Jackthemimic
JackTheMimic

Hoch die anarchie. Bomb throwing champion.

Public Key

npub1m50e65pv09ga73lglrkjgh5tlgj006pv9rce8xdg7rn5kps38gssh2glzq

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsd68ua2qk8j5wlgl503mfyt69l5f8haqkz3uvnnx50pe6tqcgn5ggpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerfw36x7tnsw43qz9rhwden5te0wfjkccte9ejxzmt4wvhxjmccfmvdq

Publishing to

Author Public Key

npub1m50e65pv09ga73lglrkjgh5tlgj006pv9rce8xdg7rn5kps38gssh2glzq

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-09-09 11:17:17 UTC

WORD5 #705 3/6* (Hard Mode)
⬛⬛🟧🟧⬛
🟧🟧🟧⬛🟪
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-09-08 14:02:56 UTC

WORD5 #704 4/6* (Hard Mode)
🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛
🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛
🟪🟪⬛🟪⬛
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-09-07 21:57:32 UTC

- reply

In what way? Reorgs?

2026-09-07 17:59:55 UTC

That would be called Gray hat hacking, just FYI. White hats don't allot their own "Bug Bounty
#nevent1q…6fal

2026-09-07 04:00:58 UTC

- reply

Well, define control. If 5 mining companies don't confirm your transaction, do you control it?

2026-09-06 23:14:52 UTC

- reply

That's hot. (In Paris Hilton voice)

2026-09-06 23:12:16 UTC

- reply

Next is bitcoin. All they need is 2 mining pools and 1 exchange to pull off an attack I wrote. Very simple stuff. Just need the balls to do it.

2026-09-06 18:43:28 UTC

WORD5 #702 6/6* (Hard Mode)
🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧
⬛🟧⬛🟪⬛
⬛⬛🟧🟪🟪
⬛🟪⬛🟪🟪
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-09-06 15:24:43 UTC

- reply

I've already wrote the attack, Antpool, Coinbase, and Foundry just need to have the balls to do it.

2026-09-06 15:23:43 UTC

- reply

I can't wait for the miners to kill bitcoin. Your hubris is hilarious.

2026-09-05 12:33:23 UTC

- reply

"Get her checked into a mental hospital" generally not good for a caretaker to have this phrase spoken about them.
I would also be crazy dangerous to my kids on meth amphetamines. That's why you have to have 2 parents. And make good decisions. Murdering this children is not one of those.

2026-09-05 12:30:11 UTC

WORD5 #701 4/6* (Hard Mode)
⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛
🟪⬛⬛⬛⬛
🟪🟧🟧🟧⬛
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-09-04 19:03:33 UTC

- reply

Hey moron, I actually understand how non-state money works. You think the market has no control levers? Virtue Signal my nuts, faggot.

2026-09-04 15:22:14 UTC

WORD5 #700 3/6* (Hard Mode)
⬛⬛⬛🟧🟪
⬛🟪⬛🟪🟪
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-09-04 13:08:04 UTC

- reply

Yikes. Sad existence.

2026-09-03 17:49:17 UTC

- reply

Sheep

2026-09-03 17:24:43 UTC

- reply

Why would you want to be on an exchange? Is it money or a trading token? Mine it yourself, work for it, or take payment in it. Listing is fiat nonsense.

2026-09-03 17:17:41 UTC

- reply

Why would money need to be listed on an exchange?

2026-09-03 02:59:50 UTC

WORD5 #699 4/6* (Hard Mode)
⬛⬛🟧🟧⬛
🟧🟧⬛🟧⬛
🟪🟪⬛🟪🟧
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-09-02 14:39:10 UTC

- reply

Does that mean the government can claw back the tax exemptions they used with those disbursements?

2026-09-02 14:22:08 UTC

- reply

Someone should tell that Bitcoin company that Bitcoin is non-refundable.

2026-09-02 00:26:53 UTC

WORD5 #698 4/6* (Hard Mode)
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛⬛🟪⬛
⬛🟪⬛🟪⬛
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-09-01 12:41:09 UTC

- reply

Those are rare. Just like american mothers. Most people are not that attractive.

