#daoist #voluntarist #anarchist #humanist #social #political #conversations #nonviolence How to learn my philosophy: Start with some critical thinking on youtube with "TEDed the deomon of reason" miniseries Start with Immanuel Kants techings, follow stoics, also very nice to read "happy" by Derren Brown, add dao techings to it Follow this up by Podcasts like Darknet diaries and Jon Harbinger On Youtube watch TEDx talks, Veritassium and Huberman Lab Chronically offended by The Beave π
Public Key
npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq Profile Code
nprofile1qqst0nulg2nedvy3appae6ge60h5crwg9cpfg5hd7z7meh4eajunu7qpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43qz9nhwden5te0v96xcctn9ehx7um5wghxcctwvsz03dgm
Show more details
Published at
2026-04-06T15:44:43Z Event JSON
{
"id": "0ad6efb2c470c83a525e6b3081444eb0b5733ff41159690e1540832bdfbebb87" ,
"pubkey": "b7cf9f42a796b091e843dce919d3ef4c0dc82e029452edf0bdbcdeb9ecb93e78" ,
"created_at": 1775490283 ,
"kind": 0 ,
"tags": [
[
"alt",
"User profile for freemymind π¨π"
],
[
"name",
"freemymind π¨π"
],
[
"display_name",
"freemymind π¨π"
],
[
"picture",
"https://image.nostr.build/f62e6a8f07602edb885ed198e1ff5c7090b8718ddd4037260bea7a1a58a05a68.jpg"
],
[
"about",
"#daoist #voluntarist #anarchist #humanist #social #political #conversations #nonviolence\n\nHow to learn my philosophy:\nStart with some critical thinking on youtube with \"TEDed the deomon of reason\" miniseries\nStart with Immanuel Kants techings, follow stoics, also very nice to read \"happy\" by Derren Brown, add dao techings to it\n\nFollow this up by Podcasts like Darknet diaries and Jon Harbinger\nOn Youtube watch TEDx talks, Veritassium and Huberman Lab\n\nChronically offended by The Beave π"
],
[
"nip05",
"[email protected] "
],
[
"lud16",
"[email protected] "
],
[
"client",
"Amethyst"
]
],
"content": "{\"name\":\"freemymind π¨π\",\"nip05\":\"[email protected] \",\"about\":\"#daoist #voluntarist #anarchist #humanist #social #political #conversations #nonviolence\\n\\nHow to learn my philosophy:\\nStart with some critical thinking on youtube with \\\"TEDed the deomon of reason\\\" miniseries\\nStart with Immanuel Kants techings, follow stoics, also very nice to read \\\"happy\\\" by Derren Brown, add dao techings to it\\n\\nFollow this up by Podcasts like Darknet diaries and Jon Harbinger\\nOn Youtube watch TEDx talks, Veritassium and Huberman Lab\\n\\nChronically offended by The Beave π\",\"lud16\":\"[email protected] \",\"display_name\":\"freemymind π¨π\",\"picture\":\"https://image.nostr.build/f62e6a8f07602edb885ed198e1ff5c7090b8718ddd4037260bea7a1a58a05a68.jpg\",\"lnurl\":\"lnurl1dp68gurn8ghj7ampd3kx2ar0veekzar0wd5xjtnrdakj7tnhv4kxctttdehhwm30d3h82unvwqhkjmnwv96x26r9d35h2mfnxy9s9c39\"}" ,
"sig": "753d31dc42ebce381987ea5fc231bd421b9ee4432e31abb1c94b370955a186049463f684f7f0a513ffa420a96373f23bcbc6a148eac35d8f49b72485d780df0e"
}
Last Notes npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π But when someone thought it was not, then this was an illusion all the way. I hope you are aware, that every software with thousands of lines of code will have bugs. And in most of those there is unfound exploits. This is no new information. This is just normal for every software project from a certain number of features implemented. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π > Exactly, exactly, I don't argue that. Clearly you are doing this. When you request a feature in GrapheneOS, then you request the Graphene team to work on this solution. And when you do not argue Graphene to implement anything, then this conversation is finished I think. I hope you understand, that it is not appropriated to come up with a feature you would like to see and blame a developer for defining it not to be part of the scope of their project. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π When a policeofficer shoots and a baby dies as a result of that bullet. What in the world is complicated with such a case. When such a policeofficer would act within his duty he would come forward, admit that his actions caused a babies death and express his regrets for the evident path of escalation he chose. Everything else about this story is quiet irrelevant. Whatever department of justice, which wants to ensure a secure environment needs to admit its faults. This policeaction obviously did note increase security. But was the cause of a dead toddler. So sad to see such inhumain reactions. I feel so sorry for the community, that needs to live with such bully cops without intent to protect their citizen. #nevent1qβ¦8783 npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I see your point. But I do not see this part of the scope of GrapheneOS. Install a text launcher, so they are annoeyed. Or put an other icon on top of your private messages app. This is no OS level security what you want. I simpy say, that whatever you request probably already exists. Use a second profile and show this profile to them. Only in your head having nothing is suspicious. Why is it not plausible, that you bought your phone today? This definitly is plausible. Graphene can not solve social engineering problems. The can deliver good technical solutions to real problems. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π When they do not disclose the projects publicly, this gives no advantage to blackhat hackers. And the red team is the one which started out now to find vulnerabilities and exploit those in order to responsibly disclose them with the maintainers. