naruto
Naruto

I never go back on my word

Public Key

npub1w2rfg6swqzjgv84h23lwp2vdga4w90wntxejmf4zfhrwl0kuzqpqvc7tte

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs89p55dg8qpfyxr6m4glhq4xx5w6hzhhf4nved563ym3h0hmwpqqspp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqprfmhxue69uhhg6r9vehhyetnwshxummnw3erztnrdaks2zc3y6

Publishing to

nos.lol

theforest.nostr1.com

Author Public Key

npub1w2rfg6swqzjgv84h23lwp2vdga4w90wntxejmf4zfhrwl0kuzqpqvc7tte

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-08-31 03:45:27 CEST

- reply

@nprofile…nj27 had an interesting idea to use nostr to mirror X. Seems like you're doxxed and going through it now, but maybe other operators or folks in the nitter community could be interested in running with this idea. I'm sorry you're going through it.
#nevent1q…pm5v

2026-08-31 01:33:19 CEST

- reply

You specifically said you don't want to see people poor. That is a comment on price, not adoption.
On adoption: Monero dominates Bitcoin when both are accepted, and Monero's adoption as p2p money is trending positively (see xmrbazaar. In fact you can even see positive trends on here of people wanting to send XMR via payment targets and negative trends on BTC zaps).

2026-08-31 00:28:36 CEST

- reply

Anyone who held Monero past 5 years would be wealthier than someone who held equivalent amount of Bitcoin. Monero's doing fine price wise.
More importantly, Bitcoin culture's obsession with NGU has been damaging to the tech and holding Bitcoin back on the p2p money front. Monero's entire focus is driven by that focus, not Wall Street adoption and acceptance by bankers and hedge funds. Zoom out and observe where this is heading, it's pretty easy to see when you're not blinded by laser eyes.

2026-08-31 00:19:38 CEST

- reply

You're stuck in a rut where Bitcoin's UX for p2p money is absolutely atrocious and not going to be improved any time soon. Bitcoin used to fix problems and incrementally improve: segwit and taproot being the most notable examples. Now people like you have no ability to discern clear improvements in line with Bitcoin's past history of improving. Michael Saylor is relevant here because he wants to ossify and is playing a role in Bitcoin ossifying. It's sad to see.
Covenants are obviously fine. Start there. If Bitcoin doesn't improvd the p2p money UX case, it's just going to remain mostly a speculative instrument for now Wall Street.

2026-08-29 17:36:20 CEST

- reply

CTV was prematurely pushed 😂
Hey man I have a bridge that's really cool do you wanna but it?

2026-08-28 23:52:27 CEST

- reply

Evidence is 0 change in Bitcoin. Even if it's not just him, there's a problem. It's stuck as is.

2026-08-28 20:18:32 CEST

Monero has the motion. The Most Censored.

2026-08-28 19:25:01 CEST

- reply

Yeah and unfortunately those morons need a digital beating which can get ugly. Especially when they're influential.

2026-08-28 19:12:09 CEST

- reply

I don't know. Your interpretation is that the New Covenant utterly erases what was prior established and ordained by God? As I understand, the Old Testament is still considered critical text that is later fulfilled by Jesus, not that some of the Old Testament was fucked up and could be thrown away. I agree it's not exactly righteous what that text states, but I think you're pointing out an issue that also is inherently tied to Christianity. And that's not to trash Christianity. I think there is problematic text in religious text all over, and it's not exactly fair to hyper fixate on problematic text like this to trash one and not another.

2026-08-28 19:00:57 CEST

- reply

This text is considered divine ordinance from God in Christianity too. This is literally the Christian Bible explaining God's will. Are you not pointing out an issue with the Christian Bible in making this point?

2026-08-28 18:56:07 CEST

- reply

As in, a lot of Monero people do want to see Bitcoin succeed.

2026-08-28 18:55:34 CEST

- reply

Monero is actually improving in the face of resistance from literally every direction. Bitcoin isn't and it's sad to see that. A lot of Monero people actually don't want to see that happen for Bitcoin.