2026-09-01 12:39:30 UTC

- reply

It's crazy how people just short-hand a government imposed national socialist party to mean "Against Jews." Like, that's not the only thing. Does Kanye also want the government control of manufacturing? Don't adopt government bullshit for the one thing you like.
This works on so many people it's sad. Don't like gays? Be Republican. Don't like corporations? Be democrat. Don't like Jews? Be Nazi.
How about just don't like the shit you don't like and don't involve the government?
Anyway, catchy song.

2026-08-31 13:05:01 UTC

WORD5 #696 3/6* (Hard Mode)
🟪🟪⬛⬛⬛
🟪🟪⬛⬛⬛
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-08-30 15:31:34 UTC

- reply

New to me. Looks like a new bot attack. I blocked and WoT reported them.

2026-08-30 14:48:52 UTC

- reply

It's a podcast about money. How interesting is money really? Most people are interested in what happens after you spend the money not the interim between providing value and exchanging it.

2026-08-30 14:35:12 UTC

WORD5 #695 6/6* (Hard Mode)
⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛
⬛🟧🟧⬛⬛
⬛🟧⬛⬛🟪
🟪⬛⬛🟧🟪
🟪🟧🟧⬛🟪
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/
The last word on my mind.

2026-08-29 22:33:34 UTC

WORD5 #694 3/6* (Hard Mode)
⬛🟪⬛🟪⬛
🟪🟪⬛🟪⬛
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-08-29 16:39:56 UTC

- reply

Basically bad colon stuff. Still on the mend.
But I hear kidney stones will put you on your knees so, be careful out there.

2026-08-29 11:55:23 UTC

- reply

NFTs can be done on any database, a blockchain is unnecessary. SmartContracts, are just what normal people call programs with cryptographic key pair signatures.
Ethereum is a rube-goldberg machine of useless technical debt. There is no need to make a contract on a Blockchain database. Just write a program, sign it with private keys, and OTS it. No giant contrived datastructure necessary.

2026-08-29 11:48:11 UTC

- reply

Dude, forreal, ethereum blows chunks. I don't see a single thing it could do that Nostr and Monero couldn't.

2026-08-29 11:43:48 UTC

- reply

How would they find out? I thought it was private.

2026-08-29 11:31:34 UTC

- reply

Your own or someone else's?

2026-08-29 11:30:33 UTC

- reply

I thought I had one, turns out I had Diverticulitis, combined with a UTI. Brutal stuff. Anyway, I hope your peehole is alright bud.

2026-08-25 17:25:45 UTC

- reply

Stop eating too, I guarantee you spent more on food than a node and that's opportunity cost flying right out the window.

2026-08-25 13:35:25 UTC

- reply

I agree. Don't buy Monero. You should probably do something of worth for it. Like create a product or deliver a service. Who TF give away their Monero for fiat?

2026-08-25 11:57:31 UTC

WORD5 #690 5/6* (Hard Mode)
⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛
⬛🟪⬛⬛🟧
⬛🟪🟧⬛⬛
🟪🟪⬛🟪⬛
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-08-25 05:04:16 UTC

- reply

I was wondering why no one was taking a sober look at the state of mining and code governance. This make a lot more sense.

2026-08-25 05:02:52 UTC

- reply

"If" the government gets that power. Who's delulu?

2026-08-24 11:30:58 UTC

- reply

I'm fucking with you, everyone knows if you don't say Israel is literally the worst, got the call, don't you know? To be clear, they might be the worst, but real opinions may vary.

2026-08-24 11:25:31 UTC

- reply

Weev got the call, on IRC, apparently. 😂

2026-08-23 16:36:20 UTC

- reply

30 hours or so, the other 50, I drive trucks. The money is nice. ¯\\_(ツ)_/¯

2026-08-23 16:03:39 UTC

- reply

I work about 80 hours a week, and yes 55 is more than enough, just a joke pal.

2026-08-23 15:51:37 UTC

- reply

55-hours? Dang lightweight.

2026-08-22 14:53:44 UTC

WORD5 #687 5/6* (Hard Mode)
⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧
🟪⬛🟧⬛⬛
🟪🟧🟧⬛⬛
🟪⬛⬛🟪🟪
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-08-21 16:04:23 UTC

- reply

The false premise you're starting with is that your genetics determine anything to do with your willpower, which is not correct. You know written in your heart, what is good and what is bad. The will to do the good thing is simply an inverse relation of your ego. If you think that you're able to determine what is good for you better than the intuition bestowed upon you. Your ego is simply not humble enough.

