buckyfonds
Control-Plane Capital

Truth seeker

Public Key

npub1x9hghmfunry8wcgg8s8w5e3drmkndw92r8qu0cp2l28u32aqqn9q6p6rta

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsrzm5ta57f3jrhvyyrcrh2vck3amfkhz4pnsw8uq404r7g4wsqfjspz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dsykcwx7

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1x9hghmfunry8wcgg8s8w5e3drmkndw92r8qu0cp2l28u32aqqn9q6p6rta

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-04-29 10:44:47 CEST

The DARPA "entrepreneurs" reading from the same script as always 😂
But guys, I thought Elon Musk and Sam Altman hated each other 😂
They've already sold their souls and they're trying to take as many people with them as possible.
The Amish always knew not to play their Jewish, Satanic games.
Their goal: a One World government that fully replaces God.
Government replaces God when it becomes the highest practical authority over meaning, morality, safety, identity, money, speech, movement, family, life, death, forgiveness, punishment, and the future.
The test is simple:
- Can you say "God says no" and still live?
The more the answer becomes "not really", the more the replacement has already happened.
https://blossom.primal.net/513373ff5aadcdfbde8767be1b4c95ad2ebd896d34ec12a011cbca745b8e0ce8.mp4

2026-04-20 16:38:26 CEST

- reply

Haven't seen this. It's interesting if real. Wouldn't say it proves they faked his death but an interesting "coincidence" for sure.

2026-04-17 10:57:22 CEST

- reply

Backdoored Bitcoin/Monero hardware wallets are much more of a threat than Quantum computing.
There is zero credible evidence that Quantum can be engineered to scale cheaply and reliably enough to be broadly useful, and yet most of the attention is focused on Quantum and not the very likely case that most of the main hardware wallets are backdoored.
This video is great:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCKq9u-AL0A
If you spend some time doing objective research, you'll likely come to the conclusion that there is no neat solution that makes you "immune to the NSA". The best you can do is:
- Make mass, silent theft via one corporate/vended rail impossible,
- Force any serious adversary into messy, noisy, manual operations if they want you specifically.
The only real structural defense is collusion forcing:
- Heterogeneous multi-sig (different vendors + DIY),
- Multi-source entropy (XOR’d seeds),
- Passphrases kept off the compromised device,
- Independent stacks for different key shares.
A state-level actor can plausibly:
- backdoor RNG/nonces,
- exfil keys via signatures,
- coerce vendor into "minor tweaks",
- intercept shipping,
- or just use host+legal leverage.
There are very many attack vectors and in some places, you just have to trust as you can't verify.
Some of the attack vectors:
- Closed-source secure elements with opaque behavior.
- Compromised RNG -> predictable keys.
- Firmware "updates" that:
(a) leak shards,
(b) weaken PIN delays,
(c) selectively target flagged serials.
- Supply chain substitution:
(a) devices swapped in transit,
(b) chips with additional logic embedded.
If we assume Controller-grade adversaries and cooperation leverage over:
- silicon vendors,
- big wallet brands,
- customs/parcel systems,
then for mass-market users:
- "self-custody" often means: "I'm holding a compromised device that behaves like self-custody until it's politically useful to make it misbehave."
And of course, they don't need 100% coverage. If they can de-risk 80-90% of "self-custody" BTC/Monero via:
- hardware design,
- vendor pressure,
- update channels,
then most people hold just another pool of conditionally controllable assets.
Even if they never fully exploit it, the option exists.
If you think hardware wallets being compromised is a bit of a stretch, maybe look into Dual_EC_DRBG, operation Bullrun, Edgehill, the company Crypto AG, operation Rubicon, etc.
https://blossom.primal.net/219618dedfd0b7d99bf43bb8f14eae62742860bfa419689f643dc358a46f9254.png
Who knows what sorts of stuff people like Adam Back and co are up to.
#nevent1q…63cs

2026-04-17 10:13:15 CEST

- reply

All you can do is try to save yourself and your loved ones. Most people will get rekt. That's just how it always goes.
Many of the people who are preparing are misguided as well.
At this point, I think we have to assume that most Bitcoin/Monero hardware wallets are backdoored.
Instead of focusing how we can ensure at least some of the main hardware wallets are not backdoored (which to my knowledge, we can't), we are focusing on how to migrate to government-selected post-quantum scam algorithms and whose coins to freeze.
Most people never learn.
https://blossom.primal.net/b5703fa391d478ed2ffd636b0923640cdc9412c5f93a86e76f3829a6d084d24a.png

2026-04-17 05:33:33 CEST

They are already on their back-up plan. Banks are lending billions to Caiman Islands hedge funds who then buy trillions of Treasuries on leverage while the Fed and the Treasury keep volatility low so the hedge funds don't blow up.
https://blossom.primal.net/f58263667d2dbbae5f6dc091783cbad8567e1e1946a5c61a7ea8a2ab4fa63298.png
After the reset:
- the petrodollar falls,
- Gold is the top-level settlement asset for blocs,
- CBDCs are the day-to-day money,
- and almost everything else is a revocable license.
https://blossom.primal.net/6e13f6ffd94bdcd1ae25a5b92ac7a70c7abfd9637f7a2c5cc3e989ead24a9af3.png
So they certainly have a back-up plan. Hope you do as well.

2026-04-16 13:17:56 CEST

Don't know what to think of this one 😂
Not sure if coincidence or not.
https://blossom.primal.net/70350a44788c6d3d5df9f2b937a4f4fca128a974243249a50d0e11ad93c3bed1.png
If Bitcoin doesn't comply, they'll eventually have to suspend dividends and this thing will tank.

2026-04-16 11:53:18 CEST

The professor Jiang character is very interesting.
Graduated Yale university and used to work for the UN (aka the One World Government organization that sponsors child trafficking and genocide by vaccines).
He was suspected by the Chinese government of spying in 2002 and was deported 😂
Going viral organically doesn't really work in 2026. Platforms like Twitter, Youtube, TikTok, only promote content that pushes the official narrative (so plants and useful idiots).
After watching a few of his videos, I think it is very likely he is an intelligence asset (most likely CIA).
He could be a useful idiot but I find this less likely based on his takes.
It was much easier for intelligence agencies to control people's access to information pre-Covid.
Many more people used to watch mainstream media, but the CIA pushed the propaganda too far.
Once different networks started repeating the same script word for word, people stopped watching and lost trust.
The CIA knew they needed to keep control of the narrative, so they started pushing certain "independent media" personalities.
Tucker Carlson (CIA) got "fired" by Fox news (even though he had the highest ratings 😂) just because people stopped watching TV and the CIA needs him to reach more people.
In many cases, even when professor Jiang is likely correct about his conclusions, his argumentation is so flawed that he ends up pushing people away from the "conspiracy theory".
Watching some of his recent videos remind me of the recent podcast with Joe Rogan and Theo Von.
The whole podcast looked like a hostage video. Both completely compromised (especially Rogan) and terrified to not say something they shouldn't say.
Professor Jiang is a bit more subtle than these guys, but I still find it unlikely he's a useful idiot based on his interviews.
The "this is extremely dangerous to our democracy" moment is probably when the CIA knew they had to focus on pushing the "independent" media personalities.
https://blossom.primal.net/6d5abd78445ae441cb84e7845a311a2abc8399d5786fd1b5c7682c315e9f2b56.mp4
Controlling the media is at the core of the protocols of the learned elders of Zion.
The CIA hasn't given up on propaganda now that mainstream media is cooked (only watched by boomers, retards, and retarded boomers).
https://blossom.primal.net/c811efbbfdf2ad9adaf8461275ae9f31571887068ab0c2327b04b845e45436f3.jpg

2026-04-15 08:27:43 CEST

Great video by Dr. Sam Bailey on how viruses don't exist and have never been isolated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIfcsRJyqs4
Dr. Tom Cowan goes into more detail in this video.
https://rumble.com/v6rh2e3-there-was-no-covid-virus-how-weve-all-been-duped-by-the-medical-establishme.html
When it comes to these massive "conspiracy theories", most people usually say: "There's no way that's true. Do you know how many people would have to be in on it?"
And of course, not very many people would have to be in on it.
Most doctors still vaccinate themselves, their children, and their pets even though vaccines are used to depopulate.
However, many of the main puppet politicians are likely in on it (US, Russia, China, India, Iran, Israel, etc.). The Covid scamdemic was a mask off moment for our One World Government.
https://blossom.primal.net/eb766e62dd1a02eea7e0b26bc00421a890c9cb7b10197bf5b2ea8693aaa3e7e2.jpg

2026-04-13 06:14:05 CEST

- reply

They need to hook this lady up with an earpiece.
https://blossom.primal.net/31186e5ec3abb9bf99872bbe61b9193ad5a8dd0b15681c65e7be1a07ec4ec244.mp4
Allegedly, Christina Koch, one of the Artemis astronauts, is also an actress in Mad Max: Fury Road.
https://blossom.primal.net/5afaab95ea6fd2e7566e8bb0a75dda7692412345299f096b70f52966768e6d4f.webp
https://blossom.primal.net/a86b25e7cdd27f26ecfecd5a57460a2a0b7b027ba6dffae5c6cffe46355d26cb.png
https://blossom.primal.net/8e7d06ae6f392e74fa16c96ff474ba1e85fca2c04f41940a524601c491a026bd.jpg
Big if true.
This is why you hire mainly military personnel and not random actors.
(Unless you're DEI-maxxing)
#nevent1q…4y75

2026-04-12 04:30:11 CEST

- reply

Turns out the Pakistani PM is also a puppet for the US and Israel.
How stupid do you have to be to not remove the "Draft - Pakistan's PM Message on X" line 😂
Welcome to our One World Government
https://blossom.primal.net/0ea2ebf504be1d8c7eb80d29fe0c2aa7ab853e4cef1f04fc987068cb50d51c11.png
#nevent1q…7cwp

2026-04-11 11:13:20 CEST

- reply

As Mark Twain said: "It's easier to fool people than convince them they've been fooled".
When most people get triggered, they get emotional and their intellect switch turns off.
So they don't have to be retards to believe in the moon landings, they just have to be uninformed, heavily invested, or both.

2026-04-11 10:01:09 CEST

- reply

I'd be interested if any of the moon landing believers, who are intellectually honest, can watch this logical analysis and still come out on the other side as believers.
Matt Walsh pushes all of the same logical fallacies in the video below.
Try and see if you can objectively examine the evidence (or the lack thereof), or whether you'll enter into a cope spiral.
Starts at 10:30
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lnBFABSbRMA
#nevent1q…zj07

2026-04-03 08:01:34 CEST

- reply

Maybe I worded it wrong. They don't necessarily have to be in on it. They can just be the useful idiots who were allowed to lever up and provided exit liquidity for the big boys.
Saylor had a failing company until he switched to a Bitcoin treasury. The only reason his model worked is because the banksters allowed it.
Adam Back has been on Epstein island and seems completely compromised.
Jack Mallers was calling out Epstein's banker and then proceeded to start a company with Epstein's neighbour.
Reading motives is hard unless you have all the information and I certainly don't.