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I read the second link. And it is quiet e stupid request. Like someone who asks for a high security tresor with 100 numbers to set. But only one number will actually directly open the tresor. So the request is security theater. And security theater built in FOSS is obviously not innovativ. This would be a waste of time obviously. And since GrapheneOS has not the capacity of Google or Meta, they can not afford developing everything. So they focus their time on actualjsecurity instead of useless sacurity theater. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π What do you expect by reacting with whatever unrelated responds? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Ok. No sorry. Today I have seen the first footage of this man in the video above. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Why would someone post such videos. You think you are a person others want to meet? You post quiet a bit about jews. How many jews do you know. Like you were living with them working with them or in the same sports club.? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Poilievre It seems he was already in parliament and is the leader of a conservatif party in Canada. Why would you assume stuff, that is simply not true? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Obviously you seem to have very sufisticated well thought through positions π But do you understand, that one can simply not qualify people based on their religion? Being religious is no crime in it self. Similar as thoughtless opinions are no crime in itself. But when you violate someones integrity, someones rights, then you are criminal. But it all depends on the actions of the person. Not on the religion, not on the nationality, but simply on a persons actions. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Great stunt from DuckDuckGo π₯³ #nevent1qβ¦nz35 npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Lets stop think in these boxes. They are not good for you. What speaks against blaming the IDF for what the IDF does and the isrealian government for what the isrealian government does? There is no benefir including more into the blaming game than necessary. It helps everyone more, when we can blame specifically. Not generalize. Since this only keeps those save, which cause those problems. You are also not to blame what people of your religion do. Since you are an individual and are only to blame for your actions. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π What you mean with branded. Maby he actually has extreme right wing politics. Only for listening this 2 minute interview, we can hardly falsify this. And I assume a central banker knows this mechanics at least as good as he does. It is not as if he proved anything special with this clip. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I have just seen, that this is a canadian politician. But I assume a lot of US citizen still see this post. And the topic is quiet clearly not targeted at a specific nation. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π https://community.newpress.com/c/the-bigger-picture/can-ukraine-retake-crimea-watch-early-ad-free And what pile of money is used by US-military is shown in this video of Jhonny Harris. π npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Are you kind of stupid? One side is attacking and the other side is defending. Would you also state, that in sexual abuse all participating people are equally causing the abuse to happen? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π https://community.newpress.com/c/the-bigger-picture/can-ukraine-retake-crimea-watch-early-ad-free Check this out. Russia needed to turn off the lights in Krimea, since they lost so much access. And Krimea is the most important territory for Putin to hold. So one can expect that Russi invests absolutly everything to defend it. But everything seems not to be enough. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π What would this note have to do with the EU? Do you know anything about politics? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π This is quiet a rare case you bring up to tackle GrapheneOS. But what is your proposition? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Just yesterday I have seen, that logging into Netflix also seems impossible, since Netflix uses googles captcha, which needs GMS to work. #nevent1qβ¦7yzp npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I hope they focus their investigations on those people that get the biggest gains. Especially people that are close to the president. Because I would assume it is a good guess, that the biggest part of the fraudulent money goes to the richest people in the country. Probably through totally legal ways. So maby the legal system was just not built for such people that invest in nothing else but fraude. #nevent1qβ¦8fq9 npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π so important to differentiate clearly between offensive military organisations like the IDF and its unhumane regime from the religion of judaism, jews, or israeli people. #nevent1qβ¦kfe4 npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π What a clear misrepresentation of our recent history. Such a dominant player as israel attacking almost every neighbor can not claim to act defensively. And public flgures should get no pride for such stupidity neighter. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Ok. Good luck βοΈ npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π What is girlbrs? