quantum computing scam is easily the most telegraphed attack.
I am not a believer in Quantum, but I think it will be largely irrelevant whether Quantum can be engineered to scale cheaply and reliably enough to be broadly useful because the incentives line up almost too perfectly (More context: https://controlplanecapital.com/p/a-quantum-resistance-upgrade-would ).
The BIS (the central bank of central banks that is developing CBDCs with 137 countries) has published quite a few papers on how important "quantum-proofing payment systems" is.
I already knew Quantum FUD was inevitable when I saw that CBDCs are being designed with post-quantum cryptography to "defend against future threats". Notice that existing systems rely on "vulnerable public-key encryption".
https://blossom.primal.net/b63e30c653650fb08ca30a3738082c22f6e606783cf56a8493e71b8c4abf4340.png
In July 2025, the BIS published their "Quantum-readiness for financial system: a roadmap paper".
The first few sentences of the Abstract are quite clear: "Quantum computers may in the future break today's widely used encryption. This paper provides a framework to support the financial system in the transition to quantum-safe cryptographic infrastructures. It emphasises the need to start the transition today – with broad awareness and cryptographic inventory as critical foundations".
Then in December, the BIS published their "Project Leap phase 2: quantum-proofing payment systems" paper.
"Protecting financial systems from the potential threat posed by quantum computers requires a proactive and coordinated approach. Challenges go beyond technical aspects and include awareness, resource allocation, competence development, inventory, pilots, governance and more.
Project Leap Phase 2, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Centre, the Bank of Italy, the Bank of France, Deutsche Bundesbank, Nexi-Colt, and Swift, tested post-quantum cryptography in an operational payment system.
The experiment replaced traditional digital signatures with post-quantum cryptography, while sending liquidity transfers. It involved modifying numerous system components to ensure compatibility with updated cryptographic libraries.
"
https://blossom.primal.net/3e8d8b4997b9eae4755c9d533cf6bc251d9fad1e852dbac1741b50195d889b5d.png
In June 2025, the EU published their "A Coordinated Implementation Roadmap for the Transition to Post-Quantum Cryptography" paper.
"
The EU Member States, supported by the Commission, issued a roadmap and timeline to start using a more complex form of cybersecurity, the so-called post-quantum cryptography (PQC).
Quantum computing has been identified as a threat to many cryptographic algorithms used to protect the confidentiality and authenticity of data. This threat can be countered by a timely, comprehensive and coordinated transition to Post-Quantum Cryptography (PCQ).
This document is the first deliverable and is meant to be a first high-level paper aimed at Member States. It includes a set of recommendations that Member States need to implement for a synchronised transition to PQC, as well as measures to ensure that all stakeholders are well informed on the quantum threat to cryptography.
"
These are just 3 recently-published papers of many. They are written as if Quantum Computing being able to scale cheaply and reliably enough to be broadly useful is a foregone conclusion.
The coordination between ALL countries is insane. If you want to be a part of the new financial system, you'll have to play game.
As I've shown in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/a-quantum-resistance-upgrade-would ), a quantum-resistance upgrade would be terrible for Bitcoin (and Monero).
The Coordination tax I've outlined in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoin-will-fail-as-mass-non-custodial ) is why the next few years are probably going to be very messy.

2026-02-24 13:05:35 UTC

- reply

Yes, this is a financial reset + imprisonment into CBDC + Digital ID by a forced conversion if you want to recover what's left of your assets.
To me gold seems like a better option because of the reasons I've written about in this article: https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoin-will-fail-as-mass-non-custodial
Both are assets outside the system if custodied properly, so it's not either or.