2026-08-28 18:53:28 CEST

- reply

I actually commend nostr for the respect people tend to have for Monero around here. But for years the toxic maxis like @nprofile…rrsm have spewed complete bullshit about Monero and lots of people listened. It's not such simple work to undo that damage and cultural rot in maxi land. People need to understand why Monero fits in many cases where Bitcoin doesn't. Unfortunately that requires explaining the issues with Bitcoin, and many people have a difficult time accepting that.

2026-08-28 18:47:20 CEST

- reply

Idk about that. Michael Saylor now has major influence over Bitcoin's direction and he wants Bitcoin to ossify. I think the legacy system is absolutely having an observable negative effect on Bitcoin. Y no covenants?

2026-08-28 02:46:11 CEST

- reply

Is that for GPU's?

2026-08-28 02:40:56 CEST

- reply

How'd you set it up? Want to ask the LLM to share the steps how to reproduce what you did? :)

2026-08-28 01:12:59 CEST

- reply

Who's that? Gud take

2026-08-28 01:07:26 CEST

- reply

I pronounce it "gif"
How do you pronounce it?

2026-08-27 22:43:22 CEST

- reply

Monero should be in any intellectualy honest conversation discussing a censorship resistant protocol. Sorry you get triggered by that.
- The payment targets NIP PR was merged as a result of that exact conversation because I brought up how it's bullshit non Bitcoin PR's stall. Now it's part of the nostr spec.
- I suggested a better UX for Payment Targets.
- I suggested a better UX for being exposed to content via feeds. I raised issues I have in Amethyst.
- @nprofile…nj27 actually had a great suggestion to have nitter devs mirror X on nostr toward the end of the conversation.
Last one obviously wasn't me, but sometimes it's impactful to make noise about things that are going wrong so suggestions like that come to light.
The nostr ship is being steered in a direction leading to the current situation. Yet you just want to focus on me bringing up Monero. Why?

2026-08-27 18:57:46 CEST

- reply

You can do whatever you want on Ethereum too and Ethereum didn't replace Bitcoin or any other chain.

2026-08-27 17:30:36 CEST

- reply

The market is completely irrelevant to every point I made. It's a silly point.

2026-08-27 17:08:21 CEST

- reply

That's a bullshit copout response

2026-08-27 10:15:39 CEST

- reply

How would someone not be able to restart but would be able to turn it off? What user are you imagining that advice applies for?

2026-08-27 09:52:53 CEST

- reply

I hear you. He's a particularly loud Monero character on X arrived on the scene in the past year or so. He holds similar views as you do, but he comes across much less authentic in my opinion. He says things like Monero is the tool for whites to take back power and wants to get rid of Jews. In effect he tries to tie Monero to Nazi idelogy and tries to portray Monero as the ultimate tool for the Nazi ideology to prevail. He also fights with almost everyone in the Monero community and shit talks almost everything and everyone in the community very aggressively, while talking up Monero out of the side of his mouth. He comes across as a glowie to me sowing division and helping frame Monero in a negative light to normies.

2026-08-27 09:39:18 CEST

- reply

Spicy. What are your thoughts on Monero Maverick on X?

2026-08-27 09:23:21 CEST

- reply

What are your spicy racial and religious takes?

2026-08-27 03:03:41 CEST

- reply

Actually Monero has had its fair share of bugs across the ecosystem as of late. I don't think that was a well justified point. I do think @nprofile…rrsm sucks ass though.

2026-08-27 02:57:43 CEST

- reply

Maybe this is unfounded, but I also think at least for now there are fewer incompetent charlatans like @nprofile…rrsm in the Monero ecosystem. So noobs in Monero are arguably less likely to get completely fucked by incompetence than in Bitcoin. The cultural rot the maxis created has had a negative impact on keeping peoole's money safe.

2026-08-27 02:50:56 CEST

- reply

There is still trust inherent Bitcoin's math. For example that your wallet can't be drained by a faulty signature construction. Or a qauntum computer.
But yes, I take your point there is a wider surface in Monero's case. I agree with that point.
I weigh the UX of being able to easily spend without sharing my balance very highly.
It's a tradeoff I think is very well worth it in justifying both using and holding Monero. There's nothing wrong with holding both.