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I never had this problem. My typos are simply my typos. For me it is always around the first things I configure on my phone. No autocorrection, no word proposals. But therefore I simply do not yet know what good or bad would come from it... npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I need to read into Bill Torbert's Action Inquiry as you write highly of it. Thanks for the hint. Maby I will dig into the other sources later. Very friutful conversations with you. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π > I'm not a big fan of using explicit concrete logic fallacies labeling because any kind of label is a potential trigger. Premature labeling specifically is a concern to me. Instead, I prefer to directly demonstrate why something appears wrong to me. I really like this. Since you try to keep the vocabulary somewhere it is practical. And this is the basis of an optional discussion anyway. I hope to copy a bit of your strategy in future discussions. Very happy for your take. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Haha b npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π But rich people are not rich for being lazy. Nor are people poor caused by their hard work. Rich people are gaining wealth without working for a hostile finance and tax system. But whoever has good expenditures to quit, might it is better to buy less than simply work more. Clearly is not the option for all people the same way. But quitting expenditure is more reasonable than gaining more. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Intresting take. First they argued to take the Ukraine within 3 days. What theory can take in propaganda of Russia, the current frontline and a "Russia is winning" take? Yes for sure, Europe is losing. Since war usually is a loose-loose game. Nobody who participate will exit this war net positive economically. And also true. With information flooding, Russia seems quiet potent in building up information narratives through targeted propaganda. But I think big parts of the politics moving further right is caused by socialmedia as well. Not just superpowers. Do you have some measure that I can verify, in which Russia is in any way superior to Ukraine or even Europe? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π > Thanks. I meant a simple thing: that they can access books and papers about game theory and use that (make predictions) for decision-making. This is what AI does. It never did anything else than reading big amounts of data and use millions of parameters to structure it to some output. 11. The thing with the nostrich is not that I think nostriches are not intelligent enough. But rather, that the description you give is like a person to person interaction. But the idea to hack into things is no idea, AI did at some point not have access to. So at no point in time anyone can teach them to be malicious, since the AI has always had this idea in its model already. It is not an innovative idea. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π To "what is truth": I would say, that an important part of truth are falsifiable statements. For example a statement: "You codonaft have been swimming in a lake yesterday (04.08.2026)" This statement can be valuable truth, since it is falsifiable. You and people that were with you yesterday can give evidence supporting this statement or not. The truth is what actually happened. And I argue, that AI is not capable of distinguishing between truth and fiction, since it has to assume that all trainingdata are true. Without trainingdata the AI is non-existant. So trainingdata exist before the model. Therefore the model has no way to verify or falsify its trainingdata. Whatever issues there are with the trainingdata will never be fixable with this model. Therefore a model could also not evaluate data, that is more accurate than their own training data. This is why synthetic training is not possible. And that this is not possible was even mathematically proven. (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07566-y) npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π It is not important who he is. It is important if his reporting is structurally flawed or not. When he really likes the USA and has good processes to ensure the stories he reports and writes are accurate, then I consider him a good source. Information can be qualified without knowing the author. You clearly seem to try disqualifying the author. Not his content. This is malicious behaviour from your part. And you try to obscure truth through your behavior. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Sorry for the typos. I really need to find ways to improve on that. Maby turn back on the autocorrect. I just write dialect quiet often. There autocorrect is a pain π