2026-08-21 10:31:44 UTC

- reply

Capture does that to an asset.

2026-08-21 10:30:47 UTC

WORD5 #686 4/6* (Hard Mode)
⬛⬛🟧🟧🟪
🟪⬛⬛🟧🟪
🟪🟪🟧⬛🟪
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-08-21 10:12:16 UTC

- reply

Antichrist type shit, nice.

2026-08-20 11:53:18 UTC

- reply

But, UTXO Told me it didn't matter. 😭

2026-08-20 11:48:42 UTC

WORD5 #685 3/6* (Hard Mode)
🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛🟧🟪⬛
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/
Nice

2026-08-19 21:04:33 UTC

Imagine how this pump feels to people who just lost their stack to a ColdCard.

2026-08-19 02:23:16 UTC

WORD5 #684 5/6* (Hard Mode)
🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛🟧🟧⬛🟧
⬛🟧⬛🟧🟧
⬛🟧🟧🟪⬛
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-08-18 16:25:19 UTC

- reply

Hey man, I was just bad at it. Lol

2026-08-18 14:57:43 UTC

- reply

I'd rather ignore you.

2026-08-18 14:40:52 UTC

- reply

I don't know if you understand what the word emotional means. I'm using logic to deduce my positions. "If this, then that."
You, on the other hand, are attributing motive and politics to my positions, which is an emotional stance. "You're blackpilled" which attributes to me the connotation that I am unwilling to accept an eventuality where good can win, which I am not.
Telling people that the Titanic is sinking is not the black pill position. I am telling you the situation is grim and there's nothing you can do to save the ship. Facts. Saying it is impossible for anyone to survive this shipwreck is the black-pilled position.

2026-08-18 13:06:54 UTC

- reply

It's hilarious to think that you would be owed money for allowing the cancellation of a digital license.

2026-08-18 13:01:24 UTC

- reply

Their collusion would have to synchronize independent mempools and block templates as hashers, whereas a centralized block template from a pool is much, much simpler.
And of course, 100 1% pools would be better, but it wouldn't be more decentralized because each of those pools is a centralization point. Think of your question this way. Is it better to have 100 Twitter clones, but still centralized servers, or to have something like Nostr. Would 100 Twitter clones be "decentralized" Even so, that's not even close to a possibility because people gravitate to a single solution, the least resistance, the most powerful pool. So if even one of those pools got 2%, everyone would flock to it.

2026-08-18 12:43:50 UTC

- reply

Percentages per pool don't really matter because they can always coalesce or make backroom deals. The only thing that truly matters is for the standard protocol to have the hashers create the block templates as well. The only way that happens is with the adoption of stratum v2 or datum which have been roundly rejected by pools.
The only other option is for economically dense nodes such as exchanges and wallet provider nodes to change the proof of work algorithm so that miners have to start over.
allowing a competition based on Stratum v2 pools to proliferate or even as long as you're doing a proof of work change, changing the necessity for the stratum protocol in the first place.

2026-08-18 12:39:52 UTC

WORD5 #683 5/6* (Hard Mode)
🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛🟪⬛⬛⬛
⬛🟪⬛🟧⬛
⬛🟪🟧🟧⬛
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-08-18 12:11:09 UTC

- reply

Every time you respond to me, it's emotional garbage that has no argument. Who says I'm black-pilled about anything? I'm just reading things as they are. Nowhere did I say the bad guys have to win, for it's inevitable that they win.

2026-08-18 11:46:11 UTC

- reply

The hash provider also transmits the winning block hash which gets relayed around the network regardless of if the pool itself rejects the block template.
But regardless of that, they have no incentive to allow Stratum V2 at all. So that's kind of a moot point.

2026-08-18 05:05:27 UTC

- reply

That has no bearing when the incentives align. Fiat can be very persuasive to any jurisdiction. But whatever, bury your head in sand about it, I don't care anymore. 11 years of experience and technical experience but sure, the mantras influencers say are your rebuttal. It couldn't happen because game theory between nations (as if nations don't work together all the time).
All good man, don't worry about it.