2026-08-27 02:43:21 CEST

- reply

Great UX is still a work in progress for Monero. Same with liquidity. Thorchain, Serai, and bidirectional atomic swaps are on the horizon and will only strengthen censorship resistant liquidity: something no other cryptocurrency has.
Auditability concerns are a valid concern weighed against Bitcoin. I personally strongly value the UX of not sharing my balance with everyone all the time when I spend my money. And I trust Monero's conservative development process to ensure the math checks out. I don't like that Bitcoin had an inflation vulnerability identified by a Bitcoin Cash developer. That's a problem people tend to gloss over. Monero's one inflation bug was caught internally. But yes, Monero does rely on more complicated math than Bitcoin does to audit the supply. It's still an extremely useful tool with a gold star history on inflation bugs compared to Bitcoin and Zcash.

2026-08-27 02:08:17 CEST

- reply

You were right about Monero a while back, but in the past year or so you've been wrong about it on nearly every take.
- Monero is technically superior to Zcash. The Zcash supply relies on trust, the Monero supply relies on cryptography as it always has. Ironwood didn't change that since there is still a lot of Zcash in Orchard.
- You wrongly paint the entire Monero community with a broad brush. Monero Maverick is a loser retard and probably a fed, not representative of the Monero community. The Monero community is uncomprosing in the core ethos that matter for censorship resistant money.
- The core principles driving Monero matter deeply, such as not having a dev tax. Even without a dev tax, Monero has a strong slate of contributors who get funded consistently.
- Sean Bowe is an arrogant overrated blowhard. Tachyon is a shitty idea for scaling and Zcash's ecosystem is hurtling toward shit because it has no ability to keep the arrogant turd in check.
- You underweight Monero's consistent real world usage and its resilience in the face of delistings that no other cryptocurrency has dealt with.
The list goes on.
For some reason, you turned your axe wrongfully toward Monero and it's been a disappointment to see.

2026-08-27 01:32:26 CEST

- reply

What's the deal with Boltz?

2026-08-27 01:13:27 CEST

- reply

I think anyone who thinks Monero isn't a valuable tool to resist censorship isn't being honest

2026-08-27 01:02:18 CEST

It saddens me that the Samourai devs are still in prison. Why did Ross get so much more attention? It seemed like the whole Libertarian movement got behind Ross. Why doesn't Samourai get even close to that level of support?

2026-08-27 00:04:28 CEST

- reply

Lol no I'm not, retard

2026-08-26 23:56:36 CEST

- reply

Yes but giving a company your entire transaction history is objectively worse for your privacy than using someone else's node to sync. If you use Monero frequently on your phone, the syncing isn't such a big deal.

2026-08-26 22:45:11 CEST

- reply

That's because Edge uses servers that sync for you and can see your transaction history. Unless you use their new full sync feature. But then you have to sync.

2026-08-26 21:56:04 CEST

- reply

The problem is that it's hard to actually curate the experience and takes a lot of work / navigating the client.
I'm using Amethyst. I want to try out Imwald soon.
But in Amethyst for example, I have no idea how to see @nprofile…nt9f 's follow lists. Nothing populates in the UI when I tap their lists. Idk if I'm doing something wrong or looking in the wrong place.
I've recently found "feed algorithms" in this app which are kind of interesting when they load, but the UX is pretty painful digging through to figure it out. Loading screens that just sit, sometimes never functioning with unclear messages.
And my main point was that clearly a lot of development time has gone into features like Cashu NWC. It's the center button on the bottom bar of the app. Rather than features that actually would make this a pleasant experience for non maxis.
I feel bad picking on Amethyst because the creator seems like a genuine nice person. I hope this can be taken as constructive feedback because I really do like nostr's bones and there really is so much potential with it (and with this app).

2026-08-26 21:31:31 CEST

- reply

Sometimes a little kicking and screaming is good to wake people up :)

2026-08-26 21:09:55 CEST

- reply

Right now you're arguing that paying for KYC'd products with Monero is pointless. That's an extremely retarded thing to argue. I don't really care what your prior dispositions are.