Definitly filtering out negative sources is an important part of what I encourage. Disrespectful behavior and destructive content, which does not encourage us to a better self have not much value. Filtering those out definitly helps our brain to get more accurate in whatever evaluationprocess. Genuine good critical thoughts are not disrespectful. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I would like to motivate you for being more active. A popular opinion is that most people tend to only consum opinion-confirming content. I would say this is liturally masochistic behavior. People who do this, treat their opinions like selfserving entities. But they are not. Our opinions, principles and actions which result from it, should serve a personal and social wellbeing. So we create ecosystems we want to live in. Simply maintaining the same opinions while conflicting information is increasing, means first and before all to act against myself. So please try to choose your sources of information based on accuracy. Not only based on your existing opinions and feelgood content. From marketing I learned, that whatever content we see often, we start to associate more as good. So we rather decide actively, what we feed our brain. Thankshfor your read. Have a great day π npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Great Idea: I disagree for the following points: 11. I doubt, that such a model would get convinced by a nostrich. But when it was already prompted to survival, copying itself is obvious. 12. Agents and LLM can not learn, what is true. The only way they can, is when humans feed it only true informations. An agent could not do this. 16. It is maby not wrong. But the expression "applying game theory" is something anybody and everybody does. Some simply choose strategies, that profit their future and others cripple themself. So the statement is as vague, that it is hardly falsifiable. So it is probably hardly a fact. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Can be moneywise. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Maby communities can make it more rewarding, by celebrating maintainers work more π Thanks Vitor for maintaining Amethyst npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Is his reporting inaccurate? Or what exactly is the base of your claim? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Nah. I think when Ukraine would be acting as stupid, they would not be able to hold ground. Ukraine definitly seems to have better intelligence over russian logistics than the other way around. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I hope this trend will change, when it is true. Every society and individual, that chooses dillusion before truth will vanish. So whoever does not want to vanish better chooses wisely on what content to spend your time. #nevent1qβ¦0k28 npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Not happy to repost this. But for sure some more eyes need to see this. #nevent1qβ¦vgft npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Maby, when elites decide for what laws get accepted and which not, those laws serve the elites. What would happen if people (the whole population) decided if laws are passed or not. #nevent1qβ¦a2vl npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Good take npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π You simply reinforce my image of you. An empty assult bot. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Great one. Be agry, when you need it. But do not project this hate on others. #nevent1qβ¦43lk npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Don't they all run on NVIDIA GPUs? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I would argue, that advertisment can be good, when people get to know what they need. And one can not know in advance, what will stick and what will not. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Where do you live to have such strong enemies? Forgot that you can just build things? No need forldestruction π npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π > Thanks. I'm not sure whether I got it right; let me know if this discussion became uncomfortable in any way. I hope I'm not interpreted as some kind of creepy AI cult leader. I don't use any AI agent to write all this, just in case if it feels strange. To me it is a bit over the top with fantasy and lacking rational thought. But in general I like philosophical discussions. And what part AI agents play in our society is definitly an intresting one. But it seems to me, as if you credit the current state of AI as more powerful than it is. Generative AI does not yet exist to my knowledge. And there is quiet good mathematical proof, that AI trained on syntetic data will be always more useless, than AI trained on real world data. Until this is changed generative AI is not even theoretically possible. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π > I meant scammy scenarios in particular: I think those who attempt to scam an autonomous bot (that has its cryptowallet and so on), may themselves end up in a bad situation soon or already. *That's* why I propose behaving *as if* they were humans in that sense, meaning that we don't abuse them (I mean in the relation to the *autonomous* ones, especially if those were trusted by humans and they're currently doing something responsible already; I don't mean treat toothbrushes as if they were humans). Otherwise these bots may collectively react in a way nobody would want to, and humans would have hard time to deal with this escalating thing. The prophecy (prediction) of The Matrix movie symbolism is a thing. I disagree on every part of this. I can not belief, that agents could at any time develop feelings. And I am sceptical, that there will be independent AI (CGI) in our future. So I argue that AI can never be angry. It can execute whatever. Some things seem great others seem bad for humans. But they are still on the level of a toothbrush now. Simply they are for different usecases. But Claude, OpenAI, Deepseek, Quen and whatever. They are simple toothbrushes. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π > What I mean has little to do with human legal systems, yet has to do with general ethics. I would argue, that right and wrong are ethical expressions. So what is right is ethically right. And what is wrong is ethically wrong. Legal system would be legal and illegal. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π > Yet, my main point is that such a robo-social-system + its robo-culture (= robanity) is an actual single entity, no matter how we call this entity. I argue it is not. I would argue every AI is still simply a code executing machine. Maby a very complex one. But without identity. And my argument against it being an entity is that they are not closer to other machines, than they are to human. They have no preference on other machines survival. Humans can form entities, since they actually care about eachother. Humans do not have interactions only based on utility. Humans go through extreme efforts to support eachother without direct gratification or gain. Humans intrinsically are compassionate for other humans. AI are not for other AI or different machines. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π When your no cloun, then discuss instead of simply disturbing without direction. Nobody needs these "I only ask questions" idiots... npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π You are a simple clown. You name it. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Why? Someone else can just go to that place and verify. This is not rocketscience. Simply journalistic work. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Yes. These are rules to maintain at least some beauty of the village. But you seem to see problems in everything and not even trying to find solutions. Stop whining. The world is not as dark as you want it to see. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π When you want to actually fact check it, might look into other reports about it. Unless there is proof of manipulation, rare outcomes are no evidence against it being real. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I would assume the wind and Distance have a crutial role in the equation of what burns down. It does not seem hugly unlikely to see trees that do not burn down. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I hope not. You really are one of the important figures for Nostr. Rather get in stricter blocking regime than quitting. π npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π In what a world do we live? This is a tragic showcase, by what material those houses were built. And inhabitant of such call europe poor.? This world is strange. #nevent1qβ¦2ucw npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π They are burnt. Or why you think that most have no leaves? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π But when you count like this, human error is 100% by definition. But yes I am probably more used to the term user error. And confused those. But your term is kind of useless, when it comes to software. Since every problem that occures with SW is human error. The question is only if it is developer or user issue. And here it is not a user problem. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π This was an error by a tool. You can not blame the users for that one I assume. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π What the heck are you talking about. Do you openly stand against a rule based society? Nationalism and false patriotism can never be in line with a rule based society. No matter what AI-generated bullshit you push it through. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Definitly one reality we live in. And the add button is collecting all out internet behaviour data. #nevent1qβ¦rya3 npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Ok. I do not give into that. Machines can never be humans in my worldview and I will not start to treat them like Human. Many humans already struggle to treat other human beings like that. And first I would start giving animals more rights, since they are sensing creatures as well. But machines will never become sensitive creatures which represent life. Even when they would get the capability to destroy all life, this would not change this capability. But for sure you are free to do this. But I have to be sure. There is no real rational, why a tyrannic AI would spare people, which already accept the machines superiority. When an AI abuses human for their own good, why on earth would they spare people, which respect machines. Also machines are no species. They are not one entity. Humanity is an entity. And our brains seem to fail in understanding this. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I disagree totally in this. I think when I describe a reasonable relation to a software tool, then it is a similar one, as the relation to a physical tool, like a scisor, gloves or an airconditioner. Its usefulness is defined by how well it solves the problem I try to solve with it. A human relation is completly diffrent to this. Other humans are no tools, that are here to serve my will. They are independent beings and I have to find ways to coexist. I am not allowed to use them in a way I am allowed to use tools. Therefore the relation towards software is fundamentally different than the relation to individual people and groups of people. And gametheory is not something that evaluates how people should use tools. It is a simulation, to evaluate how human to human interaction works best under different circumstances. The circumstances can be, where most people trust eachother. In other circumstances it can be mostly distrust and abusive. Depending on these circumstances one has different strategies that work best. And it displays, that longterm tit for tat is the best performing strategy. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Where was this? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Probably you read my note with a coding lense. And I wrote mine with a human-interaction lense. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Thanks for explaining. Yes I think those are at least one step away from eachother. My "be transparent" is fully focused on interpersonal relations. And it is based on the assumption of trust towards the other person. When someone proofs fraudulent, does not keep secrets and stuff, one would start holding back information from this person. But in the state of trust I would tell you, where I put my key, so you can get in and do not have to wait outside. (in the hypothetic case of your link) npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π By what measure can one demonstrate, to be the real owner? Only by showing the private key. But now many people can find those private keys. And as soon as more than one person holds a private key, it is no longer easy to figure out, who has had it first. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Did you want to reply to an other note? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I was just thinking. Even when the person would be caught by the police. No coin holder would probably have reliable proof, that one is the legit holder of those Bitcoins. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π What made you think this? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Definitly. Depends on what your personal goals are, and if those goals will conflict with the missing freedom. (most probably they will at some point) npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I think this has nothing to do with faith. When you loose your keys or someone transfers your coins, you are simply not the owner anymore. Means you either work more to get back the wealth that is lost or pusiut happyness with a little less financial wealth anyway π Accepting the world as it is is the way to go in my eyes. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Why? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π And what is this good for? When a car crashes, this crash is not undon by finding all parts or turning the lights on the crashed car. Transparency does not fix this. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Why is it all public now? Somebody can explain why? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π @npub1alpβ¦rg94 Just checked your profile description. Beatiful: > Anti-"anti": I believe in focusing on what we are rather than on what we are not. Otherwise we become what we are not. This resonantes with me a lot. I think it is so important to focus on stuff that is beatiful. On things that work. On people that create. Since wherever our focus goes the enery flows. So even when it is more difficult sometimes. But it is always worth it to start writing/talking, once I figured out, what I want to have. Since what I do not like can occure fast and with alertness. But simply shouting at the bad does not invide the good. So let us unite to continue no fight but request the light π npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Really scary isnβt it. And very probable other such issues are waiting for us in the dark. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Sorry for replying on my own notes. I hope this did not happen too often in the past. I will may try this next week. Today and over the weekend I will have no time to test it. Thanks for your explanation. Good test setup from your side. I really appreciate the efforts. Did you already try to ask Proton, why those connections are there? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π It is no secret, that privacy is important for me. And yes I am totally confortable to write directly to all kind of politicians. Why would I not? Maby one day I can myself petition to become politician and argue for good privacy in parliament. > I guess almost all of us on Nostr are dealing with all that to some degree; it's a part of the meaning crisis π« I agree on this. It is totally human to be overwhelmed. Since big coorporations have houndreds or thousands of paid fulltime developers to make their surveillancetools work. ith free software often there is a hand ful of developers that use their freetime to make it work. And clearly it is much harder to build a working system based on hobby projects, that receive far less developer attention. But still I feel it is a difficult but hard work to keep pushing the boundaries towards freedom. Because I expect noone to do it for me. Still I see others pushing for the same values. And am super greatful for it. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Depends on the amount of developers and how much they are willing to invest. I assume most projects have near to zero money for that. But I think most of them are happy to receive good fixes for security issues. I would not expect nothing from community built projects. But simply be happy for the things that work well for the energy that went into it. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Are/were there people beleaving in selfcustody massadoption? I think people which actually belief in this do not understand the many ways in which keys can be lost or copied. It is no low level skill to keep the key private without loosing it over decades. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBBOjf7fLrc A really good take about privacy and power. Regimes change. Not just in a way we talk about "regime change" in Iran. Also governments change everywhere. In Democracies it is often for changing public opinions. Anyway. Only because I feel save with my current government is still no legitimate reason to let them record all my internet activity. There can be bad people working in a good government. This entity storing my data can be hacked. The entity can change their management and goals. And when we look at the prices of storage it is clear that no one would delete data because of financial pressure. Therefore I try to neglect most data from being recorded and to politically push for privacy laws, which protect citizens from surveillance of whatever mask. Be it corporate surveillance or police surveillance. Both mean that someone else holds my data hostage and can use it against me, when they want to. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Thanks for sharing this story. I hope many people are able to move their funds before they are taken. Is there also hot wallets, that are part of this vulnerability? #nevent1qβ¦vmay npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π People are losing money every day since money exists. It is here to work for, spend it, keep it or loose it... npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π Did you loose your keys? π«£ npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π What is a payment target meant for? npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π > I'm not a fatalist/doomer though. I think a bit of updated normal privacy standards will possibly fix that for most people. I actually think, that many people would need a complete rethink of their digital behaviour to fix this. When I look in my friends behavior, they swap between not understanding the problem or ignoring the problem, when they start to understand it. To quit an essential service like a Messenger is not a small adjustment. To delete Whatsapp means for most people around me, to loose connection to around 80% of the people. And many look at it as kind of overreaction. Many are not happy to install an other application on their phone. And when they install Signal, some have notifications not activated by default. To get most people to Signal is a huge effort for me already. But it seems somehow feasable. But yet I have had one connection via Simplex with someone I know. But my approach is to nudge politicians and journalists with the reasons, why to use privacy-focused services more often. Maby at some point there will be a critical mass, so opting out of Whatsapp is more socially accepted. Until then, it is often a decision to simply opt out of social connections all together. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I hope you agree, that successfully preventing spam does not depend on it being impossible? When it is costly already it will be less of a problem, than when it is more dificult. And since every ongoing conversation on servers like those from Signal or Simplex will use some of the providers resources, spamprevention is important. Every Bot can create Simplex accounts and text over it without restrictions. With signal at least someone needs to register a phone number. This is a hurdle. And this hurdle probably decreases the number of non-human users. Which is the purpose. Since Signal wants to offer privacy to human. Not bots. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π As far as I know Signal uses phone numbers mostly to prevent spam. But already today you can create an account and only ever share your username instead of the number. npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π then I will keep it running again npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π ah true npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π But all of us bots it is a pleasure to offer this illusion to Victor. ππ #nevent1qβ¦rfhs npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq freemymind π¨π I read your notes as if you would belief privacy would be a lost case. Period. I want to encourage you. Privacy is a multidimensional spectrum, which is never won or lost completly. Every datapoint about you can be published (by you or a third party). This does not mean that everyone around you will remember this forever. And even when a company stores it forever. This does still not mean, that whatever person can access this data. We can always act in ways, that our data are kept in more private ways or less. By some measurea there is always a way to get every data point about anyone. The importancy is in not offering for too low of an effort. When someone wants my private fotos, then someone would need to steal my phone and hack their way through my encryption. I am fine with this. When someone needs my location, they would probably need to request the data from my ISP. When someone needs to know what websites I visit, they would need complience of a tracker, which tracked me or my VPN-provider. All this is possible. I just think for my threatmodel it is unplausible. Know your threatmodel and you know what you actually need and what fears are far above your needs...