2026-08-17 21:45:02 UTC

- reply

Says fucking who? With as much hash share as they have who says that an Iranian can make a transaction if the pools agree not to? That is pure speculation. If hashers can pick templates it is assured by overwhelming probability that every transaction makes it into blocks as soon as fee-appropriate.

2026-08-17 21:38:42 UTC

- reply

"my pool is working hard to make me more money, for free – hey, instead can they allow me to ruin the whole pool, for everyone, for no reason? After all, I contribute 0.0001% of the hashrate of this pool, I should be allowed to destroy the whole pool (and the pool’s brand, and reputation, which I had no part in making) because I am a retard”
Great argument. I guess being an actual miner is pointless.
(Try reading the article instead of just reposting it instead of an argument)

2026-08-17 21:30:31 UTC

- reply

Source
-Bro, trust me.

2026-08-17 19:29:03 UTC

- reply

How do you solve Bitcoin's miner centralization problem?

2026-08-17 18:46:52 UTC

- reply

Twitter is not the Bitcoin network. Ypu HAVE to run software that enforces your ideas or you have no opinion on it.

2026-08-17 18:45:14 UTC

- reply

No. A softfork is consensus valid meaning any new blocks are accepted by status quo nodes. If they rejected those version 4 bit blocks, THAT would be signaling "nay". Usually you would have to run a URSF client or accept the new stricter rules.

2026-08-17 15:10:00 UTC

WORD5 #682 5/6* (Hard Mode)
⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧
🟧🟪⬛⬛⬛
⬛🟪🟪⬛⬛
⬛🟪🟪🟪⬛
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-08-17 13:21:14 UTC

- reply

Remind who? The exchanges and the mining pools that control Bitcoin now? Knowing your cypherpunk roots disallows those establishments to take a foothold in the first place. Once they have a foothold, there's no removing them. Cool? Lol

2026-08-17 11:52:23 UTC

- reply

I'm not going back to trading rocks for stuff.
Also, the foot guns that you're mentioning are entirely avoidable, even in the most retard-proof way. Seed QRs or having seed cards are a way that even retards can hold their money securely.
And I don't know if you've ever studied history here, but taking on the government head on is actually never the way things work out for the revolutionaries. They always start with subterfuge and backroom meetings so they don't immediately get stamped out.
Bitcoin's capture is simply because the revolutionaries forgot their purpose.
I always gave Monero shit because some of the economic policies are kind of retarded. But because of the cypherpunk ethos being first and foremost, they never forget what their purpose is.
That, it turns out, is the much more valuable aspect of a good cryptocurrency.

2026-08-17 11:46:47 UTC

Yo @nprofile…jyhm this is the second update in a row that has been pushed with invalid signing credentials. Are all of the developers that are pushing and merging part of the GitHub keyring? Because whoever is signing the releases is not a valid credential on the actual release.

2026-08-17 04:00:02 UTC

- reply

I would just piss it out if I could but it ain't budging.

2026-08-17 03:47:13 UTC

If you ever have the chance to develop a kidney stone, I'd say, don't do it. It doesn't feel like it's worth it. 0/10 wouldn't.

2026-08-16 21:33:24 UTC

- reply

I think you are attributing things to me that I don't believe. I am talking practical application of the promise of bitcoin. It only works as a decentralized node and decentralized mining network. If either centralize it fails. Mining has centralized necessitating "firing the miners" but the practical accomplishment of that goal is borne upon a large swath of users who don't see the problem.

2026-08-16 15:19:40 UTC

👀👀👀👀
WORD5 #681 2/6* (Hard Mode)
⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-08-16 15:12:46 UTC

- reply

We just saw the evidence with BIP110. How many nodes outside of the BIP110 crowd said "Hey, the miners ignored them, that's not good. We should fire them and change the proof of work!"
Nearly 0%. So now how many BIP100 nodes defected after the chainsplit? A few. So now less than 20% of the network is just going to start again on a hardforked chain.
My emphasis is on the "just" fire the miners. The JUST is doing a lot of heavy lifting.