2026-08-26 20:55:47 CEST

- reply

> There are ways to obfuscate how much bitcoin I own
You want to teach your wife and kids how to do that too and trust they won't mess up? That's retarded.
If you think Bitcoin has any hope at putting a dent in the money printing machine, then it has to be useful as money. It's failing at that in ways Monero is succeeding, and in ways Monero will always be better at.
You're delusional to ignore the above rationale and cling on to your fantasy future where Bitcoin replaces the money printing machine on its own.

2026-08-26 20:41:33 CEST

- reply

You like sharing how much Bitcoin you own with people when you spend it? You want your family to do that too? Are you a fucking retard?

2026-08-26 19:15:47 CEST

- reply

They're closer to 1-2 cents

2026-08-26 19:03:06 CEST

- reply

Have a look at Monero's transaction fees.

2026-08-26 18:56:51 CEST

- reply

They are. Monero has a dynamic block size like BCH. Also, Bitcoin fees are very low like 95% of the time. And the 5% past few years is primarily because of ordinals. Monero doesn't have ordinals.

2026-08-26 18:54:35 CEST

- reply

I have no problem with it existing. I don't think it's necessary when we have Monero.

2026-08-26 18:14:19 CEST

- reply

You're misreading my point. It's clear the focus is misplaced on niche Bitcoin maxi use cases rather than legitimate use cases more people would be interested in (not just Monero, but also yes Monero lots of like minded people who value censorship resistance use Monero). And I did raise a concrete suggestion unrelated to money.

2026-08-26 17:24:22 CEST

- reply

Sure, the nostr ecosystems doesn't *have* to be such cunts toward things not Bitcoin-centric, and have boners for everything Bitcoin-centeic either. Yet here we are and this is the result. I'm pointing out a reality that this ecosystem has constructed. Other open source ecosystems have succeeded at their goals. Nostr is succeeding primarily for Bitcoin maximalists. If that's your goal, great! Have fun staying niche.

2026-08-26 09:25:19 CEST

- reply

Amethyst doesn't have an intuitive field input like that. Payment Targets are tucked away in settings in a very unintuitive place. Someone had to tell me to look for Payment Targets specifically to find it.

2026-08-26 08:08:06 CEST

- reply

Backing up to this: re-opening the app after 3 years I'm not sure how best to find interesting content. I imagine there are probably good algos out there featuring good nostr content. Is it still a general policy to avoid algos? I think I remember that being a thing. But I also think amethyst could help out in some capacity pointing me toward content I'd be interested in beyond just laboriously finding people to follow.

2026-08-26 08:01:04 CEST

- reply

OK, I hear you. Monero and other cryptos could use a well thought out protocol that integrates well with nostr the way zaps and NWC do. There haven't been people around to do that. Most people involved with nostr development know more about Bitcoin.
I wonder if that has anything to do with the active hostility toward "shitcoins" by maxis like fiatjaf on NIPs PR's bringing in features for other cryptos. But I digress.
I think better support for displaying the URI in a profile would be nice until contributors arrive.
Maybe if there is legit openness to contributions like "how to do zaps or NWC with Monero", I will consider contributing.

2026-08-26 07:38:16 CEST

- reply

I don't see why you need all wallets in that page to implement that protocol. For Monero, adding the wallet to the app could be as simple as just displaying the address and linking the URI in user's profiles.
Besides, Nostr Wallet Connect is kind of exactly what I'm talking about is the issue with Nostr development. Just from a glance, it's obviously designed with Lightning and only Lightning in mind. That's a Bitcoin maxi way of thinking that's contributing to a Bitcoin maxi hivemind around here. A more general protocol that could function for other cryptos (not just XMR, but gasp including USDC and USDT) would help foster more diverse content in the nostr ecosystem.

2026-08-26 07:22:01 CEST

- reply

Ok how about: when a user goes to the "Wallet" page in the menu, and taps the "+", how about supporting adding a Monero address that way? It could reuse the Payment tag people use today. But this way it's actually intuitive how to add a Monero address in the app and it's not tucked away in an extremely unclear place.
I apologize for being rude to you above. I think you're friendly.