2026-04-02 14:04:59 CEST

- reply

Francis Hunt has theorized that Saylor, Jack Mallers (Howard Luttnick), Adam Backstein, and co have had the task of providing exit liquidity for the big boys (insider whales) for the last ~2 years.
It is a very interesting theory considering that with all the corporate stacking, we're back at 2021 price levels on Bitcoin.
There is no way to get to lever up the way Saylor, Mallers and co are doing unless the banksters allow you to.
We also kept hearing about how there was no retail interest during the last bull market.
Of course, there was retail interest, but the interest was mostly amongst retail plebs whereas retail whales were looking for the exit.
Businesses in the chart below are mostly treasury companies, and individuals are mostly retail whales.
Do these whales who bought way cheaper have insider information in terms of what governments are cooking?
Last midterm year (2022), the US (Israeli) government created the Scam Bankmann Fried character. This midterm year, they'll probably come up with scammy Quantum computing "breakthroughs".
Expect more and more attacks on Bitcoin/Monero as we transition to CBDCs.
https://blossom.primal.net/6e13f6ffd94bdcd1ae25a5b92ac7a70c7abfd9637f7a2c5cc3e989ead24a9af3.png
#nevent1q…k7ax

2026-04-02 08:10:55 CEST

- reply

Jeff Booth cryptically describes the Coordination Tax ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoin-will-fail-as-mass-non-custodial ).
And the reaction to Covid is a great example of how Bitcoiners will react to the Quantum scam.
I used the same example in my first Quantum article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/is-quantum-computing-a-threat-to ).
https://blossom.primal.net/87f0f63b24b0822802981223a040ee8aa4f34477aa87fbec81fbbab0b393149f.png
During Covid (no virus has ever been isolated):
Government: "Citizen, we'd really like you to take this safe and effective vaccine to protect your grandma. It's free... and you must get it... or you will be responsible for killing your grandma."
Quantum (never been proven to scale cheaply and reliably enough to be broadly useful):
Government: "For your safety, dear Bitcoiners, we'd really like you to migrate to these algorithms we have selected for you. If you don't comply, Bitcoin will get hacked and you will lose everything by 20XX."
Most Bitcoiners don't care about (1) how a potential Quantum-resistance upgrade would castrate Bitcoin as money ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/a-quantum-resistance-upgrade-would ), or (2) whether scalable fault-tolerant quantum computing is economically (or operationally) viable, they care about NGU.
A serious quantum-resistant upgrade for Bitcoin almost certainly means: much bigger transactions, faster chain growth, higher node requirements, and thus either (a) fewer transactions per block on L1 or (b) bigger blocks and more centralization pressure.
As I wrote in the "A Quantum-resistance upgrade would be terrible for Bitcoin" article:
- A quantum-resistance upgrade for Bitcoin would be one of the most complex, politically loaded, and coordination-fragile events in its history. It touches every private key, every wallet, every L2, every custody stack. It's also a perfect vector for capture, centralization, and "safety"-framed control.
#nevent1q…juau

2026-04-02 07:13:28 CEST

- reply

Her heart is at the right place, but she is so brainwashed, it's hard to listen to.
(1) Somehow she noticed that when the covid plandemic started hospitals were empty while the media was reporting they were overrun.
Proceeds to say they noticed the same patterns they noticed during the regular flu season.
(Spoiler alert covid didn't exist - https://rumble.com/v6rh2e3-there-was-no-covid-virus-how-weve-all-been-duped-by-the-medical-establishme.html )
(2) She then noticed that hospitals were paid handsomely to "treat" (poison) patients using Remdesivir.
(3) Hospitals had never seen patients so inflamed, so she assumes patients were inflamed because of covid and not because of poisoning them with vaccines and Remdesivir 😂
(4) She then says that hospitals were not allowed to treat the inflammation with steroids even though these steroids were shown to be effective.
She wants to treat the symptom of poisoning her patients with Remdesivir by administering steroids (another big pharma poisonous concoction)
(5) She then noticed that after they injected their patients with the covid shots, hospitals actually got overrun. So they finally managed to fill the hospitals by poisoning people with the covid jab.
Her manager told her "Gale, this hospital has had 3 times more admissions than we have ever had since the hospital opened the doors. A 300% increase in hospitalizations directly associated to the onset of the covid shots."
Open your eyes, lady.
https://blossom.primal.net/358bd13c44630a647175ae4cc09f73bec4c7d23f105e0dff29c4f1efdbc73cce.jpg
#nevent1q…3plu

2026-04-01 04:31:35 CEST

- reply

Haven't had the chance to read Google's new paper from yesterday yet.
"Securing Elliptic Curve Cryptocurrencies against Quantum Vulnerabilities: Resource Estimates and Mitigations"
- https://research.google/blog/safeguarding-cryptocurrency-by-disclosing-quantum-vulnerabilities-responsibly/
Just wanted to CTRL + F for the "national security" section and it is as bad as I thought and covered in "A Quantum-resistance upgrade would be terrible for Bitcoin" ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/a-quantum-resistance-upgrade-would )
https://blossom.primal.net/ce371174d9eeed543eafe2085fb3e0dcb4e6240bd2bf8cd8c2258c331dfeb658.png
"As before, blockchain's loss of the ability to reliably identify asset owners combined with the laches doctrine enables governments to argue that the original owners, through years of inaction, have failed to assert their property rights."
I already covered why I think Bitcoin is goy gold in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-i-think-the-government-created )
#nevent1q…3glm

2026-03-30 16:17:09 CEST

- reply

Is Bitcoin Core gay or straight? 🤔
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5a7QjY4XKA
#nevent1q…v50s

2026-03-28 03:23:46 CET

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/f571257a946479e8113bb58cf1c525bff3b485b0ebf67852f4f648d44c58a40b.jpg
#nevent1q…wzp4

2026-03-27 15:11:15 CET

- reply

David Rogers Webb made 2 documentaries because most people won't read the book (and don't have to):
1) https://odysee.com/@EarthNewspaper:e/The-Great-Taking-by-David-Rodgers-Webb:3
2) https://rumble.com/v6qy8lo-stop-it-the-great-taking-documentary.html

2026-03-27 15:09:35 CET

- reply

When I first figured out that viruses don't exist and vaccines are used to depopulate, I wanted to tell everyone and their mother.
Some people are open-minded and want to objectively investigate the evidence for themselves. Them you can try and help.
On the other hand, most people effectively turn into Mr Smith (a defender of the genocidal state) and attack you.
https://blossom.primal.net/d65bb81ff6b2240bb911fae89065729a3bfd356d89f6e71e80d2122e68d2cebc.jpg
At first, I tried to help them figure things out, but eventually, I stopped trying.
As Mark Twain said: "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they've been fooled."
This is more of an issue when it comes to people in your life (friends/family).
Some of your friends/family are probably capable of using logic and the rest are probably the average NPC.
What works best for convincing the second group is - pain and suffering, or if you're a winner.
If you're a winner and things just work for you, people tend to listen even if you come at them with "crazy conspiracy theories".
#nevent1q…te2a

2026-03-27 12:23:16 CET

Even with all the implicit and explicit yield curve control, bond yields are slowly rising.
https://blossom.primal.net/220d4c4ef87283175d51ef9d636da08108fdb392b71160f6aa4b555cbd353e6a.png
I am of the opinion that the Controllers can prolong the fiat ponzi for much longer than most think, but will eventually decide to rug.
Why? Because all fiat currencies eventually fail, and the Controllers will definitely decide to fail the current financial system in a carefully preplanned fashion to avoid excess chaos.
https://blossom.primal.net/6e13f6ffd94bdcd1ae25a5b92ac7a70c7abfd9637f7a2c5cc3e989ead24a9af3.png
If markets were efficient, bond yields would be in the double digits (and then most would realize that with current debt levels this is game over).
However, markets are efficient to constraints.
Most of the bond holders in the system are captive - meaning they are aware that it is a mathematical certainty they will get robbed if they buy bonds, but they are forced to.
So bond yields are fake and managed, just like the prices of most, if not all, assets.
Yield Curve Control (YCC) = Central Bank commits to cap yields on some part of the curve (say 10Y at 4.25%). If yields try to rise above the cap, Central Bank buys bonds in unlimited size to enforce the level.
It's a way to say:
"Beyond this point, the bond market no longer gets to vote on our fiscal/monetary mix."
Yield Curve Control is the bridge that lets the Controllers carry an insane nominal debt pile through inflation surges, regime shifts, and crises, without allowing yields to reflexively spike and force default.
With YCC, the curve is no longer a sensor; it's a policy-controlled output.
You often hear about explicit YCC (Japan style), but the whole fake fiat system is designed around implicit YCC.
The logical question is:
- "Who are these rich retards who keep buying bonds and keep getting robbed just so they can fund their own enslavement?"
Most people/companies who have lots of money usually know that owning bonds is a losing proposition, so you have to force them to buy your useless paper.
States design the rules so that banks, insurers, pensions, and autopilot funds end up long bonds, and then bonds get expropriated in real terms.
This is the path of least resistance.
Retail with direct bonds is rounding error.
So the bondholders are the institutional skeleton that anchors the regime: states, banks, pensions, insurers, big funds, and foreign sovereigns.
Why them?
Because they are controllable, slow, diffuse, and essential. They can't easily run, can't easily revolt, and can be quietly sheared to fund whatever comes next (AI governance).

2026-03-27 10:39:14 CET

- reply

Perhaps, the most important question of our time:
- What would have to happen for a few dozen people to enslave a few billion people?
A very compressed TL;DR
The hardest truth is that a few dozen people do not enslave billions by being superhuman.
They do it by sitting above systems that most people cannot see, cannot exit, and cannot coordinate against.
The public usually imagines slavery as maximal visible brutality.
But the more durable form is:
- administratively soft,
- technologically deep,
- financially integrated,
- morally justified,
- narratively fragmented,
- and psychologically internalized.
In that form, many slaves call themselves free because they can still choose entertainment, careers, identities, purchases, opinions, and aesthetic tribes inside the cage.
That is the real danger.
So, for a few dozen people to effectively enslave a few billion people, they would need:
- monopoly on force as backstop,
- dominance over money and payments,
- universal identity and legibility,
- integrated surveillance and behavioral telemetry,
- control over media, prestige, and the language of legitimacy,
- the ability to punish through exclusion rather than visible violence,
- destruction of horizontal trust and local autonomy,
- a dependent "middle class", not a starving mass,
- fusion of state, corporate, legal, media, and financial power,
- a population fragmented into isolated individuals and reactive tribes,
- permanent crisis to justify centralization,
- and a permissioned lifeworld where survival, mobility, work, savings, and speech all depend on system-compatible access.
That is how a few dozen could rule billions.
Not by owning every mind.
By owning the rails that decide what happens to people who do not comply.
#nevent1q…wpz4

2026-03-27 10:15:58 CET

- reply

Precisely. Guys like him should stop and ask themselves: "How has 'serving your country' worked out for your country?"
Considering it is now run by pedophiles, probably not great.

2026-03-27 10:10:14 CET

- reply

Most people will do whatever they think is in their short-term interest. It's that simple.
Which is why the corrupt media and influencers romanticize war and "serving your country" so much.
The only way this changes is if becoming a mercenary for the government becomes expensive and looked down upon.

2026-03-27 08:45:23 CET

- reply

Listened to the Tucker Carlson interview with James (Jim) Webb, the 3rd generation Marine "war hero" who served the Controllers and further enslaved his descendants.
If this weren't so sad it would be funny.
1) You go and kill people on the other side of the world.
2) You possibly lose your soul and/or your life.
3) The people who are enslaving your family steal the resources of the people you killed.
4) Your family gets further and further enslaved.
5) Brainwashed NPCs thank you for your service to the Controllers.
They never stop and ask: "How many people actually make the decision to start a war?", "Who are these people?", "What are their actual interests and do they converge with the interests of your family?".
As Henry Kissinger said: "Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy."
Young, healthy men who are able and willing to protect their family are going to be a problem for their governments after the coming financial reset.
The two most likely solutions are wars and vaccines.
I have all the respect in the world for anyone who protects their friends and family, and none for brainwashed, glorified, government yes-men.
#nevent1q…sx37

2026-03-18 06:15:50 CET

Joe Kent, the US Director of the National Counter-terrorism Center just resigned.
https://blossom.primal.net/a7f3f4a4e917c7f46cfaf87da73139f0a6ce6cb29ed503fc77ff96792fe0386b.png
https://blossom.primal.net/f8731985d9a9f1054801e10cbe7da486a912d5bb98cf1bd93010f17ed8b7c719.png
This guy has the highest security clearance in the entire US government, so if I had to guess, he probably has good reasons to believe this war won't end anytime soon.
Also, "Director of the National Counter-terrorism Center".
Most of the terrorism throughout the world is perpetrated by the CIA and Mossad (practically the same thing).
The CIA has almost always used false flags to get Americans to support the next big bankers' war. However, this time there was no false flag and most Americans are seemingly opposed to this war.
Did this guy think that there would be a false flag CIA operation to get more people to support this war?
He "lost his life in a war manufactured by Israel", and, it was highly likely they were going to use him as a scapegoat for future false flags.
As Henry Kissinger wold say: "Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy."
https://blossom.primal.net/5224a7878d099712ccd7d4dddf24917a9efd46837452ede61fd3193f4b4ad62b.jpg
It seems to me the US is using this war because they need a plausible reason to step down from dollar hegemony ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/the-us-israel-war-with-iran-brings ).
US hegemony is expensive and brittle:
- Dollar as sole reserve demands large, persistent deficits.
- Weaponized finance (sanctions, seizures) pushes others to defect.
A perceived defeat / stalemate against Iran provides a reason to frame:
- partial dedollarization,
- more multipolar arrangements,
- more gold-based settlement,
as reluctant necessity rather than voluntary surrender.
The Controllers effectively want to move from US-dollar hegemon to multi-bloc gold-backed settlement without a clean "US surrender".
They need a credible geopolitical reason for:
- US relative humiliation,
- reserve shifts,
- new settlement arrangements,
without making it look like a board (One World Government) decision.
You can think of it this way:
- Current system = dollar + US Treasuries as core reserve/collateral.
- Endgame = fiat currencies float, but physical gold is the final settlement asset between blocs (tokenized, physical, or rewriting ledgers in warehouses throughout the world).
From last year: "China is considering setting up overseas gold warehouses to support international settlements via the Shanghai Gold Exchange, according to the People’s Bank of China (PBOC). This move aims to expand the use of the RMB benchmark internationally. The Shanghai International Gold Exchange is key to China’s de-dollarization push, offering RMB reserve holders the opportunity to convert into gold. The RMB is now used for most inbound and outbound transactions, according to the China State Administration of Foreign Exchange."
( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/what-our-financial-system-will-look )