2026-02-24 00:54:10 UTC

The whole thing where the EU froze Russia's reserves makes 0 sense and is very similar to October 7th.
Russia left roughly 200-300B euro parked at Euroclear in Belgium and attacked Ukraine.
So they left ~70% of their reserves in Europe absolutely knowing their reserves would get frozen.
It is literally written into law that Euroclear holds the true title; retail and funds (Russia in this case) hold entitlements.
Everything is in street name, no bearer certs, no simple "I have the certificate, I own the thing".
This is a relatively recent development and is the law in every country in the world, including Russia.
The actual odds of them leaving their reserves parked at Euroclear and attacking Ukraine are ~0.
The obvious alternative explanation would be that they wanted to get their assets frozen to push the "deglobalization" narrative, to normalize the Great Taking, and to give an excuse for ~all Central Banks to simultaneously start stacking gold because the "dollar has been weaponized".
The EU froze Russia's reserves in February 2022.
https://blossom.primal.net/be4c04472a7966fbf2c2444996a162bf8d710d3e4eccbde53b3c6bc18e2fbac7.png
It would've been kinda weird if Central Banks just started buying 3x the gold year over year without an excuse 😂
And this is just official Central Bank gold buying, the real numbers are in the multiples.
I think they are preparing for a financial reset and I wouldn't be too shocked if they decide to run it this or next year.
Central Banks usually under-inject liquidity in midterm years.
https://blossom.primal.net/95eabcb1a428c85c085bdfc2945c12ab769ead7fb358a47e65c836c978553d2c.webp
With current consent levels, they won't be able to sell the majority of the population on CBDCs and they are well aware.
The Controllers (BIS in this case) didn't force 137 countries (= 98% of global GDP) to develop CBDCs so they can beg the population to switch to CBDCs/Digital ID. They know they'll have to use a crisis.
https://blossom.primal.net/6e13f6ffd94bdcd1ae25a5b92ac7a70c7abfd9637f7a2c5cc3e989ead24a9af3.png
We'll see a systemic collateral/custody rug and people will get forcibly converted into CBDCs to "save the financial system".
David Rogers Webb (author of the Great Taking) went to the US to try to change the law, but unfortunately they were unsuccessful.
Great Taking = legal + plumbing architecture that lets the top of the collateral pyramid seize or haircut claims on financial assets in a systemic crisis, while keeping the underlying assets safely inside the system.
Translation: you don't own any of your stocks/bonds in your brokerage account.
David Webb filmed his attempts to change the law in a few US states and got threats from the banking lobby.
Eye-opening documentary: https://rumble.com/v6qy8lo-stop-it-the-great-taking-documentary.html
The banking lobby lawyers are fighting to keep using "your" stocks as collateral in the ~4 quadrillion USD derivatives pyramid like their life depends on it.
It is probably too late to try and change the laws, so everyone has to save themselves.

2026-02-18 00:03:21 UTC

The BIS wants to steal our assets; All G20 countries agree
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/the-bis-wants-to-steal-our-assets

2026-02-15 02:31:46 UTC

Bitcoin will fail as mass, non-custodial Medium-of-Exchange
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoin-will-fail-as-mass-non-custodial

2026-02-14 05:24:02 UTC

- reply

It's certainly possible it was organic, or it was Controller-seeded or at least Controller-green-lit at inception. I wasn't there so all I can do is speculate.
If it was organic, they certainly did a great job of capturing it and using it to their advantage so kudos to them.

2026-02-14 04:23:00 UTC

Added a "More on why I think the Government created Bitcoin" subheading with a couple more points to my "Why I think the government created Bitcoin" article.
Subheading: https://controlplanecapital.com/i/187487845/more-on-why-i-think-the-government-created-bitcoin
Full article: https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-i-think-the-government-created

2026-02-13 04:11:46 UTC

I am not familiar with this lady, but she’s got some great points. She summarizes the World Economic Forum financial reset talking points.
At the end of the clip Larry Fink has some great points as well: Everything on one common blockchain that he and his bosses control, but more democratization and he will be reducing fees, so don't worry. Fees will be reduced, that's for sure (and your assets will also be reduced).
https://blossom.primal.net/0d8dba64b1ae3ce4f4048c18cd84d6ac0c5ca9353ccf506c479c703117aea1dd.mp4

2026-02-13 00:09:50 UTC

- reply

I have no idea. The architecture is there. The question is when and how hard they decide to use it.
My best guess is before 2033. Still just a guess.

2026-02-13 00:07:38 UTC

Central Banks are likely preparing for a financial reset
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/central-banks-are-likely-preparing

2026-02-12 15:32:21 UTC

- reply

I hated writing this article 😂, but wanted to put the idea out there in case someone wants to do their own deeper dive
I gave up a couple of times mid-article.