2026-08-26 04:34:59 CEST

- reply

3 years later follow up:
- Still no covenants because maxis are idiots and can't come to agreement.
- Ark sucks ass because of that.
- Still no eltoo because maxis are idiots and can't come to agreement.
- Lightning is still a pain because of that.
- Maxi morons bickering over inconsequential bullshit like Bip 110 instead of discussing legitimate ways to improve Bitcoin as p2p money.
- Michael Saylor the moron now has major influence over protocol decisions and ossification is his goal because maxis are NgU addicts.
Maxis are fucking up Bitcoin.

2026-08-26 04:19:52 CEST

- reply

I haven't used nostr in 3 years. I reopened it hoping it wouldn't still be the maxi circle jerk festival it was back then. Yet here we are. It's really not surprising at all things haven't changed much given dogmatic Bitcoin maxis like you are running this ecosystem.

2026-08-26 04:14:24 CEST

- reply

No, I don't think that. I do think nostr gets a lot of value and credit from enabling people to send value to each other. That's a compelling and attractive use case. Zaps are cool and seems like they played a role in attracting a solid user base here.
I also think that user base has an obvious ceiling and that there are plenty of users out there who would be interested in it if it wasn't so tunnel vision focused on niche Bitcoin maxi features.
The protocol is a viable alternative to Twitter. But if you continue to keep the focus so narrow on maxi dogma, then it's not going to reach its potential.

2026-08-26 04:03:11 CEST

- reply

Turns out I assumed correctly. Bitcoin centric features are first class citizens in the nostr ecosystem. And you help foster that climate with hostile rhetoric to non maxi contributors like you did in this PR: https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/1934
If you like seeing nostr remain the niche echo chamber for Bitcoin maxis that it very obviously is, keep doing what you're doing.

2026-08-26 03:59:17 CEST

- reply

Ya, and it gets first class treatment in the nostr ecosystem because Bitcoin maxis are dogmatic morons who like to drive good ideas to the ground

2026-08-26 03:52:25 CEST

- reply

Here's a concrete suggestion for you!
Don't be a fucking dickhead in discussions like this and actually help move them along: https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/1934
Why is that PR sitting there still? Why be a hostile fucking dickhead on the PR?

2026-08-26 03:39:17 CEST

- reply

Here I'll tag @nprofile…vhl6 as well, who apparently is more invovled in creating this state of things I see from my perspective. @nprofile…vhl6 why is it so difficult to put a Monero address in my profile, but so dead obvious how to connect a Cashu wallet that clearly has a deep integration in your app? Related, why are you focused so much on Bitcoin maxi features, as opposed to a client that is more intuitive for the general user? Your app could be so attractive to people outside the Bitcoin maxi ecosystem.

2026-08-26 03:22:18 CEST

- reply

I assumed from your involvement in the creation of nostr (and your past hilariously absurd comments about Monero) that you had more involvement in maxi things like https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/1952
NIP 47 is a blatant Bitcoin maxi catered feature, clearly sucking up developer time and effort. Time and effort that could instead be spent on ways to make nostr a better place for general content literally the entire rest of the world would be interested in. For example ideas like this that went nowhere: https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/issues/522
I'm using Amethyst and it's so easy to find all these niche Bitcoin features all over the app that are integrated into the nostr ecosystem. But it's difficult to find interesting content outside of the Bitcoin maxipad bubble. That is a result of conscious collective decision making to cater nostr features to Bitcoin maxis.

2026-08-26 00:06:34 CEST

- reply

The devs received a cease and desist from X

2026-08-25 22:56:28 CEST

- reply

Goddamnit

2026-08-25 22:50:14 CEST

- reply

I'm using Amethyst and I have no idea how to see your followers. The only follower it shows is me. What app do you use?

2026-08-25 22:38:24 CEST

- reply

Totally unrelated.. Do you have suggestions on people to follow? Or a way to improve my feed so I see good content like this? I'm interested in Monero and 3D printing as well. Nostr is extremely unintuitive so I have to ask. But good thing I can add a Cashu wallet if I want /s

2026-08-25 22:26:14 CEST

- reply

I don't hate Bitcoin and hold that view. You guys are ostriches fucking up a good idea with potential.