2026-03-16 14:55:23 CET

- reply

How Oil is used as a hidden tax dial
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/how-oil-is-used-as-a-hidden-tax-dial
#nevent1q…jmve

2026-03-16 12:23:34 CET

- reply

UBI is a bit different in terms of:
1. Universality
- Welfare: targeted; you get it only if you pass means tests, specific conditions.
- UBI: default for everyone in-system.
- This removes some stigma, massively broadens dependency on the State rail.
2. Automation + digitization
- Old welfare: messy bureaucracy, paper forms, case workers.
- UBI: automated through CBDC + ID + AI: easy to adjust, integrated with tax & enforcement, fully surveilled.
3. Integration with macro policy
- Welfare: budget decision, somewhat disconnected from high-frequency macro.
- UBI: can be tuned algorithmically: raise by X in recessions or plandemics, cut in "overheating", modulate by region, etc.
In the current world, welfare is effectively a patch on "capitalism".
UBI will be presented as a new operating system: "We're in the post-work, AI age. This is your share of progress... as long as you obey (accept certain "health"/ID/compliance steps)."
So UBI will become the moral anchor that justifies a lot of other control.

2026-03-16 12:14:29 CET

- reply

There is no mass solution. Everyone has to find a solution for themselves.
Yes, in an ideal world, you could help the less fortunate with a monthly stipend. In the current regime, they effectively become a weapon for the state.
The Great Taking is true in the sense that they can legally steal people's assets, whether they decide to do it is the question.

2026-03-16 12:08:31 CET

- reply

Most workers could become obsolete over a relatively short period of time (years, not decades) due to AI and robotics.
Yes, UBI will be inflationary - just like Covid stimulus checks were inflationary. However, mass job losses and AI + robotics are deflationary, so UBI effectively undoes the deflation and adds inflation on top.
They effectively steal most of the productivity that would have otherwise flowed to society.
UBI only makes sense when coupled with CBDCs and Digital ID.
Each UBI recipient must:
- have a legal identity,
- be KYC'ed in a compliant wallet,
- link to an address/jurisdiction.
The shift produces a large, semi-dispossessed class who:
- can't rebuild real assets easily,
- are structurally less employable in the old sense,
- are still needed as consumers and as "consent mass".
The question for states is:
- "How do we stop these people from becoming an unmanageable insurgency, while still keeping them in the system and consuming?"
The answer is UBI.
Problem: manage surplus humans in an automated, high-control economy.
Solution 1: UBI.
Solution 2: Vaccines and war.
https://blossom.primal.net/0624156192e4d111a790e9e701985cf82181265ed346e10ff1a3e6c0274e80ee.jpg

2026-03-16 08:47:15 CET

Elon Musk keeps spamming this "universal high income" nonsense 😂
"All jobs will be optional. There will be universal high income."
What could possibly go wrong if you put every citizen on the State's payroll? Surely, they won't abuse UBI (Universal Basic Income) in any way.
https://blossom.primal.net/5b5acc028bfe2d0cf44f772d97ba43670bea0b3ba22785b9271b6110b87776fa.png
Unfortunately, UBI is going to be inevitable.
And UBI is not just "free money" as Elon would like you to believe. It's a control rail to manage the losers of the reset, stabilize consumption and harden behavioral obedience.
Unfortunately, it's not about "ending poverty" 😂
UBI is a centrally engineered, always-on income stream from the State to individuals, delivered through traceable digital channels, with conditions hiding inside the surrounding system (ID, tax, social credit, eligibility rules).
UBI is going to be perfect for soft policing:
- Carrot: "Behave, and your floor is guaranteed."
- Stick: "Break certain rules (tax, "health", speech, protest in the wrong way), and administratively you can be investigated, delayed, or temporarily cut off."
It is a perfect on-ramp to the CBDC + ID stack. "To get your UBI, you must:"
- register your digital wallet,
- verify your ID,
- keep your biometrics up to date,
- accept the terms (AML, travel-rule, etc.).
That brings everyone into the rails they already want for tax, surveillance, and capital controls.
So essentially, UBI = social shock absorber + behavioral throttle after they've run the Great Reset.

2026-03-15 02:23:06 CET

- reply

It's much worse than censoring jew posts.
Elon's masters are building the non-Chinese WeChat - a state-compatible super-app.
All content and metadata are available to the state under low friction.
Payments and IDs will tightly coupled to real-world identity and bank/CBDC rails (social scoring).

2026-03-14 11:27:51 CET

- reply

The awakening after the Covid scamdemic sped up the execution of the script. The more their deception is uncovered, the more the Controllers have to act.
This year is going to be crazy.

2026-03-14 10:08:00 CET

If the name of a company contains the words "truth", "honesty", "transparency", "safety", etc., you can be almost certain it's a scam.
Shout-out to "truth social" 😂
Inversion is the core operating pattern for modern control systems.
Inversion = when the label and the function trade places.
- "Freedom" rails used to tighten control.
- "Safety" doctrines used to centralize risk.
- "Decentralized" tools pinned to centralized choke-points.
- "Protection of property rights" used to rewrite who owns what.
- "Transparency" means: you are transparent; the system is not.
Blunt tools:
- naked expropriation,
- open censorship,
- outright bans,
- top-down classification,
... all burn legitimacy and trigger resistance.
Inversion is cheaper:
1) It piggybacks on real desires:
- "Protect my kids."
- "Prevent the next 2008."
- "Save the planet."
- "Give me better UX."
2) It lets the Controllers pose as:
- protectors,
- technocratic fixers,
- responsible adults
…while the actual consequence is: tighter rails, fewer exits, more programmable constraints.
3) It's self-enforcing:
- people defend the inverted rail because they're attached to the original value word.
If you attack the rail, most people hear "you hate safety / fairness / the planet / children".
So inversion is not decorative; it's the main way to turn:
- legitimate needs -> high-acceptance control systems.

2026-03-14 02:46:35 CET

- reply

I think it's very unlikely for Bitcoin held in self-custody (properly) to end up being a rugpull because the government would much rather you own Bitcoin than physical gold or something like Monero.
Based on my research, in 99% of cases, the government would prefer you own Bitcoin than physical gold.
The other 1% of cases are mostly people who move 8-9-10 figures in Bitcoin to finance groups the government doesn't like (very rare).
So I don't think governments wan to rug Bitcoin, but that doesn't mean they execute everything perfectly and don't overshoot.
One area where they might overshoot is the Quantum scam ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/a-quantum-resistance-upgrade-would ).
At present, nearly 90% of stocks are held by the top 10% of society, and that same 10% of society performs nearly 50% of all consumer spending.
So wealth is very concentrated (mostly amongst boomers as you said).
For them to run the Great Taking, they don't actually need to rug most of the population.
As you said, younger cohorts are still on average much more dangerous than older ones - which is why you build the control rails (Palantir/MSFT/ID/CBDC), and send some of them to die in senseless wars.
It's going to be tough to get young people to organize if 1/5th of the people in their country were imported in the last 10 years (mass migration).
Running the Great Taking is still very risky.
If I am correct that they want to reset, they likely want to keep Bitcoin as a plan B in case they aren't able to execute Freegold cleanly (which would be relatively low probability but enormous upside).
I need to write more on demographics because it's very important and nuanced, but TL;DR:
The developed world ran:
- a demographic Ponzi (ever-growing base),
- layered with a financial Ponzi (ever-growing claims).
Fertility collapse + aging = demographic Ponzi is over.
Debt explosion + low real growth = financial Ponzi is over.
Controllers now need some combination of:
- expropriation (Great Taking),
- re-basing (Freegold + inflation),
- control rails (Palantir/MSFT/ID/CBDC),
- and carefully managed leaks (BTC, physical gold in private hands).
Demographics is the slow needle that burst the illusion that you can:
- promise infinite pensions,
- with finite young workers,
- and never have to choose who eats the loss.
In other words, demographics is the deep constraint surface the rest of the game is played on.

2026-03-14 02:08:28 CET

- reply

No one said anything about "viruses dying" in any of the videos I've posted.
You couldn't even watch the Kim Iversen interview (60 min) before coming out with your straw man, red herring, false analogy logical fallacies.
Scientists can't even see a unique particle. They say you can't do that and they've never done that, so where did the "can't be isolated from host cells without dying" argument come from? Your imagination.
Scientists say there's not enough of these particles to see.
There are over 200 FOIA requests to the CDC, NIH, and the Robert Koch institute asking for pictures of these unique particles from any fluid of a sick person, and the response is that it can't be done in virology.
Your bad faith straw man argument is an instant mute.
It's all good though, you can keep trusting the science.

2026-03-13 15:01:11 CET

- reply

That's a great question and the answer is - I don't know for sure, which is why I advocate for owning both (bitcoin and gold).
It is possible that some governments are accumulating BTC behind the scenes, although I haven't seen any credible evidence.
I like to read revealed preference - you prefer X over Y if, when offered both, you choose X. So far in my view, revealed preference points to gold.
You are looking at this from the multipolar (competing governments) viewpoint, whereas in my opinion we live under something very close to a One World Government ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/how-i-know-we-live-under-a-one-world ).
With countries representing 98% of global GDP developing/implementing CBDCs, the level of coordination is striking.
https://blossom.primal.net/6e13f6ffd94bdcd1ae25a5b92ac7a70c7abfd9637f7a2c5cc3e989ead24a9af3.png
BTC's settlement doesn't require state-controlled rails, which in my opinion is not something the Controllers are likely to embrace.
This would destroy their ability to weaponize monetary rails.
As you noted gold reserves of the West are very opaque.
Only a small portion of gold buying by Central Banks is reported, and usually mostly by Emerging Market Central Banks.
G7 can’t be seen stampeding into gold. If you're running the incumbent fiat+bond system (US, Eurocore), it is suicidal optics to visibly join the gold rush.
If the US or major euro Central Banks started aggressively buying gold, the obvious signal to foreign creditors and domestic savers is:
- “We are preparing for currency debasement / reserve system change.”
That would basically nuke the bond market.
Also, the moment you say "we’re buying gold because it’s the ultimate money", you implicitly admit:
- "Your pensions and savings are sitting in a debasing unit we control."
That's a legitimacy grenade.
The official script still needs:
- "fiat is fine",
- "the dollar/euro are stable reserve currencies",
- "gold is just another reserve asset, barbarous relic, diversification".
If you visibly act like a goldbug, you blow up that narrative.
I have written more about why I think all roads lead to gold in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/all-roads-lead-to-gold ).
If you look at the EU architecture, it is practically the Freegold model ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/mario-draghi-revealed-the-plan-for ).
Euro was deliberately designed so that:
- Gold is not legally "backing" the currency (no fixed parity),
- But is held on the Eurosystem balance sheet,
- And crucially, marked to market regularly in euros.
I can write more on this and this is something I've done a lot of research on, but many people in positions of power and many bankers have slipped over the years (have given away that for them gold is the final store-of-value). I could probably write a 100 more articles like the Mario Draghi one just analyzing how different individuals in positions of power give up the game.
If you want to look at it from a darker point of view - if the Controllers are thinking in global balance-sheet terms, it's coherent:
1) You want the manufacturing/real-asset bloc (China + some EM) to survive the reset with:
- enough private wealth in hard assets to keep working,
- enough sovereign + household gold to have credibility in the Freegold world.
2) You want the rentier/consumption bloc (US/EU middle classes) to bear a bigger share of the claim destruction, because:
- their wealth is easier to dematerialize,
- their consumption can be cut without immediate loss of productive capacity.
Hence the asymmetry:
- West: encourage paper, discourage gold.
- China: accept/encourage physical gold accumulation.
Chinese state-linked media regularly push narratives like "gold is a safe long-term store of value" and encourage retail buying. The West, not so much.
Ultimately, I don't have any insider information, so all I can do is read incentives based on the information that I have and guess.