2026-02-12 07:09:41 UTC

I wonder what all these Presidents mean by "New World Order" 🤔
https://blossom.primal.net/ec362f3e548d0aa7e5534d049429e440d5088aa068dc95e841fa41a85553dd7c.mp4
No way we live under a One World Government. That would be insane. I think all these Presidents are lying. It's all just a big coincidence.
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/how-i-know-we-live-under-a-one-world

2026-02-12 05:37:29 UTC

All roads lead to Gold
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/all-roads-lead-to-gold

2026-02-11 18:44:22 UTC

- reply

I am from Europe. I don't have a 401K, so take with a grain of salt and verify.
401K is inside the sacrificial layer for a Great Taking, so you can't make it "safe", you can only:
- limit how much of your life you leave in that bucket,
- change what kind of claim you hold inside it, and
- use every legal leak (loans, rollovers, withdrawals) to migrate value off-system over time.
So the restrategizing beyond "just take the match" is mostly about sizing, mix and exit channels, not asset choice that turns your 401K into physical gold somehow.
You cannot turn a 401K into expropriation-resistant physical. "Gold IRA" etc. just re-route you to another custodian inside the same legal perimeter.
In a Great Taking event, the Controllers want to:
- Keep "pensions and retirement" visibly alive (low Gross Consent Product constraint),
- While using that pool to absorb systemic losses and lock people into the new regime (forced conversion).
So the 401K bucket is extremely unlikely to be spared; the reasonable expectation is partial confiscation / conversion, not zeroing.
- "We're protecting your retirement with safe new government stability bonds / CBDC accounts" while quietly imposing a big real haircut.
Given that, the question becomes:
- How much of your life do you want inside that mechanism?
Employer match = almost pure arbitrage
- A typical US setup is "100% match on first X% of salary", etc.
- Under almost any regime, including Great Taking, that's (1) instant, risk-free uplift on your contribution, (2) highly likely to partially survive even in a bail-in, because retirement optics are sacred and legitimacy cost of fully rug-pulling matches is huge.
Taking the full employer match is still rational. That's the "least bad" use of the 401K rail.
Above the match: treat as "captive, haircut-prone annuity".
Above the match you're trading:
- Tax advantage now vs
- Being locked inside a privileged expropriation target later.
So:
- Always take the full match.
- Be very skeptical about large contributions above the match, unless you're deliberately using the 401K as a future state-managed annuity, and you're comfortable that your real SoV lives outside (physical gold, self-custody Monero, BTC, real assets).
A lot of people will still choose to max 401K for tax/accounting reasons. I'd cap 401K contributions at the match (or modestly above),
and push incremental savings into off-system SoV instead.
There are some legal ways to leak value out over time. You'd want a gradual "escape plan" for 401K money as you age and rules allow.
E.g. early, penalty-free withdrawal windows (55+)
US rule of 55:
- If you leave the employer in or after the year you turn 55 (age 50 for certain public safety roles),
- You can withdraw from that 401K without the 10% early penalty (still taxed as income).
This is an early exit hatch to pull some value out, accept tax hit, reallocate into off-system SoV before a possible systemic Taking.
All in all, position 401K as state-managed annuity in your personal stack, not your core SoV.
- Core SoV = physical gold, self-custody Monero, BTC, assets outside the most capture-prone custody rails.
- 401K = "I'll probably get something from this after they're done patching the system, but I'm not betting the house on it."

2026-02-11 15:55:50 UTC

- reply

Usually the people who think 'governments' are stupid think the people they see on TV make the decisions (e.g. Elon Musk, Trump, AOC, Kamala, etc.).
The deepest technical minds (the real outliers) they find in universities all over the world remain inside state/para-state labs and defense contractors. They don't give interviews on TV to show people how smart they are 😂
That's the whole point - to pretend the government is incompetent.

2026-02-11 03:10:32 UTC

Why I think the government created Bitcoin (and a few predictions)
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-i-think-the-government-created

2026-02-10 03:10:51 UTC

- reply

Yes, in my opinion it didn't happen organically.
In the 2000s China was integrated tightly and the eurodollar bloomed.
China became dollar shock absorber & reserve sink.
Offshoring + overcapacity = disinflation buffer → more room for USD debt growth.
If they kept most of the jobs in the US, they wouldn't be able to QE + ZIRP, otherwise inflation would skyrocket.
From Lyn Alden's latest newsletter:
- "....This is because nearly 90% of stocks are held by the top 10% of society, and that same 10% of society performs nearly 50% of all consumer spending."
I knew that 90% of stocks are held by the top 10%, but didn't know that the top 10% performs 50% of all consumer spending.
This is how you get to QE infinity without having record-high inflation - almost everyone is broke because the manufacturing jobs are in China.