2026-08-25 21:49:01 CEST

The devs behind nitter received a cease and desist from X. nitter is open source software that allows people to see posts on X without an account, without JavaScript, basically in private. If nostr wasn't so Bitcoin maxi focused, it would be a good place for people disillusioned by X to come to.
Instead, Bitcoin maximalists like @nprofile…nj27 have made sure nostr is mostly a place for Bitcoin maximalists, with tons of native features designed just for Bitcoin, with niche Bitcoin features only diehard maxis care about and will use.
Bitcoin maxis are great at fucking up good ideas.

2026-08-25 21:24:03 CEST

- reply

How'd you add a Monero address to your profile?

2026-08-25 21:15:18 CEST

nostr needs more Monero content and Monero friendly features. The @nprofile…rrsm Coldcard saga should have shown how hollow the Bitcoin maximalist toxicity is. Rational humans should begin to recognize Monero is building a strong tool for resisting censorship and maintinaing privacy.

2026-08-25 21:06:19 CEST

- reply

Monero is used for real world commerce in higher % than BTC in the places that accept XMR. BTC has degenerated into a speculative asset. No meaningful upgrades to the p2p use case on the horizon. The current status for Bitcoin as censorship resistant money looks very weak. Most Bitcoiners are like ostriches these days or focused on unimportant bullshit like Bip 110 and not real practical ways to improve BTC as money. Monero is as always focused on the use case and working toward improving it. Good luck, ostrich ;)

2023-06-01 11:01:33 CEST

- reply

This is how it works. The idea is to have a small number of ASPs.
https://twitter.com/brqgoo/status/1664006603119501314

2023-06-01 10:48:02 CEST

- reply

Why would someone choose Fedi/cahsu over Ark? Better theoretical privacy maybe?

2023-05-10 00:47:45 CEST

- reply

Cancel you cuz I'd rekt you in Shogi

2023-05-08 15:10:48 CEST

The invention of the computer and then the internet promised a more democratic world; a world where people have more power and knowledge at their fingertips; where people would be able to resist power structures' control and manipulation for their gain at the people's expense. We've made good progress, but it hasn't fully panned out yet. Bitcoin is the next critical step fowards toward that end. I'm enjoying watching history progress.

2023-05-08 14:43:19 CEST

- reply

Honestly, fuck you. My government is recklessly irresponsible with fiscal and monetary policy and Bitcoin serves me as useful insurance against their continued egregious incompetence.

2023-05-08 13:59:10 CEST

- reply

Interesting times we're living in

2023-05-08 13:48:44 CEST

- reply

Has it happened during a bear market? I can't recall

2023-05-07 10:01:47 CEST

- reply

Do you think this is the most common onramp to bitcoin maximalism? Shitcoiners who first ignored Bitcoin like idiots?

2023-05-03 20:53:15 CEST

- reply

#[7] ?^

2023-04-29 22:20:49 CEST

- reply

If you lose access to this data but still have your seed, how does restoring your history look like? Can the ecash server instantly provide you all your transactions and only yours?

2023-04-27 20:45:44 CEST

Bitcoin makes me optimistic for a better future for humanity.
Bitcoin maxis make me pessimistic.

2023-04-27 20:37:14 CEST

- reply

Bitcoin conf thing is just a guess based on timing of Seth's post. Idk.

2023-04-27 20:31:20 CEST

- reply

On your first two paragraphs, I get the view. I disagree it's the ideal structure for the business landscape (for the government to protect IP) but I'm not gonna go on about that. I insulted you because you characterized my view as socialist and entitled, which it clearly is not. My view is closer to anarchy than anything haha.
I'm pretty sure this particular saga started because coinkite is going to be on the open source stage at the bitcoin conference. That is confusing to people who are unaware. Coinkite accepting to be there is sketch.
https://twitter.com/ck_SNARKs/status/1650875333212602370
Also, here is what Seth had to say about a business choosing not to be FOSS:
https://twitter.com/sethforprivacy/status/1651243037966708746
So he doesn't view it as negatively as I do.