2026-03-13 14:23:43 CET

- reply

> I certainly became wealthier fiat wise, but I didn’t sign up for another shitcoin copy of Ethereum.
Yes, the "I certainly became wealthier" part is how I cope as well.
> The greatest disappointed for me tho was how naive, stupid and two-dimensional Bitcoiners ended up to be.
I am very bearish on any community (Bitcoiners included). I just was stuck in podcast hopium land (mainly Jeff Booth) up until I started doing my own research.
I was high on protocol-level truth hopium (consensus rules, proof-of-work, 21M cap, etc.), and ignored the fact that protocol truth without perimeter control is a philosophical win and a market loss.
To be fair, I'd be more bullish on a community that has a single goal and some courage than a community that is pulling in ten different directions.
Once I realized that Bitcoin's survival and adoption depend on whether its most committed users can detect, coordinate, and counter inevitable policy, market, and social attacks, I pretty much checked out mentally to be honest.

2026-03-13 12:30:51 CET

- reply

Give the videos a shot if you want.

2026-03-13 12:28:57 CET

- reply

I try to be a freedom maxi. Whatever gives you the most freedom is what you should use.
I've covered what made me fall out of love with Bitcoin in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoin-will-fail-as-mass-non-custodial ).
TL;DR - no privacy by default, DEI developers who've been attacking its sovereign/MoE use, L2s seem like a failed project at least from the mass, non-custodial use viewpoint, etc.
The community having to coordinate to defend Bitcoin from attackers all of the time (the Coordination tax I've written about) is why I think we'll be stuck in infinite "Bitcoin wars":
- Core v30 — Inscriptions / spam vs "art" (ongoing)
- Taint, "clean UTXOs" & compliant-Bitcoin vs grey-Bitcoin
- Node liability & "publisher" / CSAM / sanctions content
- Quantum-resistance, key-rotation & "lost coins"
- Paperization & "wrapped Bitcoin" vs base-layer Bitcoin
- Protocol ossification vs "surgery to survive"
- Blockspace & "digital cash vs data chain" (the rematch)
The Core v30 fiasco and how many people updated their node software by default, was a big wake up call for me.
If I immerse myself in all of this garbage, I'll probably start aging in dog years.

2026-03-13 09:43:37 CET

- reply

Well, your lived experience, just like mine, is that we have been brainwashed from the day we were born.
My assertion is that no virus exists, not that just Covid doesn't exist.
1) https://rumble.com/v6rh2e3-there-was-no-covid-virus-how-weve-all-been-duped-by-the-medical-establishme.html
2) https://www.bitchute.com/video/pWcHXqLDVvYL
3) https://www.bitchute.com/video/URcvRFVibHJF
No virus has ever been isolated. Vaccines are used to depopulate.
Your cousin got sick of something (doesn't mean it was Covid), even if she had a positive Covid test.
Falsification is independent of replacement and the burden of proof is on the one making the positive claim.
In other words, if you say that Covid exists, you ought to isolate the virus and prove it and so far no virus has ever been isolated as shown in the 2 documentaries above.
You can't conclude that your cousin was sick from Covid just because she was sick.
In regards to nuclear weapons, I wrote that there is no evidence that anyone has ever split an atom and nuclear weapons as advertised exist. That doesn't mean that very powerful bombs don't exist.
1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6oGXzXz6yQ
The podcast I've linked to above has all of the receipts. There is no evidence that an atom has ever been split.
There was a study published in The Journal of the American Medical Association in 1990. The 40-year study of thousands of Japanese who survived the "atomic bombs" dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki found radiation exposure did not cause genetic damage that could lead to human mutations.
"intense study of 70,000 offspring of atomic bomb survivors has failed to identify an increase in congential abnormalities, cancer, chromosome aberrations or mutational blood protein changes."
All of the receipts are in the podcast I've linked to (peer-reviewed scientific journals).
The Japanese people likely got firebombed.
"It is an established fact that napalm chemical firebombing of wooden Japanese cities was extremely destructive. In May 1945, Tokyo was hit with incendiary payloads from 334 B-29 Superfortresses, burning 16 square miles and destroying more than half of the city. The Hiroshima operation involved 4 sq. miles. Using the Tokyo ratio, it could have been achieved with 83 planes.
Hiroshima was a wooden shantytown constructed in a concentrated area. It was a sitting duck for a carefully crafted firebombing terror attack with an atomic-bomb psyop added on for full effect."
There are literally pictures of concrete buildings that survived a ground zero atomic blast. Hiroshima looks carpet-bombed.
I'd focus more on the "viruses don't exist" part because very many people poison themselves and their loved ones with vaccines.
Whether somebody gets bombed with an "atomic bomb" or gets fire-bombed, the end result is likely the same.

2026-03-13 05:17:38 CET

Like every other war, the US-Israel war with Iran is a bankers' war ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/the-us-israel-war-with-iran-brings ).
What has become more obvious now than ever is how our overlord bankers use the price of oil as a hidden tax dial for mass control.
Oil is not just a commodity, it's the broadest fastest, least-voted-on tax lever in the system.
It is uniquely useful because it sits upstream of almost everything:
- transport,
- agriculture,
- mining,
- chemicals,
- plastics,
- shipping,
- aviation,
- diesel backup power,
- military logistics,
- construction,
- emergency response,
- food distribution.
So when oil rises, the public does not experience it as "oil rose".
We experience it as:
- fuel rose,
- food rose,
- freight rose,
- airline tickets rose,
- packaging rose,
- fertilizer rose,
- heating and backup-power costs rose,
- then everything else rose with a lag.
That makes oil completely different from other commodities (e.g. copper, lumber).
Oil is a tax dial because it:
- reaches everyone,
- hits quickly,
- is hard to avoid,
- is regressive,
- and gets blamed on "markets", "wars", "greed", or "unexpected events" instead of on a direct policy choice.
If you are trying to extract purchasing power from a population without openly voting for a tax increase, oil is almost ideal.
The beauty of oil for the Controllers is that it behaves like a tax that:
- does not need parliamentary approval,
- does not show up on a clean line item,
- can be blamed on foreigners, cartels, speculators, weather, pipelines, war, or "global supply-demand",
- and can be selectively reversed when politically necessary.
Oil lets the Controllers do four things at once:
1. Extract disposable income
- households spend more on essentials,
- less remains for discretionary consumption,
- private-sector demand cools without an explicit austerity vote.
2. Discipline labor
- people under energy/food stress become more job-dependent,
- strike appetite falls,
- mobility falls,
- tolerance for shitty real wages rises because survival takes priority over bargaining.
3. Reprice assets
- high oil feeds inflation,
- inflation feeds rate pressure,
- higher rates hit duration and leverage,
- the sacrifice layer gets squeezed.
(We are in the discipline <by default> period - midterm year)
https://blossom.primal.net/95eabcb1a428c85c085bdfc2945c12ab769ead7fb358a47e65c836c978553d2c.webp
4. Reallocate wealth upward and outward
- from consumers to producers,
- from importers to exporters,
- from weak countries to hard-currency/commodity powers,
- from households to states and systemically important firms.
So oil is more than an "inflation input". It is a transfer mechanism.
Oil is one of the most efficient system-wide coercion levers because it hits:
- households,
- firms,
- currencies,
- rates,
- and sovereign stability
all at once.
The Controllers use it to:
- extract purchasing power invisibly,
- discipline labor and weaker states,
- create inflation justification,
- trigger asset repricing,
- consolidate ownership,
- and preserve optionality for the eventual patch/reset.
To be clear, I'm not saying they perfectly control every print. They do it through:
- shipping and insurance friction,
- underinvestment,
- producer coordination,
- sanctions and waivers,
- reserve releases/refills,
- refinery/product bottlenecks,
- futures/plumbing influence,
- and dollar-liquidity interaction.

2026-03-11 14:34:19 CET

The US-Israel war with Iran brings us closer to the Great Reset
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/the-us-israel-war-with-iran-brings

2026-03-10 04:09:10 CET

- reply

My exchange froze my account over a UTXO consolidation 😂
They eventually unfroze it but it was a good wake up call for me

2026-03-09 09:41:24 CET

- reply

Our lord and savior Thomas Massie also seems to stay away from these topics.
#nevent1q…4530

2026-03-09 04:59:27 CET

The more and more people start waking up, the more and more the script's execution has to speed up.
Once a good enough portion of the population starts asking questions such as these, you're on borrowed time:
- How many people did it take to make a decision to close down the world in 2020 due to a "virus" that doesn't exist and was never isolated?
- How many people did it take to make a decision to start poisoning the world's population by injecting them with heavy metals (vaccines)?
- How many people does it take to make a decision to start a war because of "nuclear weapons" that don't exist? What about a world war?
- How many people does it take to make a decision to incinerate our savings?
- How many people will it take to make a decision to run the Great Taking (which is now legal in the entire world) and expropriate practically everyone.
And the answer to these questions is - not that many. Probably less than a few dozen.
Look at this poor bastard with his stupid mask pretending to take the Covid vaccine.
https://blossom.primal.net/eb766e62dd1a02eea7e0b26bc00421a890c9cb7b10197bf5b2ea8693aaa3e7e2.jpg
The leader of the "opposition" then proceeded to convince his people to inject themselves with poison to protect them from a virus that doesn't exist.
Of course, like every other leader that matters, he's part of the club.
There's no solution from within the system.
The solution is: keep your health and wealth outside the system and stay armed to be able to defend yourself and your loved ones.
Try to be more self-sufficient every month. Be more Amish.
History rhymes.
The Controllers have repeatedly:
- overloaded the claim-stacks,
- centralized ledgers and custody,
- detonated a crisis at a convenient time,
- swept / rewritten claims,
- and rebooted the same control architecture with upgraded rails.
https://blossom.primal.net/4fd4011596a18610d337d5e8f5b859e1901c40c08b9872dd4542ab8a8c2052da.jpg
It's not a matter of if but when.
At some point, more and more people will stop playing games that cannot be won (at scale) which will inevitably speed up the execution of the script.
The "everything bubble" was used for the AI governance buildout (a.k.a the AI bubble if you listen to mainstream media).
https://blossom.primal.net/fa34c7f072e6571c7cd9cb18b08e5459caf019e2cb0d790e849249b429f050c4.webp
The AI governance buildout is in its late stages and debt levels are rapidly rising. We might be nearing the Great Reset.
https://blossom.primal.net/6e13f6ffd94bdcd1ae25a5b92ac7a70c7abfd9637f7a2c5cc3e989ead24a9af3.png

2026-03-08 12:42:40 CET

- reply

If you learn to love the New World Order, you too can be President 😂 (even if you are a vegetable)
https://blossom.primal.net/6136a5f2814b67aa4e852f208e33643a3f7dfeb9c52b12a64e71ab77f1df1b3e.png
#nevent1q…7cwp

2026-03-08 11:14:51 CET

It's interesting that Iran is building an interoperable AI governance system with the West. I thought they hated each other.
https://blossom.primal.net/92c25768ab1d415fd1a744f0a6bf1ce30471d818e80fa95df6bb58b0ce16943b.png
https://blossom.primal.net/c93c5fefa16673a418b92ce5f0ad642dbe01d387f570d2996a8f7ebf7e81748a.png
It's also interesting that Iran's supreme leader got "vaccinated" for a virus that doesn't exist and was never isolated.
He then psyop'ed a large portion of his people to take the poisonous jab.
https://blossom.primal.net/eb766e62dd1a02eea7e0b26bc00421a890c9cb7b10197bf5b2ea8693aaa3e7e2.jpg
It's not left vs right or West vs BRICS, it's simply people vs system.