2026-02-09 16:29:27 UTC

- reply

Yes. China and America (aka Chimerica) love each other.
Controllers' lens after the 90s:
US wants:
- cheap imports,
- suppressed goods inflation,
- someone to buy endless Treasuries,
- geopolitical leverage over industrial chains.
China wants:
- export-led growth,
- technology & capital inflows,
- time to build domestic capacity and surveillance apparatus,
- a way to turn sweat + coal into reserves and gold.
So the deal (often framed as "globalization" in official language) is:
- US prints high-quality paper (USTs, Agencies, USD bank liabilities).
- China prints low-wage labor, exports, and real goods.
- China recycles the USD surplus back into US paper.
= ❤️

2026-02-08 05:14:03 UTC

How I know we live under a One World Government
The US, China and Russia are building interoperable programmable, surveilled money, programmable, surveilled movement, programmable, surveilled speech while pretending to hate each other on TV.
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/how-i-know-we-live-under-a-one-world

2026-02-08 03:19:43 UTC

- reply

Here are my top 3 actors at present:
1) Donald Trump
It's a close one between him and #2, but he got the nod because of how he pretended to get shot in the ear. Incredible performance.
He is probably the lowest IQ of the 3, but it doesn't matter because 100D chess.
https://blossom.primal.net/2051faea79e745e159fdbdd6b295e8491d59a96d0fa31b8af006b820807d991b.png
2) Vladimir Putin
This actor served in the KGB (=CIA) eventually reaching the rank of lieutenant colonel. He later auditioned for the role of president and secured the role.
Securing the role was the result of not only the actor’s skill and suitability for the role but also his ability to navigate the complexities of the casting process.
https://blossom.primal.net/03443a94ad6595082230dd54dbef979aea5601b24f17601755b7b2e20bb66690.png
3) Xi Jinping
This actor is a bit stiff. Despite his minimal dialogue, he still contributes to the scene.
https://blossom.primal.net/7bf1d385233e568913351eb45887114e5a14f5d805a03945e673344e3f4949ac.png
Any of these actors can send you to die in a bankers' war of their choosing, inject you with heavy metals for "your safety" for a virus that doesn't exist, and blast you with 5G, while they continue to build the CBDC, Digital ID, AI governance regime.
These actors have coordinated incredibly well while pretending to hate each other:
- Full globalization of fiat + Basel + AML/KYC
- Convergent emergency powers legal structures
- Coordinated CBDC/stablecoin development
- Chokepoint concentration in cloud, OS, payments, comms
- Shared narratives: extremism, disinfo, public health, climate, cyber
These are exactly the systems you'd build if you wanted:
- Programmable, surveilled money
- Programmable, surveilled movement
- Programmable, surveilled speech
across nominally separate "countries".
All of these actors coincidentally support the same direction of the world:
- From anonymous → identified
- From cash → traceable digits
- From ad hoc law → parameterized enforcement
#nevent1q…50j8

2026-02-07 04:05:57 UTC

How the Stock market actually works (each ticker has a role)
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/how-the-stock-market-actually-works

2026-02-06 07:59:06 UTC

All of your favorite Entrepreneurs work for the Government
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/all-of-your-favorite-entrepreneurs

2026-02-05 04:20:57 UTC

- reply

When I first found out about paper Bitcoin (
- The protocol can cap issuance at 21,000,000 BTC.
- Markets can create claims on far more than 21,000,000 BTC.
- More context: https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-bitcoins-21m-cap-is-not-guaranteed
), I got a bit black-pilled on Bitcoin because of the Coordination Tax I've described in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/what-made-me-sell-most-of-my-bitcoin ).
When you raise the problem of paper Bitcoin, captured, retarded influencers hit you with: "I hate to break it to you, but Bitcoin is for everyone."
"Bitcoin is for everyone" is true at the protocol boundary and false in the lived system.
Because the path of least resistance is: paperization + perimeter control. That means other people's choices (custody ETFs, policy clients, protocol-bloat, KYC defaults) directly degrade your outcomes — just like bad drivers raise your accident risk and premiums even if you drive perfectly.
In the lived system most people's incentives are convenience, rebates, and legality.
So power will keep steering the majority into programmable, supervised money, and that majority's behavior redefines the economic surface you live on — even if your keys are perfect.
"Bitcoin is for everyone" is an oversimplification only a retarded/captured (or both) influencer would use.
#nevent1q…em8m