2023-04-27 19:32:21 CEST

- reply

That's a cleaner argument. I'll discuss this argument without insulting you.
If someone thinks they can execute ideas better than someone else, I think we should want and encourage that. Innovators then make their money by executing their ideas better than the competition. Ideas and by extension, goods and services, then flow at cheapest cost from best competitor to the market. Monopolies lose protected edge granted to them by the government.
This is the opposite of socialist. It's pure free market competition. The strong survive, the consumers benefit.

2023-04-27 19:21:22 CEST

- reply

Right there are some people who like free markets but only when it suits them. They use laws to protect their business when it doesn't. They call it acumen. Everyone else who doesn't do this is socialist, commie, entitled, and lazy. You sound like the next Steve Jobs man, keep going.

2023-04-27 19:14:48 CEST

- reply

PSA: free and open source software is now socialist shitcoining.
Preferring the government not prevent competition in the free market is now socialist shitcoining.
Bitcoin maxipads are such idiots sometimes. It's comical.
#[2]

2023-04-27 19:06:40 CEST

- reply

Yes, FOSS is shitcoiner socialist energy. That's right. You're doing great!

2023-04-27 18:11:46 CEST

- reply

I think he understands it, he just selectively chooses to ignore it when he thinks he can get away with it. And bitcoin maxis give him a pass on everything so long has he keeps that whole charade up.

2023-04-27 17:59:37 CEST

- reply

Lmao bingo to the ad hominem. Classic.

2023-04-27 17:58:43 CEST

- reply

Lol, my arguments have been fine. Yours have been alright too, much better than anything nvk has said on the topic. From what I've seen him say on this and how he's acted, I think you're giving him too much benefit of doubt.
Yes I don't like how nvk acts for valid reasons, in this instance included.

2023-04-27 17:25:49 CEST

- reply

First paragraph, yes foundation forked from coldcard and have always made this clear. Just like coldcard forked from trezor.
The MIT commons clause license website faq explicitly states it shouldn't be considered open source.
Sounds like you're running with incomplete information and ignoring the facts on the ground.
I don't give a shit what product you use. Have fun.

2023-04-26 23:36:12 CEST

- reply

That last paragraph looks ripe for lawyers to sort out and suck more money up out of free enterprise.
Even though Foundation forked from the permissively licensed code, NVK and co still continue to launch plenty of accusations Foundation was/is a re-skin of Coldcard with no substantial changes to the code, which isn't the case.
It is clear NVK's choice of this license had 1 goal: prevent Foundation from building on the code.
This decision was and continues to be bad for the Bitcoin space and antithetical to FOSS principles that led to Bitcoin in the first place.

2023-04-26 22:11:33 CEST

- reply

Does this reveal # of a user's txs + timing leaks?

2023-04-26 17:43:02 CEST

- reply

They made a business decision purely out of fear and reliant on the state. Weak sauce.

2023-04-26 17:23:06 CEST

- reply

#[4] did this because he is afraid of competition and loose on ethos. In other words, because he is weak.
You're confusing MIT (FOSS) with MIT-CC (not FOSS, source available).
It does affect quality and security of their products. Fewer people can build on top of their code means fewer eyes on the code means fewer bugs discovered and patched by the wider ecosystem.

2023-04-26 07:14:21 CEST

- reply

Principles are tight. Some have em and keep em, others "adapt"

2023-04-26 07:01:55 CEST

- reply

Yes, exactly. The antithesis of Bitcoin protects coldcard.
Just because we live under the threat of violence from the state doesn't mean we should adapt to use the state to be violent against each other. That is regression. It is weak.

2023-04-26 06:51:38 CEST

- reply

If I fork coldcard's code today and start selling a product using this code, who will protect coldcard from me?

2023-04-26 06:19:03 CEST

- reply

Badass cypherpunk tools that wouldn't exist if the state didn't protect their code lol

2023-04-26 05:30:38 CEST

- reply

Being a Bitcoin maximalist can be logical. Most who espouse the religion throw logic out the window and ignore facts in favor of the cult narrative.