2026-03-07 10:08:30 CET

- reply

Yes, you tend to get some incompetence at the local level usually.
Once you get to the standards bodies (BIS, FSB, WTO, WHO, OPEC, etc.), they tend to have access to practically all of the data they need to run complex simulations and probably malice >> incompetence.

2026-03-07 09:04:54 CET

I often see people asking "do you think governments mess up out to malice or incompetence?"
You only need to look at the food pyramid to figure it out.
How do you get literally everything wrong (the food pyramid is inverted) out of incompetence?
Scientists:
- "We finally figured it out - animal fat makes you sick and industrial waste products are good for you."
Then you start looking into how every government on Earth is injecting children with poisonous vaccines for "viruses" that don't exist and have never been isolated.
Democide is death by government and was the number one cause of death worldwide in the 20th Century.
Political scientist R. J. Rummel revived and redefined the term democide as:
- "The murder of any person or people by a government, including genocide, politicide, and mass murder."
Democide was responsible for the death of 262,000,000 people worldwide during the 20th Century. On average governments killed 2,620,000 people per year, 218,333 per month, or 7,178 per day.
The 21st Century will be no different.

2026-03-03 14:58:02 CET

A medium-of-exchange that isn't private by default would never work in today's regime.
If you treat privacy as "expert mode", you guarantee surveillance wins by default.
You need privacy & fungibility by construction, not by habit.
If surveillance can reliably distinguish "good" vs "bad" coins, policy and perimeter will always drift to "good only".
All transactions must look like each other:
- No transparent subset as "legacy mode".
- No visible amounts or script opcodes per tx.
- No address types that reveal more metadata.
This collapses the main control trick: "we only KYC or de-bank these flows".
Make the policy choice binary: ban the entire asset, or accept that everything is indistinguishable.
This way you have no taint wars, no heuristic creeping.
Privacy-by-default vs opt-in privacy is basically the difference between:
- You're dark unless you explicitly shine a light.
- You're lit up by default unless you personally crawl around the interface turning lamps off.
You don't get tax exemptions by begging corrupt politicians, you get tax exemptions by implementing privacy by default.
Privacy by default protects the lazy, the busy, and the non-expert.
Opt-in privacy protects only the most disciplined, and even then often only cosmetically - while turning them into a distinct, more interesting group.
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoin-will-fail-as-mass-non-custodial

2026-03-02 13:59:48 CET

What our financial system will look like after the coming reset
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/what-our-financial-system-will-look

2026-03-01 11:14:52 CET

What propaganda is in the current regime:
Mostly not lying posters from the Ministry of Truth.
Propaganda = structure + incentives + narrative that make some thoughts cheap and others expensive.
Think of it as:
Perception management = (What you can see) × (What feels normal) × (What feels futile to resist)
It mostly operates on 3 layers:
1. Attention formation - What you notice at all
2. Interpretation frame - How you explain what you notice
3. Action channeling - What paths feel available/legitimate to act
Propaganda is how the system keeps consent barely high enough that it can keep stealing the time, energy and rights of the majority without inviting revolt.

2026-03-01 11:02:14 CET

- reply

I think you have done 0 research on what natural law even is, which is why I sent you an 8 hour seminar that addresses your points in the reply, but you've already formed strong opinions on a topic you haven't researched, so good luck.

2026-03-01 10:05:45 CET

- reply

Natural Law
https://odysee.com/@DotConnectorReports:e/Mark-Passio---Natural-Law-Seminar-FULL-Version:e

2026-03-01 09:25:31 CET

Out of all the retarded ideas people believe in, "democracy" is definitely up there.
"Democracy" is the front-end UI, not the operating system.
The OS is the Controllers + plumbing (money, collateral, standards, surveillance).
Elections, parties, parliaments = the skin that keeps the organism looking human while the internal organs quietly swap out.
What "Democracy' actually is:
Firmware layer:
- Debt/Liquidity physics.
- Collateral architecture (Central securities depositories, rehypothecation, bail-in law).
- Gold & reserve structure.
- CBDC/ID rails being built.
OS layer (Controllers):
- IC/security, Treasury/CB/BIS, big asset managers, primes, key megacaps, law/compliance, insurers, foreign blocs.
- Objective: keep funding, collateral and consent intact at minimum career/legitimacy cost.
UI layer (democracy):
- Elections, parties, presidents, parliaments, coalition politics, "public debate".
- Functions:
1. Measure and manage Gross Consent Product.
2. Allocate blame and credit (villains vs saviors).
3. Refresh avatars (faces in front of persistent rails).
4. Legitimize pre-planned structural moves (resets, wars, pension reforms, Great Taking-type sweeps).
5. Route anger into reversible channels (votes, protests, memes, speculation) instead of permanent regime damage.
Democracy is a behavioral feedback layer wrapped around the real constraints:
- Net Liquidity,
- refinancing walls,
- reserve structure,
- security imperatives,
- external balance.
When those constraints tighten, the democratic layer's job is to translate "we have to do this" into "you voted for this / you forced our hand / we had no choice but to save you".

2026-02-27 15:45:01 CET

Mario Draghi revealed the plan for the Great Reset
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/mario-draghi-revealed-the-plan-for

2026-02-24 14:55:19 CET

The next few years are probably going to be very messy for Bitcoin and Monero.
The Quantum computing scam is easily the most telegraphed attack.
I am not a believer in Quantum, but I think it will be largely irrelevant whether Quantum can be engineered to scale cheaply and reliably enough to be broadly useful because the incentives line up almost too perfectly (More context: https://controlplanecapital.com/p/a-quantum-resistance-upgrade-would ).
The BIS (the central bank of central banks that is developing CBDCs with 137 countries) has published quite a few papers on how important "quantum-proofing payment systems" is.
I already knew Quantum FUD was inevitable when I saw that CBDCs are being designed with post-quantum cryptography to "defend against future threats". Notice that existing systems rely on "vulnerable public-key encryption".
https://blossom.primal.net/b63e30c653650fb08ca30a3738082c22f6e606783cf56a8493e71b8c4abf4340.png
In July 2025, the BIS published their "Quantum-readiness for financial system: a roadmap paper".
The first few sentences of the Abstract are quite clear: "Quantum computers may in the future break today's widely used encryption. This paper provides a framework to support the financial system in the transition to quantum-safe cryptographic infrastructures. It emphasises the need to start the transition today – with broad awareness and cryptographic inventory as critical foundations".
Then in December, the BIS published their "Project Leap phase 2: quantum-proofing payment systems" paper.
"Protecting financial systems from the potential threat posed by quantum computers requires a proactive and coordinated approach. Challenges go beyond technical aspects and include awareness, resource allocation, competence development, inventory, pilots, governance and more.
Project Leap Phase 2, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Centre, the Bank of Italy, the Bank of France, Deutsche Bundesbank, Nexi-Colt, and Swift, tested post-quantum cryptography in an operational payment system.
The experiment replaced traditional digital signatures with post-quantum cryptography, while sending liquidity transfers. It involved modifying numerous system components to ensure compatibility with updated cryptographic libraries.
"
https://blossom.primal.net/3e8d8b4997b9eae4755c9d533cf6bc251d9fad1e852dbac1741b50195d889b5d.png
In June 2025, the EU published their "A Coordinated Implementation Roadmap for the Transition to Post-Quantum Cryptography" paper.
"
The EU Member States, supported by the Commission, issued a roadmap and timeline to start using a more complex form of cybersecurity, the so-called post-quantum cryptography (PQC).
Quantum computing has been identified as a threat to many cryptographic algorithms used to protect the confidentiality and authenticity of data. This threat can be countered by a timely, comprehensive and coordinated transition to Post-Quantum Cryptography (PCQ).
This document is the first deliverable and is meant to be a first high-level paper aimed at Member States. It includes a set of recommendations that Member States need to implement for a synchronised transition to PQC, as well as measures to ensure that all stakeholders are well informed on the quantum threat to cryptography.
"
These are just 3 recently-published papers of many. They are written as if Quantum Computing being able to scale cheaply and reliably enough to be broadly useful is a foregone conclusion.
The coordination between ALL countries is insane. If you want to be a part of the new financial system, you'll have to play game.
As I've shown in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/a-quantum-resistance-upgrade-would ), a quantum-resistance upgrade would be terrible for Bitcoin (and Monero).
The Coordination tax I've outlined in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoin-will-fail-as-mass-non-custodial ) is why the next few years are probably going to be very messy.

2026-02-24 14:05:35 CET

- reply

Yes, this is a financial reset + imprisonment into CBDC + Digital ID by a forced conversion if you want to recover what's left of your assets.
To me gold seems like a better option because of the reasons I've written about in this article: https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoin-will-fail-as-mass-non-custodial
Both are assets outside the system if custodied properly, so it's not either or.

2026-02-24 01:54:10 CET

The whole thing where the EU froze Russia's reserves makes 0 sense and is very similar to October 7th.
Russia left roughly 200-300B euro parked at Euroclear in Belgium and attacked Ukraine.
So they left ~70% of their reserves in Europe absolutely knowing their reserves would get frozen.
It is literally written into law that Euroclear holds the true title; retail and funds (Russia in this case) hold entitlements.
Everything is in street name, no bearer certs, no simple "I have the certificate, I own the thing".
This is a relatively recent development and is the law in every country in the world, including Russia.
The actual odds of them leaving their reserves parked at Euroclear and attacking Ukraine are ~0.
The obvious alternative explanation would be that they wanted to get their assets frozen to push the "deglobalization" narrative, to normalize the Great Taking, and to give an excuse for ~all Central Banks to simultaneously start stacking gold because the "dollar has been weaponized".
The EU froze Russia's reserves in February 2022.
https://blossom.primal.net/be4c04472a7966fbf2c2444996a162bf8d710d3e4eccbde53b3c6bc18e2fbac7.png
It would've been kinda weird if Central Banks just started buying 3x the gold year over year without an excuse 😂
And this is just official Central Bank gold buying, the real numbers are in the multiples.
I think they are preparing for a financial reset and I wouldn't be too shocked if they decide to run it this or next year.
Central Banks usually under-inject liquidity in midterm years.
https://blossom.primal.net/95eabcb1a428c85c085bdfc2945c12ab769ead7fb358a47e65c836c978553d2c.webp
With current consent levels, they won't be able to sell the majority of the population on CBDCs and they are well aware.
The Controllers (BIS in this case) didn't force 137 countries (= 98% of global GDP) to develop CBDCs so they can beg the population to switch to CBDCs/Digital ID. They know they'll have to use a crisis.
https://blossom.primal.net/6e13f6ffd94bdcd1ae25a5b92ac7a70c7abfd9637f7a2c5cc3e989ead24a9af3.png
We'll see a systemic collateral/custody rug and people will get forcibly converted into CBDCs to "save the financial system".
David Rogers Webb (author of the Great Taking) went to the US to try to change the law, but unfortunately they were unsuccessful.
Great Taking = legal + plumbing architecture that lets the top of the collateral pyramid seize or haircut claims on financial assets in a systemic crisis, while keeping the underlying assets safely inside the system.
Translation: you don't own any of your stocks/bonds in your brokerage account.
David Webb filmed his attempts to change the law in a few US states and got threats from the banking lobby.
Eye-opening documentary: https://rumble.com/v6qy8lo-stop-it-the-great-taking-documentary.html
The banking lobby lawyers are fighting to keep using "your" stocks as collateral in the ~4 quadrillion USD derivatives pyramid like their life depends on it.
It is probably too late to try and change the laws, so everyone has to save themselves.

2026-02-18 01:03:21 CET

The BIS wants to steal our assets; All G20 countries agree
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/the-bis-wants-to-steal-our-assets

2026-02-15 03:31:46 CET

Bitcoin will fail as mass, non-custodial Medium-of-Exchange
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoin-will-fail-as-mass-non-custodial

2026-02-14 06:24:02 CET

- reply

It's certainly possible it was organic, or it was Controller-seeded or at least Controller-green-lit at inception. I wasn't there so all I can do is speculate.
If it was organic, they certainly did a great job of capturing it and using it to their advantage so kudos to them.