2026-08-16 05:32:45 UTC

- reply

This is the equivalent of saying "Just make your own military." It doesn't really work that way and people were naive to think it did.

2026-08-16 05:23:38 UTC

- reply

That was never the issue, obvsly.

2026-08-16 04:00:59 UTC

- reply

Report an *aggravated murder

2026-08-15 23:59:49 UTC

- reply

Can't do that if you don't have an economic node rivaling an exchange or Hashpower rivalling Foundry. ¯\\_(ツ)_/¯

2026-08-15 23:58:57 UTC

- reply

Tail emissions and Demurage talk pushed by Peter Todd.
Ordinal BIP pushed after LukedashJr was removed as BIP editor.
Pay attention, you can't just be complacent and have freedom, it works when the miners are on your side, not when it's against their interest.

2026-08-15 23:52:33 UTC

- reply

Demon, obviously projecting that he shouldn't be alive.

2026-08-15 13:09:49 UTC

- reply

Have you been checking these reports and videos for AI? The water doesn't make any sense in the second video.

2026-08-15 13:08:33 UTC

- reply

Then she died

2026-08-15 13:04:04 UTC

- reply

Yeah, but when it happens to someone who spent over a decade studying it, building on it, and helping others into it, maybe there's something to be analyzed there.

2026-08-15 12:56:36 UTC

WORD5 #680 4/6* (Hard Mode)
⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛
🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛
⬛🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-08-15 02:54:27 UTC

- reply

Yeah, we get it Peter is always trying to destroy Bitcoin. With centralized mining he can ABSOLUTELY get a demurrage softfork pushed.

2026-08-14 18:50:35 UTC

- reply

Like many other things a government touches, it gets corrupted. Lots easier when it's already a centralized network.

2026-08-14 17:08:44 UTC

- reply

Gay take.

2026-08-14 15:28:40 UTC

- reply

Now that miner centralization has been proven, of course Israel gets involved. They never play a game that isn't rigged.

2026-08-14 13:54:30 UTC

WORD5 #679 4/6* (Hard Mode)
⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛
🟧⬛🟧⬛🟪
⬛🟧🟪🟪🟪
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-08-14 13:29:41 UTC

- reply

See? That's what I've been saying. Reject it don't just pretend 20% of the network didn't exist. (Now they don't exist)

2026-08-13 21:37:44 UTC

- reply

Being indifferent on a protocol IS acceptance. This is why legacy wallets are compatible with SegWit. If running older software was a rejection, SegWit wouldn't have activated.
Either way "economic support" SHOULD be irrelevant to the network node model but, it turns out if you are an exchange node your node is more important than thousands of individual nodes. Which is basically banking with extra steps.

2026-08-13 16:16:19 UTC

WORD5 #678 6/6* (Hard Mode)
⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛
🟧⬛⬛🟧⬛
🟪🟧🟧⬛⬛
🟪⬛🟪🟧⬛
🟪⬛🟪🟪🟪
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-08-13 16:04:35 UTC

- reply

Collusion is not necessary for this to occur. Everyone just follows incentives. The hashers provide hash at the lowest cost they can. The pools maximize revenue by including EVERY transaction they can (regardless of node rules). Exchanges nodes will always try to maximize the amount of Bitcoin they can purchase from miners. Making their relationship symbiotic. Core are coders first and the more feature rich you can make a program, the more you can do with it.
All of this culminates in the mining pools effectively setting the rules of the network. I have expressed how this could be exploited to get even more control but THAT requires collusion. The issue is they didn't realize they were in control until last Saturday.
As far as the UASF there was no URSF meaning the miners have the option to do a MRSF. But, normally people would say "The hashers would move their hash out of a pool that goes rogue. The hashers did not do that. I think they are complacent and will go along with whatever the pool pushes.

2026-08-12 21:41:22 UTC

- reply

Well, the last sentence is the real crux. "Refuse upgrades without needing anyone's permission"
That becomes no with the mining centralization and "economically dense" nodes working in concert (as they did on Saturday). I wrote up an easy way they could push a new rule without social consensus and force everyone's compliance, here:
#nevent1q…87e6

2026-08-12 18:48:19 UTC

- reply

Technically, no, but in effect, yes.