2026-02-14 05:23:00 CET

Added a "More on why I think the Government created Bitcoin" subheading with a couple more points to my "Why I think the government created Bitcoin" article.
Subheading: https://controlplanecapital.com/i/187487845/more-on-why-i-think-the-government-created-bitcoin
Full article: https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-i-think-the-government-created

2026-02-13 05:11:46 CET

I am not familiar with this lady, but she’s got some great points. She summarizes the World Economic Forum financial reset talking points.
At the end of the clip Larry Fink has some great points as well: Everything on one common blockchain that he and his bosses control, but more democratization and he will be reducing fees, so don't worry. Fees will be reduced, that's for sure (and your assets will also be reduced).
https://blossom.primal.net/0d8dba64b1ae3ce4f4048c18cd84d6ac0c5ca9353ccf506c479c703117aea1dd.mp4

2026-02-13 01:09:50 CET

- reply

I have no idea. The architecture is there. The question is when and how hard they decide to use it.
My best guess is before 2033. Still just a guess.

2026-02-13 01:07:38 CET

Central Banks are likely preparing for a financial reset
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/central-banks-are-likely-preparing

2026-02-12 16:32:21 CET

- reply

I hated writing this article 😂, but wanted to put the idea out there in case someone wants to do their own deeper dive
I gave up a couple of times mid-article.

2026-02-12 08:09:41 CET

I wonder what all these Presidents mean by "New World Order" 🤔
https://blossom.primal.net/ec362f3e548d0aa7e5534d049429e440d5088aa068dc95e841fa41a85553dd7c.mp4
No way we live under a One World Government. That would be insane. I think all these Presidents are lying. It's all just a big coincidence.
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/how-i-know-we-live-under-a-one-world

2026-02-12 06:37:29 CET

All roads lead to Gold
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/all-roads-lead-to-gold

2026-02-11 19:44:22 CET

- reply

I am from Europe. I don't have a 401K, so take with a grain of salt and verify.
401K is inside the sacrificial layer for a Great Taking, so you can't make it "safe", you can only:
- limit how much of your life you leave in that bucket,
- change what kind of claim you hold inside it, and
- use every legal leak (loans, rollovers, withdrawals) to migrate value off-system over time.
So the restrategizing beyond "just take the match" is mostly about sizing, mix and exit channels, not asset choice that turns your 401K into physical gold somehow.
You cannot turn a 401K into expropriation-resistant physical. "Gold IRA" etc. just re-route you to another custodian inside the same legal perimeter.
In a Great Taking event, the Controllers want to:
- Keep "pensions and retirement" visibly alive (low Gross Consent Product constraint),
- While using that pool to absorb systemic losses and lock people into the new regime (forced conversion).
So the 401K bucket is extremely unlikely to be spared; the reasonable expectation is partial confiscation / conversion, not zeroing.
- "We're protecting your retirement with safe new government stability bonds / CBDC accounts" while quietly imposing a big real haircut.
Given that, the question becomes:
- How much of your life do you want inside that mechanism?
Employer match = almost pure arbitrage
- A typical US setup is "100% match on first X% of salary", etc.
- Under almost any regime, including Great Taking, that's (1) instant, risk-free uplift on your contribution, (2) highly likely to partially survive even in a bail-in, because retirement optics are sacred and legitimacy cost of fully rug-pulling matches is huge.
Taking the full employer match is still rational. That's the "least bad" use of the 401K rail.
Above the match: treat as "captive, haircut-prone annuity".
Above the match you're trading:
- Tax advantage now vs
- Being locked inside a privileged expropriation target later.
So:
- Always take the full match.
- Be very skeptical about large contributions above the match, unless you're deliberately using the 401K as a future state-managed annuity, and you're comfortable that your real SoV lives outside (physical gold, self-custody Monero, BTC, real assets).
A lot of people will still choose to max 401K for tax/accounting reasons. I'd cap 401K contributions at the match (or modestly above),
and push incremental savings into off-system SoV instead.
There are some legal ways to leak value out over time. You'd want a gradual "escape plan" for 401K money as you age and rules allow.
E.g. early, penalty-free withdrawal windows (55+)
US rule of 55:
- If you leave the employer in or after the year you turn 55 (age 50 for certain public safety roles),
- You can withdraw from that 401K without the 10% early penalty (still taxed as income).
This is an early exit hatch to pull some value out, accept tax hit, reallocate into off-system SoV before a possible systemic Taking.
All in all, position 401K as state-managed annuity in your personal stack, not your core SoV.
- Core SoV = physical gold, self-custody Monero, BTC, assets outside the most capture-prone custody rails.
- 401K = "I'll probably get something from this after they're done patching the system, but I'm not betting the house on it."

2026-02-11 16:55:50 CET

- reply

Usually the people who think 'governments' are stupid think the people they see on TV make the decisions (e.g. Elon Musk, Trump, AOC, Kamala, etc.).
The deepest technical minds (the real outliers) they find in universities all over the world remain inside state/para-state labs and defense contractors. They don't give interviews on TV to show people how smart they are 😂
That's the whole point - to pretend the government is incompetent.

2026-02-11 04:10:32 CET

Why I think the government created Bitcoin (and a few predictions)
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-i-think-the-government-created

2026-02-10 04:10:51 CET

- reply

Yes, in my opinion it didn't happen organically.
In the 2000s China was integrated tightly and the eurodollar bloomed.
China became dollar shock absorber & reserve sink.
Offshoring + overcapacity = disinflation buffer → more room for USD debt growth.
If they kept most of the jobs in the US, they wouldn't be able to QE + ZIRP, otherwise inflation would skyrocket.
From Lyn Alden's latest newsletter:
- "....This is because nearly 90% of stocks are held by the top 10% of society, and that same 10% of society performs nearly 50% of all consumer spending."
I knew that 90% of stocks are held by the top 10%, but didn't know that the top 10% performs 50% of all consumer spending.
This is how you get to QE infinity without having record-high inflation - almost everyone is broke because the manufacturing jobs are in China.

2026-02-09 17:29:27 CET

- reply

Yes. China and America (aka Chimerica) love each other.
Controllers' lens after the 90s:
US wants:
- cheap imports,
- suppressed goods inflation,
- someone to buy endless Treasuries,
- geopolitical leverage over industrial chains.
China wants:
- export-led growth,
- technology & capital inflows,
- time to build domestic capacity and surveillance apparatus,
- a way to turn sweat + coal into reserves and gold.
So the deal (often framed as "globalization" in official language) is:
- US prints high-quality paper (USTs, Agencies, USD bank liabilities).
- China prints low-wage labor, exports, and real goods.
- China recycles the USD surplus back into US paper.
= ❤️

2026-02-08 06:14:03 CET

How I know we live under a One World Government
The US, China and Russia are building interoperable programmable, surveilled money, programmable, surveilled movement, programmable, surveilled speech while pretending to hate each other on TV.
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/how-i-know-we-live-under-a-one-world

2026-02-08 04:19:43 CET

- reply

Here are my top 3 actors at present:
1) Donald Trump
It's a close one between him and #2, but he got the nod because of how he pretended to get shot in the ear. Incredible performance.
He is probably the lowest IQ of the 3, but it doesn't matter because 100D chess.
https://blossom.primal.net/2051faea79e745e159fdbdd6b295e8491d59a96d0fa31b8af006b820807d991b.png
2) Vladimir Putin
This actor served in the KGB (=CIA) eventually reaching the rank of lieutenant colonel. He later auditioned for the role of president and secured the role.
Securing the role was the result of not only the actor’s skill and suitability for the role but also his ability to navigate the complexities of the casting process.
https://blossom.primal.net/03443a94ad6595082230dd54dbef979aea5601b24f17601755b7b2e20bb66690.png
3) Xi Jinping
This actor is a bit stiff. Despite his minimal dialogue, he still contributes to the scene.
https://blossom.primal.net/7bf1d385233e568913351eb45887114e5a14f5d805a03945e673344e3f4949ac.png
Any of these actors can send you to die in a bankers' war of their choosing, inject you with heavy metals for "your safety" for a virus that doesn't exist, and blast you with 5G, while they continue to build the CBDC, Digital ID, AI governance regime.
These actors have coordinated incredibly well while pretending to hate each other:
- Full globalization of fiat + Basel + AML/KYC
- Convergent emergency powers legal structures
- Coordinated CBDC/stablecoin development
- Chokepoint concentration in cloud, OS, payments, comms
- Shared narratives: extremism, disinfo, public health, climate, cyber
These are exactly the systems you'd build if you wanted:
- Programmable, surveilled money
- Programmable, surveilled movement
- Programmable, surveilled speech
across nominally separate "countries".
All of these actors coincidentally support the same direction of the world:
- From anonymous → identified
- From cash → traceable digits
- From ad hoc law → parameterized enforcement
#nevent1q…50j8

2026-02-06 08:59:06 CET

All of your favorite Entrepreneurs work for the Government
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/all-of-your-favorite-entrepreneurs

2026-02-05 05:20:57 CET

- reply

When I first found out about paper Bitcoin (
- The protocol can cap issuance at 21,000,000 BTC.
- Markets can create claims on far more than 21,000,000 BTC.
- More context: https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-bitcoins-21m-cap-is-not-guaranteed
), I got a bit black-pilled on Bitcoin because of the Coordination Tax I've described in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/what-made-me-sell-most-of-my-bitcoin ).
When you raise the problem of paper Bitcoin, captured, retarded influencers hit you with: "I hate to break it to you, but Bitcoin is for everyone."
"Bitcoin is for everyone" is true at the protocol boundary and false in the lived system.
Because the path of least resistance is: paperization + perimeter control. That means other people's choices (custody ETFs, policy clients, protocol-bloat, KYC defaults) directly degrade your outcomes — just like bad drivers raise your accident risk and premiums even if you drive perfectly.
In the lived system most people's incentives are convenience, rebates, and legality.
So power will keep steering the majority into programmable, supervised money, and that majority's behavior redefines the economic surface you live on — even if your keys are perfect.
"Bitcoin is for everyone" is an oversimplification only a retarded/captured (or both) influencer would use.
#nevent1q…em8m

2026-02-05 04:12:49 CET

- reply

One more post from Bob Kendall on the topic of paper Bitcoin ( https://x.com/PortfolioXpert/status/2019237396563595317 )
Copy-pasting the entire post from his twitter:
Kevin
you’re conflating custody with price discovery.
Yes, spot ETFs hold real BTC in custody. That’s not the question.
The question is whether those coins are removed from the price-setting float.
They are not.
Why:
• ETFs custody BTC via prime brokers
• Authorized Participants hedge ETF exposure with futures, options, and swaps
• Market makers short derivatives against ETF inventory
• The same BTC supports multiple paper claims
Result:
One coin → multiple price claims
That is textbook rehypothecation — even if the underlying asset is “physically held.”
This is identical to gold ETFs:
They hold real bars and yet paper gold trades 50–100× physical supply because price is set in derivatives, not vaults.
Bitcoin now works the same way:
– Futures
– Perpetuals
– Options
– ETFs
– Swaps
All referencing the same underlying BTC.
So scarcity still exists on-chain …
but it no longer exists where price is discovered.
That’s the entire point!
#nevent1q…em8m

2026-02-05 04:09:20 CET

Very interesting post from a guy named Bob Kendall on twitter.
( https://x.com/PortfolioXpert/status/2019180840958529601 )
First the TL;DR of his tweet:
* Bitcoin price discovery shifted from onchain supply to synthetic float
* Financial derivatives created a theoretically infinite supply of Bitcoin
* Synthetic manufacturing of supply eliminated asset scarcity
* Institutions use paper inventory to manipulate price movements
* Bitcoin now functions as a fractional reserve price system
And here is Bob Kendall's original tweet:
So here’s the issue you get influencers like this guy have a quarter million followers and they claim they don’t know why it is declining… it’s because they don’t understand basic mechanics of price discovery.
They don’t understand that the marginal buyers or the float determines price they think the onchain bitcoin is that is the price discovery
Well, it was once upon a time but now..
Once you can synthetically manufacture the supply, the asset is no longer scarce and once scarcity is gone, price becomes a derivatives game, not a supply-and-demand market.
This is exactly what has happened to Bitcoin.
This is the same structural break that occurred in gold, silver, oil, and eventually equities once they became derivatives-dominated.
The original premise that no longer exists
Bitcoin’s entire valuation logic was built on finite supply (21M) and inability to be rehypothecated.
That died the moment:
•Cash-settled futures
•Perpetual swaps
•Options
•ETFs
•Prime broker lending
•Wrapped BTC
•Total return swaps
were layered on top of the chain.
From that moment forward:
Bitcoin supply became theoretically infinite.
Not on-chain in price discovery.
The metric that explains the collapse
Synthetic Float Ratio (SFR)
Once you can synthetically manufacture the supply, the asset is no longer scarce — and once scarcity is gone, price becomes a derivatives game, not a supply-and-demand market.
That is exactly what has happened to Bitcoin.
This is the same structural break that occurred in gold, silver, oil, and eventually equities once they became derivatives-dominated.
Why Wall Street can now “trade against” Bitcoin
They do exactly what they’ve done in every commodity market:
1.Create unlimited paper BTC
2.Short into rallies
3.Force liquidations
4.Cover lower
5.Repeat
They are not “betting” — they are manufacturing inventory.
The same 1 BTC can now support:
•An ETF unit
•A futures contract
•A perpetual swap
•An options delta
•A broker loan
•A structured note
All at once.
That is six claims on one coin.
That is not a market.
That is a fractional reserve price system.
----------------------------------------------
I have written about this in my "Why Bitcoin's 21M cap is not guaranteed (Paper Bitcoin)" article:
- https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-bitcoins-21m-cap-is-not-guaranteed
Even though I'm not very bullish on Bitcoin's fiat price short-term, I am starting to DCA into self-custody at these prices because something with the financial system seems very off. I'd rather take a drawdown on an asset I own than get bailed-in and get wrecked.

2026-02-03 14:21:14 CET

Interesting.
https://web.archive.org/web/20190404074246/https://www.usagold.com/goldtrail/archives/another1.html

2026-02-03 04:00:45 CET

- reply

I keep hearing about this fragmentation and deglobalization and I go to open the Atlantic Council CBDC tracker and I see that everybody and their mother is building/has launched a CBDC. ( https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/cbdctracker/ )
"137 countries & currency unions, representing 98% of global GDP, are exploring a CBDC. In May 2020 that number was only 35. Currently, 72 countries are in the advanced phase of exploration — development, pilot, or launch."
Of course, there are many, many more examples of these "adversarial" countries working together behind the scenes and pretending to hate each other in front of cameras.
Henry Kissinger, a man in the running for the most evil human to have ever lived, has some very interesting quotes that should be revisited.
Here's one.
https://blossom.primal.net/23da08db0cc9ee9b07d5ec79e0caff81c5357f2287e6813a1369a55767fd4d2e.jpg
There is no US vs China AI race, the race is who can implement AI governance quicker, and better.
It's a competition for who can fully enslave their people before fiat fails.
It's a competition for your soul.
And here is another Henry Kissinger quote which the Amish probably read and knew they were on the right track. (Unfortunately Bill Gates probably read it as well)
https://blossom.primal.net/3d68fd62f6926967cbc761091fd1bf452e3614425fca4959a019481ecb852361.jpg
#nevent1q…50j8

2026-02-02 04:54:06 CET

Since we can't make fun of gold anymore:
https://blossom.primal.net/2d276466ce7fbbb62bbd3efd16e23b02935dc1d4e7b768ad3769a813485cd899.webp

2026-02-02 02:40:14 CET

What are the odds that Jeffrey Epstein is sitting somewhere on an island enjoying all this attention he's been getting?
Probably higher than the odds of him having killed himself.

2026-02-01 19:00:51 CET

- reply

Tether is basically the government, so they do what they're told.
If they were told to stack gold, it indicates that the Controllers want to direct capital away from Bitcoin and toward gold right now.
Central banks + Tether + various sovereigns = strong revealed preference.
The other buyer in size of BTC (MSTR) also got disciplined very heavily (from margin increases to unrealized capital gains tax fud to index removal fud, to S&P 500 rejection, etc.) at a time when MSTR had an mNAV of about 2 (meaning they could issue shares to stack lots of Bitcoin in an accretive way).
So they basically implicitly told institutions: "stay away from Bitcoin, buy gold".
Bitcoin's current value proposition is a store of value with regulatory overhang and a Great Taking hedge.
Unless Bitcoin is private by default (no special mode), I don't see a scenario in which Bitcoin's value proposition becomes mass, non-custodial Medium-of-Exchange.
Which basically means that we have to hope that the Controllers allow for Bitcoin to go up in fiat terms and remains a store-of-value, so that they don't alienate the masses into Monero, physical alternatives, etc.
So far it hasn't worked in the post-ETF era and I have a feeling that we have a wave of Quantum FUD on the horizon, but what can you do.
If you get this cucked, you kinda have to wait for your turn or take a stand and there are too many simultaneous attacks for the community to coordinate a coherent response (coordination tax).
When governments capture "error assets" such as Bitcoin, they use the "Honeymoon → Normalization → Harvest" playbook because the plebs always fall for it.
New financial tech follows the same arc: big sweeteners at launch, normalization once everyone is on board, and then the quiet fee/tax/regulation harvest.
In other words, you pay people with higher fiat prieces whilst you paperize and capture so that they associate regulation with "winning".
The incentives flip as soon as enough users are corralled.
Bitcoin's honeymoon phase was very short (mostly pre-ETF) which indicates to me that they already know they have us by the balls, so they didn't have to pull out the big sweeteners.
The deeper into the Paperization game Bitcoin gets, the more they'll fuck with us.
Most Bitcoiners still don't understand that the 21M cap doesn't mean much if most people don't self custody.
The protocol can cap issuance at 21,000,000 BTC.
Markets can create claims on far more than 21,000,000 BTC.
Bitcoin's 21M cap is a protocol invariant, not a shield against synthetic supply created by ETFs, funds, wrappers, futures, structured notes, and rehypothecation.

2026-02-01 18:13:44 CET

- reply

Thank you sir, appreciate the kind words! 🫡

2026-02-01 16:07:32 CET

The Bitcoin or Gold psyop is silly and the debaters on both sides are usually clueless.
Why wouldn't you own both Bitcoin and Gold? They are both assets outside the system and have different advantages/disadvantages.
To mention some of gold's advantages (because everyone here already knows about Bitcoin's advantages):
(1) Physical gold has no public ledger.
- No historical chain of custody anchored in a global database.
- Evidence of holdings is fragmentary: vault records, invoices, eyewitnesses, maybe customs records.
- Outside that, the state has suspicion, not a cryptographic audit trail.
- The "omniscient ledger" simply doesn’t exist.
(2) Harder to geofence at scale from a screen.
- Once it is in your physical possession, there is no equivalent "app store ban" or "node-liability" lever that instantly makes it unusable for most people.
(3) Gold has no "core devs", no client politics, no mempool policy.
- "Protocol" = physics, metallurgy, and a scale.
- There is no equivalent of a small GitHub group with agenda-setting power.
- There is no "v30" for gold. No client upgrade that suddenly increases storage risk by 1200x.
- Coordination burden is basically zero at the "how it works" layer.
(4) No need to defend a node/mempool ecosystem.
- No nodes.
- No mempool.
- No UTXO set to bloat.
- You don't need an army of volunteer maintainers to keep "gold full nodes" defensible.
- Less coordination tax, fewer sociotechnical attack surfaces.
(5) Gold expropriation requires physical enforcement, not just data + policy.
There is no universal gold UTXO set or "travel rule".
Expropriation requires either:
- Knowing where the gold is (vault, safe deposit box, storage facility).
- Or house-by-house enforcement with massive manpower/legitimacy cost.
In practice, enforcement tends to focus on:
- Formal channels (vaults, dealers, banks).
- Border crossings.
- Declarations above thresholds.
@nprofile…4l07 also opened my eyes to some very significant issues regarding Bitcoin hardware wallets.
TL;DR - I'd imagine the government has access to the vast majority of seed phrases.
From what I've researched, getting this risk to zero is extremely hard (if not impossible). It can be minimized with multi-sig, heterogeneous devices instead of trusting any single black box.
Just one of the many issues are "secure" elements in which many wallets store the seed phrase.
A secure element (SE) is:
- Closed-source silicon + firmware
- Designed and signed off by a tiny number of entities
- Certified by processes you don't control (Common Criteria, labs, NDAs)
- Distributed at scale into "secure" devices (wallets, phones, SIMs, payment cards)
Secure elements are perfect for creating choke points where keys & identity cluster:
- Centralized design
- Long lifetimes
- Hard to inspect physically
- Wrapped in "security" narrative
So if you assume a serious state-level adversary wants that lever and can get it sometimes, the right prior is:
- "Treat any closed-source Secure Element as potentially backdoored if you're defending against a nation-state"
That's not the same as "we know for a fact every Secure Element is backdoored". We don't. Lacking verifiable proof is exactly what makes this such an asymmetric control point.
Dice-based seeds fix RNG trust, not key exfiltration. If a device ever sees the full seed, a malicious Secure Element/firmware can leak it later.
The only real structural defense is collusion forcing:
- Heterogeneous multi-sig (different vendors + DIY),
- Multi-source entropy (XOR’d seeds),
- Passphrases kept off the compromised device,
- Independent stacks for different key shares.
There is no neat solution that makes you "immune to NSA". The best you can do is:
- Make mass, silent theft via one corporate/vended rail impossible,
- Force any serious adversary into messy, noisy, manual operations if they want you specifically.
A state-level actor can plausibly:
- backdoor RNG/nonces,
- exfil keys via signatures,
- coerce vendor into "minor tweaks",
- intercept shipping,
- or just use host+legal leverage.
(6) Gold doesn't need electricity, internet, DNS, app stores, or routers.
- You can transact in a blackout.
- You can pay a smuggler without any digital evidence.
- You don't care about packet filtering or "crypto port" throttling.
There are many more examples of where Gold has an advantage over Bitcoin.
And of course, Bitcoin has many advantages over gold (teleportability, shock convexity in a specific Great Taking scenario, programmability for complex, conditional arrangements, granularity in price discovery, verifiability, etc.).
That's the point, gold vs bitcoin is a stupid debate.
BTC sovereignty is mathematically elegant but socially expensive and perimeter-fragile.
Gold sovereignty is technologically dumb but perimeter-resilient and legally fuzzier.
Both are useful, but for different failure modes of the system.
The same exercise can be repeated for Bitcoin and Monero. Both have their advantages and disadvantages.

2026-02-01 14:09:46 CET

- reply

Yes, his book is a free PDF on his website.
The main point is not "they rug everything tomorrow", the main point is: "they've put this into law in every country in the world".
Why would they do that? 😂
It can either be as a fallback for when they lose control over the financial system, or as a deliberate rug mechanism used to install the next financial system.
Either way, if you're mostly in the system, they have you by the balls and I don't like that feeling very much.
And why are the BIS and FSB (basically the central banks of central banks - the ones who coordinate the puppets) constantly publishing documents for how to best rug everyone in an event of a financial crisis 😂
In July 2025, the BIS published FSI Insights on policy implementation No 67 - Public support for bank resolution.
It is a pdf on the internet everyone can read it.
The document explains how to best rug everyone to save the failing system because "financial stability is a key public good and using public resources as a last resort to enhance funding capacities appears only natural".
If you're a rational person and see the central bank of central banks publishing documents intended to coordinate ALL central banks on how to rob everyone, you probably hedge a little 😂
They call robbing everyone "public support for bank resolution".
https://blossom.primal.net/9ba88eb25d3ea2ea0785fedfbaeaca9357ba985ae2f5973893235d253b35ac79.png
https://blossom.primal.net/0bdd6a3ef612525764f68d7a49b2ed51ef1bab84610baf268020fb5f8f624f10.png

2026-02-01 13:27:27 CET

I recently had to increase my odds of a Great Taking (mass expropriation) event happening in the near future.
One of the reasons is that consent has been massively deteriorating (which is mostly a good thing) and I think they'll use a Great Taking type event to usher in the CBDC + Digital ID era.
More and more people understand how the game is played and you can see Central Banks becoming more and more cornered and hiring more "credible" actors.
It's like when one of these scammers on the street (with the cups) gets exposed, they can't run the same scam in front of the same people anymore.
If the Controllers rob everyone in an artificial financial system collapse, a massive cyber attack, or w/e mass crisis they pick, people won't have much of a choice but to accept their CBDC + Digital ID.
This guy is the founder of Interactive Brokers and basically explains how most people lose everything in a Great Taking.
I remember watching this clip a few years ago and I went to check the comments and I didn't find anyone who even reacted to what he said. Blows my fucking mind 😂. This is the owner of Interactive Brokers (almost a trillion USD under management).
https://blossom.primal.net/d5f7015ee26e3f9b8910144f55055709e475ebe815953a5d93a2fd5f3268f734.mp4
And of course, you also have the 2016 predictions for 2030 of the World Economic Forum with their 1st prediction of "In 2030, you'll own nothing and you'll be happy".
You also have UN's agenda 2030 which is basically the same thing.
https://blossom.primal.net/c4019ceb3aa798ecdb0b6b71a364af7c929fafe3f089854ab70ceb505e7193dd.mp4
To give you 1 more data point: Using Federal Reserve distribution data summarized by multiple outlets:
- The top 1% by wealth hold roughly 40–45% of all U.S. corporate equities and mutual fund shares.
- The top 10% hold something like 80–90%+ of all equities; one analysis of Fed data has top 10% at ~90%+ of stock and mutual-fund wealth, bottom 50% at ~1%.
You don't have to rug very many people to actually execute the "Great Reset".
It can easily be sold as: "protecting the many from the excesses of the few".
Of course, the few will quietly be robbed via inflation, forced conversions, and taxes.
You probably have noticed the push toward socialism especially with this Mandani actor (redistributing wealth from the rich to the poor to reduce "inequality").
By 2030, they want to equalize us.
For more context on the Great Taking, watch David Rogers Webb's documentary: https://odysee.com/@EarthNewspaper:e/The-Great-Taking-by-David-Rodgers-Webb:3

2026-02-01 10:00:15 CET

Politics is completely fake and the easiest way to figure out that someone is mentally disabled is when they say they are a republican or a democrat.
The republicrats and the demopublicans are equally bad and equally fake.
The people you see on TV are actors. They are not the ones making the important decisions.
They are the ones who sell you decisions that have already been made.
And because this is a midterm year in the US, you often hear: "Trump has to juice markets to win the midterm elections."
And because politics is fake, this of course is completely incorrect.
In fact, Trump wants to lose House seats.
In midterm years, historically, the president's party usually loses House seats and often loses control of at least one chamber.
And this is useful to the system (the bosses of these actors) for multiple reasons, but I'll give you the main one.
It is a blame machine & excuse generator.
If the president's party keeps a big majority:
- They "own" everything.
- They have no one to blame when they don't deliver what the base wants (and what they've promised).
- The gap between promises vs outcomes becomes too obvious. Even the biggest dummies eventually figure out that the game is rigged.
When they lose seats and often lose one chamber:
They can say:
- "We wanted to do X, but the other side blocked us."
- "We're constrained by a divided Congress."
The opposition gets partial ownership of austerity, rate hikes, and "discipline".
So the regime gets:
- A durable excuse for why deep structural things never change.
- A way to redirect anger horizontally (left vs right) instead of vertically (people vs system).
Midterm losses create narrative cover.
It's all fake.
https://blossom.primal.net/8035c1c18dc1e98154c2a294cd0640d4cbee9762c7c59eb1d20165b780626687.png

2026-02-01 07:00:23 CET

One thing that has been disappointing is watching how Bitcoiners react to endorsements from demons such as Larry Fink, Kevin Warsh, Howard Lutnick, Donald Trump, Scott Bessent, etc.
When Kevin Warsh says "Bitcoin does not make me nervous", and that Bitcoin is not a replacement for the dollar, he really means: "Bitcoin is completely captured" and he is correct.
Would Kevin Warsh and Scott Bessent say stuff like that if Bitcoin had stealth receive addresses (no address reuse) and sender-receiver coinjoin by default, and if small Bitcoin communities started popping up everywhere and abandoned the dollar?
Privacy as a default (no special mode) lowers legal/UX risk for small commerce and defeats trivial chain surveillance that scares merchants. Privacy must be boring and automatic.
We see clips of Bitcoiners begging Trump for tax exemption on small payments and the only way we're going to get a tax exemption is by strengthening privacy.
Even if they allow for de-minimis tax, it will only be through their captured, full KYC custodians like Square.
You probably won't see these demons endorse Monero.
And to understand what I mean, you have to look at the Amish who mostly live outside the system.
They sell/trade raw milk, honey, meat, fruits, vegetables without pesticides and antibiotics and federal agencies constantly fuck with them "for your safety" (especially the ones who manage to scale).
The solutions won't come from the system, the only viable solution is for people to coordinate and stop playing a game they can never win.
Are we going to be the retards who HODL themselves into the upcoming AI governance, digital ID, CBDC era from which there is no return for the masses? It certainly looks that way.
https://blossom.primal.net/6afc892fa7467eef813a56c4bc15fd92bf94088abe6f62172584ffb680ca8368.mp4

2026-02-01 06:17:53 CET

Listened to this David Icke interview yesterday ( https://www.bitchute.com/video/mUCo7vtWyFmR ) and what he said hit hard:
"When you open to consciousness beyond the program - what you tend to do is what you think is right.
You don't go through this mental gymnastics of "what will people think of me, or say about me, or do about me if I say this", you say and do what you feel is right and you don't make a list of all the consequences of what you believe to be right, you just do it.
If you start a list of all the consequences in this world of many things that people do that are necessary to do, you'll reach a point in the list where you'll say: "OK, I'd like to do it, I'd like to do what I know to be right but not that badly.", but if you really mean it then you just do it and whatever consequences come come, because in the end I'm out of here and I'll still be all that is, and that has been, and ever can be.
I can handle that."

2026-02-01 03:43:34 CET

- reply

I think that's a given unless you are able to spend the tainted UTXOs directly for goods/services (then it could get arbitraged).
If you wanted to push everyone into paper Bitcoin ETFs (which they do), you'd make this extremely annoying for people (frozen coins, more taxes, etc.).
Everyone who lives in the EU and has had their Bitcoin frozen due to the "travel rule" or any other bullshit reason knows what I'm talking about.
Sadly, in the current regime 1 BTC is not equal to 1 BTC in some cases. You have "compliant BTC" and "non-compliant BTC". This will only get worse.

2026-01-30 11:55:00 CET

Quantum computing, like most things coming out of the government, seems like a complete scam.
- https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/17/quantum_cryptanalysis_criticism/
- https://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/bollocks.pdf
However, Covid also was a complete scam (viruses have never been isolated and don't exist - https://rumble.com/v6rh2e3-there-was-no-covid-virus-how-weve-all-been-duped-by-the-medical-establishme.html ) and it was still used throughout the entire world to further the agenda of the Controllers.
As I've shown in these 2 articles, this is also going to be the case for "Quantum Computing":
- https://controlplanecapital.com/p/is-quantum-computing-a-threat-to
- https://controlplanecapital.com/p/a-quantum-resistance-upgrade-would
"Adversarial" countries like US, China, Russia, the EU, UK, Canada are all investing massive amounts of money into quantum computing.
And you'll see that most of their "scientists" who work on quantum computing previously worked on nuclear weapons.
Nuclear weapons don't exist as there is 0 evidence that an atom has ever been split ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6oGXzXz6yQ ) - so they went from one scam to another.
We literally live under a one world government.
I'm not trying to fud. Obviously I don't know when they'll decide to pull out the quantum scam, but it's a matter of when, not if.
As I cover in this article, a quantum-resistance "upgrade" would be terrible for Bitcoin (and Monero).
- https://controlplanecapital.com/p/a-quantum-resistance-upgrade-would
I have a bad feeling that because it is a more technical topic, we might get a covid-type reaction from the community once the government-funded scientists come out with a paper how quantum computing is going to hack everything in X years.
I hope I'm wrong.
When I see videos like this 1 from Bitcoin core devs, I kind of lose faith. Obviously, Core is completely captured, but most people will still upgrade to whatever bullshit upgrade Core pushes on auto-pilot.
https://blossom.primal.net/c1229e32627be842f98a1cea78e048e6baa84a1936c11c176e4e1dac74935527.mp4
"I believe that privacy is a right and encryption is not a crime. That said, I’m reticent to recommend either Zcash or Monero because they both use elliptic curve cryptography which is vulnerable to quantum computing"
There is 0 evidence that Quantum can be engineered to scale cheaply and reliably enough to be broadly useful and this guy is just waiting to get told by NIST (the government) what post-quantum algorithm to migrate to and literally murder the network as MoE.

2026-01-25 11:59:54 CET

- reply

My post doesn't argue that Quantum is a threat to Bitcoin, it argues that it is largely irrelevant whether Quantum can be engineered to scale cheaply and reliably enough to be broadly useful because the incentives for Quantum FUD line up almost too perfectly.
If they have a 100+ page whitepaper coming, then this changes everything and Google, Microsoft, IBM, xAI, DARPA and the other government agencies will have to pack it up.
Either way, I'm happy to be wrong on this. Time will tell.

2026-01-25 09:48:47 CET

A Quantum-resistance upgrade would be terrible for Bitcoin
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/a-quantum-resistance-upgrade-would

2026-01-24 14:13:45 CET

- reply

I haven't been paying attention to all the "Quantum breakthroughs" government puppets have been posting on X.
Just read a few posts from Elon Musk, Sundar Pichai, Satya Nadella and other government officials, and at this point I'm pretty sure they are going to use quantum to fud the fuck out of Bitcoin and get infinite budgets for the upcoming AI governance regime.
The question at this point is "when?", not "if?".
And of course, quantum doesn't even have to be viable for them to scam their way into infinite AI governance money for your safety.
I wrote about this here: https://controlplanecapital.com/p/is-quantum-computing-a-threat-to
Here is a post from Sundar Pichai (the CEO of google) with a response from Musk ( https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1981045207333265688 ):
https://blossom.primal.net/aa8cf3fed1ab8ed69dc7e31b4bf0ba4e95cac9190a547e2853535525e9122980.png
Here is a quote-post from Elon on a post from Satya Nadella (CEO of Microsoft):
https://blossom.primal.net/2fe80c8b203fd487485afb517dd1ff9234a46c750952d62020b17dfc38098dc8.png
If you check the added context to the post, you'll see that Satya is scamming, but he will still likely get to redeem the card.
https://blossom.primal.net/82ed2ad08ba0a7804526b501b9c5bfb5e616bece273258e53031ca8333c775b1.png
Here you have IBM (another government agency) also posting about quantum and Elon Musk, the puppet, asking his government AI whether quantum cracks SHA-256.
Of course, Bitcoin's plumbing & history are secured by SHA-256 (block hashes, PoW, Merkle trees, script hashes, addresses, etc.).
https://blossom.primal.net/18462a48ead9efd5943433c4a6e2231b02177f84f8fe990c59b0b99c2fbe0bba.png
The government AI bot unfortunately for Elon does not cooperate.
https://blossom.primal.net/79780b4505b8c1bf34a68eaec5d36deecd19a85a6513a6cc7a309b2981de778a.png
And last but not least, you have the fake space + fake quantum combo by Elon Musk:
https://blossom.primal.net/230c86b47e9f54f5d434fcaf81446a2e3bc6c7b931738d07bc8e4af5a5bf2400.png
I find the odds of them pulling the quantum card during the next bull market very high. This would be short-term bearish for Bitcoin (and probably everything else, except for gold, silver, etc).
Hopefully it isn't mid-term bearish for Bitcoin while other assets (e.g. state-embedded equities) recover quicker. That would suck.
#nevent1q…rzzm

2026-01-24 12:18:55 CET

- reply

Imagine having the ability to print too much money, hook everyone on cheap credit, cause inflation, and then stop printing because of inflation, cause a crisis, and rug-pull everyone because there isn't enough money in the system to service the debt.
We've had this on repeat in almost every country, decade after decade, and we keep playing this game we can never win.
Humans are kinda retarded to be honest.
And for the role of the Fed's chair they always cast some old guy, or some old lady because old people would never fuck you over.
And meanwhile Jerome Powell is going to parties with Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jared Kushner, Ivanka Trump, Mitt Romney, and all of the other vampires. Shiiiiiiiiiiet.
https://blossom.primal.net/deb52df00849ff58393277e0e1c48cf0392379a776be82b09dbeb95cf29d0f45.jpg
#nevent1q…25mt